CAT Exam  >  CAT Notes  >  Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC)  >  CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8

CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8 | Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) PDF Download

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
(. . .) There are three other common drivers for carnivore-human attacks, some of which are more preventable than others. Natural aggression-based conflicts – such as those involving females protecting their young or animals protecting a food source – can often be avoided as long as people stay away from those animals and their food.
Carnivores that recognise humans as a means to get food, are a different story. As they become more reliant on human food they might find at campsites or in rubbish bins, they become less avoidant of humans. Losing that instinctive fear response puts them into more situations where they could get into an altercation with a human, which often results in that bear being put down by humans. "A fed bear is a dead bear," says Servheen, referring to a common saying among biologists and conservationists.
Predatory or predation-related attacks are quite rare, only accounting for 17% of attacks in North America since 1955. They occur when a carnivore views a human as prey and hunts it like it would any other animal it uses for food. (. . .)
Then there are animal attacks provoked by people taking pictures with them or feeding them in natural settings such as national parks which often end with animals being euthanised out of precaution. "Eventually, that animal becomes habituated to people, and [then] bad things happen to the animal. And the folks who initially wanted to make that connection don't necessarily realise that," says Christine Wilkinson, a postdoctoral researcher at UC Berkeley, California, who's been studying coyote-human conflicts.
After conducting countless postmortems on all types of carnivore-human attacks spanning 75 years, Penteriani's team believes 50% could have been avoided if humans reacted differently. A 2017 study co-authored by Penteriani found that engaging in risky behaviour around large carnivores increases the likelihood of an attack.
Two of the most common risky behaviours are parents leaving their children to play outside unattended and walking an unleashed dog, according to the study. Wilkinson says 66% of coyote attacks involve a dog. "[People] end up in a situation where their dog is being chased, or their dog chases a coyote, or maybe they're walking their dog near a den that's marked, and the coyote wants to escort them away," says Wilkinson.
Experts believe climate change also plays a part in the escalation of human-carnivore conflicts, but the correlation still needs to be ironed out. "As finite resources become scarcer, carnivores and people are coming into more frequent contact, which means that more conflict could occur," says Jen Miller, international programme specialist for the US Fish & Wildlife Service. For example, she says, there was an uptick in lion attacks in western India during a drought when lions and people were relying on the same water sources.
(. . .) The likelihood of human-carnivore conflicts appears to be higher in areas of low-income countries dominated by vast rural landscapes and farmland, according to Penteriani's research. "There are a lot of working landscapes in the Global South that are really heterogeneous, that are interspersed with carnivore habitats, forests and savannahs, which creates a lot more opportunity for these encounters, just statistically," says Wilkinson.

Question for CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8
Try yourself:According to the passage, which of the following scenarios would MOST likely exacerbate the frequency of carnivore-human conflicts?
View Solution

Question for CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8
Try yourself:According to the passage, what is a significant factor that contributes to the habituation of carnivores to human presence?
View Solution

Question for CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8
Try yourself:Which of the following statements, if false, would be inconsistent with the concerns raised in the passage regarding the drivers of carnivore-human conflicts?
View Solution

Question for CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8
Try yourself:Given the insights provided by Penteriani's research and Wilkinson's statement, which of the following conclusions can be drawn about the relationship between landscape heterogeneity and human-carnivore conflicts?
View Solution

The document CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8 | Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) is a part of the CAT Course Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC).
All you need of CAT at this link: CAT
163 videos|853 docs|126 tests
Related Searches

Semester Notes

,

Objective type Questions

,

video lectures

,

practice quizzes

,

Viva Questions

,

Summary

,

Free

,

CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8 | Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC)

,

Extra Questions

,

mock tests for examination

,

past year papers

,

pdf

,

Sample Paper

,

CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8 | Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC)

,

Exam

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Important questions

,

study material

,

ppt

,

CAT 2024 Reading Comprehension Questions - 8 | Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC)

,

MCQs

;