Mitakshara and Dayabhaga Schools | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams PDF Download

Mitakshara and Dayabhaga Schools of Hindu Law

The Mitakshara and Dayabhaga schools are two prominent schools of Hindu law in India that govern property inheritance and individual rights to property.

History of Mitakshara School

• The Mitakshara school was founded by Vijnanesvara, a scholar from the Chalukya dynasty in the 12th century.
• It is primarily followed in North India and is known for its emphasis on joint family property.
• According to this school, ancestral property is shared among male family members, with sons having equal rights to inheritance.
• Additionally, the Mitakshara school acknowledges the right to create wills for the distribution of property.

Key Concepts of Mitakshara School

• Joint family property is a central idea where all family members have a claim to ancestral property.
• Property is inherited through the male lineage, and sons inherit it equally.
• Recognition of the right to create wills as a means of distributing property.

History of Dayabhaga School

• The Dayabhaga School was established by Jimutavahana, a scholar from Bengal, in the 12th century.
• Primarily followed in Bengal and eastern India, this school focuses on individual ownership of property.
• Unlike Mitakshara, joint family property is not recognized in the Dayabhaga school.
• Daughters are ensured an equal share of ancestral property under this school.

Key Concepts of Dayabhaga School

• Emphasis on personal ownership of property, allowing owners control over distribution.
• Recognition of women's right to inherit property, ensuring daughters receive a fair share.
• Absence of the concept of joint family property in this school.

Differences between Mitakshara and Dayabhaga Schools

• Mitakshara promotes joint family property ownership, while Dayabhaga supports individual ownership.
• While sons inherit equally in Mitakshara, daughters also have inheritance rights in Dayabhaga.
• The schools have influenced India's legal system significantly and are practiced across the country.

Mitakshara School Overview

• The Mitakshara school of Hindu law is primarily concerned with inheritance and succession practices.
• Named after the text Mitakshara, which elucidates the Yajnavalkya Smriti, this school is predominant in northern and western India.
• Central to the Mitakshara school is the concept of joint family property, where ownership rests collectively with the entire family rather than individuals.

Inheritance Methods in Mitakshara School

• By Birth: Property is inherited automatically by birth.
• By Adoption: Property can be inherited through the act of adoption.
• By Will: Property can be inherited as per the deceased's will.
• By Survival: Inheritance can occur through survival in certain circumstances.

Key Concepts

• Coparcenary: All male descendants of a common ancestor share equal rights to ancestral property.
• Stridhana: Property exclusively owned by women through inheritance or gifts, protected from claims by husbands or other family members.

Sub-schools in Mitakshara School

• Banaras School: Located in Banaras, this sub-school prioritizes adherence to traditional Hindu texts in legal matters.
• Mithila School: Situated in the Mithila region, this branch advocates for equal inheritance rights for daughters, deviating from the traditional male-centric approach.
• Maharashtra School: Operating in Maharashtra, this sub-school interprets laws liberally, supporting individual ownership rights over joint family principles.
• Andhra School: Found in Andhra Pradesh, this branch underscores coparcenary, with male heirs jointly owning ancestral property, while daughters have different inheritance rights.
• Dravida School: Prevalent in Tamil Nadu and Kerala, this school emphasizes religious freedom, allowing individuals to follow personal beliefs alongside Hindu legal traditions.

These sub-schools emerged due to diverse interpretations and regional influences, each highlighting joint family ownership and inheritance within the broader Mitakshara tradition.

Dayabhaga School

• The Dayabhaga school stands as a significant branch of Hindu law in India, alongside the Mitakshara school. It finds its stronghold in the eastern regions of India, particularly in Bengal, Assam, Orissa, and parts of Bihar.
• Originating from Sanskrit roots, "Daya" meaning compassion and "Bhaga" meaning share, the Dayabhaga school prioritizes an individual's rights to property over communal ownership, distinguishing it from the Mitakshara school. Here, an individual retains complete authority over property distribution. In this system, heirs do not automatically inherit their parents' belongings; instead, inheritance is either dictated by the deceased's will or by rules based on the closeness of relationships.
• Notably, the Dayabhaga school gained acclaim through its commentary on the Manusmriti, a foundational Hindu legal text, attributed to Jimutavahana. This commentary, known as the Dayabhaga, serves as the principal legal reference for this school.

