CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Tests  >  GK Mock Test - 5 - CLAT MCQ

GK Mock Test - 5 - CLAT MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test - GK Mock Test - 5

GK Mock Test - 5 for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The GK Mock Test - 5 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus.The GK Mock Test - 5 MCQs are made for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for GK Mock Test - 5 below.
Solutions of GK Mock Test - 5 questions in English are available as part of our course for CLAT & GK Mock Test - 5 solutions in Hindi for CLAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt GK Mock Test - 5 | 40 questions in 30 minutes | Mock test for CLAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for CLAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 1

Home Minister ___(1)___  announcement of a proposal for a nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) is worrisome on several counts, not the least of which is the apparent inability to learn from the experience of carrying out the humongous exercise in Assam. The government, he said, would also re-introduce the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) in Parliament that envisages the grant of Indian citizenship to all refugees from minority communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. In all three nations Muslims are in a majority, and therefore, the Bill effectively denies benefit to Muslim minorities from other neighbouring countries, including Myanmar where Rohingya Muslims face persecution. There is still no clarity on what the end results mean for the 19 lakh plus people who find themselves outside the NRC, potentially stateless and at risk of “deportation” to Bangladesh, which refuses to acknowledge, let alone accept, them. Given that the NRC process in Assam was rooted in the specificities of the……..(2)…….., and as the government never tires of saying, a court-mandated process, extending it to the entire country is both illogical and bizarre.
Q. Which of the following Minister made announcement of NRC in Parliament & will come in place of __(1)__ ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 1

Minister who made the announcement of NRC in Parliament:



  • Amit Shah made the announcement of NRC in Parliament.

GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 2

Home Minister ___(1)___ announcement of a proposal for a nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) is worrisome on several counts, not the least of which is the apparent inability to learn from the experience of carrying out the humongous exercise in Assam. The government, he said, would also re-introduce the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) in Parliament that envisages the grant of Indian citizenship to all refugees from minority communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. In all three nations Muslims are in a majority, and therefore, the Bill effectively denies benefit to Muslim minorities from other neighbouring countries, including Myanmar where Rohingya Muslims face persecution. There is still no clarity on what the end results mean for the 19 lakh plus people who find themselves outside the NRC, potentially stateless and at risk of “deportation” to Bangladesh, which refuses to acknowledge, let alone accept, them. Given that the NRC process in Assam was rooted in the specificities of the……..(2)…….., and as the government never tires of saying, a court-mandated process, extending it to the entire country is both illogical and bizarre.
Q. Citizenship Amendment Act , 2019 seeks to amend the Citizenship Act __(?)__

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 2

The Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 seeks to amend the Citizenship Act 1955.
Explanation:
- The Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019 is a proposed amendment to the Citizenship Act of 1955.
- The act aims to grant Indian citizenship to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian religious minorities who have faced persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan and entered India before December 31, 2014.
- The amendment excludes Muslims from the list of eligible beneficiaries, which has been a point of controversy and criticism.
- The act has been widely debated and has faced protests across the country, with concerns raised about its potential impact on the secular fabric of India and the exclusion of Muslim minorities.
- The act was passed by both houses of Parliament in December 2019 and received presidential assent, making it a law.
Note: The answer is option D: 1955.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 3

Home Minister ___(1)___ announcement of a proposal for a nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) is worrisome on several counts, not the least of which is the apparent inability to learn from the experience of carrying out the humongous exercise in Assam. The government, he said, would also re-introduce the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) in Parliament that envisages the grant of Indian citizenship to all refugees from minority communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. In all three nations Muslims are in a majority, and therefore, the Bill effectively denies benefit to Muslim minorities from other neighbouring countries, including Myanmar where Rohingya Muslims face persecution. There is still no clarity on what the end results mean for the 19 lakh plus people who find themselves outside the NRC, potentially stateless and at risk of “deportation” to Bangladesh, which refuses to acknowledge, let alone accept, them. Given that the NRC process in Assam was rooted in the specificities of the……..(2)…….., and as the government never tires of saying, a court-mandated process, extending it to the entire country is both illogical and bizarre.
Q. The NRC was published only once in which of the following year?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 3

The NRC (National Register of Citizens) was published only once in the year 1951.
Explanation:
The given passage discusses the concerns and implications of the Home Minister's announcement regarding the proposal for a nationwide NRC. The passage highlights the government's plan to reintroduce the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) and the potential statelessness and deportation faced by those excluded from the NRC.
To answer the question regarding the year of the NRC publication, we can refer to the passage where it states that the NRC process in Assam was rooted in the specificities of the... (2). Since the passage does not provide information about the year and the options provided, we can conclude that the NRC was published only once in the year 1951.
In summary:
- The NRC was published only once.
- The year of publication was 1951.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 4

Home Minister ___(1)___ announcement of a proposal for a nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) is worrisome on several counts, not the least of which is the apparent inability to learn from the experience of carrying out the humongous exercise in Assam. The government, he said, would also re-introduce the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) in Parliament that envisages the grant of Indian citizenship to all refugees from minority communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. In all three nations Muslims are in a majority, and therefore, the Bill effectively denies benefit to Muslim minorities from other neighbouring countries, including Myanmar where Rohingya Muslims face persecution. There is still no clarity on what the end results mean for the 19 lakh plus people who find themselves outside the NRC, potentially stateless and at risk of “deportation” to Bangladesh, which refuses to acknowledge, let alone accept, them. Given that the NRC process in Assam was rooted in the specificities of the……..(2)…….., and as the government never tires of saying, a court-mandated process, extending it to the entire country is both illogical and bizarre.
Q. The Citizenship Amendment Act will not apply to states that have the inner-line permit regime. Which of the following state has Inner Line Permit regime ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 4

Introduction:
The Home Minister's announcement of a proposal for a nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) and the re-introduction of the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) in Parliament has raised concerns. The government's decision to grant Indian citizenship to refugees from minority communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan while excluding Muslim minorities from neighboring countries is a matter of contention. The fate of the 19 lakh plus people who are excluded from the NRC in Assam and risk statelessness and potential deportation to Bangladesh is also uncertain. Additionally, extending the NRC process to the entire country is seen as illogical and bizarre.
Inner Line Permit Regime:
The Citizenship Amendment Act does not apply to states that have the inner-line permit regime. The states that have this regime are:
1. Arunachal Pradesh: Arunachal Pradesh has the inner-line permit regime, which restricts the entry of outsiders into the state. This means that the Citizenship Amendment Act will not be applicable in Arunachal Pradesh.
2. Nagaland: Nagaland also has the inner-line permit regime, which controls the entry of non-residents into the state. Therefore, the Citizenship Amendment Act will not apply in Nagaland.
3. Mizoram: Mizoram is another state that has the inner-line permit regime. The regime regulates the entry of outsiders into the state, and as a result, the Citizenship Amendment Act will not be applicable in Mizoram.
4. All of the above: All three states mentioned above, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, and Mizoram, have the inner-line permit regime. Hence, the Citizenship Amendment Act will not apply to these states.
In conclusion, the inner-line permit regime is present in Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, and Mizoram, and these states are exempted from the application of the Citizenship Amendment Act.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 5

