The period between 1973 and 1975 saw increasing tensions in India’s democratic system. Indira Gandhi’s government faced multiple challenges, including economic distress, political opposition, and conflicts with the judiciary. High inflation, unemployment, and food shortages created dissatisfaction among the people. At the same time, opposition parties accused Indira Gandhi of authoritarianism. The judiciary ruled against the government in multiple cases, leading to tensions between the executive and the courts. These conflicts escalated, eventually leading to the imposition of the Emergency in June 1975.
i. What were the major factors leading to the Emergency in 1975? (1 Mark)
(a) External war threats
(b) Economic distress, political opposition, and judicial conflicts
(c) Natural disasters
(d) Foreign intervention
ii. How did political and economic conditions contribute to the Emergency? (2 Marks)
iii. Why was the judiciary in conflict with Indira Gandhi’s government before the Emergency? (1 Mark)
Ans:
i. (b) Economic distress, political opposition, and judicial conflicts
ii.
- High inflation, unemployment, and food shortages created widespread dissatisfaction.
- Opposition parties and the judiciary accused the government of being authoritarian.
iii. The courts ruled against the government in key cases, challenging its authority.
Q2: Read the Passage below and answer the questions that follow:
In 1974, student protests erupted in Bihar over rising prices, food scarcity, and corruption. The protests gained national significance when Jayaprakash Narayan (JP) took leadership of the movement. JP called for “Total Revolution”, demanding a complete transformation in the political, economic, and social system. He organized mass rallies and protests, calling for Indira Gandhi’s resignation. His movement gained the support of multiple non-Congress opposition parties, making him a key figure in Indian politics during the Emergency period.
i. Who led the Bihar Movement of 1974? (1 Mark)
(a) Morarji Desai
(b) Charan Singh
(c) Jayaprakash Narayan
(d) George Fernandes
ii. What were the key demands of the Bihar Movement? (2 Marks)
iii. Why was Jayaprakash Narayan’s movement significant? (1 Mark)
Ans:
i. (c) Jayaprakash Narayan
ii.
- Reforms in governance, including the elimination of corruption.
- Indira Gandhi’s resignation and political change in India.
iii. It united opposition parties and became a direct challenge to Congress rule.
Q3: Read the Passage below and answer the questions that follow:
In May 1974, railway workers, led by George Fernandes, organized a nationwide strike demanding better wages and working conditions. The strike paralyzed transportation across the country, disrupting both passenger and goods movement. The government declared the strike illegal, arrested many leaders, and deployed the army to maintain order. The strike intensified tensions between labor unions and the government, contributing to the overall climate of unrest before the Emergency.
i. Who led the nationwide railway strike in 1974? (1 Mark)
(a) Jayaprakash Narayan
(b) George Fernandes
(c) Jagjivan Ram
(d) Atal Bihari Vajpayee
ii. What were the key demands of the railway workers? (2 Marks)
ii. Why was the railway strike significant in Indian politics? (1 Mark)
Ans:
i. (b) George Fernandes
ii.
- Higher wages and improved working conditions.
- Better job security and benefits for railway employees.
iii. It increased tensions between labor unions and the government, leading to greater unrest before the Emergency.
Q4: Read the Passage below and answer the questions that follow:
On June 25, 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a National Emergency, citing internal disturbances under Article 352 of the Indian Constitution. The declaration followed a verdict by the Allahabad High Court, which found Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral misconduct. The government arrested opposition leaders, imposed press censorship, and suspended fundamental rights. This move was widely criticized as an attempt to suppress political opposition and centralize power.
i. Which article of the Constitution was used to declare the Emergency in 1975? (1 Mark)
(a) Article 356
(b) Article 370
(c) Article 352
(d) Article 51A
ii. What were the key consequences of the Emergency? (2 Marks)
iii. Why was the Emergency controversial? (1 Mark)
Ans:
i. (c) Article 352
ii.
- Suspension of fundamental rights, including freedom of speech and press.
- Arrests of opposition leaders and strict government control over political activities.
iii. Many critics viewed this as an attempt to suppress democracy and political opposition.
Q5: Read the Passage below and answer the questions that follow:
After 18 months of Emergency, Indira Gandhi announced general elections in 1977. The opposition parties united under the Janata Party, led by Morarji Desai, Charan Singh, and Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The elections were seen as a referendum on the Emergency, with opposition leaders campaigning to restore democracy. The results were shocking – Congress suffered a massive defeat, losing in major northern states. Morarji Desai became the first non-Congress Prime Minister, marking a historic political shift in India.
i. Which party defeated Congress in the 1977 elections? (1 Mark)
(a) Bharatiya Jana Sangh
(b) Janata Party
(c) Communist Party of India
(d) Bahujan Samaj Party
ii. What were the main reasons for Congress’ defeat in the 1977 elections? (2 Marks)
iii. Why was the 1977 election a turning point in Indian politics? (1 Mark)
Ans:
i. (b) Janata Party
ii. Key reasons for this outcome included:
- Public anger over the excesses of the Emergency, including the suppression of rights.
- The unification of opposition parties under the Janata Party.
iii. It was the first time a non-Congress government was elected at the national level.
Q6: Read the Passage below and answer the questions that follow:
After the Emergency ended in 1977, the new Janata Party government set up the Shah Commission to investigate the excesses committed during the Emergency. The commission, led by Justice J.C. Shah, examined cases of arbitrary arrests, press censorship, and forced sterilization campaigns. The report criticized the Indira Gandhi government for its abuse of power and human rights violations. However, when Indira Gandhi returned to power in 1980, the commission’s findings were largely ignored, and many of its recommendations were not implemented.