That two States have approached the Supreme Court of India against the conduct of their Governors once again flags the problem of political appointees in Raj Bhavan using their authority to delay the implementation of decisions by elected regimes, if not undermine them.
Article | Provisions |
---|---|
153 | Governors of state. |
154 | Executive power of state. |
155 | Appointment of Governor. |
156 | Term of office of Governor. |
157 | Qualifications for appointment as Governor. |
158 | Conditions of Governor's office. |
159 | Oath and affirmation by the Governor. |
160 | Discharge of functions of the Governor certain contingencies. |
161 | Power of Governor to grant pardons and to suspend, remit or commute sentences in certain cases. |
162 | Extent of executive power of state. |
The Indian Constitution specifies two basic qualities for the selection of a Governor.
Over time, the following conventions have emerged:
However, in some cases, both conventions have been violated.
Under the President's rule, the Lieutenant Governor becomes the government's full-fledged executive head, with the authority to create a council of ministers of advisors. The length of the President's rule is also up to the Lieutenant Governor's discretion.
The Governor's office follows the procedures and conditions provided forth in the Indian Constitution.
The Governor has the same Executive, Legislative, Financial, and Judicial authorities as the President of India. However, the Governor's power is restricted in several ways compared to that of the President, as the Governor lacks the President's military, diplomatic, and emergency authorities.
The discretionary powers of the Governor in the state are far greater than those of the President in the centre.Some of the Governor's discretionary powers are as follows:
As the Supreme Court ruled in 1979, the office of the Governor is not a position or Employment in the Central Government. The Governor's office is an independent constitutional post that is neither subordinate to nor controlled by the central government. In the B. P. Singhal case, a Supreme Court Constitutional bench ruled in 2010 that the central government has the authority to remove Governors of various states as long as it does not act arbitrarily, without reason, or in bad faith. Thus the Governor of a state serves as both the constitutional head of the state and the center's agent or representative
39 videos|4128 docs|867 tests
|
1. What is the main focus of the editorial analysis on action and authority? |
2. How does the article define action and authority? |
3. What examples are provided in the article to illustrate the relationship between action and authority? |
4. Why is understanding the relationship between action and authority important? |
5. How does the article suggest balancing action and authority for optimal outcomes? |
39 videos|4128 docs|867 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|