Table of contents | |
Passage - 1 | |
Passage - 2 | |
Passage - 3 | |
Passage - 4 | |
Passage - 5 | |
Passage - 6 | |
Passage - 7 | |
Passage - 8 |
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
A major difference between the two superpowers and their respective empires was that the Roman Empire was culturally much more diverse than that of Iran. The Parthians and later the Sasanians, the dynasties that ruled Iran in this period, ruled over a population that was largely Iranian. The Roman Empire, by contrast, was a mosaic of territories and cultures that were chiefly bound together by a common system of government. Many languages were spoken in the empire, but for the purposes of administration Latin and Greek were the most widely used, indeed the only languages. The upper classes of the east spoke and wrote in Greek, those of the west in Latin, and the boundary between these broad language areas ran somewhere across the middle of the Mediterranean, between the African provinces of Tripolitania (which was Latin speaking) and Cyrenaica (Greek-speaking).
Q1: How did the cultural diversity of the Roman Empire differ from that of the Iranian empires, and what were the primary factors contributing to this diversity?
Ans:
Q2: What were the two main languages used for administrative purposes in the Roman Empire, and how did the use of these languages vary in different regions?
Ans:
Q3: How did language and administration contribute to the cultural cohesion of the Roman Empire despite its diverse territories?
Ans:
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
The great urban centres that lined the shores of the Mediterranean (Carthage, Alexandria, Antioch were the biggest among them) were the true bedrock of the imperial system. It was through the cities that ‘government’ was able to tax the provincial countrysides which generated much of the wealth of the empire. What this means is that the local upper classes actively collaborated with the Roman state in administering their own territories and raising taxes from them. In fact, one of the most interesting aspects of Roman political history is the dramatic shift in power between Italy and the provinces. Throughout the second and third centuries, it was the provincial upper classes who supplied most of the cadre that governed the provinces and commanded the armies.
Q1: What role did the major urban centers along the Mediterranean, such as Carthage, Alexandria, and Antioch, play in the Roman imperial system?
Ans:
Q2: How did the Roman state manage its provinces, and what was the significance of the collaboration between the local upper classes and the Roman government?
Ans:
Q3: What noteworthy shift in power occurred between Italy and the provinces during the second and third centuries in Roman political history?
Ans:
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
Public baths were a striking feature of Roman urban life (when one Iranian ruler tried to introduce them into Iran, he encountered the wrath of the clergy there! Water was a sacred element and to use it for public bathing may have seemed a desecration to them), and urban populations also enjoyed a much higher level of entertainment. For example, one calendar tells us that spectacula (shows) filled no less than 176 days of the year!
Q1: What was a notable feature of Roman urban life, and how did it differ from the response to a similar initiative in Iran?
Ans:
Q2: How did Roman urban populations differ in terms of entertainment compared to some other cultures?
Ans:
Q3: Why might public baths have been a contentious issue in regions where water was considered sacred, such as in Iran?
Ans:
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
Roman women enjoyed considerable legal rights in owning and managing property. In other words, in law the married couple was not one financial entity but two, and the wife enjoyed complete legal independence. Divorce was relatively easy and needed no more than a notice of intent to dissolve the marriage by either husband or wife. On the other hand, whereas males married in their late twenties or early thirties, women were married off in the late teens or early twenties, so there was an age gap between husband and wife and this would have encouraged a certain inequality.
Q1: What were the legal rights and status of Roman women in terms of property ownership and independence in marriage, as highlighted in the passage?
Ans:
Q2: How did the age at which Roman men and women typically married contribute to a certain inequality in their relationships?
Ans:
Q3: What factors in Roman marital law and customs contributed to the legal independence and flexibility of married women?
Ans:
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
The empire included many regions that had a reputation for exceptional fertility. Campania in Italy, Sicily, the Fayum in Egypt, Galilee, Byzacium (Tunisia), southern Gaul (called Gallia Narbonensis), and Baetica (southern Spain) were all among the most densely settled or wealthiest parts of the empire, according to writers like Strabo and Pliny. The best kinds of wine came from Campania. Sicily and Byzacium exported large quantities of wheat to Rome. Galilee was densely cultivated (‘every inch of the soil has been cultivated by the inhabitants’, wrote the historian Josephus), and Spanish olive oil came mainly from numerous estates (fundi) along the banks of the river Guadalquivir in the south of Spain.
Q1: Which regions within the Roman Empire were renowned for their exceptional fertility and wealth, according to ancient writers like Strabo and Pliny?
Ans:
Q2: What were some of the key agricultural products and resources associated with these fertile regions?
Ans:
Q3: How did the fertility and productivity of these regions contribute to the overall wealth and prosperity of the Roman Empire?
Ans:
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
As warfare became less widespread with the establishment of peace in the first century, the supply of slaves tended to decline and the users of slave labour thus had to turn either to slave breeding* or to cheaper substitutes such as wage labour which was more easily dispensable. In fact, free labour was extensively used on public works at Rome precisely because an extensive use of slave labour would have been too expensive. Unlike hired workers, slaves had to be fed and maintained throughout the year, which increased the cost of holding this kind of labour.
Q1: What were the two main strategies employed by those who relied on slave labor as the supply of slaves decreased during the establishment of peace in the first century?
Ans:
Q2: Why was free labor, such as wage labor, extensively used on public works in Rome, and what cost-related advantages did it offer over slave labor?
Ans:
Q3: What impact did the reduced supply of slaves and the increasing use of wage labor have on the economic landscape in the first century?
Ans:
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
One writer of the early fifth century, the historian Olympiodorus who was also an ambassador, tells us that the aristocracy based in the City of Rome drew annual incomes of up to 4,000 lbs of gold from their estates, not counting the produce they consumed directly! The monetary system of the late empire broke with the silver-based currencies of the first three centuries because the Spanish silver mines were exhausted and government ran out of sufficient stocks of the metal to support a stable coinage in silver.
Q1: According to the historian Olympiodorus, what were the substantial annual incomes enjoyed by the Roman aristocracy based in the City of Rome in the early fifth century?
Ans:
Q2: What significant change occurred in the monetary system of the late Roman Empire, and what were the factors contributing to this transformation?
Ans:
Q3: How did the exhaustion of silver mines and the instability in the Roman monetary system affect the broader economic landscape and society during the late empire?
Ans:
Direction: Read the following Passage and Answer the Questions.
The expansion of Islam from its beginnings in Arabia has been called ‘the greatest political revolution ever to occur in the history of the ancient world’. By 642, barely ten years after the Prophet Muhammad’s death, large parts of both the eastern Roman and Sasanian empires had fallen to the Arabs in a series of stunning confrontations. However, we should bear in mind that those conquests, which eventually (a century later) extended as far afield as Spain, Sind and Central Asia, began in fact with the subjection of the Arab tribes by the emerging Islamic state, first within Arabia and then in the Syrian desert and on the fringes of Iraq.
Q1: Why is the expansion of Islam often described as "the greatest political revolution ever to occur in the history of the ancient world"?
Ans:
Q2: How did the Islamic expansion begin, and where were the initial areas of conquest located?
Ans:
Q3: What was the sequence of the Islamic expansion, including the timeline of its conquests, from its origins in Arabia to its eventual reach into Spain, Sind, and Central Asia?
Ans:
25 videos|97 docs|20 tests
|
1. What is the significance of the title "An Empire Across Three Continents"? |
2. Which continents are included in the empire discussed in the article? |
3. What are some examples of the empires that existed across multiple continents? |
4. How did the empire's expansion across three continents impact its culture and society? |
5. What were the major challenges faced by the empire in maintaining control across three continents? |
|
Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam
|