Chapter Notes: Outcomes of Democracy

Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. How do we assess democracy's outcomes?
3. Accountable, responsive and legitimate government
4. Economic growth and development
5. Reduction of inequality and poverty
6. Accommodation of social diversity
7. Dignity and freedom of citizens
8. Expectations and continuous evaluation of democracy
View more

Introduction

The chapter Outcomes of Democracy examines how democratic systems affect political life, economic development, social justice and individual freedom. It asks whether democracy delivers the promises made in principle and how we can judge its success by looking at what it produces in practice.

What is democracy? Democracy is a system of government in which final power rests with the people. Citizens participate in choosing their rulers and influencing public decisions through mechanisms such as voting, public debate and representation.

The following features are central to democratic systems:

• Individual freedoms: Citizens have the freedom of speech, association, religion and expression.
• Equal representation: Every citizen has a formal right to participate in politics and to have their voice counted.
• Protection of human rights: Democratic institutions are expected to protect basic rights and liberties of individuals.

How do we assess democracy's outcomes?

To evaluate the success of a democracy we look at both its procedures (e.g., elections, rule of law) and its outcomes (e.g., accountability, development, equality, dignity).

Common procedural features of democracies:

• Regular and free elections: Elections held at fixed intervals in which competing parties can contest.
• Universal adult franchise: The right to vote for all citizens beyond a specified minimum age.
• Political parties: Organisations that aggregate interests, propose policies and offer choices to voters.
• Rule of law: Laws apply equally to all persons and protect citizens from arbitrary action by the state.
• Independent institutions: Bodies such as courts, election commissions and audit institutions that check the government.

Democracy is widely preferred over dictatorship because it promotes equality, enhances the dignity of individuals, improves the quality of decision-making, provides peaceful methods to resolve conflicts and allows for correction of mistakes through public feedback and new elections.

• Promotes equality among citizens.
• Protects and enhances the dignity of individuals.
• Improves the quality of public decisions by encouraging debate and representation.
• Provides institutional methods to resolve conflicts peacefully.
• Allows room to correct mistakes by holding governments accountable.

Principle versus practice: While democratic ideals are widely accepted, democratic practice often falls short. Citizens may value democracy but be dissatisfied with its implementation when institutions are weak or when outcomes such as development and equality do not meet expectations.

Variation across countries: More than a hundred countries practice forms of democracy but differ greatly in how democratic institutions function because of their unique social, economic and cultural contexts.

• Expectations vs reality: Citizens expect democracies to deliver welfare, justice and rights; results vary depending on governance, resources and institutional strength.
• Active citizenship required: Democracy sets the stage for outcomes, but citizens must use democratic channels-voting, organising, protesting, using the media and legal remedies-to achieve goals.

Accountable, responsive and legitimate government

Political outcomes of democracy can be summarised as five core expectations that make government accountable, responsive and legitimate:

I. Fundamental political outcomes

• Right to choose and control: Citizens have the right to choose their rulers and influence public policy through elections and representation.
• Participation: People can participate in decision-making that affects their lives, directly or through representatives.
• Accountability: Governments are answerable to citizens and can be removed from office through elections or legal processes.
• Responsiveness: Governments should respond to the needs and demands of citizens, adjusting policies when necessary.
• Mechanisms for accountability: Democracies create formal channels-elections, legislatures, courts, audit institutions, media and civil society-that citizens can use to hold rulers to account.

II. Decision-making in democracy

• Deliberation and negotiation: Democratic decision-making relies on discussion, bargaining and compromise among competing interests.
• Procedural Approach: Following established procedures makes decisions legitimate and acceptable even to those who disagree with the outcome.

III. Mechanisms for citizen participation

• Elections: Regular, free and fair elections let citizens choose leaders and judge their performance.
• Public debate and media: Open discussion in media and civil society enables scrutiny and shapes public opinion.
• Right to information and legal remedies: Access to information, petitions, protests and courts allow citizens to seek redress and demand transparency.

IV. Transparency

• Procedural transparency: Democracies make the process of decision-making visible so citizens can understand and challenge choices.
• Contrast with non-democracies: Non-democratic regimes often lack transparency and limit public scrutiny of government actions.

V. Legitimacy

• People's government: Governments elected through recognised democratic procedures are seen as legitimate because they derive authority from the people.
• Widespread acceptance: Democracy enjoys global support as a preferred form of governance because it honours consent of the governed and civil liberties.

In short, democracy aims to make government accountable, responsive, transparent and legitimate by institutionalising people's participation and checks on power.

Economic growth and development

I. Democracy and economic growth

Scholars have compared economic performance in democracies and dictatorships across the twentieth century. Findings show that, over some periods (for example 1950-2000), dictatorships sometimes recorded slightly higher growth rates than democracies. However, growth is influenced by many factors other than the form of government.

• Factors affecting growth: Population size, global economic conditions, international cooperation, natural resources and national economic priorities all influence growth.
• Trade-offs: Democracies may grow more slowly at times because decision-making is deliberative and requires negotiation, but this process tends to protect fairness and rights.
• Value of democracy: Even if average growth rates are similar or slightly lower, democracy is recommended because it protects citizens' freedom and dignity, and because sustainable development requires institutions that are accountable and inclusive.

