Electrical Engineering (EE) Exam  >  Electrical Engineering (EE) Notes  >  Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE) PDF Download

Lecture 22 - Design of digital control systems with dead beat response, Control Systems

 

1 Design of digital control systems with dead beat response

So far we have discussed the design methods which are extensions of continuous time design techniques.

We will now deal with the dead beat response design of digital control system.

We must distinguish between the designs of deadbeat response for a digital control system, where all the components are sub ject to only digital data, and a sampled data control system, where both continuous and discrete components are present.

An all digital control system is shown in Figure 1.

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Figure 1: An all digital control system

The transfer function of the digital plant is given by

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Let us assume that the transfer function of the cascade digital controller is

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Thus the open loop transfer function becomes

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

And we get the closed loop transfer function as

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Thus for unit step input, the output comes out to be

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Thus, the output c(k) represents a unit step response where k starts from 1, that is one sample later.

In other words, c(k) reaches the desired steady state value 1, in one sampling period with out any overshoot and stays there for ever.

This type of response is known as dead beat response.

One should note that if Gp(z) was the result of sampling a continuous data system, the Dc(z) does not guarantee that no ripples occur between two sampling instants in constant output c(t).
 

1.1 Deadbeat response design when the system poles and zeros are inside the unit circle Design criteria:

1. The system must have a zero steady state error at sampling instants.

2. The time to reach final output must be finite and minimum.

3. The controller should be physically realizable, i.e., it should be causal.

We can write from Figure 1,

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Thus

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

The error signal

E (z) = R(z) − C (z) = Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Let us assumeLecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

where, N : positive integer A(z): polynomial in z−1 with no zeros at z = 1.

For unit step signal A(z) = 1 and N = 1.

For unit ramp signal A(z) = T z−1 and N = 2.

To achieve zero steady state error

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Since A(z ) does not contain any zero at z = 1, necessary condition for zero steady state error is that 1 − M (z ) should contain (1 − z −1)N as a factor, i.e.,

1 − M (z) = (1 − z−1)N F (z)

or,

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

where, F (z ) is a polynomial in z −1.

Q(z ) is a polynomial in z .

Substituting M (z) in the expression of E (z), E (z) = A(z)F (z). Since A(z) and F (z) are both polynomials of z−1, E (z) will have a finite number of terms in the power series in the inverse power of z , i.e., the error will go to zero in a finite number of sampling periods.


Physical realizability of Dc(z) : Physical realizability condition on Dc(z ) imposes constraints on the form of M (z ). Let

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

where, n and k are the excess poles over zeros of Gp(z ) and M (z ) respectively. This implies

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

For Dc(z ) to be realizable, k ≥ n, i.e., excess of poles over zeros for M (z ) must be at least equal to excess of poles over zeros for Gp(z ).

Thus, if Gp(z ) does not have poles or zeros outside the unit circle, then M (z ) should have the following forms.


1. Step input :

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

2. Ramp input:

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Try to prove the above as an exercise problem.


Example 1: Let us consider the earlier example where

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

When the input is a step function, M (z) = z−1

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Thus

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Figure 2: Deadbeat response of an all digital control system for unit step input

Hence the output sequence follows the input after one sampling instant. Figure 2 shows the output response.

When the input is a ramp function

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Thus

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

We can conclude from the above expression that the output sequence follows the input after 2 sampling periods which is shown in Figure 3.

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Figure 3: Deadbeat response of an all digital control system for unit ramp input
 

Example 2:

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

When the input is a step function, M (z) = z−2

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Thus

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

Hence the output sequence follows the input after two sampling instants.

The document Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE) is a part of Electrical Engineering (EE) category.
All you need of Electrical Engineering (EE) at this link: Electrical Engineering (EE)
Are you preparing for Electrical Engineering (EE) Exam? Then you should check out the best video lectures, notes, free mock test series, crash course and much more provided by EduRev. You also get your detailed analysis and report cards along with 24x7 doubt solving for you to excel in Electrical Engineering (EE) exam. So join EduRev now and revolutionise the way you learn!
Sign up for Free Download App for Free

FAQs on Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

1. What is a dead beat response in digital control systems?
Ans. A dead beat response in digital control systems refers to a control strategy where the system reaches its desired state in the shortest possible time without any overshoot or steady-state error. It aims to achieve perfect tracking of the reference signal in the fastest time possible.
2. How is the design of digital control systems with a dead beat response achieved?
Ans. The design of digital control systems with a dead beat response is achieved by carefully selecting the control parameters, such as the sampling time and the control gains, to ensure a fast and accurate response. Additionally, techniques like pole placement and state feedback control can be employed to shape the system response and achieve the desired dead beat behavior.
3. What are the advantages of designing digital control systems with a dead beat response?
Ans. The advantages of designing digital control systems with a dead beat response include: - Fast response: The system reaches its desired state in the shortest possible time, leading to improved performance. - No steady-state error: The dead beat response ensures perfect tracking of the reference signal, eliminating any steady-state error. - Robustness: The control strategy can handle disturbances and uncertainties in the system, ensuring robust performance. - Stability: The design techniques used for achieving a dead beat response also ensure system stability, preventing any instability issues.
4. Are there any limitations or trade-offs when designing digital control systems with a dead beat response?
Ans. Yes, there are some limitations and trade-offs when designing digital control systems with a dead beat response. These include: - Increased control effort: Achieving a dead beat response often requires higher control gains, which can increase the control effort and potentially lead to actuator saturation or other limitations. - Sensitivity to parameter variations: The dead beat response can be sensitive to variations in system parameters, such as changes in the plant dynamics or sampling time. This can affect the overall system performance. - Limited applicability: Dead beat response design may not be suitable for all control systems, especially those with complex nonlinear dynamics or constraints that cannot be easily satisfied.
5. What are some practical applications of digital control systems with a dead beat response?
Ans. Digital control systems with a dead beat response find applications in various industries and domains, including: - Robotics: Dead beat control can be used to achieve precise and fast motion control in robotic systems, ensuring accurate positioning and trajectory tracking. - Power systems: Dead beat response design can be employed in power systems to regulate voltage and frequency with minimal transient response and steady-state error. - Automotive control: Dead beat control techniques can be applied in automotive systems to achieve optimal vehicle dynamics, stability, and fuel efficiency. - Aerospace: Digital control systems with a dead beat response can be used in flight control systems to ensure precise and rapid aircraft maneuvering and stabilization. - Industrial process control: Dead beat response design can enhance the performance of industrial processes, such as temperature control, level control, and pressure control, by minimizing the response time and eliminating steady-state error.
Download as PDF
Related Searches

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

,

mock tests for examination

,

MCQs

,

Sample Paper

,

Free

,

pdf

,

Exam

,

Viva Questions

,

Objective type Questions

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

,

video lectures

,

past year papers

,

Summary

,

practice quizzes

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Important questions

,

study material

,

ppt

,

Lecture 22 - Design of Digital Control Systems with Dead Beat Response - Electrical Engineering (EE)

,

Extra Questions

,

Semester Notes

;