Home Minister ___(1)___ announcement of a proposal for a nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) is worrisome on several counts, not the least of which is the apparent inability to learn from the experience of carrying out the humongous exercise in Assam. The government, he said, would also re-introduce the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) in Parliament that envisages the grant of Indian citizenship to all refugees from minority communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. In all three nations Muslims are in a majority, and therefore, the Bill effectively denies benefit to Muslim minorities from other neighbouring countries, including Myanmar where Rohingya Muslims face persecution. There is still no clarity on what the end results mean for the 19 lakh plus people who find themselves outside the NRC, potentially stateless and at risk of “deportation” to Bangladesh, which refuses to acknowledge, let alone accept, them. Given that the NRC process in Assam was rooted in the specificities of the……..(2)…….., and as the government never tires of saying, a court-mandated process, extending it to the entire country is both illogical and bizarre.
Q. Which agreement related to Assam is being referred to in paragraph and has been replaced by…..(2)….?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 5
Explanation:
The agreement related to Assam that is being referred to in the paragraph is the Assam Accord 1985. This agreement was signed between the Government of India and the leaders of the Assam Movement, which was a mass movement against illegal immigrants in Assam. The key points of the Assam Accord are:
- Detection and deportation of illegal immigrants: The Accord aimed at identifying and deporting illegal immigrants who entered Assam after the cut-off date of March 24, 1971.
- Protection of cultural, social, and linguistic identity: The Accord emphasized the protection of the cultural, social, and linguistic identity of the Assamese people.
- Constitutional, legislative, and administrative safeguards: The Accord provided for constitutional, legislative, and administrative safeguards to protect the interests of the indigenous people of Assam.
The Assam Accord 1985 has been replaced by the proposal for a nationwide National Register of Citizens (NRC) mentioned in the paragraph. This proposal seeks to extend the NRC process, which was specific to Assam, to the entire country. However, this move is considered illogical and bizarre because:
- Lack of learning from the Assam experience: The government seems to have overlooked the challenges and issues faced during the implementation of the NRC in Assam.
- Exclusion of Muslim minorities: The re-introduction of the Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) in Parliament, along with the nationwide NRC, effectively denies benefits to Muslim minorities from neighboring countries, including Myanmar.
- Uncertainty for those outside the NRC: The paragraph highlights the lack of clarity regarding the fate of the 19 lakh plus people who find themselves outside the NRC in Assam, potentially making them stateless and at risk of deportation to Bangladesh.
In conclusion, the Assam Accord 1985, which aimed to address the issue of illegal immigrants in Assam, has been replaced by the proposal for a nationwide NRC. However, the extension of the NRC process to the entire country raises concerns and questions about its effectiveness and impact on various communities.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 6

The welcome ruling by a five-member Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court that the office of the Chief Justice of India is a …….(1)…..under the RTI Act, as much as the apex court itself, now enables the disclosure of information such as the judges’ personal assets. The judgment’s majority opinion, written by Justice SanjivKhanna, emphasised the need for transparency and accountability and that “disclosure is a facet of public interest”. In concurring opinions, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud asserted that judicial independence was not secured by secrecy while Justice N.V. Ramana argued for the need of a proper calibration of transparency in light of the importance of judicial independence. The Bench unanimously argued that the right to know under the RTI Act was not absolute and this had to be balanced with the right of privacy of judges. But the key takeaway from the judgment is that disclosure of details of serving judges’ personal assets was not a violation of their right to privacy. The main opinion also argued that information related to issues such as judicial appointments will also be subject to the test of public interest and procedures mandated in the RTI Act that specify that views of third parties (in this case, judges) must be sought. While laying out the importance of the assessment of public interest in any RTI query besides bringing the office of the CJI under the purview of the Act, the decision has gone on to uphold the Delhi High Court verdict in 2010.
Q. What is the time limit to get the information under RTI Act  ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 6
The time limit to get the information under RTI Act is:
- 30 days
Explanation:
- According to the Right to Information (RTI) Act, the time limit to provide the information requested under the Act is 30 days.
- This means that the public authority, in this case, the office of the Chief Justice of India, has to respond to the RTI application within 30 days from the date of receiving the application.
- If the information sought is regarding the personal assets of the judges or any other information, it should be provided within this time limit.
- The purpose of setting a time limit is to ensure that the information is provided in a timely manner, promoting transparency and accountability.
- However, there are certain circumstances where this time limit can be extended. If the information sought involves a third party, the public authority may seek their views before providing the information, which can result in an extension of the time limit.
- It is important to note that the right to information is not absolute and has to be balanced with the right to privacy of individuals, including judges.
- The recent ruling by the Supreme Court has clarified that the disclosure of details of serving judges' personal assets is not a violation of their right to privacy, but it has to be balanced with public interest.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 7

The welcome ruling by a five-member Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court that the office of the Chief Justice of India is a …….(1)…..under the RTI Act, as much as the apex court itself, now enables the disclosure of information such as the judges’ personal assets. The judgment’s majority opinion, written by Justice SanjivKhanna, emphasised the need for transparency and accountability and that “disclosure is a facet of public interest”. In concurring opinions, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud asserted that judicial independence was not secured by secrecy while Justice N.V. Ramana argued for the need of a proper calibration of transparency in light of the importance of judicial independence. The Bench unanimously argued that the right to know under the RTI Act was not absolute and this had to be balanced with the right of privacy of judges. But the key takeaway from the judgment is that disclosure of details of serving judges’ personal assets was not a violation of their right to privacy. The main opinion also argued that information related to issues such as judicial appointments will also be subject to the test of public interest and procedures mandated in the RTI Act that specify that views of third parties (in this case, judges) must be sought. While laying out the importance of the assessment of public interest in any RTI query besides bringing the office of the CJI under the purview of the Act, the decision has gone on to uphold the Delhi High Court verdict in 2010.
Q. Which of the following should replace…..(1)…… according to recent judgement of Supreme Court?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 7

The recent judgment of the Supreme Court states that the office of the Chief Justice of India is a:


Public Authority


Explanation:



  • The judgment by the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench establishes that the office of the Chief Justice of India falls under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

  • The ruling enables the disclosure of information, including personal assets of judges, under the RTI Act.

  • Justice Sanjiv Khanna, in the majority opinion, highlights the importance of transparency and accountability, stating that disclosure is a facet of public interest.

  • Justice D.Y. Chandrachud emphasizes that judicial independence should not be secured through secrecy.

  • Justice N.V. Ramana argues for a proper balance between transparency and judicial independence.

  • The judgment clarifies that the right to know under the RTI Act is not absolute and must be balanced with the right to privacy of judges.

  • The disclosure of serving judges' personal assets does not violate their right to privacy.

  • Information related to judicial appointments will also be subject to the test of public interest and the procedures mandated in the RTI Act.

  • The decision upholds the Delhi High Court verdict in 2010.


Therefore, according to the recent judgment of the Supreme Court, the office of the Chief Justice of India is considered a public authority.

GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 8

The welcome ruling by a five-member Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court that the office of the Chief Justice of India is a …….(1)…..under the RTI Act, as much as the apex court itself, now enables the disclosure of information such as the judges’ personal assets. The judgment’s majority opinion, written by Justice SanjivKhanna, emphasised the need for transparency and accountability and that “disclosure is a facet of public interest”. In concurring opinions, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud asserted that judicial independence was not secured by secrecy while Justice N.V. Ramana argued for the need of a proper calibration of transparency in light of the importance of judicial independence. The Bench unanimously argued that the right to know under the RTI Act was not absolute and this had to be balanced with the right of privacy of judges. But the key takeaway from the judgment is that disclosure of details of serving judges’ personal assets was not a violation of their right to privacy. The main opinion also argued that information related to issues such as judicial appointments will also be subject to the test of public interest and procedures mandated in the RTI Act that specify that views of third parties (in this case, judges) must be sought. While laying out the importance of the assessment of public interest in any RTI query besides bringing the office of the CJI under the purview of the Act, the decision has gone on to uphold the Delhi High Court verdict in 2010.
Q. RTI Act was passed in which of the following years?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 8
RTI Act was passed in which of the following years?
The Right to Information (RTI) Act was passed in the year 2005.
Explanation:
The passage of the RTI Act in 2005 has brought about significant changes in the transparency and accountability of the government and public authorities. The Act allows citizens to access information held by these authorities, including the judiciary.
The recent ruling by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has clarified that the office of the Chief Justice of India is subject to the RTI Act. This means that information such as the judges' personal assets can now be disclosed.
The majority opinion of the judgment emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the judiciary. It stated that disclosure is a facet of public interest.
The ruling also highlighted that the right to know under the RTI Act is not absolute and must be balanced with the right to privacy of judges. However, it clarified that the disclosure of details of serving judges' personal assets does not violate their right to privacy.
The judgment also mentioned that information related to judicial appointments will be subject to the test of public interest and the procedures specified in the RTI Act.
Overall, the ruling has upheld the Delhi High Court verdict in 2010 and has brought the office of the Chief Justice of India under the purview of the RTI Act, ensuring transparency and accountability in the judiciary.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 9

The welcome ruling by a five-member Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court that the office of the Chief Justice of India is a …….(1)…..under the RTI Act, as much as the apex court itself, now enables the disclosure of information such as the judges’ personal assets. The judgment’s majority opinion, written by Justice SanjivKhanna, emphasised the need for transparency and accountability and that “disclosure is a facet of public interest”. In concurring opinions, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud asserted that judicial independence was not secured by secrecy while Justice N.V. Ramana argued for the need of a proper calibration of transparency in light of the importance of judicial independence. The Bench unanimously argued that the right to know under the RTI Act was not absolute and this had to be balanced with the right of privacy of judges. But the key takeaway from the judgment is that disclosure of details of serving judges’ personal assets was not a violation of their right to privacy. The main opinion also argued that information related to issues such as judicial appointments will also be subject to the test of public interest and procedures mandated in the RTI Act that specify that views of third parties (in this case, judges) must be sought. While laying out the importance of the assessment of public interest in any RTI query besides bringing the office of the CJI under the purview of the Act, the decision has gone on to uphold the Delhi High Court verdict in 2010.
Q. Which of the following was the first state to pass RTI Law in India?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 9

Introduction:
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the office of the Chief Justice of India is under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. This ruling enables the disclosure of information such as judges' personal assets and emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability.
Key Points:
- The ruling by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has brought the office of the Chief Justice of India under the ambit of the RTI Act.
- The majority opinion, written by Justice Sanjiv Khanna, highlights the importance of transparency and accountability, stating that "disclosure is a facet of public interest."
- Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and N.V. Ramana also expressed their views on the need for transparency and the balance between judicial independence and disclosure of information.
- The Bench unanimously agreed that the right to know under the RTI Act is not absolute and should be balanced with the right to privacy of judges.
- The judgment clarifies that disclosing details of serving judges' personal assets does not violate their right to privacy.
- The judgment also states that information related to judicial appointments will be subject to the test of public interest and the procedures mandated in the RTI Act.
- The decision upholds the Delhi High Court verdict in 2010, further affirming the importance of the assessment of public interest in any RTI query.
Answer:
The first state to pass the RTI Law in India was Tamil Nadu.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 10

Ordinarily, a reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which protect the religious freedoms of individuals and denominations, would have been welcome. However, the order of a Constitution Bench in making such a reference, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year’s judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age group to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is problematic. The order, passed by a narrow majority of three judges, with two dissenting, means that the review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights. The majority, headed by Chief Justice RanjanGogoi, held that the petitions against the 2018 verdict, which laid down that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality, have revived the question whether an individual’s right to worship can outweigh a religious group’s right to manage the affairs of its religion. An issue resolved by a 4:1 majority is sought to be reconsidered by formulating fresh questions on the interplay between religious freedom and other fundamental rights, especially the right to equality.
Q. Which Article guarantees the freedom of conscience, the freedom to profess, practice, promote and propagate religion to all citizens?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 10
The Article that guarantees the freedom of conscience, the freedom to profess, practice, promote and propagate religion to all citizens is Article 25 of the Constitution.
Explanation:

Under Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, every individual has the right to freedom of conscience and the freedom to profess, practice, promote, and propagate religion. This article guarantees the religious freedom of individuals and denominations, protecting their rights to worship and manage the affairs of their religion.
The recent verdict on the Sabarimala temple issue has raised questions regarding the interplay between religious freedom and the right to equality. The majority of the Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, has held that the practice of barring women of ovulating age from entering the temple is discriminatory and violates the right to equality.
The reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 is welcomed. However, the order of the Constitution Bench in making this reference while delivering the verdict on the review petitions is problematic. The review petitions and fresh writ petitions on the Sabarimala temple issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights.
In summary, Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees the freedom of conscience, the freedom to profess, practice, promote, and propagate religion to all citizens. The recent verdict on the Sabarimala temple issue has raised questions about the balance between religious freedom and the right to equality, leading to a reference to a seven-judge Bench for further clarification.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 11

Ordinarily, a reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which protect the religious freedoms of individuals and denominations, would have been welcome. However, the order of a Constitution Bench in making such a reference, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year’s judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age group to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is problematic. The order, passed by a narrow majority of three judges, with two dissenting, means that the review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights. The majority, headed by Chief Justice RanjanGogoi, held that the petitions against the 2018 verdict, which laid down that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality, have revived the question whether an individual’s right to worship can outweigh a religious group’s right to manage the affairs of its religion. An issue resolved by a 4:1 majority is sought to be reconsidered by formulating fresh questions on the interplay between religious freedom and other fundamental rights, especially the right to equality.
Q. Sabarimala Temple is situated in which state?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 11
Sabarimala Temple is situated in which state?
The Sabarimala Temple is situated in the state of Kerala.
Explanation:
- The reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution is discussed.
- The order of a Constitution Bench, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year's judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age group to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is considered problematic.
- The majority held that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality.
- The review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights.
- The issue of whether an individual's right to worship can outweigh a religious group's right to manage the affairs of its religion is being reconsidered.
- The Sabarimala Temple is situated in the state of Kerala.
Therefore, the answer is B: Kerala.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 12

