A historical perspective on the use of bandwidth
An elegant mathematical formulation requiring two hours of computation on a supercomputer is some-what irrelevant in most engineering offices. The determination of good progressions on an arterial must be viewed in this context:only 25 years ago, hand held calculators did not exist; 20 years ago, calculators had only the most basic functions. 15 years ago, personal computers were at best a new concept. Previously, engineers used slide rules. Optimization of progressions could not depend on mathematical formulations simply because even one set of computations could take days with t he tools available. Accordingly,graphical methods were developed. The first optimization programs that took queues and other details into account began to appear, leading to later developments that produced the signal-optimization programs in common use in late 1980s. As computers became more accessible and less expensive, the move to computer solutions accelerated in the 1970s. New work on the maximum-bandwidth solution followed with greater computational power encouraging the new formulations.
Forward and reverse progressions
Simple progression is the name given to the progression in which all the signals are set so that a vehicle released from the first intersection will arrive at the downstream intersections just as the signals at those intersections initiate green. As the simple progression results in a green wave that advances with the vehicles, it is often called a forward progression. It may happen that the simple progression is revised two or more times in a day, so as to conform to the direction of the major flow, or to the flow level. In this case, the scheme may be referred to as a flexible progression. Under certain circumstances, the internal queues are sufficiently large that the ideal offset is negative. The downstream signal must turn green before the upstream signal, to allow sufficient time for the queue to start moving before the arrival of the platoon. The visual image of such a pattern is of the green marching upstream, toward the drivers in the platoon. This is referred to as reverse progression.
Effective progression on two-way streets
In certain geometries it is possible to obtain very effective progressions in both directions on two-way streets. The existence of these patterns presents the facts that:
• The system cycle length should be specified based primarily on the geometry and platoon speed whenever possible, to enhance progressions.
• The task of good progression in both directions becomes easy if an appropriate combination of cycle length, block length and platoon speed exist.
• Whenever possible the value of these appropriate combinations should be considered explicitly for they can greatly determine the quality of flow for decades.
• In considering the installations of new signals on existing arterial, the same care should be taken to preserve the appropriate combinations and/or to introduce them.
Importance of signal phasing and cycle length
The traffic engineer may well be faced with a situation that looks intimidating, but for which the community seek to have smooth flow of traffic along an arterial or in a system. The orderly approach begins with first, appreciating the magnitude of the problem. The splits, offsets, and cycle length might be totally out of date for the existing traffic demand. Even if the plan is not out of date, the settings in the field might be totally out of date, the settings in the field might be totally different than those originally intended and/or set. Thus, a logical first step is simply to ride the system and inspect it. Second, it would be very useful to sketch out how much of the system can be thought of as an open tree of one way links. A distinction should be made among
• streets that are one way
• streets that can be treated as one-way, due to the actual or desired flow patterns
• streets that must be treated as two-ways
• larger grids in which streets interact because they form unavoidable closed trees and are each important in that they cannot be ignored for the sake of establishing a master grid which is an open tree
• smaller grids in which the issue is not coordination but local land access and circulation Downtown grids might well fall into the last category, at least in some cases. Third, attention should focus on the combination of cycle length, block length and platoon speed and their interaction. Fourth, if the geometry is not suitable, one can adapt and fix up the situation to a certain extent. Another issue to address, of course, is whether the objective of progressed movement of traffic should be maintained.
Oversaturated traffic
The problem of oversaturation is not just one of degree but of kind - extreme congestion is marked by a new phenomenon: intersection blockage. The overall approach can be stated in a logical set of steps:
• Address the root causes of congestion
• Update the signalization, for poor signalization is frequently the cause of what looks like an incurable problem
• If the problem persists, use novel signalization to minimize the impact and spatial extent of the extreme congestion.
• Provide more space by use of turn bays and parking congestion.
• Develop site specific evaluations where there are conflicting goals.
Signal remedies
Signalization can be improved through measures like, reasonably short cycle lengths, proper offsets and proper splits. Sometimes when there is too much traffic then options such as equity offsets(to aid cross flows) and different splits may be called upon. A metering plan involving the three types - internal, external and release - may be applied. Internal metering refers to the use of control strategies within a congested network so as to influence the distribution of vehicles arriving at or departing from a critical location. External metering refers to the control of the major access points to the defined system, so that inflow rates into the system are limited if the system if the system is already too congested. Release metering refers to the cases in which vehicles are stored in such locations as parking garages and lots, from which their release can be in principle controlled.
1. What is a coordinated traffic signal system? | ![]() |
2. How does a coordinated traffic signal system work? | ![]() |
3. What are the benefits of a coordinated traffic signal system? | ![]() |
4. Are there any challenges in implementing a coordinated traffic signal system? | ![]() |
5. Are there any other technologies or strategies that can complement a coordinated traffic signal system? | ![]() |