Class 12 English Official Sample Question Paper (2018-19) | English Class 12 PDF Download

 Page 1


1 
 
 
Class XII  
English Core (301) 
Sample Question Paper 2018-19  
 
Time allowed: 3 hrs.                 Max. Marks: 100 
General Instructions:  
1. This paper is divided into three sections: A, B and C.  
2. All the sections are compulsory.  
3. Read the instructions very carefully given with each section and question and follow them 
faithfully.  
4. Do not exceed the prescribed word limit while answering the questions.   
 
 
SECTION-A (READING)                                                        
Q1. Read the passage and on the basis of your understanding of the passage answer the questions 
given below:                                                            (20) 
1. India has never subscribed to the doctrine of militarism and war in her history. Here war was never 
treated as an ideal. It was only tolerated as unavoidable and inevitable, and all attempts were made to 
check it and bring it under control.  Inspite of the frequency of wars in ancient India, in spite of 
highly developed military organization, techniques of war and imperialism, and in spite of the open 
justification of war as national policy, the heart of India loved pacifisms as an ideal capable of 
realization. India?s symbolic role was that of a peacemaker and it sincerely pinned its faith on the 
principle of „Live and let live?. At least philosophically, India?s intelligence supported the cause of 
peace not only in national affairs but in international affairs also. All the great seers of the yore 
visualized the unity of life, permeating all beings, animate or inanimate, which ruled out killing and 
suicidal wars. 
 
2. This doctrine of philosophical pacifisms was practiced by ancient Aryans is, no doubt, a question of 
controversial nature. Certainly, the great Indian teachers and savants stuck to this doctrine tenaciously 
and in their personal life they translated it into practice and preached it to masses and even to princes 
of military classes. 
 
 
3. Another culture of those times, the existence of which has been proved by the excavations of Mohan-
jo-Daro, also enunciated the doctrine of pacificism and friendship to all. Strangely enough, the Indus 
Valley civilization has revealed no fortification and very few weapons. 
 
4. Ahimsa or the doctrine of non-violence in thought, speech and action assumed a gigantic importance 
in the Buddhist and Jain period. By a constant practice of this virtue, man becomes unassailable by 
even wild beasts, who forgot their ferocity the moment they entered the circumference of his 
magnetic influence. The monks and nuns of these churches were apostles of peace, who reached 
every nook and corner of the world and delivered the message of love to war-weary humanity. The 
greatest votary was the royal monk Ashoka, who in reality was responsible for transforming Ahimsa 
as an act of personal virtue, to Ahimsa as an act of national virtue. 
Page 2


1 
 
 
Class XII  
English Core (301) 
Sample Question Paper 2018-19  
 
Time allowed: 3 hrs.                 Max. Marks: 100 
General Instructions:  
1. This paper is divided into three sections: A, B and C.  
2. All the sections are compulsory.  
3. Read the instructions very carefully given with each section and question and follow them 
faithfully.  
4. Do not exceed the prescribed word limit while answering the questions.   
 
 
SECTION-A (READING)                                                        
Q1. Read the passage and on the basis of your understanding of the passage answer the questions 
given below:                                                            (20) 
1. India has never subscribed to the doctrine of militarism and war in her history. Here war was never 
treated as an ideal. It was only tolerated as unavoidable and inevitable, and all attempts were made to 
check it and bring it under control.  Inspite of the frequency of wars in ancient India, in spite of 
highly developed military organization, techniques of war and imperialism, and in spite of the open 
justification of war as national policy, the heart of India loved pacifisms as an ideal capable of 
realization. India?s symbolic role was that of a peacemaker and it sincerely pinned its faith on the 
principle of „Live and let live?. At least philosophically, India?s intelligence supported the cause of 
peace not only in national affairs but in international affairs also. All the great seers of the yore 
visualized the unity of life, permeating all beings, animate or inanimate, which ruled out killing and 
suicidal wars. 
 
2. This doctrine of philosophical pacifisms was practiced by ancient Aryans is, no doubt, a question of 
controversial nature. Certainly, the great Indian teachers and savants stuck to this doctrine tenaciously 
and in their personal life they translated it into practice and preached it to masses and even to princes 
of military classes. 
 
 
3. Another culture of those times, the existence of which has been proved by the excavations of Mohan-
jo-Daro, also enunciated the doctrine of pacificism and friendship to all. Strangely enough, the Indus 
Valley civilization has revealed no fortification and very few weapons. 
 