II. Democracy and development

• Deliberation and fairness: Democratic decision-making is slower but tends to produce more equitable and widely accepted policies.
• No automatic guarantee: Democracy does not guarantee rapid development; its strength lies in providing space for public scrutiny and correcting policies that do not work.

Economic Outcomes of Democracy

The relationship between democracy and economic outcomes can be summarised as follows:

• Between 1950 and 2000, some dictatorships achieved slightly faster growth than some democracies.
• Factors that affect a country's economic growth include:
  • Population size
  • Global circumstances
  • Cooperation with other nations
  • Economic priorities of the country
• The difference in development between democracies and dictatorships among less developed countries has often been small.
• Democracy should not be dismissed because it offers additional social and political benefits such as protection of rights, participation and accountability.

Reduction of inequality and poverty

Expectations: Democracies are expected to reduce economic inequalities and provide basic needs for all citizens. In theory, elected governments should respond to demands for welfare and redistribution because poorer groups form a sizeable electoral base.

Current realities

• Wealth Distribution: A small number of very wealthy individuals have a disproportionately large share of wealth and income, with their portion in the total income of the country rising. At the same time, a small segment of the population holds a significant amount of wealth, while those at the lower end struggle more.
• Basic Needs: People at the bottom of the economic ladder find it hard to meet essential needs such as food, housing, education, and healthcare, with their incomes declining.

• Democratic Effectiveness:

  • Political Equality vs. Economic Inequality: While democracies support political equality through voting rights, they may not effectively tackle economic inequality. In practice, democracies seem to struggle with reducing these inequalities.
  • Government Response: The poor make up a large group of voters, and no political party wants to lose their support. However, democratically elected governments do not seem very eager to address poverty issues as one might expect.

• Global Context:

  • Poverty in Poor Countries: In some nations, the situation is even worse, with many people living in poverty. Numerous poorer countries rely on aid from wealthier nations for basic supplies.

Accommodation of social diversity

One major political challenge for democracies is managing social diversity-differences of language, religion, region, caste and ethnicity-so that all groups feel included and conflicts are reduced.

Democratic approach

• Balancing majority rule with minority rights: Democracy requires that majority decisions do not become domination by one community; minorities must have safeguards and opportunities to be heard.
• Majority-minority cooperation: Effective democracies promote cooperation and accommodation between majorities and minorities.
• Constitutional protections: Rights, decentralisation, power sharing and affirmative action are ways to include minorities and reduce tensions.

Examples

• Belgium: Uses federal arrangements and power-sharing between linguistic communities to manage diversity and reduce conflict.
• Sri Lanka: Despite being a democracy, Sri Lanka experienced violent ethnic conflict when the concerns of minorities were not adequately addressed; this shows that democratic forms alone need supportive policies and accommodations to prevent domination by the majority.

Dignity and freedom of citizens

How democracy promotes dignity and freedom

Democracy is especially valued for promoting the dignity and freedom of individuals. The system recognises each person as an equal citizen with rights that the state must respect.

• Individual dignity: Democratic institutions and rights protect people from arbitrary discrimination and social exclusion.
• Freedom of expression and association: Citizens can express opinions, join groups and demand change without fear of state repression.
• Legal and moral support: Democracy strengthens legal remedies and moral norms that challenge discriminatory or oppressive social practices.

Challenges and achievements

• Women's dignity: Historically many societies were male-dominated; democratic movements and legal reform have advanced women's rights and social recognition.
• Legal and Moral Foundations: In democracies, the legal and moral support for individual freedom and dignity is stronger, creating a basis to challenge unacceptable practices.
• Caste inequalities in India: Democracy has empowered historically disadvantaged castes to claim equal status and access to opportunities; democratic norms and constitutional safeguards make caste-based discrimination legally unacceptable.

Expectations and continuous evaluation of democracy

Democracy is not a static achievement but a continuous process. Citizens frequently re-evaluate democratic institutions and demand better outcomes, making democracy an ever-renewing project.

• Unending examination: Democracies are constantly judged by citizens who raise new demands as awareness and expectations grow.
• Complaints as a sign of success: Public criticism and protest can indicate a healthy democracy because they show that people feel empowered to scrutinise power.
• From subjects to citizens: Widespread public dissatisfaction often reflects an active citizenship that expects accountability and change rather than passive acceptance.
• Belief in the impact of voting: A core expectation is that voting and public participation can change policies and protect people's interests.
• Awareness of rights: Democracy fosters awareness of civic rights which citizens use to demand better governance.
• Democracy versus other forms: Compared with dictatorship, democracy provides safer, more legitimate and more adaptable means of governance.
• Advantages summarised: Democracy promotes equality, dignity, better decision-making, peaceful conflict resolution and correction of errors through institutional mechanisms.

In conclusion, democracy's outcomes must be judged by both procedures and results: whether institutions are accountable, whether the economy promotes welfare and equity, whether diversity is managed peacefully, and whether individual dignity and freedom are upheld. Success requires active citizens, strong institutions and policies that translate democratic rights into real social and economic progress.