GS-IV can be confounding. That’s because the questions in this paper tend to be subjective with no single correct answer. There can be multiple ways to answer a particular question and all of them might be right.
Hence, though aspirants are clear about the syllabus, they are often confused about how to answer ethics questions. Given this subjectivity and confusion pertaining to this paper, it becomes challenging to come up with a convincing framework for answer writing. However, some broad principles can guide us in structuring our responses.
In this chapter, we will go through some of those guidelines that can help you argue your case more clearly and make your ethics answer compelling.
GS- IV syllabus can be divided into two segments:
In this portion (and to some extent in case studies) questions are usually of three types. One, the definition of an ethical value; two, the significance of the value; and three, the application of that value in our daily lives. To put it short, theory answers contains the definition along with a vivid example.
Let’s take the term integrity. Three questions that could be asked about it are:
What do you understand by integrity? [Definition of the value]
What is the importance of integrity? In its absence, what are the consequences for an individual, society, country or in different walks of life? [Significance of the value]
What are the challenges in cultivating integrity? How do you overcome them? [Application of the value]
You may substitute other ethical values for integrity to see the kind of questions you may face in the test. Anticipate such questions and formulate a basic answer to all ethical terms given in the syllabus. This exercise will help you immensely in preparing for the theory portion.
If the question pertains to a specific ethical value, you must introduce the answer with a crisp definition, followed by an example. The definition can be a personal one, reflecting what it means to you.
Example 1: Integrity
Integrity means being honest and doing the right thing even when nobody is watching you. It can be conveyed through a simple example: Stopping at a red light signal at 3am in the night, even when the entire road was clear. This is an example of my integrity.
Example 2: Leadership
Leadership is the act of motivating a group of people towards achieving a common goal. Leadership provides inspiration, motivation and a vision for the future. Eg: Mahatma Gandhi showed exemplary leadership to unite the country in our fight for independence.
Always prefer a simple definition and avoid jargon. Simplicity is clarity. Another useful way of introducing your answers is by starting with an interesting quote and then proceeding to define the term.
Example 1: When you are answering a question on Emotional Intelligence, it can be started with the following quote: “As much as 80% of adult success comes from EQ” - Daniel Goleman
And then proceed onto defining the term.
Example 2: A question on RTI can be introduced with this quote: “RTI is the master key to Good Governance” - 2nd ARC
The idea is to take an eminent personality and then map him or her onto the values they stood for. Here is a small example to indicate how you can map it. Try and add other values that you think fits with a particular leader and repeat this exercise for all eminent persons.
Leader | Values they stood for |
Babasaheb Ambedkar | Social Justice, Human Rights, Rule of Law, Empathy and Compassion |
JRD Tata | Ethical Capitalism, Philanthropy, Professionalism |
As you map values onto the list of most important leaders, philosophers, or administrators, it will be easier to recollect and quote relevant thinkers in your answers to give weight to your Ethical analysis.
For some topics such as Emotional Intelligence, Good Governance, Civil Service Values, illustrating their features through flowcharts and diagrams makes your answers concise and neat. Prepare these flowcharts and diagrams beforehand and incorporate them in your mock tests so that it becomes easier to use them in the final test.
Examples are what make your answer come alive. They not only make the concept clearer, but also convey how the ethical principles and conflicts manifest in real life. Without them, an ethics answer would be a pointless theoretical rambling. Remember that the examiner is not evaluating how much you know about ethics. They want to see how well you can apply those principles in your day-to-day life. For this, examples are crucial.
Some important sources from which to collect these examples are:
More than the theory part, case studies bring out our ethical dilemmas and logical reasoning sharply. Done well, they can propel your score beyond 110. Gone wrong, they may restrict your marks to under 90.
The purpose of case studies is to make you ready for the field experience. Once you enter the civil service, you may face situations in which competing values clash. Would you strictly adhere to rules or stay flexible at times to help the needy? Would you suspend an erring subordinate, thereby curtailing his income, or overlook his misdeeds and close it with a warning, considering his dependent family? These are the real-life situations a civil servant confronts on a daily basis. Through case studies, the examiner can understand how you might behave if you were in a similar situation. So, one of the foremost tips (and one of the obvious) is to put yourself in the shoes of an administrator, and consider yourself a problem solver. This makes the whole exercise enjoyable and inevitably your answers exude passion and cogent articulation.
In this component, we will go through some pointers which can help you attempt the case studies well.
Having a concrete framework ready while answering gives a sense of flow, coherence and structure to your case study. Else, it faces the risk of steering away from the question and exceeding the word limit. Therefore, it’s helpful to categorise your answer under the following subheadings:
Subject Matter : Briefly in a line or maximum two try to capture the entire case study. E.g. In a case Study dealing with an IAS aspirant heading for Interview but sees an accident on the way, subject Matter could be: Dilemma between achieving career ambition Vs responding to accident victim as a good samaritan.
Stakeholders: List down the set of people who would be directly and indirectly affected in the case. For instance, a case in which you as CEO of a PSU is facing severe unionism and strikes, affecting company profits. Stakeholders are yourself, employees, government, public at large, local families, investors and shareholders. You may also represent this information through a spoke and wheel diagram.
Ethical Dilemmas/Key Principles: Enumerate the ethical issues in the case study. This is a crucial part of your answer since you explicitly mention the conflicting values you face in your judgement. For instance, in a case involving mining in a tribal inhabited forest, ethical issues will be: development vs. nature conservation; public interest vs protection of tribal land rights, economic growth vs equitable prosperity. Mention these issues in bullet points, sequentially.