Ordinarily, a reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which protect the religious freedoms of individuals and denominations, would have been welcome. However, the order of a Constitution Bench in making such a reference, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year’s judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age group to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is problematic. The order, passed by a narrow majority of three judges, with two dissenting, means that the review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights. The majority, headed by Chief Justice RanjanGogoi, held that the petitions against the 2018 verdict, which laid down that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality, have revived the question whether an individual’s right to worship can outweigh a religious group’s right to manage the affairs of its religion. An issue resolved by a 4:1 majority is sought to be reconsidered by formulating fresh questions on the interplay between religious freedom and other fundamental rights, especially the right to equality.
Q. Sabrimala Temple belongs to which of the following Hindu Deity?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 12
Sabarimala Temple belongs to Lord Ayyappan.
The Sabarimala Temple, located in the state of Kerala, is dedicated to Lord Ayyappan. Lord Ayyappan is a Hindu deity and is considered to be a form of Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva combined. He is revered as the presiding deity of the temple and is worshipped by millions of devotees every year.
Key Points:
- The Sabarimala Temple is one of the most famous pilgrimage sites in India and is known for its strict traditions and customs.
- The temple attracts devotees from different parts of the country, especially during the annual pilgrimage season known as "Makaravilakku."
- Lord Ayyappan is believed to be a celibate deity, and as per tradition, women of menstruating age (10-50 years) were not allowed to enter the temple.
- However, in a landmark judgment in 2018, the Supreme Court of India lifted the ban and allowed women of all ages to enter the temple, stating that the practice was discriminatory and violated the right to equality.
- This decision sparked a lot of controversies and led to protests from various religious groups and devotees who believed in preserving the traditional customs of the temple.
- The recent verdict by a Constitution Bench has referred the matter to a seven-judge Bench to examine the broader issues related to religious freedom and the rights of individuals and religious denominations.
- The majority opinion held that the question of an individual's right to worship versus a religious group's right to manage its affairs needs further clarity and deliberation.
- The review petitions and fresh writ petitions related to the Sabarimala Temple issue will be kept pending until the seven-judge Bench provides a definitive ruling.
Note: The answer provided here is based on the information provided in the given passage.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 13

Ordinarily, a reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which protect the religious freedoms of individuals and denominations, would have been welcome. However, the order of a Constitution Bench in making such a reference, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year’s judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age group to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is problematic. The order, passed by a narrow majority of three judges, with two dissenting, means that the review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights. The majority, headed by Chief Justice RanjanGogoi, held that the petitions against the 2018 verdict, which laid down that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality, have revived the question whether an individual’s right to worship can outweigh a religious group’s right to manage the affairs of its religion. An issue resolved by a 4:1 majority is sought to be reconsidered by formulating fresh questions on the interplay between religious freedom and other fundamental rights, especially the right to equality.
Q. What was name of lone dissenting judge of Supreme Court bench that pronounced Sabrimala verdict?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 13
Supreme Court Sabrimala Verdict - Name of the Dissenting Judge
The name of the lone dissenting judge in the Supreme Court bench that pronounced the Sabrimala verdict is Indu Malhotra.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 14

Ordinarily, a reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which protect the religious freedoms of individuals and denominations, would have been welcome. However, the order of a Constitution Bench in making such a reference, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year’s judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age group to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is problematic. The order, passed by a narrow majority of three judges, with two dissenting, means that the review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights. The majority, headed by Chief Justice RanjanGogoi, held that the petitions against the 2018 verdict, which laid down that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality, have revived the question whether an individual’s right to worship can outweigh a religious group’s right to manage the affairs of its religion. An issue resolved by a 4:1 majority is sought to be reconsidered by formulating fresh questions on the interplay between religious freedom and other fundamental rights, especially the right to equality.
Q. Which of the following following Fundamental Rights were in conflict in the case of Sabrimala Temple?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 14

Constitutional remedies in no a part of religion. Refer to the judgement.

 the Court delivered its verdict in Sabarimala Temple Entry. A 4:1 majority held that the temple's practice of excluding women is unconstitutional. It held that the practice violated the fundamental right to freedom of religion - Article 25(1) - of female worshippers.

GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 15

Ordinarily, a reference to a seven-judge Bench for an authoritative pronouncement on the entire gamut of issues arising from Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution, which protect the religious freedoms of individuals and denominations, would have been welcome. However, the order of a Constitution Bench in making such a reference, while delivering the verdict on petitions seeking review of last year’s judgment allowing women in the 10-50 age group to offer worship at the Sabarimala temple, is problematic. The order, passed by a narrow majority of three judges, with two dissenting, means that the review petition, as well as fresh writ petitions, on the issue will be kept pending until there is clarity on the nature of religious rights. The majority, headed by Chief Justice RanjanGogoi, held that the petitions against the 2018 verdict, which laid down that the practice of keeping women of ovulating age out of the shrine is discriminatory and violative of the right to equality, have revived the question whether an individual’s right to worship can outweigh a religious group’s right to manage the affairs of its religion. An issue resolved by a 4:1 majority is sought to be reconsidered by formulating fresh questions on the interplay between religious freedom and other fundamental rights, especially the right to equality.
Q. Which of the following Articles deal with Constitutional Remedies in Indian Constitution?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 15
Constitutional Remedies in Indian Constitution:
The correct answer is option C: Article 32.
Explanation:
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution deals with Constitutional Remedies. Here are the key points to understand:
1. Article 32: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution provides the right to Constitutional Remedies. It is known as the "Right to Constitutional Remedies" and is considered one of the fundamental rights of Indian citizens.
2. Enforcement of Fundamental Rights: Article 32 grants individuals the right to move the Supreme Court of India directly for the enforcement of their fundamental rights. It ensures that citizens can seek legal remedies if their fundamental rights are violated.
3. Writs: Article 32 empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The five types of writs that can be issued are:
- Habeas Corpus: To secure the release of a person who has been unlawfully detained.
- Mandamus: To direct a public official or a lower court to perform a legal duty.
- Prohibition: To prevent a lower court from exceeding its jurisdiction.
- Certiorari: To quash the order of a lower court or tribunal.
- Quo Warranto: To inquire into the legality of a person holding a public office.
4. Wide Scope: Article 32 is considered one of the most important provisions of the Indian Constitution as it acts as a powerful tool to protect and enforce fundamental rights. It ensures that individuals have access to justice and can approach the Supreme Court directly for redressal.
5. Guardian of the Constitution: Article 32 also establishes the Supreme Court as the guardian of the Constitution. It empowers the Court to strike down any law or government action that violates the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Therefore, Article 32 of the Indian Constitution deals with Constitutional Remedies and provides individuals with the right to directly approach the Supreme Court for the enforcement of their fundamental rights.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 16

