Daily Practice Questions Questions for CAT with Answers PDF

Using any two of the statements, there are numerous possibilities.
Using all three statements, we get that all three statements are required to answer the question.

Using statements I, II and III, we can know the gender of G and hence, the relation with D.
Note : Using I and III, there are 2 possibilities and by second possibility, we cannot determine the gender.

Using all three statements, we get
J > I > K/M > O > L > K/M > N
We cannot answer the question even using all the three statements.v

From I, we deduce that B is a parent of A.
From II, we deduce the gender of A and from this, we get that A is either the son or the nephew of B.
From III, again it can be deduced that A is a male and from this, we get that A is either the son or the nephew of B.
Hence, using statement I and either II or III, we can conclude A is the son of B.

From I:
S > P > R
From II:
S scored the highest marks.
From III:
R > Q
From I and III:
P > R > Q
It implies that:
P > Q
Hence, only statements I and III are sufficient to answer the question.

Using statements I and II only, we can get the exact position of A and C.

Using all three statements:
Priya > Shilpa > Vicky
Priya > James > Rahul > Sachin
__ > __ > James > __ > __ > __ > __
Either Priya or Vikram scored the highest.
All three statements together are not enough.

Statements III and either I or II are required to answer the question.

Using any one of the statements we cannot determine if Raj is to the left of Sam or to the right of Sam.
When we combine statement II with other two statements we get to know that Raj is to the left of Sam and there are 12 persons between them.
Hence, in total there are 15 persons in the row.
Thus, Only statements II and either I or III are sufficient.

Using statement I:
As Raj has only one sibling, So the nephew of my only sister is my son
Then mother of my son is my wife
So, Simar will be Raj's wife
Using statement II:
Simar can be Raj's wife, wife of Raj's brother or husband of Raj's sister.
Using statement III:
Simar can be Raj's wife or husband of Raj's sister.
So, from statement I only, we get that Simar is the wife of Raj.

Statements II and either I or III are required to answer the question.

Statements I and either II or III are required to answer the question.

Using statement I:
Raj > Atul > Vicky
Using statement II:
Vijay > Amar >__>__>__> Hiten >__
Using statement III:
Raj > __>__>__> Rohit
Using statements I and II:
Vijay > Amar > Raj > Atul > Vicky > Hiten > Rohit
Using statements II and III:
Vijay > Amar > Raj > Atul/Vicky > Hiten > Rohit
Using statements I and III:
Any one of Vijay, Rohit and Amar can be the shortest.
Only statements II and either I or III are sufficient.

Using all the statements, we cannot find the exact code for 'me'.

Using statements I and II:
'How was your day' and 'what time of day' have only one word common, which is day.
Hence, code for 'day' is 'ry'
'Give me some time' and 'what time of day' has only one word common, which is 'time'.
Hence, code for 'time' is 'mi'.
Using statements I and III:
We do not have any sentence, which has common words of sentence 'how was your day', hence we cannot find the code for day.
Using statements II and III:
Word 'time' is common in three sentences, hence code for 'time' is 'mi'.
'What time of day' and 'Good time of you' have common words 'time' and 'of'. Also, code for 'what' is known.
Hence, from 'what time of day', code for 'day' is 'ry'.
Statement II and either I or III are sufficient to answer the question.

Using statement III alone, there arise two possibilities.

Using either statement I or II, possibility 2 can be denied and hence, we get the answer.

Statement I gives data about colours.
From II, we can infer that A does not live in the white or the red-coloured house.
Hence, A must live in the blue-coloured house.
Hence, option (3) is the answer.

Using statement I:
Let the number of students between Inder and Simu be x.
Number of students ahead of Inder = 3x
So, 3x +x + 1 = 13
x = 3
Using statements I and II:
Number of students behind Simu = 2x = 6
Total number of students = 14 + 6= 20
Using statements I and III:
Number of students ahead of Inder = 3x = 9
Number of students behind inder = 9 + 1 = 10
Total number of students = 9 + 1 + 10 = 20
Using statements II and III,
From statement II, we get
Number of person after simu = 2x
Total number of persons = 14 + 2x .....(1)
Also from statement III,we get:
Number of persons before Inder = 12-x
Number of persons after Inder = 12-x + 1
Total number of persons = 12 - x + 1 + 1 ....(2)
By equalising (1) and (2), total number of persons = 20
So, any two statements can be used to answer the question.

From statement (B):
Speed of train =  m/s = 20 m/s
From statement (A):
Time taken to cross the woman = 35 seconds 
Thus, from (A) + (B), we have: 
Length of train = 20 × 35 = 700 m
Let the length of platform be x metres.
Thus, total length = x + 700 m 
Then, Speed = Length/Time


or, 1000 = x + 700
or, x = 300 m 
Thus, length of platform is 300 m.
From (C): Length of the train is 700 m.
This statement alone is not necessary to find the length of the platform.
Thus, only statements A and B together are sufficient.

Using statements I and II:
”Time’ coded as “te” or “si”.
Using statements II and III:
”Time” is coded as “te”
Using statements I and III:
”Time” is coded as “te” or “me”
Hence, statements II and III are sufficient to answer the question.