Bipan Chandra Summary: Revolt of 1857 | Famous Books for UPSC Exam (Summary & Tests) PDF Download

The Revolt of 1857: Causes and Context

Introduction

• The Revolt of 1857, also known as the Indian Rebellion of 1857 or the First War of Indian Independence, was a significant event in Indian history.
• It began with a mutiny among the sepoys of the British East India Company's army but soon escalated into a widespread uprising involving millions of peasants, artisans, and soldiers.
• This revolt was a culmination of long-standing grievances against British rule and economic exploitation.

Economic Exploitation

• The British had imposed economic policies that devastated traditional Indian industries and impoverished large sections of society.
• Land and revenue policies led to the dispossession of peasant proprietors and their exploitation by traders and money lenders.
• Corruption at lower levels of administration further exacerbated the economic hardships faced by the common people.

Social Exclusion and Discontent

• The middle and upper classes of Indian society, especially in the North, were excluded from high administrative positions, leading to frustration and resentment.
• The decline of Indian states deprived many Indians of their means of livelihood, causing further discontent.
• The British disregard for Indian culture and religious practices alienated religious preachers and intellectuals, who played a role in spreading anti-British sentiment.

Foreignness of British Rule

• The British remained aloof from Indian society, maintaining a sense of racial superiority and treating Indians with contempt.
• Unlike previous conquerors, they did not settle in India but aimed to enrich themselves and return to Britain, further alienating the Indian populace.
• Indians perceived the British as foreign invaders and refused to recognize them as benevolent rulers.

Loss of Faith in British Invincibility

• Events such as the British army's setbacks in wars with Afghanistan and Punjab, as well as the Crimean War, shattered the myth of British invincibility.
• The successful resistance of the Santhal tribesmen in Bihar and Bengal demonstrated the potential for popular uprisings against British rule.
• These events instilled confidence among Indians that the British could be defeated, contributing to the outbreak of the revolt.

Conclusion

• The Revolt of 1857 was a culmination of economic exploitation, social exclusion, foreignness of British rule, and loss of faith in British invincibility.
• It was a watershed moment in Indian history, marking the beginning of the end of British colonial rule.

Causes of Resentment Leading to the Revolt of 1857

Annexation of Avadh

• The annexation of Avadh by Lord Dalhousie in 1856 sparked widespread resentment, particularly among the people of Avadh and the Company's army.
• Many sepoys hailed from Avadh and felt a strong regional and local patriotism, resenting the imposition of foreign rule over their homeland.
• The annexation also adversely affected the sepoys financially, as they had to bear higher taxes on the land their families owned in Avadh.

Economic Impact of Annexation

• Dalhousie's stated rationale for annexing Avadh was to relieve the people from oppression by the Nawab and taluqdars, but in reality, the common people saw no relief.
• The annexation led to increased land revenue and additional taxes on essential goods, exacerbating the financial burden on the common man.
• Peasants and old zamindars lost their land to new zamindars and money-lenders, further destabilizing the economic situation.

Unemployment and Displacement

• The dissolution of the Nawab's administration and army resulted in widespread unemployment among nobles, officials, and soldiers, affecting almost every peasant household.
• Merchants, shopkeepers, and craftsmen who had relied on the Avadh Court and nobles for their livelihoods also suffered due to the annexation.
• The British failed to provide alternative employment opportunities, aggravating the discontent among the displaced population.

Breakdown of Trust in British Promises

• The annexation of Avadh, along with other annexations by Dalhousie, alarmed rulers of native states who realized that their loyalty to the British did not guarantee protection against territorial ambitions.
• Repeated breaches of treaties and pledges by the British undermined their political prestige and fueled resentment among Indian rulers.
• Specific actions such as the refusal to grant pensions and the humiliation of Indian royals further alienated influential figures like Nana Sahib and the Rani of Jhansi.

Religious and Cultural Concerns

• Christian missionary activities, supported by the British government, instilled fear among the Indian population regarding the threat to their religion.
• Government measures perceived as interference in religious customs, such as the abolition of Sati and reforms in widow remarriage, exacerbated religious sentiments.
• Taxation of lands belonging to temples and mosques, previously exempted, stirred anger among Brahmin and Muslim families, who saw it as an attack on their religion.

Conclusion

• The annexation of Avadh and the broader policies of the British administration in India contributed to widespread resentment, fueled by economic exploitation, political betrayal, and religious and cultural concerns.
• These factors played a significant role in igniting the flames of rebellion during the Revolt of 1857.

Factors Leading to the Sepoy Rebellion in the Revolt of 1857

Sepoys' Reflection on Indian Society

• Sepoys, despite being part of the Company's army, were still members of Indian society and shared in the hopes, desires, and sufferings of other Indians.
• They were affected by the economic consequences of British rule, religious interference, and caste grievances, just like the rest of the population.
• Actions such as maintaining chaplains and Christian propaganda among sepoys fueled their belief that the British aimed to convert Indians to Christianity.

