The document Logical Connectives - Introduction and Examples (with Solutions), Logical Reasoning CAT Notes | EduRev is a part of the LR Course Quantitative Aptitude for Banking Preparation.

All you need of LR at this link: LR

A **Logical Connective** (also called a logical operator) is a symbol or a word which is used to connect two or more sentences. Each logical connective can be expressed as a truth function.

- NOT (Negation)
- AND (Conjunction)
- EITHER OR (Disjunction)
- IF-THEN (Material Implication)

In logical reasoning, we deal with statements that are essentially sentences in English language. However, factual correctness is not important. We are only interested in logical truthfulness of the statements. We can represent simple statements using symbols like p and q. When simple statements are combines using logical connectives, compound statements are formed.

Negation is the opposite of a statement. For example,

- Statement: It is raining.
- Negation: It is NOT raining.

When two statements are connected using OR, at least one of them is true. For example,

- Either p or q: p alone is true; q alone is true; both are true

In such situation, valid inference is If p did not happen, then q must happen. And If p did not happen, then p must happen.

When two statements are connected using AND, both statements have to be true for compound statement to be true.

- p and q: p should be true as well as q should be true

If p, then q (p --> q): It is read as p implies q. It means that if we know p has occured, we can conclude that q has occured. In such situations, only valid inference is "If ~q, then ~p"; If q did not happen, then p did not happen.

- Negation (p OR q) is same as Negation p AND Negation q
- Negation (p AND q) is same as Negation p OR Negation q
- Negation (p --> q) is same as Negation p --> Negation q

**Example**

**Examine the following statements:**

**I watch TV only if I am bored****I am never bored when I have my brother’s company.****Whenever I go to the theatre I take my brother along.**

**Which one of the following conclusions is valid in the context of the above statements?**

**If I am bored I watch TV****If I am bored, I seek my brother’s company.****If I am not with my brother, then I’ll watch TV.****If I am not bored I do not watch TV.**

**Ans.**

- Given = I watch TV only if I am bored
- This is not in standard format. So first exchange position
- Only if I’m bored (1), I watch TV(2)
- What is the valid inference? Just look at the formula table
- Only if 1=>2 then ~1=~2
- Valid inference= if I’m not bored, I do not watch TV.
- Look at the statements given in the answer choices, (D) matches. Therefore, final answer is (D).

Offer running on EduRev: __Apply code STAYHOME200__ to get INR 200 off on our premium plan EduRev Infinity!

66 videos|50 docs|90 tests