Consider the following statements: (2023) Statement-I: In India, prisons are managed by State Governments with their own rules and regulations for the day-to-day administration of prisons. Statement-II: In India, prisons are governed by the Prisons Act, 1894 which expressly kept the subject of prisons in the control of Provincial Governments. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I. (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I. (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect. (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct.
Solution:
Ans: (a)
Prisons'/'persons detained therein' is a "State-List" subject under Entry 4 of List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.
Administration and management of prisons and prisoners is the responsibility of respective State Governments who are competent to take appropriate action in this regard. Hence, statement 1 is correct.
However, given the significance of prisons in the Criminal Justice System, the Ministry of Home Affairs has been providing regular guidance and support to the States and UTs on diverse issues relating to prison administration.
Under Prison act 1894, which governs the prisons, management and administration of prison falls in the domain of state governments. Hence statement 2 is correct.
Therefore, both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.
Question 2:
Consider the following statements: (2023)
If the election of the President of India is declared voidby the Supreme Court of India, all acts done by him/her in the performance of duties of his/her office of President before the date of decision become invalid.
Election for the post of the President of India can be postponed on the ground that some Legislative Assemblies have been dissolved and elections are yet to take place.
When a Bill is presented to the President of India, the Constitution prescribes time limits within which he/she has to declare his/her assent.
How many of the above statements are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None
Solution:
Ans: (d)
If the election of a person as President or Vice President is declared void by the Supreme court, acts done by him in the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of the office of President or Vice President, as the case may be, on or before the date of the decision of the Supreme Court shall not be invalidated by reason of that declaration. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
When an assembly is dissolved, the members cease to be qualified to vote in the presidential election, even if fresh elections to the dissolved assembly are not held before the presidential election. Thus election to the president will not be postponed on the grounds that some Legislative Assemblies have been dissolved. Hence, statement 2 is not correct.
Assent to Bills: When a Bill has been passed by the Houses of Parliament, it shall be presented to the President, and the President shall declare either that he assents to the Bill, or that he withholds assent therefrom Provided that the President may, as soon as possible after the presentation to him of a Bill for assent, return the Bill if it is not a Money Bill to the Houses with a message requesting that they will reconsider the Bill or any specified provisions thereof and, in particular, will consider the desirability of introducing any such amendments as he may recommend in his message, and when a Bill is so returned, the Houses shall reconsider the Bill accordingly, and if the Bill is passed again by the Houses with or without amendment and presented to the President for assent, the President shall not withhold assent therefrom Procedures in Financial Matters. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
Question 3:
With reference to India, consider the following pairs: (2023)
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None
Solution:
Ans: (b)
The Official Secrets Act was first enacted in 1923 and was retained after Independence. The law, applicable to government servants and citizens, provides the framework for dealing with espionage, sedition, and other potential threats to the integrity of the nation. The law makes spying, sharing 'secret' information, unauthorised use of uniforms, (Under Section-6) withholding information, interference with the armed forces in prohibited/ restricted areas, among others, punishable offences. If guilty, a person may get up to 14 years' imprisonment, a fine, or both. Hence, pair 1 is correctly matched.
Under section 7 of Official Secrets Act 1923 No person in the vicinity of any prohibited place shall obstruct, knowingly mislead or otherwise interfere with or impede, any police officer, or any member of 21 [the Armed Forces of the Union] engaged on guard, sentry, patrol or other similar duty in relation to the prohibited place. Hence pair 2 is NOT correctly matched.
THE ARMS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2019 says Whoever uses firearm in a rash or negligent manner or in celebratory gunfire so as to endanger human life or personal safety of others shall be punishable with an imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine which may extend to rupees one lakh, or with both. Hence pair 3 is correctly matched.