Options Available to You: Write 3-4 choices you have in the scenario, along with the pros and cons of choosing each alternative. Two choices inevitably will be the extreme options, which are generally avoided as your choice. The remaining ones should be the practical courses of action you wish to pursue.
Choosing an Option: Under this subheading, write about the course of action which can be a combination of the above mentioned options. It should be followed by clear articulation of your arguments (more on this below) along with quotes and examples to substantiate your point of view. The best option to choose in any given situation is not the most original but the most practical. If you come up with a spectacular innovative idea, but isn’t easily implementable, it’s as good as doing nothing. Search for options that can be executed amidst the constraints a govt servant faces. For instance, let’s say in your district, tribals are agitating against a mining company planning to raze the forests and explore the mineral wealth. In such a case, a decision to put a complete ban or a moratorium on mining in your district is impractical and sub-optimal. By prohibiting any form of mining, you will not help the cause of tribals who would have benefited from the new employment opportunities in the region. So choose an option where you balance competing interests.
Articulation is the beating heart of a case study answer. This follows 'choosing an option' section we discussed above.
In this segment, you reason out why you chose a particular option and elaborate on the further of course of action. More than the option you choose, it is the reasoning that led you to choose that particular option that matters more. It's helpful to narrate from the first person point of view: Use I, wherever possible. It will personalise your answer and therefore carries the weight of a good argument.
The course of action you wish to pursue must be mentioned in detail, enumerating the steps clearly. Put yourself in the shoes of the administrator, dive into the details, and make your answer as vivid and concrete as possible. Let me illustrate this through the following examples:
Will conduct intense training sessions for ASHAs to help them detect of malaria/dengue promptly. I will try and use District Mineral Fund (if available) and local CSR funds to procure rapid diagnostic kits. I shall designate every Friday as Dry-day where households in the district will be encouraged to drain out stagnant water. I shall conduct a weekly review meeting with all health workers from village level to district level to assess preparedness and correct any issues."
For a case on eradicating child marriages in a remote area, instead of saying "I will ensure awareness on the subject and adherence to law", write— "I will take part in bi-weekly Gram Sabha sessions and make the community take a pledge against child marriages. I shall encourage rallies by school children and officers of all government departments. To monitor the on ground situation, I shall depute my officers as special officers responsible for set of blocks where they will tour, inspect discreetly and report to me. I will monitor complaints and grievances on the issue and ensure a resolution within 30 days." It helps to mention Govt. schemes like Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana or slogans such as MeriBeti-MeraGarv.
In a case where you, as the Chief, must change the work culture in your office— "At the start of every month, I will conduct a one-one meeting with each of my officers, take them into confidence and set mutually agreed goals. At the end of the month, I shall review each officer against these preset goals and rate them as per objective criteria. Best performers shall be given a letter of appreciation under my letterhead and put a copy of it on the notice board for others to see. The laggards shall be given a warning and if they don't heed, I will initiate disciplinary action as per the rules to ensure deterrence."
I don't mean to say these are the only solutions to these case studies. The point is whatever be your decision, be concrete and specific. It will strike the examiner as practical and implementable.
Towards the end of your answer, quoting a relevant thinker’s opinion or quote gives credence to your decision. For instance, if the ethical issue is about professional integrity, E Sreedharan and his leadership in executing a complex rail project should be quoted as an example. Or let's take a case study in which you are faced with a decision whether to give clearance to an important road project through a National Park (thereby helping the government save taxpayer’s money) or devising an alternate, but more expensive option (thereby preserving the ecosystem, but hurting govt finances). If you opt for the second option, you can stress on the importance of environmental economics and end with a quote saying:
As environmentalist Wangari Maathai said, “We need to promote development that does not destroy our environment”.
Just the addition of the above sentence makes the argument powerful.
Your arguments now have the moral backing of an eminent personality. The value mapping exercise we did for the theory section will be helpful here. So for every case study, try and add such relevant quotes to substantiate your points. It will show that you not only read the works of those eminent people, but also understand how to apply their teachings practically.
There is a tendency among aspirants to dedicate disproportionate time to case studies. But remember that they are worth only 120 marks.
Irrespective of whether you start with theory portion or the case studies, dedicate time also be proportionate to their weightage. So for case studies, the maximum time you should be dedicating is 90 minutes i.e. 15 minutes per case study.
Further, you should realise that UPSC can change how it distributes marks across questions, but it cannot change the 250 marks assigned to a paper. So, whatever be the number of questions or distribution of marks across those questions, your target must be to write 80 marks worth of answers in the first hour, another 80 in the second hour and 90 in the final hour. This translates to 40 marks in the initial 30 minutes. So whether you start with Part A or Part B, aim to finish questions worth 40 marks in the first half-hour and then repeat this process. Always have an eye on the clock and if you think you are falling behind time, accelerate.
Ethics paper has an emphasis on articulation and practical examples, which comes only with adequate practice. Besides, case studies across the years tend to have similar themes and ideas. So practising many of them beforehand will give you a sense of confidence to tackle any type of question.
8 videos|347 docs
|
1. What is the UPSC GS-4 exam? |
2. How many questions are there in the UPSC GS-4 exam? |
3. What is the syllabus of the UPSC GS-4 exam? |
4. How is the UPSC GS-4 exam conducted? |
5. How can I prepare for the UPSC GS-4 exam? |
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|