4. Ahimsa or the doctrine of non-violence in thought, speech and action assumed a gigantic importance 
in the Buddhist and Jain period. By a constant practice of this virtue, man becomes unassailable by 
even wild beasts, who forgot their ferocity the moment they entered the circumference of his 
magnetic influence. The monks and nuns of these churches were apostles of peace, who reached 
every nook and corner of the world and delivered the message of love to war-weary humanity. The 
greatest votary was the royal monk Ashoka, who in reality was responsible for transforming Ahimsa 
as an act of personal virtue, to Ahimsa as an act of national virtue. 
2 
 
5. Many a historian recounting the causes of the downfall of the Mauryas, hold the pacific policy of 
Ashoka which had eschewed the aggressive militarism of his predecessors, responsible for an early 
decay of the military strength of the state and its consequent disintegration, leading to the rise of 
Sungas, Kanvas and Andhras. But, in reality the fault lies with the weak successors of Ashoka, who 
could not wield the weapon of non-violence with a skill and efficiency which required the strength of 
a spiritual giant like Ashoka. They failed due to their subjective weakness: Pacifism itself was no 
cause of their failure. 
 
6. Besides the foregoing philosophical and religious school of thought, even many political authorities 
gave their unqualified support to the cause of pacifisms. They recognized the right of rivals to exist, 
not mainly as enemies, but as collaborators in the building of a civilization operation. Thus, for 
centuries, in the pre-Mauryan India, scores of small independent republics existed and flourished 
without coming in clash with each other. 
 
 
7. With regard to Kautilya, the much maligned militarist and the so called Machiavelli of India, He 
thinks that the object of diplomacy is to avoid war. 
 
8. The Mahabharata observes in the connection, “A wise man should be content with what can be 
obtained by the expedients of conciliation, gift and dissention.” It denounces the warring world of 
men by comparing it to a dog-kennel. “First there comes  the wagging of tails, then turning of one 
round to other, then the show of teeth, then the roaring and then comes the commencement of the 
fights. It is the same with men; there is no difference whatever.” Yajnavalkya adds: „War is the last 
expedient to be used when all others have failed.” Likewise, Sri Krishna who?s Bhagwad-Gita has 
been styled by some as „a song of the battle?, should not be considered out and out militarist. When 
all the three expedients were exhausted, then alone the fourth was resorted to. 
 
 
9. All possible avenues of peace such as negotiation, conciliation through conference, meditation and so 
on, were explored before the war was resorted to. This proves that the heart of ancient India was 
sound and it longed for peace, although war also was not treated as an anathema, which was to be 
avoided as far as possible.                                                                                              (Words – 737)    
(Extract from ‘Culture India-Pacifism has been the Ideal’ by Sri Indra) 
 
1.1 Answer each of the questions given below by choosing the most appropriate option:     (1X5=5) 
 
(i) The heart of India loved ____ 
  a) a highly developed military organization 
   b) techniques of wars and imperialism 
   c) loans 
  d) pacifism 
 
(ii) Principle of „Live and let live? means 
  a) imperialism 
  b) militarism 
 c) frequency of wars among nations 
 d) role of peace makers 
Page 3


1 
 
 
Class XII  
English Core (301) 
Sample Question Paper 2018-19  
 
Time allowed: 3 hrs.                 Max. Marks: 100 
General Instructions:  
1. This paper is divided into three sections: A, B and C.  
2. All the sections are compulsory.  
3. Read the instructions very carefully given with each section and question and follow them 
faithfully.  
4. Do not exceed the prescribed word limit while answering the questions.   
 
 
SECTION-A (READING)                                                        
Q1. Read the passage and on the basis of your understanding of the passage answer the questions 
given below:                                                            (20) 
1. India has never subscribed to the doctrine of militarism and war in her history. Here war was never 
treated as an ideal. It was only tolerated as unavoidable and inevitable, and all attempts were made to 
check it and bring it under control.  Inspite of the frequency of wars in ancient India, in spite of 
highly developed military organization, techniques of war and imperialism, and in spite of the open 
justification of war as national policy, the heart of India loved pacifisms as an ideal capable of 
realization. India?s symbolic role was that of a peacemaker and it sincerely pinned its faith on the 
principle of „Live and let live?. At least philosophically, India?s intelligence supported the cause of 
peace not only in national affairs but in international affairs also. All the great seers of the yore 
visualized the unity of life, permeating all beings, animate or inanimate, which ruled out killing and 
suicidal wars. 
 