Question 4:
Consider the following statements: (2023) Statement-I: India's public sector health care system largely focuses on curative care with limited preventive, promotive and rehabilitative care. Statement-II: Under India's decentralized approach to health care delivery, the States are primarily responsible for organizing health services. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements? (a) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I (b) Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I (c) Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect (d) Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct
Solution:
Ans: (d)
The Ayushman Bharat - Health and Wellness Centres (ABHWCs) were launched under the Ayushman Bharat Programme in a bid to move away from selective health care to a more comprehensive range of services spanning preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative and palliative care for all ages. Hence, statement 1 is not correct.
In AB, HWCs at the Sub Health Centre (SHC) level, Multi-Purpose Workers (male & female) & ASHAs and Primary Health Centre / Urban Primary Health Centre are organized by state govt but in case of tertiary Health services Central govt is also a key stakeholders. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
Question 5:
Consider the following statements: (2023)
According to the Constitution of India, the Central Government has a duty to protect States from internal disturbances.
The Constitution of India exempts the States from providing legal counsel to a person being held for preventive detention.
According the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002, confession of the accused before the police cannot be used as evidence.
How many of the above statement are correct? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None
Solution:
Ans: (b)
As per Article 355, it shall be the duty of the Union to protect every State against external aggression and internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every State is carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution. Hence, Statement 1 is correct.
Article 22 (1) of the Constitution, for example, guarantees the right to legal counsel, but Article 22 (3) (b) strips this right from persons arrested or detained under preventive detention law. Relying on these provisions, the Supreme Court stated, in A.K. Roy v. Union of India, that detainees do not have the right to legal representation or cross-examination in Advisory Board hearings. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 and the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (commonly known as TADA and POTA respectively) had made provisions to admit the confessions made by the accused before the police authorities. Hence, statement 3 is not correct.
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides that confession made before police authority or under police custody is inadmissible.
Question 6:
Consider the following statements: (2022)
Pursuant to the report of H.N. Sanyal Committee, the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 was passed.
The Constitution of India empowers the Supreme Court and the High Courts to punish for contempt of themselves.
The Constitution of India defines Civil Contempt and Criminal Contempt.
In India, the Parliament is vested with the powers to make laws on Contempt of Court.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 1, 2 and 4 (c) 3 and 4 only (d) 3 only
Solution:
Ans: (b)
The 1963 Bill prepared by the Satyapal Committee was reviewed by a Joint Committee of Parliament (1969-70) (Bhargava Committee). Based on which the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 was enacted. Hence statement 1 is correct.
Article 129 of the Constitution empowered the Supreme Court to punish for contempt of self. Article 215 gave the respective power to the High Courts. Hence statement 2 is correct.
According to the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, contempt refers to the offence of showing disrespect to the dignity or authority of a court. The expression 'contempt of court' has not been defined by the Constitution. However, Article 129 of the Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to punish for contempt of self. Hence statement 3 is not correct.
The power to punish for contempt is a constitutional power vested in the Supreme Court which cannot be curtailed or abolished even by a legislative act. Article 142(2) states that "subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament in this behalf" the Supreme Court shall have full power to make any order on the punishment of contempt. Hence statement 4 is correct.
Question 7:
With reference to India, consider the following statements: (2022)
Government law officers and legal firms are recognised as advocates, but corporate lawyers and patent attorneys are excluded from recognition as advocates.
Bar Councils have the power to lay down the rules relating to legal education and recognition of law colleges.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Solution:
Ans: (b)
Government law officers, legal firms and patent jurists are recognized as advocates, while corporate lawyers are outside the recognition of advocates. Hence statement 1 is not correct.
The Bar Council of India is a statutory body established under Section 4 of the Advocates Act 1961 that regulates legal practice and legal education in India. Its members are elected from amongst lawyers in India and thus represent the Indian Bar. It sets standards of professional conduct, etiquette and exercises disciplinary jurisdiction over the bar.
It also sets standards for legal education and provides recognition to universities whose law degrees will serve as qualifications for students to enroll as advocates at the undergraduate level. Hence, statement 2 is correct.
