The Chemical Potentials of a Pure Substance in Two Phases in Equilibrium | Chemistry Optional Notes for UPSC PDF Download

Chemical Potential of Two Phases in Equilibrium

• Equilibrium between two phases, e.g. water ice (ice) and liquid water (water), is at constant  T and  P. Therefore:
  
• There is a relationship between the amount of ice and water:
  dn_ice = −dn_water
  From this, we get:
  0 = [μ_ice−μ_water]dn_water = Δ_μ dn_water
• As  dn_water is not zero, this means that  Δ_μ must be zero! This must hold true for any set of points where ice and water are in equilibrium. The statement is not just for liquid and solid water, but for any two phases in equilibrium. That is, any two phases in equilbrium will always have the same chemical potential.

The Clapeyron Equation

• That is the almost vertical line in the diagram. Its points are not at the same  P  and  T , but we can find out where they should be by considering the thermodynamic potential  μ as a function of  T and  P:
  
• Because  it is not hard to identify the partial derivatives:
  
• This is true for both water and ice, or any two phases in equilibrium. As the  Δ_μ = 0, we can equate the dμ expressions for both water and ice:
  
• Rearranging and identifying the partials gives:
  
• Solving for dP/dT we get:
  
  As, we have:
  
  So:
  
• This expression should be valid for all points along a phase boundary, such as the melt line. In fact, it tells use that the phase boundary is defined by . For water and ice, we immediately see why the melt line runs a little to the left: exceptionally   is negative for ice, because water is actually a little denser that ice. The above expression(s) are named after Clapeyron. The values of do not change much with pressure and can often be considered constants for the melting line. When gases are involved that is not really true.