Table of contents | |
Introduction | |
Terms of Reference | |
Areas of Concern | |
Recommendations |
The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) was established through a resolution by the Government of India in the year 2000. The commission comprised 11 members and was led by M.N. Venkatachaliah, the former Chief Justice of India. It successfully submitted its report in the year 2002.
The commission independently identified eleven areas for study, which included:
4. The political climate faces impurity with issues like criminalization of politics, political corruption, and the politician-criminal-bureaucratic nexus requiring systemic changes.
5. National integrity and security issues lack adequate attention, with mechanisms for early warning signs of social unrest and disaster management being insufficient.
6. The working of parliamentary democracy institutions reveals serious fault lines, posing a threat to basic democratic values.
7. Misuse of the electoral process and the inability to prevent the entry of individuals with a criminal record into law-making institutions are areas of concern.
8. Parliament and State Legislatures lack adequate representative character due to inherent weaknesses in the electoral system.
9. Increasing instability of elected governments is attributed to opportunistic politics and unprincipled defections, with high economic and administrative costs.
10. The state of the Indian economy is disturbing, facing issues like a debt-trap, corruption, and wasteful expenditure leading to parallel economies and governments.
11. Rural de-population, urbanization, urban congestion, and social unrest need immediate attention due to increasing unemployment.
12. The future society, driven by knowledge, demands urgent repair in the quality of education and higher research.
13. The system of administration of justice is an area of concern, with the criminal justice system on the verge of collapse, delays in law, and high litigation costs.
14. Communal and inter-group riots need a holistic approach, treating them as manifestations of collective behavioral disorders rather than just a law and order issue.
15. Social infrastructure concerns include inadequate arrangements for the education, health, and well-being of 380 million children below the age of 14.
16. Health indicators, despite progress, remain at high and disconcerting levels, with infectious diseases witnessing an alarming increase.
In all, the commission made 249 recommendations. Of them:
3. The following should be added as new Fundamental Rights:
(a) Right against torture, cruelty and inhuman treatment or punishment.
(b) Right to compensation if a person is illegally deprived of his/her right to life or liberty.
(c) Right to leave and to return to India.
(d) Right to privacy and family life
(e) Right to rural wage employment for a minimum of 80 days in a year.
(f) Right to access to courts and tribunals and speedy justice.
(g) Right to equal justice and free legal aids.
(h) Right to care and assistance and protection (in the case of children).
(i) Right to safe drinking water, prevention of pollution, conservation of ecology and sustainable development.
4. The right to education (under Article 21-A) should be enlarged to read as: 'Every child shall have the right to free education until he completes the age of fourteen years; and in the case of girls and members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes until they complete the age of eighteen years'.
5. Two changes should be made with respect to preventive detention (under Article 22), namely, (i) the maximum period of preventive detention should be six months; and (ii) the advisory board should consist of a chairman and two other members, and they should be serving judges of any high court.
6. Sikhism, Jainism, and Buddhism should be treated as religions separate from Hinduism, and the provisions grouping them together (under Article 25) should be deleted. At present, the word 'Hindu' is defined to include these religions also.
7. The protection from judicial review afforded by Article 31-B to the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule should be restricted to only those which relate to (i) agrarian reforms, (ii) reservations, and (iii) the implementation of Directive Principles specified in clause (b) or (e) of Article 39.
8. No suspension of the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights under Articles 17, 23, 24, 25, and 32 in addition to those under Articles 20 and 21 during the operation of a national emergency (under Article 352).
Article 300-A should be recast as follows:
4. An Inter-Faith Commission should be established to promote inter-religious harmony and social solidarity.
5. There must be a body of high status to review the level of implementation of the Directive Principles.
6. A strategic Plan of Action should be initiated to create a large number of employment opportunities in five years.
7. Implementation of the recommendations contained in the Report of the National Statistical Commission (2001).
6. Immediate steps be taken to set up a Nodal Standing Committee on National Economy.
7. A Standing Constitution Committee of the two Houses of Parliament for a priori scrutiny of constitutional amendment proposals should be set up.
8. A new Legislation Committee of Parliament to oversee and coordinate legislative planning should be constituted.
9.The existing Parliamentary Committees on Estimates, Public Undertakings, and Subordinate Legislation may not be continued.
10. The Parliamentarians must voluntarily place themselves open to public scrutiny through a parliamentary ombudsman.
11. The State Legislatures with less than 70 members should meet for at least 50 days in a year and other State Legislatures for at least 90 days. Similarly, the minimum number of days for sittings of Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha should be fixed at 100 and 120 days respectively.
12. A Study Group outside Parliament for the study of procedural reforms should be set up.
144 videos|611 docs|204 tests
|
1. What is the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution mentioned in the article? |
2. When was the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution established? |
3. What was the main purpose of the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution? |
4. Which specific aspect of the Indian Constitution did the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution focus on? |
5. What was the significance of the recommendations made by the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution? |
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|