Question 8:
With reference to India, consider the following statements: [2021]
Judicial custody means an accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate and such accused is locked up in police station, not in jail.
During judicial custody, the police offi cer in charge of the case is not allowed to interrogate the suspect without the approval of the court.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (b)
Police Custody means that police have the physical custody of the accused while Judicial Custody means an accused is in the custody of the concerned Magistrate. In the former, the accused is lodged in a police station lockup while in latter, it is the jail. So, statement 1 is incorrect.
When Police take a person into custody, the Cr.P.C kicks-in and they were produced before a Magistrate within 24 hours of the arrest.
Police Custody with permission to interrogate
During Judicial Custody, the police offi cer in charge of the case is not allowed to interrogate the suspect.
However, the court may allow the interrogations to be conducted if it opines the interrogation being necessary under the facts produced before the court. So, statement 2 is correct. And, Option (b) is Correct.
Question 9:
Which one of the following categories of Fundamental Rights incorporates protection against untouchability as a form of discrimination? [2020-I] (a) Right against Exploitation (b) Right to freedom (c) Right to constitutional remedies (d) Right to equality
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (d)
Following fundamental rights are related to "Equality":
Article 14 → Equality before law
Article 15 → Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth
Article 16 → Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment
Article 17 → Abolition of untouchability
Article 18 → Abolition of titles
Question 10:
In India, Legal Services Authorities provide free legal services to which of the following type of citizens? [2020-I] 1. Person with an annual income of less than Rs. 1,00,000 2. Transgender with an annual income of less than Rs. 2,00,000 3. Member of Other Backward Classes (OBC) with an annual income of less than Rs. 3,00,000 4. All Senior Citizens Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 3 and 4 only (c) 2 and 3 only (d) 1 and 4 only
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (a)
AS per the official page of NALSA: senior citizens eligible depending on income. So, #4 "ALL senior citizens eligible" is wrong. b and d eliminated. As per the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 → There is no provision of free legal aid for OBCs. (This eliminates the 3rd Statement) So, answer a: 1 and 2 only.
Question 11:
In the context of Indian history, the Rakhmabai case of 1884 revolved around: [2020-I] 1. women's right to gain education 2. age of consent 3. restitution of conjugal rights Select the correct answer using the code given below: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 3 only (d) 1,2 and 3
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (d)
Rukhmabai was married off at an early age of 11. Hence by 1880 she fought a court case against her husband who demanded to live married life with her & have physical relations with him.
She wanted to study further and also wanted the marriage age should be increased leading to the formation of Rukhmi bai defence committee supported by social reformers like Behramji Malabari, finally leading to the Age of Consent Bill- 1891 which increased the Minimum age of Marriage.
She also became a doctor after resuming her studies.
Hence all 3 statements are correct.
Question 12:
In India, separation of judiciary from the executive is enjoined by [2020-I] (a) The Preamble of the Constitution (b) A Directive Principle of state policy (c) The Seventh schedule (d) The conventional practice
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (b)
Article 36 to Article 51 of our Constitution deal with Directive Principles of the State Policy. Within that Article 50 deals prescribes Separation of judiciary from executive
Question 13:
Consider the following statements: [2019-I] 1. As per recent amendment to the India Forest Act, 1927, forest dwellers have the right to fell the bamboos grown on the forest areas.
2. As per the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, bamboo is a minor forest produce.
3. The Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers ( Recognition of Forest Rights) Act , 2006 allows ownership of minor forest produce to forest dwellers.
Which of the following statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (b)
Indian Forest Act was amended to omit the word "bamboos" from the definition of tree, to exempt bamboos grown on non-forest area from the requirement of permit for felling or transit under the said Act, and would encourage bamboo plantation by farmers resulting in the enhancement of their income from agricultural fields. So, #1 is wrong.