2. This doctrine of philosophical pacifisms was practiced by ancient Aryans is, no doubt, a question of 
controversial nature. Certainly, the great Indian teachers and savants stuck to this doctrine tenaciously 
and in their personal life they translated it into practice and preached it to masses and even to princes 
of military classes. 
 
 
3. Another culture of those times, the existence of which has been proved by the excavations of Mohan-
jo-Daro, also enunciated the doctrine of pacificism and friendship to all. Strangely enough, the Indus 
Valley civilization has revealed no fortification and very few weapons. 
 
4. Ahimsa or the doctrine of non-violence in thought, speech and action assumed a gigantic importance 
in the Buddhist and Jain period. By a constant practice of this virtue, man becomes unassailable by 
even wild beasts, who forgot their ferocity the moment they entered the circumference of his 
magnetic influence. The monks and nuns of these churches were apostles of peace, who reached 
every nook and corner of the world and delivered the message of love to war-weary humanity. The 
greatest votary was the royal monk Ashoka, who in reality was responsible for transforming Ahimsa 
as an act of personal virtue, to Ahimsa as an act of national virtue. 
2 
 
5. Many a historian recounting the causes of the downfall of the Mauryas, hold the pacific policy of 
Ashoka which had eschewed the aggressive militarism of his predecessors, responsible for an early 
decay of the military strength of the state and its consequent disintegration, leading to the rise of 
Sungas, Kanvas and Andhras. But, in reality the fault lies with the weak successors of Ashoka, who 
could not wield the weapon of non-violence with a skill and efficiency which required the strength of 
a spiritual giant like Ashoka. They failed due to their subjective weakness: Pacifism itself was no 
cause of their failure. 
 
6. Besides the foregoing philosophical and religious school of thought, even many political authorities 
gave their unqualified support to the cause of pacifisms. They recognized the right of rivals to exist, 
not mainly as enemies, but as collaborators in the building of a civilization operation. Thus, for 
centuries, in the pre-Mauryan India, scores of small independent republics existed and flourished 
without coming in clash with each other. 
 
 
7. With regard to Kautilya, the much maligned militarist and the so called Machiavelli of India, He 
thinks that the object of diplomacy is to avoid war. 
 
8. The Mahabharata observes in the connection, “A wise man should be content with what can be 
obtained by the expedients of conciliation, gift and dissention.” It denounces the warring world of 
men by comparing it to a dog-kennel. “First there comes  the wagging of tails, then turning of one 
round to other, then the show of teeth, then the roaring and then comes the commencement of the 
fights. It is the same with men; there is no difference whatever.” Yajnavalkya adds: „War is the last 
expedient to be used when all others have failed.” Likewise, Sri Krishna who?s Bhagwad-Gita has 
been styled by some as „a song of the battle?, should not be considered out and out militarist. When 
all the three expedients were exhausted, then alone the fourth was resorted to. 
 
 
9. All possible avenues of peace such as negotiation, conciliation through conference, meditation and so 
on, were explored before the war was resorted to. This proves that the heart of ancient India was 
sound and it longed for peace, although war also was not treated as an anathema, which was to be 
avoided as far as possible.                                                                                              (Words – 737)    
(Extract from ‘Culture India-Pacifism has been the Ideal’ by Sri Indra) 
 
1.1 Answer each of the questions given below by choosing the most appropriate option:     (1X5=5) 
 
(i) The heart of India loved ____ 
  a) a highly developed military organization 
   b) techniques of wars and imperialism 
   c) loans 
  d) pacifism 
 
(ii) Principle of „Live and let live? means 
  a) imperialism 
  b) militarism 
 c) frequency of wars among nations 
 d) role of peace makers 
3 
 
 
(iii) Aryans preached and practiced this to the masses 
  a) non-violence 
  b) freedom of speech and action 
  c) philosophical pacifisms 
         d) practice of military organization 
  
(iv) Mahabharata compares the warring world with 
  a) wise men  
  b) dog kennel 
  c) song of the battle 
         d) militarist  
 
(v) Unearthing Mohan-jo–Daro reinforced the following of Pacifism  
        a) there was no fortification and very few weapons 
b) they delivered the message of love 
c) they were apostles of peace 
d) thinks that the object of diplomacy is to avoid war 
 
1.2 Answer the following questions briefly:        (1X6=6) 
(i)   How was war treated in India?  
(ii)  Describe India?s preparedness for war in spite of their belief in Pacifism. 
(iii) How did the Aryans practice the Doctrine of Pacifism? 
(iv) What is Ahimsa? 
(v)  What is the meaning of co-existence with rivals? 
(vi) Why should Bhagvad-Gita not be considered as “A song of the battle”? 
 
