Derivation of Three-Moment Equation
Consider a arbitrarily loaded continuous beam in which A, B and C are three consicutive support as shwon in Fgiure 9.1.
Module 2 Lesson 9 Fig.9.1
Fig. 9.1.
Let LAB, IAB and EAB, LBC, IBC nd EBC are span length, second moment of area and Young’s modulus coresponding to span AB and BC respectively. This is an indeterminate beam which may be made statically determinate by releasing moment constraint (inserting hinge) at A, B and C. Therefore MA, MB and MC are the redundatn moments. The basic determinate structure is shwon in Figure 9.2.
Fig. 9.2.
Deflected shape of the span AB and BC due to external loading and the redundant moments are shwon in Fgure 9.3a-b.
Fig. 9.3.
Slopes at θBA, θBC due to external loading (Figure 9.3a) and \[{\bar \theta _{BA}}\] , \[{\bar \theta _{BC}}\] due to redundant momoment (Figure 9.3a) may be obtaind moment-area method discussed in lesson 5. Bending moment diagrams for each span are shwon in Figure 9.3c-d.
\[{\theta _{BA}} = {{{{{{{{\rm{Moment of }}M} /{EI{\rm{ diagram between A and B about A}}}}} \over {{{\rm{L}}_{{\rm{AB}}}}}} = {{{A_{AB}}{x_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}{L_{AB}}}}\]
\[{\theta _{BC}} = {{{{{{{{\rm{Moment of }}M} /{EI{\rm{ diagram between B and C about C}}}}} \over {{{\rm{L}}_{{\rm{AB}}}}}} = {{{A_{BC}}{x_{CB}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}{L_{BC}}}}\]
Similarly, \[{\bar \theta _{BA}}\] and \[{\bar \theta _{BC}}\] may be obtained as,
\[{\bar \theta _{BA}} = {1 \over {{L_{AB}}}}\left[ {{{{M_A}{L_{AB}}} \over {E{I_{AB}}}}{{{L_{AB}}} \over 2} + {1 \over 2}{{\left( {{M_B} - {M_A}} \right){L_{AB}}} \over {E{I_{AB}}}}{{2{L_{AB}}} \over 3}} \right] = {{{M_A}{L_{AB}}} \over {6{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}} + {{{M_B}{L_{AB}}} \over {3{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}}\]
\[{\bar \theta _{BC}} = {1 \over {{L_{BC}}}}\left[ {{{{M_C}{L_{BC}}} \over {E{I_{BC}}}}{{{L_{BC}}} \over 2} + {1 \over 2}{{\left( {{M_B} - {M_C}} \right){L_{BC}}} \over {E{I_{BC}}}}{{2{L_{AB}}} \over 3}} \right] = {{{M_C}{L_{BC}}} \over {6{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}} + {{{M_B}{L_{BC}}} \over {3{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}}\]
Now, compatibility condition at B says, the relative rotation at B is zero.
Therefore,
\[{\theta _{BA}} + {\theta _{BC}} + {\bar \theta _{BA}} + {\bar \theta _{BC}}=0\]
\[\Rightarrow {{{A_{AB}}{x_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}{L_{AB}}}} + {{{A_{BC}}{x_{CB}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}{L_{BC}}}} + {{{M_A}{L_{AB}}} \over {6{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}} + {{{M_B}{L_{AB}}} \over {3{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}} + {{{M_C}{L_{BC}}} \over {6{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}} + {{{M_B}{L_{BC}}} \over {3{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}}=0\]
\[\Rightarrow {{{M_A}{L_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}} + 2{M_B}\left( {{{{L_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}} + {{{L_{BC}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}}} \right) + {{{M_C}{L_{BC}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}}=-{{6{A_{AB}}{x_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}{L_{AB}}}} - {{6{A_{BC}}{x_{CB}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}{L_{BC}}}}\]
The above equation is known as the Three-Moment Equation.
9.1.2 Three-Moment Equation with Support Settlement
In the above form of Three-Moment Equation it was assumed that the support reactions and internal forces in the beam are induced only due to external load. However, sometime movement of joints, for example support settlement may take place and if it happens, its effect has to be considered in the analysis. In this section, a generalised Three-Moment Equation including the effect of support settlement is derived.
Consider the continuous beam given in Figure 9.1. Additionally suppose support A, B and C have settled to position A¢, B¢ and C¢ by amounts dA, dBand dC respectively as shwon in Figure 9.4.
Fig. 9.4.