In both b and c, statement #3 is common, so we've to accept it as true without verifying. Forest rights Act: Section 2(i) Minor forest produce includes bamboo, brushwood, honey, wax etc. So, #2 is right. Thus answer is b.
Question 14:
Which Article of the Constitution of India safeguards one's right to marry the person of one's choice? [2019-I] (a) Article 19 (b) Article 21 (c) Article 25 (d) Article 29
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (b) 2018-April: "The right to marry a person of one's choice is integral to Article 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constitution". SC Judgement on Hadiya Case. Then answer is "b".
Question 15:
"Rule of Law Index" is released by which of the following ? [2018-I] (a) Amnesty International (b) International Court of Justice (c) The Office of UN Commissioner for Human Rights (d) World Justice Project
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (d)
Topic was in news during 2018-March: The World Justice Project released its Rule of Law Index 2017-18 report, which measures the extent to which 113 countries have adhered to the rule of law in that perio(d) (India's rank was 62, better than China, Pakistan, Myanmar and Bangladesh; Denmark occupied the top spot. Ref: TheHindu
Question 16:
Consider the following statements: [2018-I]
1. As per the Right to Education (RTE) Act, to be eligible for appointment as a teacher in a State, a person would be required to possess the minimum qualification laid down by the concerned State Council of Teacher Education.
2. As per the RTE Act, for teaching primary classes, a candidate is required to pass a Teacher Eligibility Test conducted in accordance with the National Council of Teacher Education guidelines.
3. In India, more than 90% of teacher's education institutions are directly under the State Governments.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 2 (b) 2 only (c) 1 and 3 (d) 3 only
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (b)
Under RTE Act section 23, National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) decides the minimum qualification. So, #1 is wrong.
After RTE it is mandatory that only those people may be appointed as teachers who are able to clear TET. So, #2 is right. Thus by elimination, we get the correct answer b: only 2.
Question 17:
In India, Judicial Review implies [2017-I] (a) the power of the Judiciary to pronounce upon the constitutionality of laws and executive orders. (b) the power of the Judiciary to question the wisdom of the laws enacted by the Legislatures. (c) the power of the Judiciary to review all the legislative enactments before they are assented to by the President. (d) the power of the Judiciary to review its own judgements given earlier in similar or different cases.
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (a)
Judicial review means the power of SC or HC to examine the constitutionality of any law. So, "A" is the most fitting option.
Question 18:
With reference to the 'Gram Nyayalaya Act', which of the following statements is/are correct? [2016-I]
As per the Act, Gram Nyayalayas can hear only civil cases and not criminal cases.
The Act allows local social activists as mediators/ reconciliators.
Select the correct answer using the code given below. (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (b)
Each Gram Nyayalaya is a court of Judicial Magistrate of the first class and its presiding officer is appointed by the state government in consultation with the High court. Gram Nyayalaya Act; 2008 came into force of Oct, 2, 2009. The objective of this Act is to Provide inexpensive justice to people in rural areas at their doorsteps.
Gram Nyayalaya try criminal cases, civil suits, claims or disputes which are specified in the First Schedule and the Second Schedule of the Gram Nyayalaya Act the Act.The Gram Nyayalaya are supposed to try to settle the disputes as far as possible by bringing about conciliation between the parties and for this purpose, it can make use of the appointed conciliators.
Reference- Page no. 601 of India year book 2016, under heading Judiciary it says- Panchayat Courts also function in some states under various names like Nyaya Panchayat, Panchayat Adalat, Gram Kachehri, etc., to decide civil and criminal disputes of petty and local nature. That means first statement is wrong.
Under this act, District court with consultation of DM, prepares panel of social workers to act as councilors. Hence 2nd statement is right.
Question 19:
The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States falls under its [2014 - I] (a) advisory jurisdiction (b) appellate jurisdiction (c) original jurisdiction (d) writ jurisdiction
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (c)
The original jurisdiction of supreme court includes disputes between
The centre and one or more states; or
The centre and any state or states on one side and one or more states on the other; or
Between two or more states.
