Rights in the Indian Constitution Class 11 Political Science

Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. The Importance of Rights
3. Bill of Rights
4. Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution
5. Bill of Rights in the South African Constitution
6. Right to Equality
7. Right to Freedom
8. Rights of the Accused
9. Right against Exploitation
10. Right to Freedom of Religion
11. Cultural and Educational Rights
12. Right to Constitutional Remedies
13. Types of Writs
14. National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)
15. Directive Principles of State Policy
16. Fundamental Duties of Citizens
17. Relationship Between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
18. Conclusion
View more

Introduction

A constitution does more than define the structure of different branches of government and their interrelationships. It also places limits on government power and guarantees certain rights to individuals so that justice and fair treatment are ensured in society. The presence and protection of rights help maintain social balance and dignity of the individual.

The Importance of Rights

• When constitutional rights are violated and not challenged, it leads to serious injustices.
• Legal action by courts, human rights bodies or civil society organisations is often necessary to remedy violations and uphold rights.
• Constitutional guarantees such as the prohibition of exploitation and the right to a fair trial are central to protecting individual dignity.

Two instances where constitutional rights and legal intervention made a difference are described below.

Asian Games Construction (1982)

• The government contracted private firms for construction work; these contractors employed poor workers in unsafe conditions and paid wages lower than the prescribed minimum wage.
• Social scientists and activists petitioned the courts, arguing that underpayment and exploitation violated constitutional protections against exploitation.
• The court ruled for the workers and directed that they be paid the prescribed minimum wages, thereby enforcing labour rights and dignity of work.

Case of Machal Lalung

• Machal Lalung was arrested at the age of 23 for causing grievous injuries and was found mentally unfit; he was sent for treatment to Lok Priya Gopinath Bordoloi Mental Hospital.
• Despite being declared fit for trial in 1967 and again in 1996, authorities did not proceed, and he remained in custody without trial for 54 years.
• The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) intervened and he was released in 2005 at the age of 77. The case highlighted serious violations of the right to life and personal liberty and the need for a fair and speedy trial.

Bill of Rights

• Both examples highlight the importance of having rights and their actual implementation in a democracy.
• A democracy must guarantee that individuals have specific rights and that the government will consistently recognize these rights. 
• Most democratic countries practice listing the rights of citizens in the constitution itself, known as the 'bill of rights.'
• A bill of rights prevents the government from violating individual rights and ensures a remedy if those rights are violated. 
• The rights of a person can be threatened by another person or organization, which requires government protection.
• It is essential that the government is obligated to protect individual rights.
• The different organs of the government (like the legislature, executive, bureaucracy, or judiciary) may, during their functions, violate individual rights.

Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution

• Leaders of the freedom movement understood the importance of rights; the Motilal Nehru Committee demanded a bill of rights in 1928.
• After independence, there was broad agreement on including and protecting rights in the Constitution as Fundamental Rights.
• Fundamental Rights are specially protected by the Constitution and can be enforced against the state through courts.
• These rights differ from ordinary legal rights because they are constitutional guarantees and can be altered only by amending the Constitution.
• The judiciary has the power to protect Fundamental Rights and to declare government actions void if they violate or unreasonably restrict these rights.
• Fundamental Rights are not absolute; the Constitution allows reasonable restrictions in the interests of public order, morality, security and similar grounds.

Bill of Rights in the South African Constitution

• The South African Constitution was adopted in December 1996 and contains a comprehensive Bill of Rights as a cornerstone of its democracy.
• It prohibits discrimination on grounds including race, gender, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, age, disability, religion, belief, culture, language and birth.
• It guarantees a broad range of socio-economic and civil rights and has a special Constitutional Court to enforce those rights.

Key rights included  in the Constitution are:

• Right to dignity.
• Right to privacy.
• Right to fair labour practices.
• Right to a healthy environment and its protection.
• Right to adequate housing.
• Right to health care, food, water and social security.
• Rights for children.
• Right to basic and higher education.
• Rights of cultural, religious and linguistic communities.
• Right to information.

Right to Equality

• Equal Access: Right to Equality ensures equal access to public places without discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
• Non-Discrimination: The right prohibits discrimination in public employment on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
• Abolition of Untouchability: Abolishes untouchability and forbids its practice in any form.
• Title Restriction: Prohibits the state from conferring titles, except for military and academic distinctions.
• Equality of Opportunity: Guarantees equal opportunity for all sections of society, with provisions for affirmative action for disadvantaged groups.
• Judicial Protection: Empowers the judiciary to declare government actions illegal if they violate fundamental rights.

Article 16 (4): Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State.

