Table of contents |
|
Intext-questions and Ans: |
|
Understanding the Text |
|
Appreciating the Text |
|
Grammar and Usage |
|
Words in Use |
|
Q: How does the writer show us that Yannick is not very impressed by the famous man? Does he tell us this directly? (para 3)
Ans: The writer indirectly shows Yannick’s lack of impression by describing the famous man as “an ordinary man without much hair.” This simple description, devoid of any recognition or awe, highlights Yannick’s unawareness of the man’s importance at that moment.
Ans: The writer shows us that Yannick is not very impressed by the famous man indirectly. He doesn’t explicitly state, “Yannick wasn’t impressed.” Instead, he describes the famous man as someone who “looked like an ordinary man without much hair.” This simple and somewhat dismissive description reveals Yannick’s lack of recognition or awe for the visitor. He sees him as just another unremarkable person. The contrast between Yannick’s perception and the later reveal of the man’s fame highlights Yannick’s innocence and lack of awareness at that moment.
Q: How does the writer show a change in the atmosphere of the room when Amandine shouts at Yannick? (paras 4-7)
Ans: The writer illustrates the change in atmosphere through the immediate silence that falls over the restaurant after Amandine’s outburst. The phrase “Everyone in the restaurant stopped eating and went silent” vividly portrays the shift from a normal setting to one charged with tension and shock due to Amandine’s anger directed at Yannick.
The writer shows a sudden and significant shift in the atmosphere. Before Amandine shouts, the scene is likely the normal, perhaps slightly busy, environment of the inn after guests have dined. When Amandine shouts “You fool! You little fool!” the atmosphere immediately becomes tense and charged. This is emphasized by the detail in paragraph 7: “Everyone in the restaurant stopped eating and went silent.” This abrupt silence indicates that Amandine’s outburst was shocking and disrupted the normal flow of the inn. The writer uses the reaction of the other diners – stopping their activity and falling silent – to vividly illustrate the dramatic change in the room’s atmosphere, highlighting the seriousness of Amandine’s anger.
Q: Why do you think the writer made the other people in the room react in this manner? (para 7)
Ans: The other people in the room likely reacted with silence to emphasize the unusual and intense nature of Amandine’s shouting. This collective stillness underscores the disruption of the normal environment, highlights Yannick’s potential embarrassment, and draws the reader’s attention to the significance of the conflict unfolding.
The writer likely made the other people in the room react with complete silence to emphasize the severity and unusual nature of Amandine’s outburst. Several reasons could explain this:
Q: Why do you think the writer focuses on the contrast between the famous man’s appearance and his eyes? (para 19)
Ans: The writer focuses on the contrast between the famous man’s “very old” appearance and his “young, bright and searching” eyes to subvert the expectation of a great artist looking imposing. This contrast hints at his enduring passion and observant nature, characteristic of an artist, and creates a more memorable and intriguing image while perhaps foreshadowing his kind interaction with Yannick.
The writer likely focuses on the contrast between the famous man’s ordinary appearance and his “young, bright and searching” eyes in paragraph 19 for several reasons:
In essence, this contrast adds depth to the characterization of the famous painter, making him more than just a name and hinting at the inner qualities that might contribute to his artistic success and his interaction with Yannick.
A. Choose the correct answers.
Ans:
B. Answer these questions.
1. Who was going to visit the inn? Was he someone important? How do you know? (para 1)
Ans: A famous man, the inn’s best customer, was going to visit the inn. Yes, he was someone important. We know this because there was a “bustle at the inn” for his visit, indicating excitement and special preparation. Amandine also mentions he lived in the chateau and was “very famous.”
2. Why did Amandine try to remove the burning tablecloth from the fire? (para 6)
Ans: Amandine tried to remove the burning tablecloth from the fire because the famous man who had just left often drew a picture on it as a tip for her father if he enjoyed his meal. She realized that Yannick had unknowingly thrown away this valuable drawing.
3. Did Amandine think her father would be angry with her for the burnt tablecloth? What tells you this? (para 9)
Ans: Maybe because she initially blamed Yannick and told her father that he had burned the tablecloth. Her quickness in blaming Yannick without hesitation highlights her fear that her father might become angry if he thought she was responsible.
4. I thought she was going to lie. Who is the speaker talking about? Why did he think that she was going to lie? (para 11)
Ans: The speaker, Yannick, is talking about his cousin Amandine. He thought she was going to lie because her cheeks were wet with tears after Uncle Bruno asked if she had told Yannick about the artist drawing on the tablecloth. Yannick likely thought she would lie to avoid getting into trouble for not informing him.
5. I had worked out exactly what to do and how to do it. What was the speaker going to do and why? What does this say about him? (para 18)
Ans: Yannick planned to go to the chateau and ask the famous painter for another drawing. His motivation was to rectify his mistake of burning the original and to make his cousin Amandine happy again. This action reveals Yannick’s sense of responsibility and his caring nature towards Amandine. He is proactive in trying to mend the situation and values her feelings.