1.3 Answer any three of the following questions in 25-30 words:                (2X3=6) 
 
(i)   What kind of unity did all the seers visualize? 
(ii)  By some, Ashoka was considered as the cause of the downfall of the Mauryas. Do you agree?   
     Give reasons for your answer. 
(iii) Which options were explored by Sri Krishna before resorting to war? 
(iv) Throw some light on the thinking of Kautilya regarding war. 
 
1.4 Pick out the words/phrases from the passage which are similar in meaning to the following:  
           (1X3=3) 
(i)  express in definite and clear terms (para 3 ) 
(ii) defensive wall   (para 3) 
(iii) the beginning   (para 8) 
 
 
 
 
Page 4


1 
 
 
Class XII  
English Core (301) 
Sample Question Paper 2018-19  
 
Time allowed: 3 hrs.                 Max. Marks: 100 
General Instructions:  
1. This paper is divided into three sections: A, B and C.  
2. All the sections are compulsory.  
3. Read the instructions very carefully given with each section and question and follow them 
faithfully.  
4. Do not exceed the prescribed word limit while answering the questions.   
 
 
SECTION-A (READING)                                                        
Q1. Read the passage and on the basis of your understanding of the passage answer the questions 
given below:                                                            (20) 
1. India has never subscribed to the doctrine of militarism and war in her history. Here war was never 
treated as an ideal. It was only tolerated as unavoidable and inevitable, and all attempts were made to 
check it and bring it under control.  Inspite of the frequency of wars in ancient India, in spite of 
highly developed military organization, techniques of war and imperialism, and in spite of the open 
justification of war as national policy, the heart of India loved pacifisms as an ideal capable of 
realization. India?s symbolic role was that of a peacemaker and it sincerely pinned its faith on the 
principle of „Live and let live?. At least philosophically, India?s intelligence supported the cause of 
peace not only in national affairs but in international affairs also. All the great seers of the yore 
visualized the unity of life, permeating all beings, animate or inanimate, which ruled out killing and 
suicidal wars. 
 
2. This doctrine of philosophical pacifisms was practiced by ancient Aryans is, no doubt, a question of 
controversial nature. Certainly, the great Indian teachers and savants stuck to this doctrine tenaciously 
and in their personal life they translated it into practice and preached it to masses and even to princes 
of military classes. 
 
 
3. Another culture of those times, the existence of which has been proved by the excavations of Mohan-
jo-Daro, also enunciated the doctrine of pacificism and friendship to all. Strangely enough, the Indus 
Valley civilization has revealed no fortification and very few weapons. 
 
4. Ahimsa or the doctrine of non-violence in thought, speech and action assumed a gigantic importance 
in the Buddhist and Jain period. By a constant practice of this virtue, man becomes unassailable by 
even wild beasts, who forgot their ferocity the moment they entered the circumference of his 
magnetic influence. The monks and nuns of these churches were apostles of peace, who reached 
every nook and corner of the world and delivered the message of love to war-weary humanity. The 
greatest votary was the royal monk Ashoka, who in reality was responsible for transforming Ahimsa 
as an act of personal virtue, to Ahimsa as an act of national virtue. 
2 
 
5. Many a historian recounting the causes of the downfall of the Mauryas, hold the pacific policy of 
Ashoka which had eschewed the aggressive militarism of his predecessors, responsible for an early 
decay of the military strength of the state and its consequent disintegration, leading to the rise of 
Sungas, Kanvas and Andhras. But, in reality the fault lies with the weak successors of Ashoka, who 
could not wield the weapon of non-violence with a skill and efficiency which required the strength of 
a spiritual giant like Ashoka. They failed due to their subjective weakness: Pacifism itself was no 
cause of their failure. 
 
6. Besides the foregoing philosophical and religious school of thought, even many political authorities 
gave their unqualified support to the cause of pacifisms. They recognized the right of rivals to exist, 
not mainly as enemies, but as collaborators in the building of a civilization operation. Thus, for 
centuries, in the pre-Mauryan India, scores of small independent republics existed and flourished 
without coming in clash with each other. 
 
 
7. With regard to Kautilya, the much maligned militarist and the so called Machiavelli of India, He 
thinks that the object of diplomacy is to avoid war. 
 