Article 21: Protection of life and personal liberty-No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

Right to Freedom

• Equality and liberty are mutually reinforcing in a democracy; individual freedom must be balanced with the freedom of others and public interest.
• Liberty includes freedom of thought, expression and action, but not unlimited licence to harm others or endanger public order.
• Freedoms are therefore defined and subject to reasonable restrictions to ensure that all persons can enjoy their rights.

Right to Life and Personal Liberty

• The foremost right among rights to freedom is the right to life and personal liberty.
• No citizen can be denied his or her life except by procedure as laid down under the law.
• No one can be denied his or her personal liberty, meaning no one can be arrested without being told the grounds for such an arrest.
• If arrested, the person has the right to defend himself by a lawyer of his choice.
• It is mandatory for the police to take the arrested person to the nearest magistrate within 24 hours.
• The magistrate, who is not part of the police, will decide whether the arrest is justified or not.
• The right to life and personal liberty includes the right to live with human dignity, which is free from exploitation.
• The Supreme Court has ruled that the right to life includes the right to shelter and livelihood, as no person can live without the means of living.
• 
  

Preventive Detention

• Normally arrest follows the commission of an offence, but under special laws the state may detain a person to prevent likely unlawful activity-this is preventive detention.
• Preventive detention is used where the state considers a person a threat to public order or national security.
• Such detention is limited in duration; initial periods are short (commonly up to three months) after which review by an advisory board is required.
• Preventive detention provisions are powerful but prone to misuse; safeguards and judicial review are necessary to prevent arbitrary deprivation of liberty.
• There is a constant tension between individual liberty and measures taken in the interest of security or public order.

Other Freedoms

• The right to freedom comprises a set of freedoms (for example, freedom of speech and expression; freedom to assemble peacefully; freedom of association; freedom of movement; freedom of residence and settlement; and freedom of profession) that are subject to specified restrictions.
• Freedom of speech and expression may be restricted for reasons such as public order, security of the state, defamation and morality.
• Freedom of assembly must be peaceful and without arms; the state can regulate the time, place and manner of assemblies to protect public order.
• Restrictions on these freedoms can be misapplied by authorities, which makes public awareness and judicial protection important.
• Some members of the Constituent Assembly had reservations about the extent of restrictions, but the text sought a balance between liberty and order.

Rights of the Accused

To ensure a fair trial, the Constitution provides important protections to persons accused of offences. Key protections include:

• No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once (protection against double jeopardy).
• No law shall impose punishment for an act that was not an offence at the time it was committed (protection against ex post facto laws).
• No person accused of an offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself or herself (protection against self-incrimination).

Right against Exploitation

• Millions of people in our country are underprivileged and deprived, often subjected to exploitation.
• The Constitution prohibits begar or forced labour without payment, which was historically imposed by landlords, moneylenders, and wealthy persons.
• Despite this prohibition, some forms of bonded labour still exist, especially in brick kiln work, but it has been declared a crime and is punishable by law.
• Another form of exploitation, the buying and selling of human beings and using them as slaves, is also prohibited by the Constitution.
• The Constitution forbids the employment of children below the age of 14 years in dangerous jobs like factories and mines.
• With child labour being made illegal and the right to education becoming a fundamental right, the right against exploitation has become more meaningful.

Right to Freedom of Religion

• Everyone enjoys the right to follow the religion of their choice, a hallmark of democracy.
• Historically, rulers often persecuted or forced conversion of those following different religions.
• Democracy incorporates the freedom to follow one's chosen religion as a fundamental principle.

Freedom of Faith and Worship

• In India, everyone is free to choose, practice, profess, follow, and propagate any religion.
• This freedom includes the freedom of conscience, allowing individuals to choose any religion or none at all.
• The government can impose restrictions to protect public order, morality, and health, and to root out social evils. For instance, practices like sati have been banned by the government in the past.
• Restrictions on religious practices often create tensions, especially regarding the propagation and conversion activities.
• The Constitution does not permit forced conversions. It only grants us the right to share information about our religion and, in doing so, attract others to it.

Equality of All Religions

• The state must treat all religions equally and no official state religion is recognised.
• Holding public office is not subject to any religious test.
• The Constitution bars discrimination in state actions on religious grounds and supports the principle of secularism.

Cultural and Educational Rights

• Minorities are groups with a common language or religion that are outnumbered by other social sections in a particular area or the country as a whole.
• The Constitution believes diversity is a strength and includes the right for minorities to maintain their culture.
• Minorities have the right to conserve and develop their own culture, language, and script.
• All minorities, whether religious or linguistic, can set up their own educational institutions to preserve and develop their culture.
• The government will not discriminate against any educational institution managed by a minority community when granting aid to educational institutions.