Sub-schools within the Dayabhaga School

• Bengal School: This traditional subgroup emphasizes the mother's role in inheritance, granting her equal status with the father. It upholds a son's right to inherit all paternal property and underscores the significance of joint family assets.
• Mayukha School: Stemming from the Mayukha commentary on the Yajnavalkya Smriti, this sub-school highlights the eldest son's entitlement to inherit all paternal assets and recognizes the father's autonomy in property division.
• Vyavahara Matrika School: Drawing insights from the Vyavahara Matrika commentary, this subgroup underscores the importance of documented evidence in determining inheritance. It acknowledges the rights of daughters and widows in inheriting property.
• Dattaka Mimamsa School: Rooted in the Dattaka Mimamsa text on adoption, this sub-school accentuates the significance of adoption in inheritance laws, equating the rights of an adopted son with those of a biological one.
• Nirnaya Sindhu School: Influenced by the Nirnaya Sindhu commentary, this subgroup places emphasis on customs in establishing inheritance laws, validating the father's authority to distribute property as per his wishes.- These sub-schools within the Dayabhaga tradition offer diverse interpretations and features, significantly shaping inheritance and succession laws in eastern India.

Differences Between Dayabhaga School and Mitakshara School

Origins and Significance

• The Dayabhaga school originated from Jimutavahana's text, while the Mitakshara school is based on Vijnaneswara's commentary on the Yajnavalkya Smriti.
• Both schools are crucial in understanding Hindu law of succession and property rights across India.

Geographical Influence

• Mitakshara school is prominent in northern and western India, while Dayabhaga school is dominant in eastern regions like Bengal, Assam, Orissa, and parts of Bihar.
• This geographical divide leads to distinct legal frameworks reflecting cultural diversity.

Concept of Joint Family and Coparcenary

• Mitakshara grants coparcenary rights to male descendants, allowing them to share ancestral property during the father's lifetime.
• Dayabhaga asserts that sons gain ownership only after the father's death, influencing family asset management.

Partition and Inheritance

• In Mitakshara, partition defines shares of coparceners, ensuring equitable distribution.
• Dayabhaga involves physical separation of property for each coparcener, impacting inheritance planning.

Rights of Women

• In Mitakshara, women have rights in property partitions, acknowledging their position in the family.
• Dayabhaga treats women differently as fathers retain ownership, limiting women's entitlements.

Sub-Schools and Interpretations

• Various sub-schools have emerged under Mitakshara and Dayabhaga, catering to regional nuances.
• This diversity reflects India's legal landscape richness.

Impact on Hindu Society

• These schools influence family dynamics, property management, and succession planning.
• Mitakshara fosters joint family cohesiveness but poses challenges in property division, while Dayabhaga emphasizes individual ownership.

Continuing Relevance

• In modern India, these schools still shape inheritance laws and practices.
• Legal reforms engage with these traditions while balancing evolving societal needs.

The difference between Mitakshara and Dayabhaga Schools can be summarised as:

Dayabhaga and Mitakshara Schools of Hindu Law

Dayabhaga School

• The Dayabhaga school is a branch of Hindu law primarily followed in eastern regions like Bengal, Assam, and Orissa.
• This school emphasizes individual ownership and property rights, where inheritance is determined by the deceased's will or rules based on the proximity of the relationship.
• In the Dayabhaga school, sons inherit only after the father's demise, reflecting a focus on individual rights over joint family ownership.
• For example, if a father passes away, his property may be distributed according to his will, specifying how his assets are to be divided among his heirs based on his choices or customary rules.

Mitakshara School

• The Mitakshara school is another branch of Hindu law prevalent in northern and western parts of India.
• This school emphasizes joint family ownership through the concept of coparcenary, where sons have an equal share in ancestral property by birth.
• Partition of property in the Mitakshara school occurs through defined shares, ensuring that each coparcener receives a rightful portion of the ancestral assets.
• For instance, in a Mitakshara joint family, upon the death of the father, the sons automatically become coparceners and have a share in the property by birthright.

Impact on Property Rights and Family Dynamics

• The differences between the Dayabhaga and Mitakshara schools significantly influence property rights, inheritance patterns, and family dynamics within the Hindu community.
• These legal traditions showcase the diversity and complexity of Hindu inheritance practices, highlighting regional variations in approaches to succession and property ownership.
• For example, in regions where the Mitakshara school is dominant, joint family structures are common, fostering a sense of shared ownership and familial unity.
• On the other hand, in areas following the Dayabhaga school, individual autonomy in property matters may lead to distinct inheritance norms and legal frameworks.