NCERT Solutions Chapter - 1.BRICKS, BEADS AND BONES, History, Class 12 - Humanities/Arts PDF Download

THEME : 01
BRICKS, BEADS AND BONES
THE HARAPPAN CIVILISATION

Key conceps in nutshells

Period :- ( I ) Early Harappa culture – Before 2600 BCE
(II) Mature Harappa culture-2600BCE to 1900 BCE
( III ) Late Harappa culture- After 1900 BCE
Extent of Harappan civilisation :-
Northern boundary-Manda Southern Boundary-Daimabad
Eastern boundary- Alamgirpur Western boundary-Sutkagendor

Characteristics of the Harappan Civilisation :-
Two Sections :- ( I ) The Citadel
( II ) The Lower Town

Carefully planned drainage system.

At burials in Harappan sites the dead were generally laid in pits.

Seals and sealings were used to facilitate long distance communication.

Exchanges were regulated by a precise system of weignts, usually made of a stone
called Chert and generally cubical, with no markings.

Some archaeologist are of the opinion that Harappan society had no rulers,
whereas other archaeologist feel that there was no single ruler but several rulers.

Several explanation for the decline of Harappan civilisation are Climatic changes,
deforestation, excessive floods, the shifting and/or drying up of rivers.

Metals known :- Gold, Silver, Copper, Bronze.

Scripts :- The Harappan scripts are undeciphered. There are 375-400 signs. The script
was written from right to left.

Craft :- The place Chanhudaro was totally involved for craft production. There were
experts in bead makings, shell cutting, seal making, weight making. Lothal was also one
of the important place for craft production.

Modes of Transportation :- Bullock carts and Boats. 

Q.1 List the raw materials required for craft production in the Harappan civilisation and
discuss how these might have been obtained. (2)
Ans. The variety of materials used to make beads is remarkable: stones like carnelian (of a
beautiful red colour), jasper, crystal, quartz and steatite; metals like copper, bronze and
gold; and shell, faience and terracotta or burnt clay.
Two methods of procuring materials for craft production :-
1. They established settlements such as Nageshwar, Shortughai and Balakot.
2. They might have sent expeditions to areas such as the Khetri region of
Rajasthan (for Copper) and south India (for gold).

Q.2 “Our knowledge about the Indus Valley Civilization is poorer than that of the
other Civilizations”. Explain it by your arguments? (2)
Ans. Yes, our knowledge about the Indus Valley Civilization is poorer than that of the other
because of the following reasons:-
· The script of that age has hitherto not been deciphered.
· The easy method behind seeking knowledge about other Civilizations such as that of
Egypt, Mesopatamia, China etc. was the deciphering of their scripts. Scripts is that sole
basis through which we can gather through knowledge about the art, literature, customs,
dresses, function and religion etc. of any Civilizations

Q.3 What were the confusions in the mind of Cunningham while studying Harappan
civilization ? (2)
Ans.
· He used the accounts left by Chinese Buddhist pilgrims who had visited the
subcontinent between the fourth and seventh centuries CE.
· He thought that Indian history began with the first cities in the Ganga valley.
· In fact, Cunningham’s main interest was in the archaeology of the Early Historic (c.
sixth century BCE-fourth century CE) and later periods.

Q.4 What were the differences in the techniques adopted by Marshall and Wheeler in
studying Harappan civilization ? (2)
Ans.
· Marshall tended to excavate along regular horizontal units, measured uniformly
throughout the mound, ignoring the stratigraphy of the site.

· This meant that all the artefacts recovered from the same unit were grouped together,
even if they were found at different stratigraphic layers. As a result, valuable
information about the context of these finds was irretrievably lost.
R.E.M. Wheeler, rectified this problem. Wheeler recognised that it was necessary to
follow the stratigraphy of the mound rather than dig mechanically along uniform
horizontal lines

Q. 5 “Burials is a better source to trace social differences prevalent in the Harappan
civilization”. Discuss. (2)
Ans. 1. Studying burials is a strategy to find out social differences.
2. At burials in Harappan sites the dead were generally laid in pits.
Sometimes, there were differences in the way the burial pit was made – in some
instances; the hollowed-out spaces were lined with bricks.
3. Some graves contain pottery and ornaments, perhaps indicating a belief that
these could be used in the afterlife. Jewellery has been found in burials of both
men and women.

