Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Notes  >  Civil Law for Judiciary Exams  >  Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams PDF Download

Definition of Arbitration Agreement

  • The concept of an Arbitration Agreement serves as the foundation of any contractual arrangement. Essentially, it represents a provision within a contract that dictates the resolution of disputes through arbitration when they arise. It signifies the agreement by which parties involved in a dispute commit to resolving their differences through arbitration.

Enforcement of Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

  • Enforcement Types:
    • First type involves waiving the power to adjudicate in courts.
    • Second type grants jurisdiction to private arbitrators.
  • Legal Frameworks:
    • Enforcement under UNCITRAL Model Law and New York Conventions.
  • Arbitration Agreement Defined:
    • Defined under the Model Law as an agreement to arbitrate disputes within a legal relationship.
    • According to the New York Convention, parties agree to arbitrate differences concerning a legal relationship.
  • Applicable Law:
    • Modern law basis allows parties to proceed with the arbitration clause as the agreement.
    • Other cases may require assent from both parties as per applicable law.

Applicability of Law

  • The choice of law made by the parties plays a crucial role in governing the arbitration agreement. Parties can select a specific law to govern their arbitration.
  • The applicable contract law also influences the arbitration agreement. The law governing the contract will extend to the arbitration agreement as well.
  • Procedural law steps in when there is no agreement on the governing law. In such cases, the procedural law of arbitration takes precedence.
  • The law of the arbitration's location holds significance. It can be designated as the governing law for the arbitration process.

According to the principles of the New York Convention, the validity of an arbitration agreement is primarily determined by the law chosen by the involved parties. If no specific choice is made, the law of the arbitration's location will apply. This approach is well-established for enforcing awards and can also be applied when addressing the recognition of the arbitration agreement in court.

Question for Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Try yourself:
What is the purpose of an Arbitration Agreement in a contract?
View Solution

Key Elements of an Arbitration Agreement under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act

  • Arising from Mutual Consent:
    • One crucial aspect of an arbitration agreement is that it must stem from the mutual agreement of all involved parties.
    • Example: Two business partners deciding to resolve any future disputes through arbitration rather than litigation.
  • Legal Capacity Requirement:
    • All parties entering into the arbitration agreement must possess the legal capacity to do so.
    • Example: A minor not having the legal capacity to enter into such a binding agreement.
  • Written Form:
    • It is essential that the arbitration agreement is documented in writing to ensure clarity and enforceability.
    • Example: A signed contract outlining the terms and conditions of arbitration between two companies.
  • Based on a Defined Legal Relationship:
    • The agreement should arise from a clearly defined legal relationship between the parties involved.
    • Example: An arbitration agreement between an employer and an employee regarding disputes related to their employment contract.
  • Arbitrability of Subject Matter:
    • The subject matter of the dispute must be capable of settlement through arbitration.
    • Example: Disputes related to intellectual property rights being resolved through arbitration.

Termination of Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act

  • Termination of the arbitration agreement occurs through mutual consent of both parties.
  • Another cause for termination can be the death of one of the parties involved.
  • Parties entering insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings can also lead to the termination of the agreement.
  • In certain jurisdictions, the death of an arbitrator does not halt the arbitration process; a replacement is typically provided. However, in some regions, the death of an arbitrator can impact the proceedings.

Understanding Severability of the Arbitration Agreement under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act

  • Previous Interpretation: Initially, it was believed that the arbitration agreement was merely an accessory to the main contract. As a result, if the main contract was deemed invalid, the arbitration agreement would also be considered void.
  • Introduction of Severability Doctrine: However, the concept of severability emerged to address this issue. This doctrine establishes that the arbitration agreement is independent and distinct from the main contract. Therefore, the nullity of the contract does not automatically render the arbitration agreement void.
  • Autonomy of Arbitration Agreement: Under this principle, even if the main contract is found to be invalid, the arbitration agreement remains enforceable, ensuring that parties can still resolve their disputes through arbitration.
  • Incorporation in Model Law: The principles of severability are explicitly included in the Model Law, emphasizing the autonomy and separateness of the arbitration agreement from the underlying contract.

Judicial Intervention in Arbitration

  • According to Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, judicial intervention is restricted in matters falling under this Act unless explicitly provided for.
  • The Act mandates minimal interference by judicial authorities in arbitration proceedings.
  • Recent legal cases, such as Ssangyong Engineering & Construction v. National Highways Authority of India, emphasize that courts should not replace arbitrators' decisions with their own.
  • In the case of McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standards Co. Ltd., the court highlighted that the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, assigns a supervisory role to courts, primarily to ensure fairness during the review of arbitral awards (judicial review under Section 34 of the Act).

Conclusion

The pivotal component in arbitration is the Arbitration Agreement, as it establishes the authority and jurisdiction of the arbitration process. The agreement delineates the rules governing the arbitration, and the specific rule to be followed can be determined by the parties involved. The doctrines of severability and competence-competence are adhered to in both the model law and the New York Convention.

Question for Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act
Try yourself:
What is one of the key elements of an arbitration agreement?
View Solution

The document Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams is a part of the Judiciary Exams Course Civil Law for Judiciary Exams.
All you need of Judiciary Exams at this link: Judiciary Exams
253 docs|259 tests

Up next

FAQs on Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act - Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

1. What is the significance of an arbitration agreement under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Ans. An arbitration agreement is a crucial element in resolving disputes through arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, as it sets out the terms and conditions for the parties to submit their disputes to arbitration rather than litigation.
2. How can an arbitration agreement be enforced under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
Ans. An arbitration agreement can be enforced through judicial intervention, where the courts can compel parties to adhere to the agreement and resolve their disputes through arbitration as per the Act.
3. What are the key elements of an arbitration agreement as outlined in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Ans. The key elements of an arbitration agreement include a clear intention to arbitrate, the identification of the disputes to be resolved through arbitration, the appointment of an arbitrator or arbitral tribunal, and the procedural rules to be followed during the arbitration process.
4. How does the concept of severability apply to an arbitration agreement under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Ans. The concept of severability allows for the validity of the arbitration agreement to be upheld even if the main contract containing the agreement is found to be invalid, ensuring that parties can still proceed with arbitration to resolve their disputes.
5. What is the role of judicial intervention in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act?
Ans. Judicial intervention in arbitration is limited to certain circumstances such as appointing arbitrators, enforcing arbitration agreements, and providing interim relief, while ensuring that the arbitrator's decision is final and binding on the parties.
253 docs|259 tests
Download as PDF

Up next

Explore Courses for Judiciary Exams exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

practice quizzes

,

Extra Questions

,

video lectures

,

Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

ppt

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Semester Notes

,

Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

Free

,

Sample Paper

,

Exam

,

Objective type Questions

,

Viva Questions

,

MCQs

,

Arbitration Agreement under Arbitration and Conciliation Act | Civil Law for Judiciary Exams

,

pdf

,

past year papers

,

mock tests for examination

,

Important questions

,

Summary

,

study material

;