Right to Constitutional Remedies

• The right to constitutional remedies enables individuals to approach the courts to enforce Fundamental Rights.
• Dr. B.R. Ambedkar described this right as the "heart and soul of the Constitution".
• The Supreme Court and the High Courts may issue orders and directions to enforce fundamental rights.
• The courts can issue special orders called writs to protect citizens from violations of rights.

Types of Writs

Habeas Corpus

• A writ of habeas corpus directs that an arrested person be brought before the court to examine the lawfulness of detention.
• If the court finds the detention unlawful, it can order the release of the person. This writ protects against unlawful detention.

Example: A person arrested without a warrant and held without charge: the family petitions for habeas corpus; the court orders production of the detainee and may order release if detention is unlawful.

Mandamus

• A writ of mandamus commands a public official or authority to perform a public or statutory duty which they are refusing or neglecting to perform.

Example: A public official refuses to grant a licence despite the applicant meeting all conditions. The court may issue mandamus ordering the official to perform the duty.

Prohibition

• A writ of prohibition is issued by a higher court to prevent a lower court or tribunal from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice.

Example: If a lower court is hearing a matter beyond its jurisdiction, the higher court may issue prohibition to stop further proceedings.

Quo Warranto

• A writ of quo warranto challenges the legality of a person's claim to a public office and commands them to show by what authority they hold the office.

Example: If an unqualified person is occupying a public post, a petition for quo warranto may be filed to remove them from that position.

Certiorari

• A writ of certiorari is issued by a higher court to quash the order or decision of a lower court or to transfer a case for review where the lower court has acted without jurisdiction or violated the principles of natural justice.

Example: A party aggrieved by an erroneous order of a lower court may seek certiorari for the higher court to examine and quash that order.

National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)

• Background: Independent organisations such as the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and the People's Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR) have worked to protect human rights. The government established the NHRC in 1993 to provide an institutional mechanism for protection.
• Composition: The NHRC includes a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, a former Supreme Court judge, a former Chief Justice of a High Court, and two other members with knowledge and practical experience in human rights matters.
• The NHRC investigates complaints of human rights violations, monitors government action, and recommends remedial measures.
• The Commission, however, lacks prosecutorial power; it can make recommendations to the government and suggest legal action, but it cannot itself prosecute offenders.

Directive Principles of State Policy

• The framers of the Constitution included Directive Principles as policy guidelines to be followed by the State to promote social and economic welfare.
• Directive Principles are non-justiciable, meaning they are not enforceable by courts; they are meant to guide legislation and government policy.
• Though not legally enforceable, they carry moral and political force and are intended to be used to shape laws and programmes.

What do the Directive Principles contain?

The Directive Principles cover three broad areas:

• The goals and objectives that society should aim for (for example, social and economic justice).
• Additional rights and protections that can complement Fundamental Rights.
• Policy directions that the government should follow in matters such as welfare, distribution of resources and public administration.

Examples of Directive Principles' implementation include the abolition of zamindari, nationalisation of banks, factory laws, minimum wage legislation, promotion of cottage and small industries, reservation policies for scheduled castes and tribes, recognition of the right to education, strengthening of panchayati raj institutions, employment guarantee programmes and the mid-day meal scheme.

Directive Principles of State Policy

Fundamental Duties of Citizens

• Fundamental Duties were added to the Constitution by the 42nd Amendment (1976).
• There are ten Fundamental Duties listed in the Constitution.
• The Constitution does not prescribe a specific mechanism for enforcing these duties; they are moral and civic obligations expected of citizens.
• They include duties such as abiding by the Constitution, defending the country, promoting harmony, and protecting the environment.
• The inclusion of duties does not make the enjoyment of fundamental rights conditional on their performance.

Relationship Between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles

• Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are complementary: Fundamental Rights restrain the state while Directive Principles exhort the state to undertake positive action for social welfare.
• Fundamental Rights protect individual liberties; Directive Principles are aimed at the welfare of society as a whole.
• Conflicts can arise when measures to implement Directive Principles appear to infringe Fundamental Rights (for example, early disputes arose when abolition of zamindari affected property rights).
• The government and courts have had to balance individual rights and social goals; the judiciary has generally protected Fundamental Rights while recognising the importance of Directive Principles.
• The Kesavananda Bharati case is a landmark decision that affirmed that Parliament cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution; Fundamental Rights are part of that structure, and their essential character cannot be destroyed by amendments.

Right to Property

Conclusion

The Constitution's inclusion and protection of rights aim to build a just and equitable society. Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles together seek to ensure individual freedoms and collective well-being. Legal mechanisms such as writs, independent courts and human rights institutions empower citizens to defend their rights. Balancing individual liberties with societal needs remains a continuing task for lawmakers, the executive, the judiciary and civil society.