The chapter focuses on the Harappan Civilisation, its urban planning, economic activities, social structure, and decline. Below is a concise Q&A set to help you prepare for class tests, school exams, or board-level assessments with key, repetitive questions.
Q1. What were the key features of Harappan urban planning?
Key features of Harappan urban planning include:
Q2. What factors contributed to the decline of the Harappan Civilisation?
The decline of the Harappan Civilisation around 1900 BCE can be linked to several factors:
While these factors are discussed, the precise cause of the decline remains a topic of debate among historians.
The Harappan civilisation utilised a variety of raw materials for craft production, including:
These materials were obtained through several methods:
Thus, the Harappans either settled near resource-rich areas or established trade networks to acquire necessary materials.
The primary reason our understanding of the Harappan (Indus Valley) civilisation is less comprehensive than that of other ancient cultures is the undeciphered script. Unlike the texts of Egypt or Mesopotamia, which scholars can read, the Indus script lacks a Rosetta Stone for translation. Key points include:
Cunningham, the first Director-General of the ASI, faced confusion while studying Harappan sites due to several factors:
As a result, he did not recognise the age and relevance of the artefacts he encountered
Marshall's excavation technique involved digging in uniform horizontal layers across the entire mound. This approach had several drawbacks:
In contrast, R.E.M. Wheeler focused on excavating along the natural historical layers of the mound:
Harappan seals and sealings played a crucial role in trade by ensuring the security and authenticity of goods. Here’s how they were used:
In short, seals ensured security and authenticated goods during long-distance trade.
Harappan cities were divided into two main sections:
This division reflects the careful urban planning of Harappan cities.
Harappan writing has distinct features that set it apart from other ancient scripts:
Archaeologists reconstruct the past of the Harappan civilisation through various methods:
By piecing together artefacts, ecofacts, and their contexts, archaeologists create a comprehensive picture of Harappan society, economy, and beliefs.
The Harappan drainage system was a remarkable feat of urban planning, featuring:
This advanced system, found in major Harappan towns, is regarded as one of the world's earliest urban sanitation systems
The Harappans employed various subsistence strategies, including:
The Harappans used bricks with a uniform ratio of length, breadth, and height (4:2:1) across major sites. This standardisation suggests:
The Great Bath was a large, watertight tank measuring 30 by 15 feet and about 8 feet deep. It featured:
Its intricate design and central position in the Citadel imply it had a ceremonial purpose. Most scholars believe it was used for:
The careful construction of the Bath indicates its significance in religious or social practices.
Harappan burials reveal social differences through various features:
a) Burials were typically in north-south pits, sometimes lined with bricks.
b) Grave goods varied significantly:
c) Richer burials had more valuable items, indicating social differentiation.
d) However, truly precious items were rarely buried, suggesting limited inequality.
Luxury items were crafted from rare or imported materials and required skilled craftsmanship. Examples include:
These luxury artefacts are typically found in major urban sites like Mohenjodaro and Harappa, often in areas associated with the elite. In contrast, smaller villages rarely yield such items. The presence of precious materials, such as gold and imported stones, along with fine craftsmanship in large cities, indicates an urban elite that controlled trade and specialised production.
Planned Layout: Cities were built on grids with streets at right angles. There was a clear division into citadel and lower town, each walled.
Standardized Architecture: Uniform baked bricks (length=4×height, width=2×height) were used across sites. Public buildings (granaries, baths, warehouses) and large platforms show organized civic design.
Sophisticated Infrastructure: Covered drainage systems with house-connected drains, public wells, and large reservoirs (e.g. Dholavira) indicate deliberate urban planning.
Public Buildings: Structures like the Great Bath, granaries, and the “stupa”-like platforms in the citadel served communal functions. Their scale implies coordinated labor and governance.
Specialized Zones: Entire city quarters (e.g. Chanhudaro) were devoted to crafts (bead-making, metallurgy), while residential sectors had courtyards and no direct street views for privacy.
Economic Complexity: Standard weights and seals indicate regulated commerce; long-distance trade networks connected ports (Lothal) to Mesopotamia. Cities had storehouses and workshops suggesting administration of production and storage.