8. The Mahabharata observes in the connection, “A wise man should be content with what can be 
obtained by the expedients of conciliation, gift and dissention.” It denounces the warring world of 
men by comparing it to a dog-kennel. “First there comes  the wagging of tails, then turning of one 
round to other, then the show of teeth, then the roaring and then comes the commencement of the 
fights. It is the same with men; there is no difference whatever.” Yajnavalkya adds: „War is the last 
expedient to be used when all others have failed.” Likewise, Sri Krishna who?s Bhagwad-Gita has 
been styled by some as „a song of the battle?, should not be considered out and out militarist. When 
all the three expedients were exhausted, then alone the fourth was resorted to. 
 
 
9. All possible avenues of peace such as negotiation, conciliation through conference, meditation and so 
on, were explored before the war was resorted to. This proves that the heart of ancient India was 
sound and it longed for peace, although war also was not treated as an anathema, which was to be 
avoided as far as possible.                                                                                              (Words – 737)    
(Extract from ‘Culture India-Pacifism has been the Ideal’ by Sri Indra) 
 
1.1 Answer each of the questions given below by choosing the most appropriate option:     (1X5=5) 
 
(i) The heart of India loved ____ 
  a) a highly developed military organization 
   b) techniques of wars and imperialism 
   c) loans 
  d) pacifism 
 
(ii) Principle of „Live and let live? means 
  a) imperialism 
  b) militarism 
 c) frequency of wars among nations 
 d) role of peace makers 
3 
 
 
(iii) Aryans preached and practiced this to the masses 
  a) non-violence 
  b) freedom of speech and action 
  c) philosophical pacifisms 
         d) practice of military organization 
  
(iv) Mahabharata compares the warring world with 
  a) wise men  
  b) dog kennel 
  c) song of the battle 
         d) militarist  
 
(v) Unearthing Mohan-jo–Daro reinforced the following of Pacifism  
        a) there was no fortification and very few weapons 
b) they delivered the message of love 
c) they were apostles of peace 
d) thinks that the object of diplomacy is to avoid war 
 
1.2 Answer the following questions briefly:        (1X6=6) 
(i)   How was war treated in India?  
(ii)  Describe India?s preparedness for war in spite of their belief in Pacifism. 
(iii) How did the Aryans practice the Doctrine of Pacifism? 
(iv) What is Ahimsa? 
(v)  What is the meaning of co-existence with rivals? 
(vi) Why should Bhagvad-Gita not be considered as “A song of the battle”? 
 
1.3 Answer any three of the following questions in 25-30 words:                (2X3=6) 
 
(i)   What kind of unity did all the seers visualize? 
(ii)  By some, Ashoka was considered as the cause of the downfall of the Mauryas. Do you agree?   
     Give reasons for your answer. 
(iii) Which options were explored by Sri Krishna before resorting to war? 
(iv) Throw some light on the thinking of Kautilya regarding war. 
 
1.4 Pick out the words/phrases from the passage which are similar in meaning to the following:  
           (1X3=3) 
(i)  express in definite and clear terms (para 3 ) 
(ii) defensive wall   (para 3) 
(iii) the beginning   (para 8) 
 
 
 
 
4 
 
 
Q 2. Read the passage and answer the questions given below:               (10) 
 
1. There is a clear dichotomy between Jayashankar Prasad’s daily life and the one that found 
expression in his literature. In his literary formulations, Prasad advocated an escape- from- 
personality ideal and categorically stated: “An artist?s art, and not his person, is the touchstone to 
assess his work . . . it is only after losing his personality that he emerges in his art as an artist”. 
 
2. In Prasad?s works – his poems, short stories, novels, dramas etc. – what emerges is life as shaped in 
the writer?s inner self by his emotions, fancies, dreams, reveries . . . His writings are a record not of 
outer reality, but of the artist?s inner world. As such, of a proper appreciation and understanding of 
his works more emphasis needs to be placed on the working of his mind, than the events of his day-
to-day life.  
 
3. Prasad was born in a renowned family of Varansi. His grand-father Shiv RatanSahu, a dealer in high 
quality perfumed tobacco (snuff). Besides being an astute businessman, he was endowed with a 
marked cultural taste. His home was the meeting place of the local poets, singers, artists, scholars 
and men of religion. Prasad?s father Devi Prasad Sahu carried forward this high tradition of family. 
Prasad, therefore, had a chance to study the various phases of human nature in the light of the 
business traditions, artistic taste and religious background of his family.  
 
