In recent decades, the primary focus of financial accounting has shifted towards how we measure income, rather than whose income is measured. Traditional accountants often believed that profit belonged solely to proprietors, considering assets as owned by the proprietor and liabilities as their obligations. This proprietary notion was accepted and practiced as long as business operations remained relatively unchanged. However, the rise of corporate entities and the legal recognition of businesses as separate from their owners led to the rejection of the proprietary theory.
Nowadays, companies report value added in their financial statements through a Value Added Statement (VAS). The VAS supplements the existing corporate financial accounting and reporting systems by highlighting the value created and distributed among various interest groups, including employees, shareholders, capital promoters, and the government. This is significant from a national perspective, as it reflects how the wealth generated by an entity is shared among its stakeholders. According to the ICAI (1985), a Value Added Statement reveals the value added by an enterprise and its distribution among those who contributed to its generation.
The VAS is prepared to calculate the amount of value added and its distribution. Its primary purpose is to measure the wealth (i.e., value) that the entity has contributed to society through the collective efforts of various stakeholders. Although it is prepared and published voluntarily with annual financial reports, the presentation of a VAS aids in disclosing an enterprise's value added. In essence, the Value Added Statement shows the company's income as an entity and how that income is divided among those who contributed to its creation.
Here are the fundamental assumptions utilized in computing the income value added through the creation of value added statements:
It is feasible to generate Value Added statements from conventional Profit & Loss accounts. However, there are significant differences between the two statements. For instance, income statements may include non-value-added items such as provisions, interests, non-trading profits and losses, etc.
The objectives of creating Value Added Statements are:
The traditional Profit & Loss Account is based on the assumption that a company is established by its shareholders and operates for their benefit. However, this conventional accounting approach merely reflects the profits or losses generated by a business entity without shedding light on how much wealth the entity has created during a specific period. In contrast, the emergent concept of value added accounting seeks to enhance the conventional financial reporting system by disclosing additional insights into the wealth produced by an entity within a given timeframe and how this wealth is distributed among contributors to its creation.
The concept of Value Added (VA) statements, which illustrate how VA is distributed among various interest groups such as employees, government, and shareholders, faces criticism. Critics argue that while these statements show how VA is allocated, the risk associated with the company is primarily borne by shareholders. Employees, the government, and external financiers are concerned only with their share of the VA, leaving shareholders to bear the full brunt of any financial troubles the company encounters. Consequently, some academics question the validity of showing VA as benefiting multiple interest groups. They suggest that since shareholders are the ultimate risk takers, the residual profit, after fulfilling the obligations of external groups, should be the only VA shown as accruing to them. However, these academics also acknowledge that from an overall perspective, VA statements could serve as supplementary financial information. Nonetheless, they argue that VA statements cannot replace traditional income statements, such as the profit and loss account.
Another contemporary criticism of VA statements is their lack of standardization. This non-standardization issue, however, can be resolved by establishing an accounting standard for VA. Thus, this criticism is seen as a temporary issue.
Despite their advantages, VA statements have several limitations:
Despite these limitations, VA statements are considered to shift the emphasis rather than change the content of traditional financial statements, making them a valuable means of social disclosure.
2 videos|51 docs|19 tests
|
|
Explore Courses for B Com exam
|