6. “Now that I was this close to him I could see he was indeed very old. But his eyes were young, bright and searching.
“a. How has this image of the painter been contrasted against Yannick’s first impression of him? (paras 3 and 19)
Ans: Yannick’s initial impression of the painter was of an “ordinary man without much hair,” suggesting an unremarkable appearance. This contrasts sharply with his later observation of the man being “very old” but possessing “young, bright and searching” eyes. This juxtaposition highlights a difference between outward appearance and inner vitality or artistic spirit.
b. How does Yannick’s initial reaction to the old man’s appearance prepare you for the rest of the events in the story? (paras 3 and 19)
Ans: Yannick’s initial view of the painter as ordinary sets up a contrast with his eventual reveal as a world-famous artist, creating surprise for the reader. The subsequent description of his old age but youthful eyes hints at a deeper, perhaps timeless, artistic quality, making his later humility and willingness to help Yannick more understandable and poignant.
7. …just as I’d seen them in Brittany. What did the speaker see in Brittany? What did he compare that sight with? Do you think he was surprised that they were so similar? (para 26)
Ans: In Brittany, Yannick had witnessed four sailing boats engaged in a race across the sea, heading beyond a lighthouse. He compared the drawing that the artist created for him to this vivid memory. Given his detailed recollection and the comparison, it’s highly probable that he was indeed surprised by the close resemblance between the drawing and the actual scene he had observed.
8. Throughout the text the famous man is described as the greatest painter in the world. And yet, at the end, he wishes his name was Cézanne. Why do you think someone who is already famous will want to be known by the name of another famous artist? What does this say about how he feels about Cézanne? (para 28)
Ans: The famous painter, who signed the drawing “Picasso,” likely wishes his name was Cézanne because he deeply admires Cézanne’s artistic talent and legacy. Even though he himself is considered the “greatest painter in the world” by some, his respect for Cézanne is so profound that he would value being associated with his name. This suggests he holds Cézanne in extremely high regard, perhaps even seeing him as a greater artist or a significant influence on his own work. It speaks to a sense of humility and a recognition of artistic greatness beyond his own fame.
1. Do you think that Meeting Cézanne is a suitable title for the text? Why or why not?
Ans: The story is told from Yannick’s point of view to create innocence and discovery. His limited understanding makes the encounter relatable and builds suspense as the painter’s identity is revealed. We experience the events through his eyes, focusing on his mistake and his desire to fix it. This perspective highlights the artist’s kindness.
2. Why do you think this text was told from Yannick’s point of view? How did this affect the way you read and understood the text?
Ans: I don’t think that “Meeting Cézanne” is the most suitable title for the text, even though the famous painter Yannick meets is revealed to be Picasso, who expresses a wish to be Cézanne. The central focus of the story isn’t really the meeting itself, but rather the chain of events that leads to it: Yannick’s mistake, Amandine’s reaction, Uncle Bruno’s wisdom, and Yannick’s determination to fix things.
A more fitting title might focus on Yannick’s journey of understanding and his unexpected interaction with a great artist. Perhaps something like “The Burned Tablecloth” (highlighting the inciting incident), “Yannick and the Famous Painter” (simple and descriptive), or even something that hints at the lesson learned, like “Always Look on the Bright Side.” While the encounter is significant, the story is more about Yannick’s actions and the surprising outcome, rather than solely about meeting a specific historical figure. The twist about the painter wishing to be Cézanne is a touching detail but not the core narrative driver.
A. Say which kind of noun the highlighted words are. Refer to a dictionary, if you are in doubt.
1. We stopped on our way to admire a beautiful rainbow across a waterfall. compound noun
2. In cold places, people still use coal and firewood for heat.
3. Skyway Airlines has placed an order for a new fleet of aircraft.
4. The intelligence of the fox is described in old stories as cunning.
5. We must add some watermelon to the fruit-salad.
6. The highway is closed because they are laying it with tar.
7. The audience cheered with excitement when the actors came on stage.
Ans:
B. Choose the correct word to complete these sentences.
Ans:
A. Find single words from the text which mean the same as these.
Ans:
B. Read these sentences and understand the situations that they describe. Then, complete them using the correct idiom with look. You may have to change the forms of the idioms in some cases.
Ans:
1 videos|39 docs|1 tests
|
1. What is the significance of Cezanne's work in the art world? | ![]() |
2. How did Cezanne’s life experiences influence his art? | ![]() |
3. What techniques did Cezanne use to create depth in his paintings? | ![]() |
4. In what ways did Cezanne challenge traditional painting methods? | ![]() |
5. What is the legacy of Cezanne’s work in contemporary art? | ![]() |