4. When the business had somewhat recovered, Prasad planned the publication of a literary journal. 
Prasad started the “Indu”. The inaugural number appeared in July 1909. By this time Prasad?s 
notions of literature had crystalized into a credo. In the first issue of Indu, he proclaimed, „Literature 
has no fixed aim; it is not slave to rules; it is free and all-embracing genius, gives birth to genuine 
literature which is subservient to none. Whatever in the world is true and beautiful is its subject 
matter. By the dealing with the True and Beautiful it establishes the one and affects the full 
flowering of the others. Its force can be measured by the degree of pleasure it gives to the reader?s 
mind as also by criticism which is free of all prejudice”. The words sound like the manifesto of 
romanticism in literature. 
 
 
5. Even while recognizing the social relevance of literature, Prasad insisted, “The poet is a creator . . . 
he is not conditioned by his milieu; rather it is he who moulds it and gives it a new shape; he 
conjures up a new world of beauty where the reader for the time being, becomes oblivious of the 
outer world and passes his time in an eternal spring garden where golden lotuses blossom and the air 
is thick and pollen”. Thus, the chief aim of literature according to Prasad is to give joy to the reader 
and to create a state of bliss in him. Later under the impact of Shaivadvaitism, this faith of Prasad 
got further strengthened.                                (word length- 490) 
     (Extract from ‘Jayashankar Prasad- His mind and Art’ by Dr. Nagendra) 
2.1 On the basis of your understanding of the above passage, make notes on it using headings and sub-
headings. Use recognizable abbreviations (wherever necessary-minimum four) and a format you 
consider suitable. Also supply an appropriate title to it.                 (5)  
 
2.2 Write a summary of the passage in about 100 words.                                                                      (5) 
 
Page 5


1 
 
 
Class XII  
English Core (301) 
Sample Question Paper 2018-19  
 
Time allowed: 3 hrs.                 Max. Marks: 100 
General Instructions:  
1. This paper is divided into three sections: A, B and C.  
2. All the sections are compulsory.  
3. Read the instructions very carefully given with each section and question and follow them 
faithfully.  
4. Do not exceed the prescribed word limit while answering the questions.   
 
 
SECTION-A (READING)                                                        
Q1. Read the passage and on the basis of your understanding of the passage answer the questions 
given below:                                                            (20) 
1. India has never subscribed to the doctrine of militarism and war in her history. Here war was never 
treated as an ideal. It was only tolerated as unavoidable and inevitable, and all attempts were made to 
check it and bring it under control.  Inspite of the frequency of wars in ancient India, in spite of 
highly developed military organization, techniques of war and imperialism, and in spite of the open 
justification of war as national policy, the heart of India loved pacifisms as an ideal capable of 
realization. India?s symbolic role was that of a peacemaker and it sincerely pinned its faith on the 
principle of „Live and let live?. At least philosophically, India?s intelligence supported the cause of 
peace not only in national affairs but in international affairs also. All the great seers of the yore 
visualized the unity of life, permeating all beings, animate or inanimate, which ruled out killing and 
suicidal wars. 
 
2. This doctrine of philosophical pacifisms was practiced by ancient Aryans is, no doubt, a question of 
controversial nature. Certainly, the great Indian teachers and savants stuck to this doctrine tenaciously 
and in their personal life they translated it into practice and preached it to masses and even to princes 
of military classes. 
 
 
3. Another culture of those times, the existence of which has been proved by the excavations of Mohan-
jo-Daro, also enunciated the doctrine of pacificism and friendship to all. Strangely enough, the Indus 
Valley civilization has revealed no fortification and very few weapons. 
 
4. Ahimsa or the doctrine of non-violence in thought, speech and action assumed a gigantic importance 
in the Buddhist and Jain period. By a constant practice of this virtue, man becomes unassailable by 
even wild beasts, who forgot their ferocity the moment they entered the circumference of his 
magnetic influence. The monks and nuns of these churches were apostles of peace, who reached 
every nook and corner of the world and delivered the message of love to war-weary humanity. The 
greatest votary was the royal monk Ashoka, who in reality was responsible for transforming Ahimsa 
as an act of personal virtue, to Ahimsa as an act of national virtue. 
2 
 
5. Many a historian recounting the causes of the downfall of the Mauryas, hold the pacific policy of 
Ashoka which had eschewed the aggressive militarism of his predecessors, responsible for an early 
decay of the military strength of the state and its consequent disintegration, leading to the rise of 
Sungas, Kanvas and Andhras. But, in reality the fault lies with the weak successors of Ashoka, who 
could not wield the weapon of non-violence with a skill and efficiency which required the strength of 
a spiritual giant like Ashoka. They failed due to their subjective weakness: Pacifism itself was no 
cause of their failure. 
 
