Table of contents |
|
Introduction |
|
Types of Property |
|
Transfer of Property |
|
Doctrine of Election |
|
Doctrine of Lis Pendens |
|
Mode of Transfer |
|
Before the British rule, different communities in India followed their own customary laws for property transfers. When the British established a formal legal system, there was no specific legislation for property transfer, so English judges used common law and principles of equity, justice, and good conscience to resolve disputes. However, these English laws were not suitable for Indian conditions, leading to conflicts and the need for clearer rules.
To address this, the Transfer of Property Act was drafted in 1870 and enacted in 1882, providing foundational principles for transferring both movable and immovable properties. While based on English law, the Act aimed to adapt these principles to Indian circumstances.
A separate law, the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, was introduced to govern the transfer of movable property through sale. The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 outlines general principles of property transfer and specific rules for transferring immovable property through sale, exchange, mortgage, lease, and gift.
1. Definition of Property
2. Immovable Property
3. Trees as Property
4. General Understanding of Immovable Property
5. Movability Definition
6. Legal Cases and Definitions
7. Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988
8. Sale of Goods Act, 1930
9. Comparison between Movable and Immovable Property
The Transfer of Property refers to the act of conveying property from one person to another, either in the present or future. In India, matters relating to the transfer of property are governed by the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The primary objective of this Act is to regulate the transfer of property between living persons and to serve as a code of contract law governing immovable property.
The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 provides a systematic and uniform legal framework for the transfer of immovable property in India. Property can also be transferred by inheritance and succession, which are governed by respective religious laws or practices.
1. Mode of Transfer
Tangible Property:
Intangible Property:
2. Attestation:
3. Registration
4. Mutation
5. Payment of Fee
In the case of Madam Pillai V. Badar Kali, the court ruled that the plaintiff acquired title through oral transfer and was entitled to the property, even though the instrument of sale was not registered.
The Doctrine of Election, as outlined in Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act (TPA), pertains to situations where a person receiving a transfer is presented with two options: a benefit and a burden. According to this principle, the recipient must accept both the benefit and the burden or reject both. They cannot selectively accept the benefit while rejecting the burden in a single transaction.
In simpler terms, when claiming the advantages of a legal instrument, one must also accept its associated disadvantages.
Illustration: Let’s say A sells his garden and house to B through a single agreement. If B wants to keep only the house and cancel the transfer of the garden, the Doctrine of Election stipulates that B must keep the garden if he wishes to retain the house, or cancel the entire transaction. B cannot pick and choose which parts of the agreement to accept.
The Doctrine of Election is grounded in the principle of equity, which asserts that one cannot accept what is beneficial while rejecting what is detrimental under the same legal instrument. This concept is encapsulated in the Latin maxim “quod approbo non reprobo,” meaning that no one can approbate and reprobate simultaneously. In essence, when a person accepts a benefit under a deed or instrument, they must also bear its burden.
The principle was further clarified in the case of Cooper v. Cooper by the House of Lords. Lord Hather in this case explained that when someone takes a benefit under a will or instrument, they are obligated to give full effect to that instrument. If the instrument deals with something beyond the donor’s power to dispose of, the law will impose on the beneficiary the obligation to carry the instrument into full effect.
Section 35 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, encapsulates the Doctrine of Election, which applies to all instruments and types of property.
The Doctrine of Lis Pendens is outlined in Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The term "lis pendens" refers to a "pending suit."
According to this doctrine, when a property is involved in a legal dispute, it should not be transferred to a third party in a manner that affects the rights of any party involved in the case. Essentially, no new interests in the property should be created through transfer while the lawsuit is ongoing.
The doctrine is rooted in the Latin maxim "ut lite pendent nihil innovetur," which means "nothing new should be introduced in a pending litigation." Its purpose is to ensure that all parties involved in a legal dispute over a property are bound by the court's decision, reflecting the court's control over the property until a final judgment is reached.
When a lawsuit or legal proceeding is pending regarding immovable property, that property cannot be transferred.
For the Doctrine of Lis Pendens to apply, certain conditions must be met:
Illustration: If A is in a legal dispute with X over the title of a property, and A tries to sell the property to B during the litigation, the sale would be invalid under the Doctrine of Lis Pendens because the property is subject to ongoing legal proceedings.
In the case of Dev Raj Dogra and others v Gyan Chand Jain and others, the Supreme Court interpreted Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act and established certain preconditions:
The Supreme Court clarified that Section 52 does not render a pendente lite transfer void or illegal but binds the pendente lite purchaser to the outcome of the ongoing litigation. This means that if a party to the suit transfers immovable property during the litigation, affecting the rights of other parties, the transfer is prohibited unless authorized by the court.
In summary, the Doctrine of Lis Pendens restricts the transfer of immovable property involved in a legal dispute to protect the rights of all parties and uphold the court's authority until a final decision is reached.
A sale involves the transfer of ownership of a property in exchange for a price, typically money. In this context, the seller is the person transferring the property, while the buyer is the one receiving it. The consideration in a sale is usually monetary.
Illustration: If A sells his house to B for Rs. 2 lakhs, this constitutes a sale where A is the seller, B is the buyer, and Rs. 2 lakhs is the consideration.
Essentials for a Valid Sale
A lease, as per the Transfer of Property Act, is a contract where one party transfers the right to enjoy land, property, services, etc., to another party for a specified period, usually in exchange for periodic payments. Importantly, a lease does not constitute a sale. According to Section 105 of the TPA, a lease can only be applied to immovable property.
Key Aspects of a Lease
Subleasing Explained
Illustration: If A leases his property to B for three years at Rs. 50,000, this is a lease agreement. If B subsequently sublets the property to C, B becomes the lessee, and C the sub-lessee, establishing a relationship similar to that of A and B.
Exchange involves the transfer of ownership between two parties, where each party gives ownership of one thing for another. According to Section 118 of the TPA, property can only be transferred by way of sale in an exchange. The rights and liabilities of the parties involved in the exchange are determined by the rights and liabilities of the buyer and seller.
Illustration: If A offers to sell his cottage to B, and B, in return, sells his farm to A, this is an example of an exchange. A receives a farm instead of money for his cottage, and his rights and liabilities are those of a seller towards the sale of the cottage and a buyer towards the sale of the farm. Similarly, B's rights and liabilities are those of a buyer towards the sale of the cottage and a seller towards the sale of the farm.
A gift, as defined in Section 122 of the TPA, is a voluntary transfer of ownership of property without any consideration. The person making the transfer is called the donor, while the person receiving it is called the donee. If the donee passes away before accepting the gift, it becomes void.
Illustration: If A gives his car to B without expecting anything in return, this is a gift. A is the donor, and B is the donee.
Comparison
98 videos|69 docs|30 tests
|
1. What are the different types of property recognized in law? | ![]() |
2. How is property transferred legally? | ![]() |
3. What is the Doctrine of Election in property law? | ![]() |
4. Can you explain the Doctrine of Lis Pendens? | ![]() |
5. What are the key learning outcomes of studying the law of property? | ![]() |