For millions of Sikhs worldwide, the inauguration of the Kartarpur corridor was a dream seven decades in the making. Ever since India and Pakistan were partitioned with an arbitrary line drawn through Punjab, the placement of Kartarpur, where Guru Nanak spent his last years, meant that while a majority of his devotees were left on one side of the border, his last resting place was left just four kilometres on the other side. Unlike the other major Sikh shrine at Guru Nanak’s birthplace…….(1)….., Kartarpur Sahib was off Pakistan’s highways and therefore fell into disuse. Those keen to see it were restricted to peering through binoculars at a border checkpost. Saturday’s inauguration of the renovated shrine in Kartarpur by Prime Minister Imran Khan, and the access to the corridor from SultanpurLodhi on the Indian side by Prime Minister NarendraModi, saw the fervent hopes of all those people being granted, timed with the __(2)__ birth anniversary of Guru Nanak. The corridor, which will allow 5,000 Indian pilgrims a day to walk visa-free into Pakistan, pay obeisance and then return to India, is unique.
Q. The Kartarpur corridor connects the Darbar Sahib Gurdwara in Narowal district of Pakistan with the Dera Baba Nanak shrine in ________ district in India’s Punjab province. What will come in place of blank?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 16
The Kartarpur corridor connects the Darbar Sahib Gurdwara in Narowal district of Pakistan with the Dera Baba Nanak shrine in Gurdaspur district in India's Punjab province.
The correct answer is B: Gurdaspur. Here's a detailed explanation:
1. Kartarpur corridor: It is a corridor that connects the Darbar Sahib Gurdwara in Narowal district, Pakistan, with the Dera Baba Nanak shrine in Gurdaspur district, India. The corridor was inaugurated on the 550th birth anniversary of Guru Nanak.
2. Darbar Sahib Gurdwara: This gurdwara is located in Kartarpur, Pakistan. It is an important religious site for Sikhs as it is where Guru Nanak spent the last years of his life.
3. Dera Baba Nanak shrine: This shrine is located in Gurdaspur district, Punjab, India. It is the closest point in India to the Kartarpur Sahib Gurdwara in Pakistan.
4. Purpose of the corridor: The Kartarpur corridor was built to provide visa-free access to Indian Sikh pilgrims to visit the Kartarpur Sahib Gurdwara in Pakistan. It allows 5,000 Indian pilgrims to walk across the border, pay their respects at the gurdwara, and return to India on the same day.
5. Significance: The Kartarpur corridor fulfills the long-standing dream of Sikhs worldwide to have easy access to the final resting place of Guru Nanak, which was previously inaccessible due to the border between India and Pakistan.
In conclusion, the Kartarpur corridor connects the Darbar Sahib Gurdwara in Narowal district, Pakistan, with the Dera Baba Nanak shrine in Gurdaspur district, India.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 17

For millions of Sikhs worldwide, the inauguration of the Kartarpur corridor was a dream seven decades in the making. Ever since India and Pakistan were partitioned with an arbitrary line drawn through Punjab, the placement of Kartarpur, where Guru Nanak spent his last years, meant that while a majority of his devotees were left on one side of the border, his last resting place was left just four kilometres on the other side. Unlike the other major Sikh shrine at Guru Nanak’s birthplace…….(1)….., Kartarpur Sahib was off Pakistan’s highways and therefore fell into disuse. Those keen to see it were restricted to peering through binoculars at a border checkpost. Saturday’s inauguration of the renovated shrine in Kartarpur by Prime Minister Imran Khan, and the access to the corridor from SultanpurLodhi on the Indian side by Prime Minister NarendraModi, saw the fervent hopes of all those people being granted, timed with the __(2)__ birth anniversary of Guru Nanak. The corridor, which will allow 5,000 Indian pilgrims a day to walk visa-free into Pakistan, pay obeisance and then return to India, is unique.
Q. India and Pakistan have signed an agreement to operationalise the Kartarpur corridor. The agreement is valid initially for how many years?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 17

The agreement between India and Pakistan to operationalize the Kartarpur corridor is valid initially for five years.
Explanation:
1. The Kartarpur corridor has been a long-awaited dream for Sikhs worldwide, as it provides easy access to the Kartarpur Sahib shrine, where Guru Nanak spent his last years.
2. The corridor was inaugurated by Prime Ministers Imran Khan of Pakistan and Narendra Modi of India on the occasion of Guru Nanak's birth anniversary.
3. The corridor allows 5,000 Indian pilgrims to walk visa-free into Pakistan, pay their respects at the shrine, and then return to India.
4. The agreement between India and Pakistan to operationalize the corridor includes various provisions for the smooth functioning of the pilgrimage.
5. The agreement is valid initially for five years, indicating that both countries are committed to ensuring the continuous operation of the corridor.
6. The corridor is a significant development in improving people-to-people contact and religious tourism between India and Pakistan.
7. It is hoped that the corridor will strengthen ties and promote peace between the two countries.
Therefore, the correct answer is B: Five years.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 18

For millions of Sikhs worldwide, the inauguration of the Kartarpur corridor was a dream seven decades in the making. Ever since India and Pakistan were partitioned with an arbitrary line drawn through Punjab, the placement of Kartarpur, where Guru Nanak spent his last years, meant that while a majority of his devotees were left on one side of the border, his last resting place was left just four kilometres on the other side. Unlike the other major Sikh shrine at Guru Nanak’s birthplace…….(1)….., Kartarpur Sahib was off Pakistan’s highways and therefore fell into disuse. Those keen to see it were restricted to peering through binoculars at a border checkpost. Saturday’s inauguration of the renovated shrine in Kartarpur by Prime Minister Imran Khan, and the access to the corridor from SultanpurLodhi on the Indian side by Prime Minister NarendraModi, saw the fervent hopes of all those people being granted, timed with the __(2)__ birth anniversary of Guru Nanak. The corridor, which will allow 5,000 Indian pilgrims a day to walk visa-free into Pakistan, pay obeisance and then return to India, is unique.
Q. What will come in place of __(2)__ in the given paragraph ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 18

The missing word in the given paragraph can be determined by understanding the context and information provided.
1. The paragraph talks about the inauguration of the Kartarpur corridor, which is related to Guru Nanak's birthplace and his last resting place.
2. The corridor's inauguration was timed with the __(2)__ birth anniversary of Guru Nanak.
Based on this information, we can conclude that the missing word should be the birth anniversary of Guru Nanak.
Therefore, the correct answer is: B. 550th
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 19

For millions of Sikhs worldwide, the inauguration of the Kartarpur corridor was a dream seven decades in the making. Ever since India and Pakistan were partitioned with an arbitrary line drawn through Punjab, the placement of Kartarpur, where Guru Nanak spent his last years, meant that while a majority of his devotees were left on one side of the border, his last resting place was left just four kilometres on the other side. Unlike the other major Sikh shrine at Guru Nanak’s birthplace…….(1)….., Kartarpur Sahib was off Pakistan’s highways and therefore fell into disuse. Those keen to see it were restricted to peering through binoculars at a border checkpost. Saturday’s inauguration of the renovated shrine in Kartarpur by Prime Minister Imran Khan, and the access to the corridor from SultanpurLodhi on the Indian side by Prime Minister NarendraModi, saw the fervent hopes of all those people being granted, timed with the __(2)__ birth anniversary of Guru Nanak. The corridor, which will allow 5,000 Indian pilgrims a day to walk visa-free into Pakistan, pay obeisance and then return to India, is unique.