6. Besides the foregoing philosophical and religious school of thought, even many political authorities 
gave their unqualified support to the cause of pacifisms. They recognized the right of rivals to exist, 
not mainly as enemies, but as collaborators in the building of a civilization operation. Thus, for 
centuries, in the pre-Mauryan India, scores of small independent republics existed and flourished 
without coming in clash with each other. 
 
 
7. With regard to Kautilya, the much maligned militarist and the so called Machiavelli of India, He 
thinks that the object of diplomacy is to avoid war. 
 
8. The Mahabharata observes in the connection, “A wise man should be content with what can be 
obtained by the expedients of conciliation, gift and dissention.” It denounces the warring world of 
men by comparing it to a dog-kennel. “First there comes  the wagging of tails, then turning of one 
round to other, then the show of teeth, then the roaring and then comes the commencement of the 
fights. It is the same with men; there is no difference whatever.” Yajnavalkya adds: „War is the last 
expedient to be used when all others have failed.” Likewise, Sri Krishna who?s Bhagwad-Gita has 
been styled by some as „a song of the battle?, should not be considered out and out militarist. When 
all the three expedients were exhausted, then alone the fourth was resorted to. 
 
 
9. All possible avenues of peace such as negotiation, conciliation through conference, meditation and so 
on, were explored before the war was resorted to. This proves that the heart of ancient India was 
sound and it longed for peace, although war also was not treated as an anathema, which was to be 
avoided as far as possible.                                                                                              (Words – 737)    
(Extract from ‘Culture India-Pacifism has been the Ideal’ by Sri Indra) 
 
1.1 Answer each of the questions given below by choosing the most appropriate option:     (1X5=5) 
 
(i) The heart of India loved ____ 
  a) a highly developed military organization 
   b) techniques of wars and imperialism 
   c) loans 
  d) pacifism 
 
(ii) Principle of „Live and let live? means 
  a) imperialism 
  b) militarism 
 c) frequency of wars among nations 
 d) role of peace makers 
3 
 
 
(iii) Aryans preached and practiced this to the masses 
  a) non-violence 
  b) freedom of speech and action 
  c) philosophical pacifisms 
         d) practice of military organization 
  
(iv) Mahabharata compares the warring world with 
  a) wise men  
  b) dog kennel 
  c) song of the battle 
         d) militarist  
 
(v) Unearthing Mohan-jo–Daro reinforced the following of Pacifism  
        a) there was no fortification and very few weapons 
b) they delivered the message of love 
c) they were apostles of peace 
d) thinks that the object of diplomacy is to avoid war 
 
1.2 Answer the following questions briefly:        (1X6=6) 
(i)   How was war treated in India?  
(ii)  Describe India?s preparedness for war in spite of their belief in Pacifism. 
(iii) How did the Aryans practice the Doctrine of Pacifism? 
(iv) What is Ahimsa? 
(v)  What is the meaning of co-existence with rivals? 
(vi) Why should Bhagvad-Gita not be considered as “A song of the battle”? 
 
1.3 Answer any three of the following questions in 25-30 words:                (2X3=6) 
 
(i)   What kind of unity did all the seers visualize? 
(ii)  By some, Ashoka was considered as the cause of the downfall of the Mauryas. Do you agree?   
     Give reasons for your answer. 
(iii) Which options were explored by Sri Krishna before resorting to war? 
(iv) Throw some light on the thinking of Kautilya regarding war. 
 
1.4 Pick out the words/phrases from the passage which are similar in meaning to the following:  
           (1X3=3) 
(i)  express in definite and clear terms (para 3 ) 
(ii) defensive wall   (para 3) 
(iii) the beginning   (para 8) 
 
 
 
 
4 
 
 
Q 2. Read the passage and answer the questions given below:               (10) 
 
1. There is a clear dichotomy between Jayashankar Prasad’s daily life and the one that found 
expression in his literature. In his literary formulations, Prasad advocated an escape- from- 
personality ideal and categorically stated: “An artist?s art, and not his person, is the touchstone to 
assess his work . . . it is only after losing his personality that he emerges in his art as an artist”. 
 
2. In Prasad?s works – his poems, short stories, novels, dramas etc. – what emerges is life as shaped in 
the writer?s inner self by his emotions, fancies, dreams, reveries . . . His writings are a record not of 
outer reality, but of the artist?s inner world. As such, of a proper appreciation and understanding of 
his works more emphasis needs to be placed on the working of his mind, than the events of his day-
to-day life.  
 
