Goa Police Constable Exam  >  Goa Police Constable Notes  >  Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. [2000 SC]

Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. [2000 SC] - Goa Police Constable PDF Download

In this case the accused gave a single fatal blow with knife on the chest on the left side of the sternum, fracturing both the ribs and track of the wound going through the sternum after passing the ribs and thereafter entering the liver and perforating a portion of stomach. Confirming the conviction under Section 302, the Supreme Court observed thus:

“Adverting to the contention of a single blow, it may be pointed out that there is no principle that in all cases of a single blow Section 302 IPC is not attracted. A single blow may, in some cases, entail conviction under Section 302 IPC, in some cases under Section 304 IPC and in some other cases under Section 326 IPC. The question with regard to the nature of offence has to be determined on the facts and in the circumstances of each case. The nature of the injury, whether it is on the vital or non-vital part of the body, the weapon used, the circumstances in which the injury is caused and the manner in which the injury is inflicted are all relevant factors which may go to determine the required intention or knowledge of the offender and the offence committed by him.”

The document Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. [2000 SC] - Goa Police Constable is a part of Goa Police Constable category.
All you need of Goa Police Constable at this link: Goa Police Constable

FAQs on Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. [2000 SC] - Goa Police Constable

1. What is the background of the case Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P.?
Ans. Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. is a notable Supreme Court case from the year 2000. It involves a legal dispute between Mahesh Balmiki and the state of Madhya Pradesh.
2. What were the key issues raised in the case Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P.?
Ans. The key issues raised in the case Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. were not specified in the given article. Additional information is required to provide a detailed answer.
3. What was the decision of the Supreme Court in Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P.?
Ans. The decision of the Supreme Court in Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. was not mentioned in the given article. It is necessary to refer to the court's judgment or other sources to provide an accurate answer.
4. How did the case Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. impact the legal landscape in Madhya Pradesh?
Ans. The specific impact of the case Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. on the legal landscape in Madhya Pradesh was not discussed in the given article. Further research is required to provide a comprehensive answer.
5. Can you provide any other relevant information about the case Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P.?
Ans. The given article does not provide any additional information about the case Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. It is necessary to refer to other sources or legal documents for more details.
Download as PDF

Top Courses for Goa Police Constable

Related Searches

Sample Paper

,

Extra Questions

,

Objective type Questions

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Important questions

,

MCQs

,

Summary

,

Exam

,

mock tests for examination

,

ppt

,

Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. [2000 SC] - Goa Police Constable

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Free

,

pdf

,

Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. [2000 SC] - Goa Police Constable

,

practice quizzes

,

study material

,

past year papers

,

Semester Notes

,

video lectures

,

Viva Questions

,

Mahesh Balmiki v. State of M.P. [2000 SC] - Goa Police Constable

;