Test: Judiciary - Constitutional, Civil and Criminal Courts and Processes - 2 - Humanities/Arts MCQ

The doctrine of double jeopardy is a legal principle that ensures no person can be tried or punished more than once for the same offense in the same jurisdiction. It is a fundamental right in many legal systems, aimed at protecting individuals from harassment and ensuring finality in legal proceedings.

X and Y to be punished as illegal act as agreement. 
In the above mentioned case, X and y are guilty for criminal conspiracy as they were administering poison to Z. That's the other thing, that they were apprehended behaviour. They are guilty and liable to get punished. Conspiracy has been made an offense with the intend to check radical capacity to misact which is picked up by a meeting of the minds to the methods.
Hence, D is the correct option.

Moot court is an extracurricular activity in law schools where the students are given legal problems and they play a role of a counsel in a mock hearing , preparing and arguing cases.

According to the section 95 of the Indian Penal Code nothing is an offense by reason that it causes, or that it is intended to cause, or that it is known to be likely to cause, any harm, if that harm is so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would complain of such harm. The reasonable conclusion drawn A is not liable for his act, as it was of trivial nature.

The high court certifies it involves a question on law. 
Article 133 of our Indian Constitution tells about about the cases which are civil and can be appealed in the supreme court or, if high court has given such statement which should be confirmed by the supreme court.
Hence, D is the correct option.

The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 provides for adjudication or trial of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of public servants. The act has made provisions for the Central Administrative Tribunal for the Centre and a State Administrative Tribunal for a particular State.

The Central Administrative Tribunal's function is to adjudicate the disputes with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or state or other local authorities within the territory of India od under the control of Government of India.

The purpose for this is in common suit harm of notoriety is missing in light of the fact that the activity is attempted out in the open and if the individual successes his case his reasonable name will be cleared up. The second head of harm that is harm to an individual isn't being referred to. 
In a common suit, there is no probability of an individual's going to prison or enduring some other sentence.
Hence, B is the correct option.

Center-State relations as provided by the Indian Constitution has been amended time and again in order to keep up with the changes in the political and economic scenario of the country. For this purpose, in the year 2007, the UPA government constituted a four-member committee to look into roles and responsibilities of different levels of the Government and their inter-relation. This committee was headed by retired Chief Justice of India Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi and hence was named as Punchhi Commission.

Absconder is someone who slows down the procedure of jurisdiction by means of hiding himself or avoiding the legal process in court. He is someone who diminishes himself from the procedure which results in the ineffectiveness of justice or as delayed justice.

Forensic science is the branch of science which is used during criminal investigation to analyze the evidence.

As, a prosecutor is opposed to an accused; plaintiff or the complainant, is opposed to the defendant, the person being sued.
Hence. B is the correct option.

A judicial proceeding, order, or injunction is said to be ex parte when it is taken or granted at the instance and for the benefit of one party only and without notice to or contestation by, any person adversely interested.

The High Courts enjoy extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. This empowers them to issue various writs, such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari, for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights or for any other purpose. While Article 32 confers similar powers to the Supreme Court, Article 226 specifically empowers the High Courts.