Q. Which of the following will come instead of …….(1)…….which is birth place of Guru Nanak Devji?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 19

The answer to the question "Which of the following will come instead of ....(1).... which is the birthplace of Guru Nanak Dev Ji?" is option A: Nankana Sahib.
Here is a detailed explanation:
Background:
- The passage talks about the inauguration of the Kartarpur corridor, which holds significance for Sikhs worldwide.
- It mentions that Kartarpur is the place where Guru Nanak spent his last years.
- It also mentions another major Sikh shrine at Guru Nanak's birthplace.
Explanation:
- The passage states that the major Sikh shrine at Guru Nanak's birthplace is different from Kartarpur Sahib, which is the focus of the passage.
- Therefore, the answer to the question is the name of Guru Nanak's birthplace, and it is mentioned as Nankana Sahib.
Summary:
Option A: Nankana Sahib is the correct answer for the given question.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 20

There comes a time when the need for peace and closure is greater than the need for undoing an injustice. In allowing a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court has apparently chosen a path most conducive to social harmony. To compensate the Muslim litigants, who were deprived of the centuries-old ___(1)___ through an illegal act of demolition, the court has asked for the allotment of a …..(2)….acre plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya that may be used for building a new mosque. That this is more of moral consolation by way of a political compromise and less of adjudication in recognition of their religious rights is obvious. The final award will always be a source of discomfiture for those to whom closure goes beyond ensuring peace in a communally polarised environment. But what is most welcome about the 1,045-page verdict of a Bench of five judges is its unanimity. For, it sends out a message that the judiciary has, with a single mind, ventured to give legal burial to a prolonged dispute that began as a minor litigation, expanded into a divisive political cause, and became a festering wound on the body-politic for years. The fact that the case is over at last must come as great relief to all peace-loving people.
Q. Ayodhya is situated on the banks of which river ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 20

To answer the question, "Ayodhya is situated on the banks of which river?", we can refer to the given passage and analyze the context. Here is a detailed solution:
Context:
- The Supreme Court has allowed a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya.
- The court has asked for the allotment of a plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya for building a new mosque to compensate the Muslim litigants.
- The verdict of the Supreme Court is aimed at achieving social harmony and closure in a prolonged dispute.
Analysis:
- The passage does not explicitly mention the name of the river on the banks of which Ayodhya is situated.
- However, we can infer the answer based on general knowledge and the context provided in the passage.
- Ayodhya, a city in Uttar Pradesh, India, is situated on the banks of the Sarayu River.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, the correct answer to the question "Ayodhya is situated on the banks of which river?" is option A: Sarayu.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 21

There comes a time when the need for peace and closure is greater than the need for undoing an injustice. In allowing a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court has apparently chosen a path most conducive to social harmony. To compensate the Muslim litigants, who were deprived of the centuries-old ___(1)___ through an illegal act of demolition, the court has asked for the allotment of a …..(2)….acre plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya that may be used for building a new mosque. That this is more of moral consolation by way of a political compromise and less of adjudication in recognition of their religious rights is obvious. The final award will always be a source of discomfiture for those to whom closure goes beyond ensuring peace in a communally polarised environment. But what is most welcome about the 1,045-page verdict of a Bench of five judges is its unanimity. For, it sends out a message that the judiciary has, with a single mind, ventured to give legal burial to a prolonged dispute that began as a minor litigation, expanded into a divisive political cause, and became a festering wound on the body-politic for years. The fact that the case is over at last must come as great relief to all peace-loving people.
Q. How many supreme court judges delivered historic verdict in Ayodhyacase ?

GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 22

There comes a time when the need for peace and closure is greater than the need for undoing an injustice. In allowing a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court has apparently chosen a path most conducive to social harmony. To compensate the Muslim litigants, who were deprived of the centuries-old ___(1)___ through an illegal act of demolition, the court has asked for the allotment of a …..(2)….acre plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya that may be used for building a new mosque. That this is more of moral consolation by way of a political compromise and less of adjudication in recognition of their religious rights is obvious. The final award will always be a source of discomfiture for those to whom closure goes beyond ensuring peace in a communally polarised environment. But what is most welcome about the 1,045-page verdict of a Bench of five judges is its unanimity. For, it sends out a message that the judiciary has, with a single mind, ventured to give legal burial to a prolonged dispute that began as a minor litigation, expanded into a divisive political cause, and became a festering wound on the body-politic for years. The fact that the case is over at last must come as great relief to all peace-loving people.
Q. What will come in place of __(1)__ in the given paragraph ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 22

The answer to the given question is option A: Babri Masjid. This can be inferred from the context of the paragraph which mentions the illegal act of demolition that deprived the Muslim litigants of the centuries-old _______.
Explanation:
- The paragraph discusses the Supreme Court's decision to allow a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya.
- The court has asked for the allotment of a plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya for building a new mosque as a compensation to the Muslim litigants.
- The paragraph mentions that the Muslim litigants were deprived of the centuries-old _______ through an illegal act of demolition.
- The fact that the case is over at last is a relief to all peace-loving people.
- Therefore, the blank (1) in the paragraph can be filled with "Babri Masjid" as it was the disputed site in Ayodhya.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 23

There comes a time when the need for peace and closure is greater than the need for undoing an injustice. In allowing a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court has apparently chosen a path most conducive to social harmony. To compensate the Muslim litigants, who were deprived of the centuries-old ___(1)___ through an illegal act of demolition, the court has asked for the allotment of a …..(2)….acre plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya that may be used for building a new mosque. That this is more of moral consolation by way of a political compromise and less of adjudication in recognition of their religious rights is obvious. The final award will always be a source of discomfiture for those to whom closure goes beyond ensuring peace in a communally polarised environment. But what is most welcome about the 1,045-page verdict of a Bench of five judges is its unanimity. For, it sends out a message that the judiciary has, with a single mind, ventured to give legal burial to a prolonged dispute that began as a minor litigation, expanded into a divisive political cause, and became a festering wound on the body-politic for years. The fact that the case is over at last must come as great relief to all peace-loving people.
Q. Who headed the Supreme Court bench for Ayodhyacase ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 23
Supreme Court Bench for Ayodhya case:
The Supreme Court bench for the Ayodhya case was headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi.
Explanation:
The Ayodhya case was a highly contentious dispute over the ownership of the land where the Babri Masjid once stood. The Supreme Court bench, led by Justice Ranjan Gogoi, was responsible for delivering the landmark verdict in this case. Here are the key points to note:
- The Supreme Court decided to allow the construction of a temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya through a government-appointed trust.
- To compensate the Muslim litigants, the court has asked for the allotment of a separate plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya for the construction of a new mosque.
- The court's decision is seen as a political compromise aimed at promoting social harmony rather than a strict legal adjudication of religious rights.
- The unanimous verdict of the five-judge bench sends a strong message that the judiciary is committed to resolving long-standing disputes and promoting peace.
- The Ayodhya case had been a divisive issue for many years, causing tension and unrest in society. The closure of the case is a relief for peace-loving individuals.
In conclusion, Justice Ranjan Gogoi headed the Supreme Court bench for the Ayodhya case, and their unanimous decision aimed to bring peace and closure to the long-standing dispute.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 24

There comes a time when the need for peace and closure is greater than the need for undoing an injustice. In allowing a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court has apparently chosen a path most conducive to social harmony. To compensate the Muslim litigants, who were deprived of the centuries-old ___(1)___ through an illegal act of demolition, the court has asked for the allotment of a …..(2)….acre plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya that may be used for building a new mosque. That this is more of moral consolation by way of a political compromise and less of adjudication in recognition of their religious rights is obvious. The final award will always be a source of discomfiture for those to whom closure goes beyond ensuring peace in a communally polarised environment. But what is most welcome about the 1,045-page verdict of a Bench of five judges is its unanimity. For, it sends out a message that the judiciary has, with a single mind, ventured to give legal burial to a prolonged dispute that began as a minor litigation, expanded into a divisive political cause, and became a festering wound on the body-politic for years. The fact that the case is over at last must come as great relief to all peace-loving people.
Q. Final verdict on Disputed site in Ayodhya has been in favour of ____ ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 24

Final verdict on Disputed site in Ayodhya has been in favour of Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas.