Grievances Against British Officers

• Sepoys faced contempt and discrimination from their British officers, who treated them as inferior beings and subjected them to verbal abuse.
• Despite being skilled soldiers, sepoy pay and living conditions were significantly inferior to those of their British counterparts, with limited prospects for advancement.
• The enforced inferiority and lack of recognition for their service bred resentment among the sepoys.

Specific Grievances and Immediate Causes

• A recent order withholding foreign service allowance for sepoys serving in Sindh or Punjab led to significant salary cuts, adding to their dissatisfaction.
• The annexation of Avadh, a region from which many sepoys hailed, further fueled their discontent and inflamed their feelings.

Historical Context of Sepoy Dissatisfaction

• Sepoy dissatisfaction had a long history, marked by mutinies and rebellions dating back to the 18th century.
• Instances such as the Vellore Mutiny in 1806 and discontent during the Afghan War in the 1840s highlighted the simmering unrest among sepoys.
• The Bengal Army, in particular, was described as being constantly on the verge of revolt, indicating widespread discontent among its ranks.

General Discontent Among Indian Society

• A widespread sense of dislike and even hatred toward foreign rule prevailed among large segments of Indian society, including soldiers of the Company's army.
• Indians perceived British laws and policies as aimed at degrading and ruining them, particularly regarding religion and economic exploitation.
• Proclamations issued by rebel leaders in Delhi voiced grievances against excessive taxation, economic oppression, and religious interference by the British.

Conclusion

• The rebellion of sepoys during the Revolt of 1857 was fueled by a combination of economic, social, religious, and historical grievances, reflecting broader discontent among Indian society against British rule.
• These grievances culminated in a widespread uprising against British authority, marking a significant turning point in Indian history.

Background to the Revolt of 1857

Accumulation of Discontent

• The Revolt of 1857 was the culmination of long-standing popular discontent with British policies and imperialist exploitation in India.
• This discontent had been accumulating for decades, with many instances of rebellion and revolt recorded by historians since the establishment of British authority in India in 1757.
• Notable uprisings included the Kutch Rebellion, the Kol Uprising of 1831, and the Santhal Uprising of 1855, each driven by various economic and social grievances against British rule.

Immediate Cause: The Greased Cartridges

• By 1857, conditions were ripe for a mass upheaval, with pent-up discontent among the people seeking a focal point for expression.
• The episode of the greased cartridges provided this spark for the sepoys, serving as the immediate cause for their mutiny and subsequently igniting broader rebellion among the populace.

Details of the Immediate Cause

The Greased Cartridges Incident

• The introduction of the new Enfield rifle in the army brought to light a controversial feature: the cartridges were greased with animal fat, including beef and pig fat.
• For Hindu and Muslim sepoys alike, the use of such cartridges was deeply offensive and raised concerns about endangering their religious beliefs.
• Many sepoys believed that the British government was intentionally attempting to undermine their religion, leading to widespread anger and resentment.

Commencement of the Revolt

Rebellion Ignited

• The greased cartridges incident catalyzed rebellion among the sepoys, who saw it as a direct assault on their religious beliefs.
• This incident provided the immediate issue around which the pent-up discontent of the people could coalesce, leading to a widespread revolt against British authority.
• The mutiny of the sepoys marked the beginning of the broader uprising, as the general populace found an occasion to join the rebellion against British rule.

Conclusion

• The Revolt of 1857, while stemming from long-standing discontent with British rule, was precipitated by the controversial incident of the greased cartridges, which symbolized broader grievances and served as the immediate cause for rebellion.
• This uprising, fueled by religious and cultural sensitivities, marked a significant moment in the struggle against British colonialism in India.

Debate on the Nature of the Revolt

Difficulty in Understanding the Revolt

• Understanding the nature of the Revolt of 1857 poses challenges due to limited records left by the rebels themselves.
• British suppression of favourable accounts of the revolt and the lack of documentation from the rebel side hinder a comprehensive understanding of its organization and planning.

Arguments for and Against Organization

• Some historians argue that the Revolt was the result of a widespread and well-organized conspiracy, citing the circulation of symbols, propaganda by wandering sanyasis, and the involvement of Indian regiments in a secret organization.
• Others refute the notion of careful planning, pointing to the absence of documented evidence of an organized conspiracy and the lack of witnesses coming forward to support such claims.

Possibility of a Middle Ground

• The truth likely lies between the two extreme views, suggesting the possibility of an organized conspiracy that had not fully matured when the revolt broke out.
• While there may have been elements of planning and coordination, the spontaneous nature of the revolt also indicates that certain events, such as the greased cartridges incident, served as immediate triggers for rebellion.

