Concepts with Tips & Tricks : Last Sentence of the Paragraph

Table of Contents
1. Nature of the task and common features
2. What the last line should contain - general guidelines
3. Approach: a stepwise method to select the best final sentence
4. Example of Para Completion
5. Common errors and traps to avoid
6. Practice tips
View more

Para Completion has been a consistent component of CAT papers since 2005. Before attempting these questions, it is important to understand their purpose and what skills they test. Para Completion questions assess a candidate's ability to deduce, summarise, continue and maintain coherence in a short passage. They require choosing the most appropriate final sentence that either logically concludes or smoothly continues the given paragraph.

Para Completion questions are similar in aim to parajumble questions, but they differ in execution. In parajumbles you reorder multiple sentences to form a coherent paragraph; in Para Completion you are given a paragraph with its final line missing and must select the option that best completes it.

Nature of the task and common features

• The task is to select the sentence that finalises the paragraph most suitably; correctness depends on "appropriateness" rather than a single mechanical rule, so intuition plays a role.
• Because "appropriateness" can be subjective, accuracy rates for these items often hover around 50% for inexperienced test-takers; practice improves the ability to spot the logically strongest choice.
• The missing final sentence usually serves one of two functions: it either draws a conclusion from the preceding material or continues an idea started earlier, providing further clarification or development.

What the last line should contain - general guidelines

The final sentence must be consistent with the paragraph's content, tone and logical progression. Check whether it is meant to conclude or continue the paragraph, then apply the relevant criteria below.

If the last line is a conclusion

• The sentence should provide a smooth, not abrupt, ending to the paragraph.
• The conclusion must be logically derivable from the premises, examples or evidence already stated; it should follow the line of reasoning presented.
• The conclusion should focus on the main idea of the passage rather than introduce a new or peripheral point.
• The concluding sentence must be relevant to the critical issues discussed earlier in the paragraph.

If the last line is a continuation of an idea

• The sentence must not introduce a completely new element unrelated to the preceding text.
• The structure and order of the continuation should mirror the pattern or logic in the earlier sentences to preserve coherence.
• The continuation should provide a logical flow or development, making transitions from the immediately preceding idea smooth.
• The tone and register of the sentence must match the paragraph's tone.

Approach: a stepwise method to select the best final sentence

• Read the entire paragraph carefully and identify its central idea or argument.
• Decide whether the missing sentence should conclude the paragraph or continue an idea; look for concluding markers (therefore, thus, hence) or linking cues that signal continuation (furthermore, in addition, moreover).
• Eliminate options that introduce new facts, persons, time-frames or issues that the paragraph never hinted at.
• Check logical fit: the candidate sentence should be a natural result or extension of what has been said, not merely a plausible statement.
• Prefer the option that preserves the paragraph's tone and scope and which requires the fewest unjustified inferences.

Example of Para Completion

Relations between the factory and the dealer are distant and usually strained as the factory tries to force cars on the dealers to smooth out production. Relations between the dealer and the customer are equally strained because dealers continuously adjust prices-make deals-to adjust demand with supply while maximizing profits. This becomes a system marked by a lack of long-term commitment on either side, which maximizes feelings of mistrust. In order to maximize their bargaining positions, everyone holds back information-the dealer about the product and the consumer about his true desires. _________________

1. As a result, 'deal making' becomes rampant, without concern for customer satisfaction.
2. As a result, inefficiencies creep into the supply chain.
3. As a result, everyone treats the other as an adversary, rather than as an ally.
4. As a result, fundamental innovations are becoming scarce in the automobile industry.
5. As a result, everyone loses in the long run.

Sol: From the options, we see that the task is to choose a logical conclusion to the paragraph rather than a mere continuation. First identify the central argument: the passage describes strained relations among factory, dealer and customer, and notes that each side withholds information to protect its bargaining position. This withholding is cast as the immediate cause of the consequence we must infer.

Option A: The passage explains strained relations and withholding of information. However, the claim that 'deal making' becomes rampant and customer satisfaction is ignored is not the most direct or necessary consequence of withholding information; it introduces a specific behavioural pattern without clear support in the passage.

Option B: Inefficiencies in the supply chain are plausible, but the passage does not discuss operational inefficiencies or provide evidence to link withholding information directly to supply-chain inefficiency; the connection is indirect.

Option C: This option claims that everyone treats the other as an adversary. While the passage does describe mistrust, it does not establish that all parties regard one another as adversaries rather than competitors or cautious partners; moreover, it overstates the role of the customer in relation to manufacturer and dealer.

Option D: The claim about scarcity of fundamental innovations is not supported. Innovation depends on many factors beyond the immediate bargaining behaviour described, so this option is an overreach.

Option E: This option follows directly from the passage's last explicit point: because each party withholds information to maximise bargaining positions, the long-term outcome is mutually harmful. It is a logical, proportionate conclusion that stays within the paragraph's focus on mistrust and short-term bargaining gains.

Therefore, Option E is the best choice.

Common errors and traps to avoid

• Selecting an option that sounds plausible but introduces a new idea or causes not foreshadowed by the paragraph.
• Preferring the most emphatic or dramatic option rather than the one that is most directly supported by the passage.
• Failing to check tone: a formal analytical paragraph requires a formal concluding sentence; an informal or illustrative paragraph needs a fitting informal closure.
• Confusing continuity with causality: a sentence that continues an idea need not state a cause or consequence unless the paragraph implies such a relation.

Practice tips

• On each practice item, explicitly label the paragraph as "conclusion" or "continuation" before looking at options.
• Underline the passage's premises and any causal markers; then test each option against those premises.
• When stuck between two options, prefer the one that requires fewer unsupported assumptions.
• Time your practice: build speed by practising under timed conditions and reviewing mistakes to spot recurring weaknesses (tone mismatch, unwarranted inference, etc.).

With regular practice following these principles-identify the paragraph's purpose, eliminate options that add new elements, check logical derivability, and match tone-you will improve accuracy on Para Completion items and make more confident choices.