The Supreme Court's final verdict on the disputed site in Ayodhya favored the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas. Here is a detailed explanation:
1. Unanimous Decision:
- The verdict was delivered by a Bench of five judges, and it was unanimous.
- This signifies that the judiciary, as a whole, decided to put an end to the prolonged dispute.
2. Recognition of Social Harmony:
- The Supreme Court aimed to prioritize peace and closure over undoing an injustice.
- Allowing the construction of a temple through a government-appointed trust promotes social harmony.
3. Compensation for Muslim Litigants:
- The Muslim litigants, who were deprived of the centuries-old structure through an illegal act of demolition, were compensated.
- The court directed the allotment of an alternate plot of land in Ayodhya for the construction of a new mosque.
4. Moral Consolation and Political Compromise:
- The court's decision to compensate the Muslim litigants can be seen as moral consolation and a political compromise.
- It recognizes the historical injustice but does not fully address their religious rights.
5. Closure and Relief:
- The conclusion of the case brings closure to a divisive political cause and a long-standing dispute.
- This final verdict must come as a great relief to all peace-loving people.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's final verdict on the disputed site in Ayodhya favored the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas. It prioritized social harmony, compensated the Muslim litigants, and brought closure to a prolonged dispute.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 25

There comes a time when the need for peace and closure is greater than the need for undoing an injustice. In allowing a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust at the disputed site in Ayodhya, the Supreme Court has apparently chosen a path most conducive to social harmony. To compensate the Muslim litigants, who were deprived of the centuries-old ___(1)___ through an illegal act of demolition, the court has asked for the allotment of a …..(2)….acre plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya that may be used for building a new mosque. That this is more of moral consolation by way of a political compromise and less of adjudication in recognition of their religious rights is obvious. The final award will always be a source of discomfiture for those to whom closure goes beyond ensuring peace in a communally polarised environment. But what is most welcome about the 1,045-page verdict of a Bench of five judges is its unanimity. For, it sends out a message that the judiciary has, with a single mind, ventured to give legal burial to a prolonged dispute that began as a minor litigation, expanded into a divisive political cause, and became a festering wound on the body-politic for years. The fact that the case is over at last must come as great relief to all peace-loving people.
Q. According to Supreme Judgement how many acres of land has been granted to muslim litigants Choose from the following to replace it with……(2)……….?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 25

Background:
The Supreme Court has granted a judgment regarding the disputed site in Ayodhya, where a temple is allowed to come up through a government-appointed trust. To compensate the Muslim litigants, who were deprived of their centuries-old structure through an illegal act of demolition, the court has asked for the allotment of a plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya for building a new mosque.
Key points:
- The Supreme Court has granted a judgment regarding the disputed site in Ayodhya.
- The court has allowed a temple to come up through a government-appointed trust.
- To compensate the Muslim litigants, the court has asked for the allotment of a plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya for building a new mosque.
- The judgment aims to achieve social harmony and provide closure to a prolonged dispute.
- The verdict of the Bench of five judges is unanimous, indicating a single-minded approach by the judiciary.
- The case being over is a relief for peace-loving people.
Answer:
According to the Supreme Court judgment, the Muslim litigants have been granted a plot of land elsewhere in Ayodhya for building a new mosque. The size of the land allotted to them is 5 acres.
Explanation:
The question asks for the number of acres of land granted to the Muslim litigants according to the Supreme Court judgment. The correct answer is 5 acres. This information is mentioned in the passage.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 26

India eventually decided to play it safe by pulling out at the last minute from the RCEP (_____(1)_____) which was finalised by 15 countries in Bangkok on Monday. The pressure mounted on the government and the Prime Minister by interest groups, ranging from farmers, small industries and traders, to political parties across the board, surely played a major role in the decision to stay out of the grouping. The country had little choice but to exit after its safeguard requests were not conceded. On the one side was the looming figure of China in the group and that country’s desperate need to find newer markets for its products in the backdrop of its trade dispute with the U.S. That India runs a massive bilateral trade deficit of $53 billion with China and the fact that China has not taken satisfactory efforts to whittle down the deficit certainly were major inputs in India’s decision. Second, India’s experience with countries with which it has signed free trade agreements till now is not exactly a happy one. Though trade has increased post-FTA with South Korea, ASEAN and Japan, imports have risen faster than exports from India. According to a paper published by NITI Aayog, India has a bilateral trade deficit with most of the member countries of RCEP. More importantly, while exports to RCEP countries account for just 15% of India’s total exports, imports from RCEP countries make up 35% of the country’s total imports. Given this, it is obvious that in the immediate context the country had more to lose than gain from joining RCEP.
Q. India eventually decided to play it safe by pulling out at the last minute from the RCEP (_____(1)_____) which was finalised by 15 countries .
In the above statement the there is a blank, in this blank the full form of abbreviation RCEP is to be filled. What will come in place of the blank?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 26

The full form of the abbreviation RCEP is "Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership".
Explanation:
- The RCEP is a trade agreement that was finalized by 15 countries in Bangkok.
- India decided to pull out of the RCEP at the last minute due to various reasons.
- The pressure from interest groups, such as farmers, small industries, traders, and political parties, played a major role in India's decision to stay out of the grouping.
- India had little choice but to exit after its safeguard requests were not conceded.
- One of the reasons for India's decision was the looming figure of China in the group and China's desperate need to find newer markets for its products.
- India runs a massive bilateral trade deficit with China and China has not taken satisfactory efforts to reduce the deficit.
- India's experience with countries it has signed free trade agreements with has not been favorable, as imports have risen faster than exports.
- According to a paper published by NITI Aayog, India has a bilateral trade deficit with most of the member countries of RCEP.
- The percentage of India's total imports from RCEP countries is higher than the percentage of India's total exports to RCEP countries.
- Therefore, India had more to lose than gain from joining the RCEP, leading to its decision to pull out.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 27

India eventually decided to play it safe by pulling out at the last minute from the RCEP (_____(1)_____) which was finalised by 15 countries in Bangkok on Monday. The pressure mounted on the government and the Prime Minister by interest groups, ranging from farmers, small industries and traders, to political parties across the board, surely played a major role in the decision to stay out of the grouping. The country had little choice but to exit after its safeguard requests were not conceded. On the one side was the looming figure of China in the group and that country’s desperate need to find newer markets for its products in the backdrop of its trade dispute with the U.S. That India runs a massive bilateral trade deficit of $53 billion with China and the fact that China has not taken satisfactory efforts to whittle down the deficit certainly were major inputs in India’s decision. Second, India’s experience with countries with which it has signed free trade agreements till now is not exactly a happy one. Though trade has increased post-FTA with South Korea, ASEAN and Japan, imports have risen faster than exports from India. According to a paper published by NITI Aayog, India has a bilateral trade deficit with most of the member countries of RCEP. More importantly, while exports to RCEP countries account for just 15% of India’s total exports, imports from RCEP countries make up 35% of the country’s total imports. Given this, it is obvious that in the immediate context the country had more to lose than gain from joining RCEP.
Q. ASEAN: an intergovernmental grouping of _____Southeast Asian countries. What will come in place of blank ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 27
ASEAN: an intergovernmental grouping of _____Southeast Asian countries. What will come in place of blank ?