Commencement of the Revolt

Outbreak and Spread of the Revolt

• The Revolt began in Meerut on May 10, 1857, quickly gaining momentum and spreading rapidly across Northern India.
• Prior incidents, such as Mangal Pandey's martyrdom at Barrackpore, signalled growing discontent and rebellion among the sepoys.

Immediate Triggers

• The refusal of Indian soldiers at Meerut to accept greased cartridges and subsequent punitive actions against them sparked a general mutiny among the troops.
• On May 10, the sepoys released imprisoned comrades killed their officers, and unfurled the banner of revolt, setting off towards Delhi.

Transformation of Mutiny into Revolution

• The rebellion in Delhi saw the proclamation of Bahadur Shah as the Emperor of India, symbolizing a shift from a mutiny of soldiers to a revolutionary war against British rule.
• This act acknowledged the Mughal dynasty's historical significance as a symbol of India's political unity.

Spread of the Revolt

Expansion of Rebellion

• The revolt quickly spread across various regions, including Avadh, Rohilkhand, the Doab, Bundelkhand, Central India, Bihar, and the East Punjab.
• In princely states, while some rulers remained loyal to the British, soldiers often revolted or remained on the brink of rebellion.
• Support for the revolt was evident in places like Indore, Gwalior, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Hyderabad, and Bengal, where local chiefs and the populace expressed hostility towards British authority.

Conclusion

• The Revolt of 1857 marked a significant turning point in India's struggle against British colonialism, characterized by both spontaneous uprising and elements of coordinated resistance.
• While debates persist regarding the organization and planning of the revolt, its widespread impact and support signify deep-seated discontent and a collective desire for liberation among the Indian populace.

Depth and Scope of the Revolt

Participation of Civilian Population

• The Revolt of 1857 saw widespread participation of civilians alongside the mutiny of sepoys.
• Civilian revolts often involved improvised weapons such as spears, axes, bows, arrows, lathis, scythes, and crude muskets.
• Peasants and zamindars expressed grievances by attacking money lenders and new zamindars, destroying account books, and targeting British-established institutions.
• Many battles involved larger numbers of commoners than sepoys, highlighting the broad popular support for the rebellion.

Sympathy and Support for Rebels

• Even in areas where there was no active revolt, there was strong sympathy for the rebels among the populace.
• People celebrated rebel successes, organized social boycotts against loyal sepoys, and actively hindered British forces by refusing help, providing wrong information, and showing open hostility.
• Accounts from the time, such as those by W.H. Russel, illustrate the deep-seated antipathy towards British rule among the Indian population.

British Response

• The British response to the Revolt was characterized by vigorous and ruthless warfare against both rebellious sepoys and the civilian population.
• British forces resorted to burning villages, massacring villagers and urban dwellers, and conducting public hangings and executions without trial to suppress the rebellion.
• Despite British efforts, the sepoys and the populace fought valiantly, with the British struggling to extinguish the revolt completely.

Hindu-Muslim Unity

Unity Among Soldiers and Leaders

• Hindu-Muslim unity was a significant aspect of the Revolt of 1857, evident among soldiers, civilians, and leaders.
• All rebels recognized Bahadur Shah, a Muslim, as their Emperor and Hindu sepoys expressed their first intent to march to Delhi.
• Orders banning cow slaughter in areas of rebel success reflected respect for Hindu sentiments, demonstrating mutual respect between Hindus and Muslims.

Representation and Acknowledgment

• Hindus and Muslims were equally represented at all levels of leadership during the revolt.
• The failure to exploit religious divisions for British advantage indicates the strong unity among Hindus and Muslims during the rebellion.
• Later acknowledgements by British officials, such as Aitchison, further underscore the significance of Hindu-Muslim unity in the revolt.

Key Figures and Centers of the Revolt

Leadership Dynamics

• The leadership of the Revolt varied, with nominal leadership held by Bahadur Shah II in Delhi, but real command often lay with military commanders like General Bakht Khan.
• Bakht Khan, representing the plebian element, played a significant role in organizing and leading the rebellion.

Challenges with Bahadur Shah II

• Bahadur Shah II, though symbolically important as the Emperor, exhibited weak leadership qualities, vacillating between support for the revolt and desire for self-preservation.
• His lack of firmness and susceptibility to intrigues from his family weakened his position and undermined the revolt's leadership at its nerve centre.

Leaders and Centers of the Revolt

Nana Sahib and Tantia Tope at Kanpur

• Nana Sahib, the adopted son of Baji Rao II, led the revolt in Kanpur, expelling the English with the help of sepoys and proclaiming himself as the Peshwa.
• Tantia Tope, a loyal servant of Nana Sahib, played a crucial role in fighting for Kanpur's independence through guerrilla warfare and determined military operations.
• Nana Sahib's deceitful killing of the garrison at Kanpur tarnished his brave record, despite his initial leadership in the revolt.