In the above federal disputes, the supreme court has exclusive original jurisdiction. Meaning, no other count can decide such disputes.
Question 20:
With reference to National Legal Services Authority, consider the following statements: [2013 - I]
1. Its objective is to provide free and competent legal services to the weaker sections of the society on the basis of equal opportunity.
2. It issues guidelines for the State Legal Services Authorities to implement the legal programmes and schemes throughout the country. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (c)
The National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) has been constituted under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to provide free Legal Services to the weaker sections of the society and to organize Lok Adalats for amicable settlement of disputes. In every state, State Legal Services Authority has been constituted to give effect to the policies and directions of the NALSA and to give free legal services to the people and conduct Lok Adalats in the State.
Question 21:
With reference to consumers' rights/privileges under the provisions of law in India, which of the following statements is/are correct? [2012 - I]
Consumers are empowered to take samples for food testing.
When a consumer files a complaint in any consumer forum, no fee is required to be paid.
In case of death of a consumer, his/her legal heir can file a complaint in the consumer forum on his/her behalf.
Select the correct answer using the codes given below: (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 (c) 1 and 3 (d) 1, 2 and 3
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (c)
Consumers are empowered to take samples for food testing. In case of death of a consumer his/her legal heir can file a complaint in the consumer forum on his /her behalf.
Question 22:
Which of the following are included in the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court? [2012 - I] 1. A dispute between the Government of India and one or more States 2. A dispute regarding elections to either House of the Parliament or that of Legislature of a State 3. A dispute between the Government of India and a Union Territory
4. A dispute between two or more States Select the correct answer using the codes given below : (a) 1 and 2 (b) 2 and 3 (c) 1 and 4 (d) 3 and 4
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (c)
The Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court includes dispute between the Government of India and one or more States, and dispute between two and more States.
Question 23:
With reference to the Delimitation Commission, consider the following statements: [2012 - I] 1. The orders of the Delimitation Commission cannot be challenged in a Court of Law.
2. When the orders of the Delimitation Commission are laid before the Lok Sabha or State Legislative Assembly, they cannot effect any modifications in the orders. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (c)
Both are correct. Hence the option (c) is right.
Question 24:
What is the provision to safeguard the autonomy of the Supreme Court of India? [2012 - I] 1. While appointing the Supreme Court Judges, the President of India has to consult the Chief Justice of India.
2. The Supreme Court Judges can be removed by the Chief Justice of India only.
3. The salaries of the Judges are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India to which the legislature does not have to vote.
4. All appointments of officers and staffs of the Supreme Court of India are made by the Government only after consulting the Chief Justice of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 3 (b) 3 and 4 (c) 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (a)
1st and 3rd are correct statements thus option (a) is right.
Question 25:
In India, if a religious sect/community is given the status of a national minority, what special advantages it is entitled to? [2011 - I]
1. It can establish and administer exclusive educational institutions.
2. The President of India automatically nominates a representative of the community to Lok Sabha.
3. It can derive benefits from the Prime Minister's 15-Point Programme.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct ? (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 (c) 1 and 3 (d) 1, 2 and 3
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (c)
Article: 30 of the constitution of India States that All minorities (whether religious or linguistic) shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
Article-331 provides for nomination of two anglo-Indians to the Lok-Sabha. But as if now their is no provision for the nomination of religious Minorities to the Lok-Sabha.
However religious minorities can avail benefits from the prime minister's 15-point programme.