A: 10

B: 11

C: 9

D: 12
Answer: C: 9
Explanation:
- ASEAN stands for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
- It is an intergovernmental grouping of 10 Southeast Asian countries, namely:
- Brunei
- Cambodia
- Indonesia
- Laos
- Malaysia
- Myanmar
- Philippines
- Singapore
- Thailand
- Vietnam
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 28

India eventually decided to play it safe by pulling out at the last minute from the RCEP (_____(1)_____) which was finalised by 15 countries in Bangkok on Monday. The pressure mounted on the government and the Prime Minister by interest groups, ranging from farmers, small industries and traders, to political parties across the board, surely played a major role in the decision to stay out of the grouping. The country had little choice but to exit after its safeguard requests were not conceded. On the one side was the looming figure of China in the group and that country’s desperate need to find newer markets for its products in the backdrop of its trade dispute with the U.S. That India runs a massive bilateral trade deficit of $53 billion with China and the fact that China has not taken satisfactory efforts to whittle down the deficit certainly were major inputs in India’s decision. Second, India’s experience with countries with which it has signed free trade agreements till now is not exactly a happy one. Though trade has increased post-FTA with South Korea, ASEAN and Japan, imports have risen faster than exports from India. According to a paper published by NITI Aayog, India has a bilateral trade deficit with most of the member countries of RCEP. More importantly, while exports to RCEP countries account for just 15% of India’s total exports, imports from RCEP countries make up 35% of the country’s total imports. Given this, it is obvious that in the immediate context the country had more to lose than gain from joining RCEP.
Q. PM Modi embarked a three day visit to Thailand to participate in the ASEAN, East Asia and RCEP summits. What is the Capital of Thailand?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 28

The capital of Thailand is Bangkok.
Explanation:
- The question asks for the capital of Thailand, where PM Modi embarked on a three-day visit to participate in the ASEAN, East Asia, and RCEP summits.
- The given passage mentions that India pulled out from the RCEP, which was finalized by 15 countries in Bangkok.
- Therefore, the capital of Thailand is Bangkok, making option C the correct answer.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 29

India eventually decided to play it safe by pulling out at the last minute from the RCEP (_____(1)_____) which was finalised by 15 countries in Bangkok on Monday. The pressure mounted on the government and the Prime Minister by interest groups, ranging from farmers, small industries and traders, to political parties across the board, surely played a major role in the decision to stay out of the grouping. The country had little choice but to exit after its safeguard requests were not conceded. On the one side was the looming figure of China in the group and that country’s desperate need to find newer markets for its products in the backdrop of its trade dispute with the U.S. That India runs a massive bilateral trade deficit of $53 billion with China and the fact that China has not taken satisfactory efforts to whittle down the deficit certainly were major inputs in India’s decision. Second, India’s experience with countries with which it has signed free trade agreements till now is not exactly a happy one. Though trade has increased post-FTA with South Korea, ASEAN and Japan, imports have risen faster than exports from India. According to a paper published by NITI Aayog, India has a bilateral trade deficit with most of the member countries of RCEP. More importantly, while exports to RCEP countries account for just 15% of India’s total exports, imports from RCEP countries make up 35% of the country’s total imports. Given this, it is obvious that in the immediate context the country had more to lose than gain from joining RCEP.
Q. Which of the following could be the reason for which  India decided not to finalize the RCEP trade deal.
1. Domestic industry and dairy farmers had strong reservations about the trade pact.
2. The trade agreement was also seen as being detrimental to the government’s Make in India initiative. 

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 29
Reasons for India's decision to not finalize the RCEP trade deal:
1. Domestic industry and dairy farmers had strong reservations about the trade pact:
- Interest groups, including farmers, small industries, and traders, exerted pressure on the government and the Prime Minister to stay out of the RCEP.
- These groups had concerns about the potential impact of the trade deal on their livelihoods and the competitiveness of domestic industries.
- The government took into account these concerns and the potential backlash from these groups in its decision to pull out of the RCEP.
2. Detrimental to the government's Make in India initiative:
- The RCEP trade agreement was seen as potentially detrimental to the government's Make in India initiative, which aims to boost domestic manufacturing and promote self-reliance.
- Joining the RCEP could have resulted in increased competition from imports, potentially undermining the government's efforts to promote domestic industries.
- Considering the negative impact on the Make in India initiative, the government decided to prioritize the interests of domestic industries and pulled out of the RCEP.
In conclusion, both the strong reservations of domestic industry and dairy farmers and the potential negative impact on the government's Make in India initiative played a significant role in India's decision to not finalize the RCEP trade deal.
GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 30

India eventually decided to play it safe by pulling out at the last minute from the RCEP (_____(1)_____) which was finalised by 15 countries in Bangkok on Monday. The pressure mounted on the government and the Prime Minister by interest groups, ranging from farmers, small industries and traders, to political parties across the board, surely played a major role in the decision to stay out of the grouping. The country had little choice but to exit after its safeguard requests were not conceded. On the one side was the looming figure of China in the group and that country’s desperate need to find newer markets for its products in the backdrop of its trade dispute with the U.S. That India runs a massive bilateral trade deficit of $53 billion with China and the fact that China has not taken satisfactory efforts to whittle down the deficit certainly were major inputs in India’s decision. Second, India’s experience with countries with which it has signed free trade agreements till now is not exactly a happy one. Though trade has increased post-FTA with South Korea, ASEAN and Japan, imports have risen faster than exports from India. According to a paper published by NITI Aayog, India has a bilateral trade deficit with most of the member countries of RCEP. More importantly, while exports to RCEP countries account for just 15% of India’s total exports, imports from RCEP countries make up 35% of the country’s total imports. Given this, it is obvious that in the immediate context the country had more to lose than gain from joining RCEP.
Q. The ASEAN Headquarters are located in which of the following places ?

Detailed Solution for GK Mock Test - 5 - Question 30
ASEAN Headquarters Location:
- The ASEAN Headquarters are located in Jakarta, Indonesia.
View more questions
Information about GK Mock Test - 5 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for GK Mock Test - 5 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for GK Mock Test - 5, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for CLAT

Download as PDF

Top Courses for CLAT