Practice Assignment 23 | Class 7 BBC Compacta Solutions PDF Download

Topic: Pets or No Pets?

Honorable judges, esteemed colleagues, and fellow students,

Today, we stand to address the pressing question: "Should We Keep Any Pets At Home?". It is with great conviction that I urge us to reject this motion.

Firstly, let us acknowledge the inherent rights of animals and birds to freedom. Nature has designed them to roam, fly, and live unrestricted by the confines of a cage or the walls of our homes. By keeping them as pets, we strip them of their natural habitat, which is not only inhumane but against the fundamental principles of wildlife conservation.

Moreover, while pets can bring joy to our lives, they also pose significant risks. Dogs can become carriers of rabies, and birds may harbor pathogens that lead to allergies or diseases akin to influenza. This risk is compounded when pets are neglected, a circumstance not uncommon in our hectic lives.

Financially, maintaining pets is a costly affair, often underappreciated when the decision to adopt is made. The costs of healthcare, food, and other necessities can quickly accumulate, placing a burden on families.

Furthermore, the lack of sufficient space in our homes is another critical issue. Many pets, especially larger breeds of dogs, require ample room for exercise and stimulation. A constrained environment can lead to behavioral issues and a diminished quality of life for the animal.

In conclusion, while the companionship of pets is cherished by many, it is our responsibility to recognize and prioritize the welfare and rights of these animals. Therefore, I firmly reject the motion to keep pets at home and encourage us all to consider the broader implications of such a choice.

Thank you.