Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Notes  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Essential Elements of Tort

Essential Elements of Tort | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams PDF Download

Tort Law Overview

  • The term "tort" originates from the Latin term "tortum," signifying twisted or crooked. 
  • According to Salmond, a tort is a civil wrongdoing that can be addressed through a common law action aiming for unliquidated damages. 
  • It differs from breaches of contract, breach of trust, or other equitable obligations.
  • To establish a tort, specific fundamental elements need to be satisfied.

Essential Elements of Tort | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

Essential Elements of Tort Law

For a tort to exist, four crucial elements must be present, as previously mentioned.

Existence of a Duty to Exercise Care

  • The concept of duty of care in tort law mandates that individuals must exercise a reasonable level of caution during activities that could potentially cause harm to others.
  • To pursue a legal claim in tort, it is crucial to establish that the individual responsible for the wrongdoing owed a duty of care to the affected party.
  • This duty must have been violated or breached for the legal case to proceed.
  • Importantly, the duty of care is a legal obligation imposed by the law and does not necessarily depend on a direct relationship between the wrongdoer and the victim.
  • For instance, a driver on the road has a duty of care towards pedestrians to operate their vehicle safely and responsibly to avoid accidents.
  • In a medical context, doctors owe a duty of care to their patients to provide competent and ethical treatment.
  • Similarly, a property owner has a duty of care to maintain their premises in a safe condition to prevent harm to visitors or tenants.

Question for Essential Elements of Tort
Try yourself:
What is the concept of duty of care in tort law?
View Solution

Understanding Wrongful Commission or Omission of an Act

  • Definition of Wrongful Act: An act is considered wrongful if it goes against the law's provisions. Contravening a legal rule makes an act unlawful.
  • Legal vs. Moral Wrong: It's crucial to differentiate between moral wrongs and legal wrongs. Just because something is morally incorrect doesn't automatically make it illegal. Legal wrongdoing is determined solely by laws, not moral standards.
  • Requirement of Harm: For an act to be deemed wrongful, it must result in actual harm or legal injury to another individual.

Case Study: Glasgow Corporation v. Taylor (1992)

  • Situation: A corporation neglected to put up proper fencing around a poisonous tree, leading to a child picking and consuming fruits from the tree, resulting in the child's death.
  • Legal Implication: The corporation could be held accountable for this omission as it led to harm.

Case Study: General Cleaning Corporation Ltd v. Christmas (1953)

  • Situation: An employer failed to provide a safety belt for a safe work system, causing negative consequences due to this negligence.

This content is designed to provide a detailed explanation of the concept of wrongful commission or omission of an act, along with real-life examples to help students grasp the idea more effectively.

Actual Harm or Legal Harm

  • Definition: Actual harm or legal harm is a fundamental aspect in tort law where a tort claim arises when the claimant suffers physical or financial loss due to wrongful actions, or their legal rights are violated, with or without resulting damage.

Injuria Sine Damno

  • The concept of "injuria sine damno" deals with situations where there is an injury without actual damage, actionable under tort law. This occurs when a person experiences a legal injury without tangible loss, indicating a violation of their absolute rights without the need for concrete harm.
  • Example: In the case of Ashby v. White (1703) 92 ER 126, Mr. Ashby, a qualified voter, was wrongfully prevented from voting by Mr. White, the constable. Despite no tangible harm suffered as the candidate Mr. Ashby intended to vote for had already won, the court held Mr. White liable. This exemplifies that hindrance to rights entitles individuals to legal remedies.
  • Additional Example: In Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir, a member of parliament was unlawfully denied entry to an Assembly election by a police constable, thus violating his legal rights.

Damnum Sine Injuria

  • "Damnum sine injuria" refers to instances where there is damage without injury. This implies that although there is actual loss, there is no infringement of legal rights. The affected party suffers physical or financial harm without a violation of their legal entitlements.
  • Example: In the Gloucester Grammar School case, where a school was opened by the defendant in the vicinity of the plaintiff's school with reduced fees, it was not considered a tort case. Here, the plaintiff faced only a financial loss without any breach of legal rights, illustrating "damnum sine injuria."

Legal Remedy

  • Definition of Legal Remedy: Legal remedies in tort law are specific actions available to individuals who have suffered harm due to a violation of their rights. These remedies typically include compensation in the form of money, return of specific property, or court-ordered injunctions.
  • Evaluation of Liability: When determining liability, courts consider factors such as directness and foreseeability. For instance, if a driver runs a red light and causes an accident, the driver can be held liable for the damages because the consequences were foreseeable and directly caused by their actions.
  • Assessment of Damage: Courts assess the extent of the damage suffered by the claimant to determine the appropriate remedy. For example, if a person's reputation is harmed due to defamatory statements, the court may award compensation for the damage caused.
  • Remoteness of Damage: Courts also examine whether the damage is too remote from the defendant's actions to warrant a legal remedy. For instance, if a person's car is damaged due to a chain reaction caused by the defendant's initial negligent act, the court may consider this damage as too remote for compensation.

Question for Essential Elements of Tort
Try yourself:
What is the difference between a legal wrong and a moral wrong?
View Solution

Conclusion

In essence, understanding the concept of torts is crucial in the realm of civil law. By grasping the duty, wrongful act, injury, and remedy aspects, individuals can navigate legal disputes effectively and seek appropriate redress for any harm suffered.

The document Essential Elements of Tort | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams is a part of the Judiciary Exams Course Civil Law for Judiciary Exams.
All you need of Judiciary Exams at this link: Judiciary Exams
253 docs|259 tests

Up next

253 docs|259 tests
Download as PDF

Up next

Explore Courses for Judiciary Exams exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

practice quizzes

,

video lectures

,

mock tests for examination

,

MCQs

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

ppt

,

past year papers

,

Free

,

Objective type Questions

,

Sample Paper

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Summary

,

Essential Elements of Tort | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Viva Questions

,

Essential Elements of Tort | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Important questions

,

Essential Elements of Tort | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Semester Notes

,

Extra Questions

,

study material

,

pdf

,

Exam

;