Q. 6 Write a note on the Drainage system of the Harappans. (5)
Ans. One of the striking features of this town was a well planned drainage system. The
drains were made of mortar, lime and gypsum. They were covered with big bricks and
stones which could be lifted easily to clean the drains. Smaller drains from houses on
both the sides of the streets came and joined a brick laid main channel. Bigger drains
which cleared the rain water were 2 and half feet to 5 feet in circumference. For
sewage from the houses, pits were provided at either side of the street. All this shows
that the Indus Valley people took great care to keep their cities neat and clean.

Q. 7 Discuss the functions that may have been performed by rulers in Harappan
society. (5)
Ans.
· Some archaeologists are of the opinion that Harappan society had no rulers and that
everybody enjoyed equal status. Others feel there was no single ruler but several.
· There are indications of extraordinary uniformity of Harappan artefacts as evident in
pottery seals weights and bricks.
· Notably bricks though obviously not produced in any single centre, were of a uniform
ratio throughout the region, from Jammu to Gujarat.
· Under the guidance and supervision of the rulers plans and layouts of the city were
prepared. Big buildings palaces forts, tanks wells, canals, granaries were constructed.
· Roads lanes and drains were also constructed and cleanliness was maintained under the
over all supervision of the ruler.
· The ruler might have taken interest in economy of the state or city states. He used to
inspire the farmer to increase agricultural production.
· He used to motivate the craftsmen to promote different handicrafts. Internal as well as
external trade was promoted by the ruler.
· He used to issue common acceptable coins or seals, weights and measurements.
· During the natural calamity such as flood earthquake, epidemic etc. the ruler used to
provide grains and other eatables to the affected people.
· He used to play active role to defend cities or state from foreign attack.

Q. 8 How can you say that the Harappan culture was an urban one. (5)
Ans. We can say that the Harappan culture was an urban one, due to the following reasons:
· The cities were well planned and thickly populated.
· The roads were straight and wide.
· The houses were made of burnt bricks and contained more than one storey.
· Every house had a well and a bathroom.
· The drainage system was excellent with house drains emptying into street drains.
· The citadel of Harappa had public buildings.
· Lothal had a dockyard and was an important trading centre.
· After the decline of the Harappan culture, town planning was forgotten and there
was absence of city life for about a thousand years.

Q.9 Write a note on the agricultural technology of Harappans. (5)
Ans. Agriculture was the chief occupation of the Harappans. The prevalence of agriculture
is indicated by finds of grains. But it is more difficult to reconstruct actual agricultural
practices. Archaeologists have found evidence of a ploughed field at Kalibangan.
Representations on seals and terracotta sculpture indicate that the bull was known, and
archaeologist extrapolate from this that oxen were used for ploughing. Terracotta
models of the plough have been found at sites in Cholistan and at Banawali. The field
had two sets of furrows at right angles to each other, suggesting that two different crops
were grown together.
Most Harappan sites are located in semi-arid lands, where irrigation was
probably required for agriculture. Traces of canals have been found at the Harappan
site of Shortughai in Afghanistan. It is also likely that water drawn from wells was
used for irrigation. Besides, water reservoirs found in Dholavira may have been used to
store water for agriculture.