Population Size: Some settlements covered hundreds of hectares (Harappa, Mohenjodaro), implying tens of thousands of inhabitants.
These features – grid planning, municipal services, uniform construction, and craft specialization – make Harappan civilization distinctly urban and advanced for its time.
Agriculture: Based on wheat, barley, rice, millets, pulses etc.. They used plows and had wells and possibly canals for irrigation (e.g. Dholavira’s reservoirs). Domestic animals (cattle, sheep, goats, buffalo, pig) provided dairy, meat and labor.
Crafts: Specialized industries (bead-making, metallurgy, pottery, shell-carving) thrived. Workshops at sites like Chanhudaro and Lothal produced beads (carnelian, etc.), shell bangles, and metal tools. Craftsmen sourced raw materials (lapis from Afghanistan, copper from Rajasthan/Oman) through trade or expeditions.
Trade: Harappans traded internally (between cities) and internationally. They exported cotton textiles, beads, pottery; and imported metals, precious stones (lapis, gold). Seals and weights facilitated commerce. Contacts with Mesopotamia (via Persian Gulf) are attested by Harappan seals in Sumerian cities and Mesopotamian texts mentioning “Meluhha”.
Markets and Administration: While no coins are found, standardized weights suggest regulated markets. Large storehouses imply grain storage and redistribution. Some scholars suggest a form of centralized control (maybe by priest-kings or councils) to manage granaries, public works and trade.
No Central Ruler (Egalitarian): Some argue there was no king or chief; the society may have been relatively egalitarian. Evidence: uniform house sizes in some cities, no obvious palaces or royal tombs, and no grand inscriptions proclaiming rulers. These scholars say local communities collectively managed affairs.
Multiple Local Rulers: Others propose a segmented political structure. For example, Mohenjodaro’s citadel and Harappa’s citadel might each have had its own leader or council, rather than one emperor. Different city-states (or regions like Punjab vs Sindh) could have been semi-autonomous.
Centralized State: A third view sees a unified state. The uniformity in urban planning, weights, seals and brick standards across hundreds of miles suggests coordinated authority. Proponents argue a central power (possibly based in Mohenjodaro or Harappa) oversaw the civilization.
Collective Leadership: Some suggest priest-kings or merchant guilds collectively guided the cities. The absence of royal palaces leaves this open.
After ~1900 BCE, many Indus cities were abandoned or shrank. Likely causes include:
Environmental Change: Shifting monsoon patterns and climate change led to aridity. The Ghaggar-Hakra (suspected Saraswati) River system dried up, undermining the water supply for agriculture. Floods or tectonic activity may have altered river courses, leaving cities without reliable water (e.g. Mohenjodaro and Harappa may have faced flooding or earthquakes).
Resource Depletion: Intensive farming and deforestation could have reduced soil fertility over centuries, making agriculture less productive.
Trade Disruption: As Mesopotamian and Central Asian trade networks changed (Mesopotamia itself was in decline), Harappan trade may have suffered, removing crucial economic exchanges (like copper, tin, lapis).
Social Transformation: Internal social stress or political fragmentation might have arisen from these pressures, leading to breakdown of urban institutions. Late Harappan settlements often become more rural and dispersed.
The decline was likely gradual and multi-causal: ecological stress (climate and river changes) undermined agriculture and water management, causing food shortages and city abandonment. This cascaded into economic and social collapse. By ~1700 BCE, most major Harappan cities were deserted or significantly reduced, marking the end of the Mature Harappan phase.
30 videos|274 docs|25 tests
|
1. What is the significance of the title "Bricks, Beads and Bones" in the context of humanities and arts? | ![]() |
2. What are some key themes explored in the study of humanities related to "Bricks, Beads and Bones"? | ![]() |
3. How can students effectively prepare for exam questions related to "Bricks, Beads and Bones"? | ![]() |
4. What are some sure shot questions that could appear in exams on this topic? | ![]() |
5. Why is it important to understand the historical context of artifacts like bricks, beads, and bones in the study of humanities? | ![]() |