Question 26:
India is home to lakhs of person with disabilities. What are the benefits available to them under the law? [2011 - I] 1. Free schooling till the age of 18 years in government run schools. 2. Preferential allotment of land for setting up business. 3. Ramps in public buildings. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 and 3 (c) 1 and 3 (d) 1, 2 and 3
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (d)
Disable students come under the Right to Education and RTE Act provides for free and compulsory education to 'children' between the ages six and 14 years, though under the Persons with Disability (PWD) Act, a child refers to a person up to the age of 18 years. So statement 1 is correct. Please note that Persons with Disability (PWD) Act provides for ramps in public building; adaptation of toilets for wheel chair users; Braille symbols and auditory signals in elevators or lifts; ramps in hospitals, primary health centres and other medical care and rehabilitation institutions. The same Act also states that appropriate Governments and local authorities shall by notification frame schemes in favour of persons with disabilities, for the preferential allotment of land at concessional rates.
Question 27:
Consider the following: [2011 - I]
Right to education.
Right to equal access to public service.
Right to food.
Which of the above is/are Human Right/Human Rights under "Universal Declaration of Human Rights'' ? (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 (c) 3 only (d) 1, 2 and 3
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (d)
With reference to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Article 25 says everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. Article 21(2) says- everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country. Article 26(1) says-Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages.
Question 28:
With reference to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, consider the following: [2010]
The Rights of Development
The Right to Expression
The Right to Recreation
Which of the above is/are the Rights of the child ?
(a) 1 only
(b) 1 and 3
(c) 2 and 3
(d) 1, 2 and 3
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (d)
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (adopted on Nov. 20, 1989) is the first legally binding international instrument to incorporate the full range of human rights i.e. civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights.
Question 29: Consider the following statements: [2010] The Supreme Court of India tenders advice to the President of India on matters of law or fact:
on its own initiative (on any matter of larger public interest).
if he seeks such an advice.
only if the matters relate to the Fundamental Rights of the citizens.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct ? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) 3 only (d) 1and 2
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (b)
According to Article 143 (Power of President to consult Supreme Court).
Question 30:
With reference to Lok Adalats, which of the following statements is correct? [2010] (a) Lok Adalats have the jurisdiction to settle matters at pre-litigating stage and not those matters pending before any court (b) Lok Adalats can deal with matters which are civil and not criminal in nature. (c) Every Lok Adalat consists of either serving or retired judicial officers only and not any other person. (d) None of the statements given above is correct.
Solution:
Correct Answer is Option (d)
Cases that are pending in regular courts can be transferred to a Lok Adalat if both the parties agree. These are usually presided over by retired judges, social Activists, or other members of the legal profession. Lok Adalats can deal with any matter falling within the jurisdiction whether it is of civil or criminal in nature.
FAQs on Judiciary & Legal Rights - Solved Questions (2010- 2024)
1. What are the different types of legal rights?
Ans. Legal rights can be categorized into various types such as fundamental rights, human rights, civil rights, political rights, economic rights, and social rights.
2. How is the judiciary system structured in India?
Ans. The judiciary system in India is structured into three tiers - the Supreme Court at the top, followed by High Courts in each state, and District Courts at the grassroots level.
3. What is the significance of an independent judiciary in a democracy?
Ans. An independent judiciary ensures the protection of individual rights, upholds the rule of law, checks the powers of the executive and legislative branches, and provides a fair and impartial system of justice.
4. Can legal rights be limited or restricted by the government?
Ans. Yes, legal rights can be limited or restricted by the government under certain circumstances such as national security, public order, morality, and in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of the country.
5. How can an individual enforce their legal rights in case of violation?
Ans. In case of a violation of legal rights, an individual can seek legal recourse by approaching the appropriate court or authority, filing a complaint, and seeking redress through the judicial system.
Judiciary & Legal Rights - Solved Questions (2010- 2024), mock tests for examination, Judiciary & Legal Rights - Solved Questions (2010- 2024), Objective type Questions, Important questions, shortcuts and tricks, Extra Questions, Sample Paper, study material, Free, Viva Questions, Exam, Semester Notes, MCQs, Judiciary & Legal Rights - Solved Questions (2010- 2024), ppt, past year papers, video lectures, Summary, practice quizzes, pdf , Previous Year Questions with Solutions;