The Begum of Avadh and the Siege of Lucknow

• The revolt in Lucknow was led by the Begum of Avadh, who proclaimed her young son as the Nawab of Avadh.
• With the support of sepoys, zamindars, and peasants, the Begum organized a fierce attack on the British, leading to the entrenchment of the latter in the Residency building.
• Although the siege ultimately failed due to the exemplary fortitude and valour of the small British garrison, the Begum's leadership showcased the widespread rebellion against British authority.

Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi

• Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi emerged as one of the greatest heroines of Indian history during the revolt.
• She joined the rebels after the British refused to acknowledge her right to adopt an heir and threatened her with annexation.
• Rani Lakshmibai displayed remarkable bravery, courage, and military skill, inspiring her followers and earning respect for her determined resistance against British forces.

Kunwar Singh and Maulavi Ahmadullah

• Kunwar Singh, a discontented zamindar of Jagdishpur near Arrah, organized the revolt in Bihar and displayed outstanding military leadership despite his age.
• Maulavi Ahmadullah, originally from Madras, emerged as a leader in Avadh, leading large-scale battles against British troops and gaining recognition for his patriotism and military ability.
• Ahmadullah's eventual betrayal and death at the hands of a treacherous Raja illustrate the challenges faced by rebel leaders in maintaining their positions.

Extent and Support of the Revolt

Participation and Opposition

• The revolt did not encompass the entire country or all segments of Indian society.
• Most rulers of Indian states and large zamindars refrained from joining, fearing British reprisals.
• Only a small percentage of rulers and chiefs actively supported the revolt, acting as a hindrance to its spread.

Regional Dynamics

• Some regions, like Madras, Bombay, Bengal, and Western Punjab, remained undisturbed by the revolt, despite favourable sentiment towards rebels.
• The middle and upper classes were mostly critical or hostile towards the rebels, complicating sustained guerrilla campaigns.
• Even discontented zamindars abandoned the revolt once assured of the return of their estates by the government, weakening the rebel cause.

Challenges and Weaknesses of the Revolt

Disunity Among Indians

• The revolt faced opposition and a lack of support from various sections of Indian society.
• Money lenders, merchants, and Bengal zamindars remained hostile due to various reasons, including fear of British reprisals and economic interests.
• Modern educated Indians, repelled by appeals to superstition and opposition to social progress, did not support the revolt, believing British rule would modernize India.

Lack of Unified Vision

• The rebels lacked a unified and forward-looking program beyond the overthrow of British rule.
• Disparate grievances and differing conceptions of post-British politics hindered the formation of a cohesive movement.
• The absence of a modern and progressive program allowed reactionary princes and zamindars to exploit the movement for their interests.

Weaknesses in Organization

• The rebels were short of modern weapons and materials of war, often fighting with ancient weapons.
• They were poorly organized, lacking central leadership and a common plan of action, leading to uncoordinated uprisings across the country.
• Selfishness and cliquishness among leaders, along with distrust and jealousy, prevented unity and consolidation of the revolt.

Feudal Character and Evolution

• The revolt initially reflected feudal leadership but gradually evolved as soldiers and people created new types of organization in the struggle.
• The lack of a modern program allowed feudal leaders to dominate, but efforts to make the revolt successful compelled the emergence of new leadership.
• The warning by Benjamin Disraeli highlighted the potential for evolving leadership if the revolt was not suppressed in time.

The Outcome of the Revolt and its Significance

Lack of Unity and Emergence of Nationalism

• Modern nationalism was absent during the Revolt, with patriotism centred around local or regional identities.
• The Revolt, despite its failure, played a crucial role in bringing Indians together and fostering a sense of belonging to one country.

Suppression of the Revolt

• British imperialism, supported by Indian princes and chiefs, proved militarily superior and suppressed the revolt.
• The British poured immense resources into the conflict, ultimately overpowering the rebels.
• The fall of Delhi marked the end of the focal point of the revolt, leading to a powerful British offensive against the remaining rebel leaders.

Fate of Rebel Leaders

• Key rebel leaders, including Nana Sahib, Tantia Tope, and the Rani of Jhansi, met different fates in the course of the conflict.
• Nana Sahib escaped to Nepal, Tantia Tope was captured and executed, and the Rani of Jhansi died in battle.
• By the end of 1859, most rebel leaders had either died or gone into hiding, and British authority over India was fully reestablished.

Significance and Legacy

• Despite its failure, the Revolt of 1857 marked the first major struggle of the Indian people against British imperialism.
• It paved the way for the rise of the modern national movement in India.
• The heroic and patriotic struggle of 1857 left a lasting impression on the Indian psyche and served as a source of inspiration for future freedom struggles.
• The heroes of the revolt became iconic figures in Indian history, despite efforts by rulers to suppress their memory.