Civil Engineering (CE) Exam  >  Civil Engineering (CE) Notes  >  Structural Analysis  >  The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE) PDF Download

Instructional Objectives

After reading this chapter the student will be able to
1. Analyse the statically indeterminate plane frame by force method.
2. Analyse the statically indeterminate plane frames undergoing support settlements.
3. Calculate the static deflections of a primary structure (released frame) under external loads.
4. Write compatibility equations of displacements for the plane deformations.
5. Compute reaction components of the indeterminate frame.
6. Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams for the frame.
7. Draw qualitative elastic curve of the frame.

Introduction

The force method of analysis can readily be employed to analyze the indeterminate frames. The basic steps in the analysis of indeterminate frame by force method are the same as that discussed in the analysis of indeterminate beams in the previous lessons. Under the action of external loads, the frames undergo axial and bending deformations. Since the axial rigidity of the members is much higher than the bending rigidity, the axial deformations are much smaller than the bending deformations and are normally not considered in the analysis. The compatibility equations for the frame are written with respect to bending deformations only. The following examples illustrate the force method of analysis as applied to indeterminate frames.

Example 11.1

Analyse the rigid frame shown in Fig.11.1a and draw the bending moment diagram. Young’s modulus E and moment of inertia I are constant for the plane frame. Neglect axial deformations.

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The given one- storey frame is statically indeterminate to degree one. In the present case, the primary structure is one that is hinged at A and roller supported at D. Treat horizontal reaction at D, RDx as the redundant. The primary structure (which is stable and determinate) is shown in Fig.11.1.b.The compatibility condition of the problem is that the horizontal deformation of the primary structure (Fig.11.1.b) due to external loads plus the horizontal deformation of the support , due to redundant RDx (vide Fig.11.1.b) must vanish. Calculate deformation a11 due to D in the direction of RDx . Multiplying this deformation a11 with RDx , the deformation due to redundant reaction can be obtained.

Δ = a11 RDx                        (1)

Now compute the horizontal deflection ΔL and D due to externally applied load. This can be readily determined by unit load method. Apply a unit load along RDx as shown in Fig.10.1d.

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The horizontal deflection ΔL at D in the primary structure due to external loading is given by

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)              (2)

where δMv is the internal virtual moment resultant in the frame due to virtual load applied at D along the resultant and RDx and M is the internal bending moment of the frame due to external loading (for details refer to Module 1,Lesson 5).Thus,

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

(span AB, origin at A)        (span BC, origin at B)      (span DC, origin at D)

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                    (3)

In the next step, calculate the displacement a11 at D when a real unit load is applied at D in the direction of RDx (refer to Fig.11.1 d). Please note that the same Fig. 11.1d is used to represent unit virtual load applied at D and real unit load applied at D. Thus,

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

= 360/EI                                (4)

Now, the compatibility condition of the problem may be written as

ΔL + a11RDx = 0                        (5)

Solving,

RDx = −2.40 kN                          (6)

The minus sign indicates that the redundant reaction RDx acts towards left. Remaining reactions are calculated from equations of static equilibrium.

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The bending moment diagram for the frame is shown in Fig. 11.1e

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

Example 11.2 
Analyze the rigid frame shown in Fig.11.2a and draw the bending moment and shear force diagram. The flexural rigidity for all members is the same. Neglect axial deformations.
The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

Five reactions components need to be evaluated in this rigid frame; hence it is indeterminate to second degree. Select Rcx (=R1) and Rcy (=R2) as the redundant reactions. Hence, the primary structure is one in which support A is fixed and the support C is free as shown in Fig.11.2b. Also, equations for moments in various spans of the frame are also given in the figure.

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

Calculate horizontal (ΔL)and vertical (ΔL)2 deflections at C in the primary structure due to external loading. This can be done by unit load method. Thus,

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

(Span DA, origin at D)                 (Span BD, origin at B                (span BC, Origin B)

= 2268/EI                                     (1)

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

(Span DA, origin at D)          (Span BD, origin at B)     (Span BE, origin at E)       (Span EC, Origin C)

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                     (2)

 In the next step, evaluate flexibility coefficients, this is done by applying a unit load along, R1 and determining deflections a11 and a21 corresponding to R1 and R2 respectively (vide, Fig .11.2 c). Again apply unit load along R2 and evaluate deflections a22 and a12 corresponding to R2 and R1 and respectively (ref. Fig.11.2d).

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                      (3)

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                       (4)

and      

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
= 117.33/EI                                    (5)

In the actual structure at C, the horizontal and vertical displacements are zero .Hence, the compatibility condition may be written as,

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                              (6)

Substituting the values of (ΔL)1, (Δl)2, a11, a12 in the above equations and solving for and R1, R2 we get

R1 = -1.056 kN (towards left)
R2 = 27.44 kN (upwards)

The remaining reactions are calculated from equations of statics and they are shown in Fig 11.2e. The bending moment and shear force diagrams are shown in Fig. 11.2f.

 

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The document The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE) is a part of the Civil Engineering (CE) Course Structural Analysis.
All you need of Civil Engineering (CE) at this link: Civil Engineering (CE)
34 videos|140 docs|31 tests

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

FAQs on The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 - Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

1. What is the Force Method of Analysis in civil engineering frames?
Ans. The Force Method of Analysis is a technique used in civil engineering to analyze the behavior of frames. It involves determining the internal forces and displacements of the frame members by considering the equilibrium conditions at each joint. This method is commonly used to calculate the bending moments, shear forces, and axial forces in structural frames.
2. How does the Force Method of Analysis work for frames?
Ans. The Force Method of Analysis works by assuming unknown member forces and displacements in a frame structure. The equilibrium equations are then applied at each joint to establish a system of equations. These equations are solved iteratively to determine the unknown forces and displacements. The process is repeated until convergence is achieved, and the final values of member forces and displacements are obtained.
3. What are the advantages of using the Force Method of Analysis in frame analysis?
Ans. The Force Method of Analysis offers several advantages in frame analysis. Firstly, it provides a straightforward approach to analyze complex frames with multiple members and supports. Secondly, it allows for the calculation of internal forces and displacements at any point in the frame. Thirdly, it can handle frames with non-linear behavior or material properties. Lastly, it provides a clear understanding of the load distribution and structural response.
4. Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using the Force Method of Analysis?
Ans. Yes, there are some limitations to the Force Method of Analysis. One limitation is that it assumes the frame to be rigid, neglecting the effects of deformations and member stiffness. This can lead to inaccuracies in the calculated member forces and displacements. Additionally, the method requires manual iteration and can be time-consuming for large and complex frames. It is also not suitable for analyzing frames with significant non-linear behavior or large deformations.
5. How does the Force Method of Analysis compare to other structural analysis techniques?
Ans. The Force Method of Analysis differs from other techniques such as the Displacement Method or Finite Element Method. Unlike the Displacement Method, which focuses on determining member displacements, the Force Method primarily deals with member forces. The Finite Element Method, on the other hand, divides the structure into smaller elements to analyze its behavior. Each method has its advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on the complexity of the frame and the desired level of accuracy.
34 videos|140 docs|31 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for Civil Engineering (CE) exam

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Important questions

,

Exam

,

Objective type Questions

,

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

past year papers

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

The Force Method of Analysis: Frames - 1 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

mock tests for examination

,

Viva Questions

,

video lectures

,

MCQs

,

Extra Questions

,

Sample Paper

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

ppt

,

study material

,

Semester Notes

,

Free

,

pdf

,

Summary

,

practice quizzes

;