Q.10 Discuss how archaeologist reconstruct the past. (10)
Ans.
1. Material evidences, allows archaeologists to better reconstruct Harappan life.
This material could be pottery, tools, ornaments, household objects, etc.
2. Recovering artefacts is just the beginning of the archaeological enterprise.
Archaeologists then classify their finds.
3. The second, and more complicated, is in terms of function: archaeologists have
to decide whether, for instance, an artefact is a tool or an ornament, or both, or
something meant for ritual use.
4. An understanding of the function of an artefact is often shaped by its
resemblance with present-day things – beads, querns, stone blades and pots are
obvious examples.
5. Archaeologists also try to identify the function of an artefact by investigating
the context in which it was found
6. The problems of archaeological interpretation are perhaps most evident in
attempts to reconstruct religious practices.
7. Attempts have also been made to reconstruct religious beliefs and practices by
examining seals, some of which seem to depict ritual scenes. Others, with plant
motifs, are thought to indicate nature worship.
8. Many reconstructions of Harappan religion are made on the assumption that
later traditions provide parallels with earlier ones. This is because archaeologists
often move from the known to the unknown, that is, from the present to the past.
9. Remains of crops, saddle querns or pit are studied to identify food.
10. Archaelogists observe the different layers of site and try to find out different
things which give picture of socio-economic conditions, religions and cultural
life of the past people.

Q.11. Passage based question:- (8)
Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follows :-
“Evidence of an “invasion”

Deadman Lane is a narrow alley, varying from 3 to 6 feet in width … At the point
where the lane turns westward, part of a skull and the bones of the thorax and upper arm of
an adult were discovered, all in very friable condition, at a depth of 4 ft 2 in. The body lay on
its back diagonally across the lane. Fifteen inches to the west were a few fragments of a
tiny skull. It is to these remains that the lane owes its name.
FROM JOHN MARSHALL, Mohenjodaro and the Indus Civilisation, 1931.
Sixteen skeletons of people with the ornaments that they were wearing when they
died were found from the same part of Mohenjodaro in 1925.
Much later, in 1947, R.E.M. Wheeler, then Director-General of the ASI, tried to
correlate this archaeological evidence with that of the Rigveda, the earliest known text in the
subcontinent. He wrote:
The Rigveda mentions pur, meaning rampart, fort or stronghold. Indra, the Aryan wargod
is called puramdara, the fort-destroyer.
Where are – or were – these citadels? It has in the past been supposed that they were
mythical … The recent excavation of Harappa may be thought to have changed the picture.
Here we have a highly evolved civilisation of essentially non-Aryan type, now known to have
employed massive fortifications … What destroyed this firmly settled civilisation?
Climatic, economic or political deterioration may have weakened it, but its ultimate
extinction is more likely to have been completed by deliberate and large-scale destruction. It
may be no mere chance that at a late period of Mohenjodaro men, women, and children, appear
to have been massacred there. On circumstantial evidence, Indra stands accused.
FROM R.E.M. WHEELER, “Harappa 1946”, Ancient India, 1947.
In the 1960s, the evidence of a massacre in Mohenjodaro was questioned by an
archaeologist named George Dales. He demonstrated that the skeletons found at the site did not
belong to the same period: Whereas a couple of them definitely seem to indicate a
slaughter,….the bulk of the bones were found in contexts suggesting burials of the sloppiest
and most irreverent nature. There is no destruction level covering the latest period of the
city, no sign of extensive burning, no bodies of warriors clad in armour and surrounded by the
weapons of war. The citadel, the only fortified part of the city, yielded no evidence of a
final defence.
FROM G.F. DALES, “The Mythical Massacre at Mohenjodaro”, Expedition, 1964.
As you can see, a careful re-examination of the data can sometimes lead to a reversal of
earlier interpretations.
(i) Name the archaeologist who presented this source? 1
Ans. John Marshall

(ii) Which argument of the destruction of Harappa civilization, this excerpt indicates? 1

Ans. This exert indicates that the Harappa civilization was destroyed by
foreign invasion.
(iii) Who co-relate this evidence with Rigveda ? Why ? 3
Ans. R.E.M. Wheeler. Because, the Rigveda mentions pur, meaning rampart, fort or
stronghold. Indra, the Aryan war-god is called puramdara, the fort-destroyer.
(iv) Who and how propounded the theory opposite to this ? 3
Ans. George Dales. He hesitates to accept that this invasion was carried on by the
Aryans. . He demonstrated that the skeletons found at the site did not belong to the
same period: Whereas a couple of them definitely seem to indicate a slaughter, the
bulk of the bones were found in contexts suggesting burials of the sloppiest and
most irreverent nature. There is no sign of extensive burning, no bodies of warriors
clad in armour and surrounded by the weapons of war.