Deflection of B with respect to A, dBA = dB – dA
Deflection of B with respect to C, dBC = dB – dC
Relative deflection at B with respect to A and C cause rotation at B which may be obtained as,
\[{\hat \theta _{BA}}=-{{{\delta _{BA}}} \over {{L_{AB}}}}\] and \[{\hat \theta _{BC}}=-{{{\delta _{BC}}} \over {{L_{BC}}}}\]
Now apply the compatibilty condition at B,
\[{\theta _{BA}} + {\theta _{BC}} + {\bar \theta _{BA}} + {\bar \theta _{BC}} + {\hat \theta _{BA}} + {\hat \theta _{BC}}=0\]
\[\Rightarrow {{{M_A}{L_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}} + 2{M_B}\left( {{{{L_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}}} + {{{L_{BC}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}}} \right) + {{{M_C}{L_{BC}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}}}=-{{6{A_{AB}}{x_{AB}}} \over {{E_{AB}}{I_{AB}}{L_{AB}}}} - {{6{A_{BC}}{x_{CB}}} \over {{E_{BC}}{I_{BC}}{L_{BC}}}} + 6\left( {{{{\delta _{BA}}} \over {{L_{AB}}}} + {{{\delta _{BC}}} \over {{L_{BC}}}}} \right)\]
The generalised Three-Moment Equation may be simplified for special cases,
Case 1: E and I constant
\[{M_A}{L_{AB}} + 2{M_B}\left( {{L_{AB}} + {L_{BC}}} \right) + {M_C}{L_{BC}}=-{{6{A_{AB}}{x_{AB}}} \over {{L_{AB}}}} - {{6{A_{BC}}{x_{CB}}} \over {{L_{BC}}}} + 6EI\left( {{{{\delta _{BA}}} \over {{L_{AB}}}} + {{{\delta _{BC}}} \over {{L_{BC}}}}} \right)\]
Case 1: E and I constant, no settlement
\[{M_A}{L_{AB}} + 2{M_B}\left( {{L_{AB}} + {L_{BC}}} \right) + {M_C}{L_{BC}}=-{{6{A_{AB}}{x_{AB}}} \over {{L_{AB}}}} - {{6{A_{BC}}{x_{CB}}} \over {{L_{BC}}}}\]
Example
A continuous beam ABCD is subjected to external load as shown bellow. Calculate support reactions.
Fig.9.5.
Bending moment diagrams for each span due to external load are obtained using any method discussed in module I.
By inspection we have,
MA = 0 and MD = 0
\[{A_{AB}}={1 \over 2} \times 15 \times 3=22.5\] and \[{x_{AB}}=1.5\]
\[{A_{BC}}={2 \over 3} \times 8.4375 \times 3=16.875\] and \[{x_{CB}}=1.5\]
Now, applying Three-Moment Equation at B,
\[3{M_A} + 2{M_B}\left( {3 + 3} \right) + 3{M_C}=-{{6 \times 22.5 \times 1.5} \over 3} - {{6 \times 16.875 \times 1.5} \over 3}\]
\[\Rightarrow 4{M_B} + {M_C}=-39.375\] (1)
Now, applying Three-Moment Equation at C,
\[3{M_B} + 2{M_C}\left( {3 + 3} \right) + 3{M_D}=-{{6 \times 16.875 \times 1.5} \over 3}\]
\[ \Rightarrow {M_B} + 4{M_C}=-16.875\] (2)
Solving (1) and (2), we have,
\[{M_B}=- 9.375{\rm{kNm}}\] and \[{M_C}=-1.875{\rm{kNm}}\]
After determining the redundant moment, remaining support reaction may be obtained by using static equilibrium equations.
\[\sum {{M_B}}=0 \Rightarrow 3{A_y} - 20 \times 1.5 = {M_B} \Rightarrow 3{A_y} - 20 \times 1.5=-9.375 \Rightarrow {A_y} = 6.875{\rm{kN}}\]
\[\sum {{M_C}}=0 \Rightarrow 6{A_y} + 3{B_y} - 20 \times 4.5 - 7.5 \times 3 \times 1.5 = {M_C}\]
\[\Rightarrow 3{B_y}=-1.875 + 123.75 - 6 \times 6.875 \Rightarrow {B_y} = 26.875{\rm{kN}}\]
\[\sum {{M_C}}=0 \Rightarrow {M_C} - 3{D_y} = {D_y}=- 0.625{\rm{kN}}\]
\[\sum {{F_Y}}=0 \Rightarrow {A_y} + {B_y} + {C_y} + {D_y} = 20 + 7.5 \times 3 \Rightarrow {C_y} = 9.375{\rm{kN}}\]
1. What is the three-moment equation in the force method for the analysis of statically indeterminate beams? |
2. How does the force method help in analyzing statically indeterminate beams? |
3. What are the advantages of using the force method for analyzing statically indeterminate beams? |
4. What are the key considerations when applying the three-moment equation in the force method? |
5. How does the analysis of statically indeterminate beams relate to agricultural engineering and the strength of materials? |
|
Explore Courses for Agricultural Engineering exam
|