3. Prasad was born in a renowned family of Varansi. His grand-father Shiv RatanSahu, a dealer in high 
quality perfumed tobacco (snuff). Besides being an astute businessman, he was endowed with a 
marked cultural taste. His home was the meeting place of the local poets, singers, artists, scholars 
and men of religion. Prasad?s father Devi Prasad Sahu carried forward this high tradition of family. 
Prasad, therefore, had a chance to study the various phases of human nature in the light of the 
business traditions, artistic taste and religious background of his family.  
 
4. When the business had somewhat recovered, Prasad planned the publication of a literary journal. 
Prasad started the “Indu”. The inaugural number appeared in July 1909. By this time Prasad?s 
notions of literature had crystalized into a credo. In the first issue of Indu, he proclaimed, „Literature 
has no fixed aim; it is not slave to rules; it is free and all-embracing genius, gives birth to genuine 
literature which is subservient to none. Whatever in the world is true and beautiful is its subject 
matter. By the dealing with the True and Beautiful it establishes the one and affects the full 
flowering of the others. Its force can be measured by the degree of pleasure it gives to the reader?s 
mind as also by criticism which is free of all prejudice”. The words sound like the manifesto of 
romanticism in literature. 
 
 
5. Even while recognizing the social relevance of literature, Prasad insisted, “The poet is a creator . . . 
he is not conditioned by his milieu; rather it is he who moulds it and gives it a new shape; he 
conjures up a new world of beauty where the reader for the time being, becomes oblivious of the 
outer world and passes his time in an eternal spring garden where golden lotuses blossom and the air 
is thick and pollen”. Thus, the chief aim of literature according to Prasad is to give joy to the reader 
and to create a state of bliss in him. Later under the impact of Shaivadvaitism, this faith of Prasad 
got further strengthened.                                (word length- 490) 
     (Extract from ‘Jayashankar Prasad- His mind and Art’ by Dr. Nagendra) 
2.1 On the basis of your understanding of the above passage, make notes on it using headings and sub-
headings. Use recognizable abbreviations (wherever necessary-minimum four) and a format you 
consider suitable. Also supply an appropriate title to it.                 (5)  
 
2.2 Write a summary of the passage in about 100 words.                                                                      (5) 
 
5 
 
 
SECTION: B (ADVANCED WRITING SKILLS)                                             
Q.3 You are Simar / Smriti of Lotus International School, Jodhpur. Your school is organizing a   
workshop on „Prevention of Drug Abuse? in the coming week. Prepare a poster with complete 
information for the students of class X-XII.                    (4) 
OR 
You are Simar / Smriti of Lotus International School, Jodhpur.Your school has decided to 
contribute in controlling traffic near your school and requires the names of volunteers from IX to 
XII. Write a notice to be displayed on the notice board. (50 words)                            (4) 
 
Q.4 Public demonstration causes a lot of disturbance in daily routine of common man. You almost 
missed your important entrance examination as people blocked the highway. As Tarun / Taruna, a 
student aspiring to be a doctor, write a letter to the Editor of The Times of India highlighting the 
need to discourage such demonstrations and disturbance by public on highways which cause a 
great loss of time and opportunity for many. (100-125 words)                                                      (6) 
OR 
You are Tarun / Taruna who bought a new Luminous Inverter for your home from R.K. 
Electronics, Noida but found many functional problems as the charging is not done properly and 
battery water is getting leaked. Write a letter of complaint to the proprietor to take care of the 
same. (100-125 words)               (6) 
 
Q.5 You are Mukul / Mahima of Alps Public School. Your school has organized a debate on „Social 
Media and It?s Effects? and you will be participating from your school. Prepare your views against 
or in favour of the motion. (150-200 words)                                                                                (10) 
                                                           OR                                                                    
 As Mukul / Mahima of Alps Public School, write a speech to be delivered in school assembly 
highlighting the importance of cleanliness suggesting that the state of cleanliness reflects the 
character of its citizens. (150-200 words)             (10) 
 
Q.6 By 2050, India will be amongst the countries which will face acute water shortage. You are highly 
alarmed and terrified of the future world without water. So, write an article on „Save water- are we 
doing enough?? for the local daily in 150-200 words.                                                                  (10) 
                                                           OR                                                            
You are Karan / Kirti of L.M. Memorial Public School, Dwarka. Your school has adopted a village 
as a social responsibility. Students are being taken to teach the children of that village on a regular 
basis. Write a report, for your school magazine, on the various other programmes organized there 
in 150-200 words.                 (10)