MCQ Test: Double Lineup questions - Banking Exams MCQ

It is given in the statements, that C cannot travel with A or B. E cannot travel with B or F. G cannot travel with F, or H, or D. By formulating the table we get

Q is with A and G is with Q => G and Q are travelling together on motorcycle M3
F travels on M1 and E travels on M2 motorcycles.
D is travelling with P on M2 => D and E are traveling together on M2
B cannot go with R => F and B go together on M1
Therefore, C and H go together on M4

So, the table can formed as below:

Looking at each option and the table. Only Option D satisfies the given condition that each selected person shares a liking with at least one of the other three selected. The selected persons must also hate at least one of the likings of any of the other three persons selected.

From Statement I: 
We have, 
SV89 is kept at the bottom and uses 7.26 ammo. 
There is a gap of one place between M16 and SV98, which uses 5.45 ammo. 
AK47 is kept at the second position from the top of the shelve. 
The gun which uses 5.56 ammo is kept at the top of the shelve. 
M16 which uses 7.62 ammo is placed above SV98. 
VKS is kept just below the AK47.

The position of QBZ and 6.87 ammo is not definite.

From Statement II: 
We have,
QBZ is kept third from the bottom and just below M16, which uses 7.62 ammo. 
Mosin is kept at the top of the shelf at a gap of one place from VKS. 
QBZ which uses 5.66 ammo is kept at any place below AK47. 
SV89 which uses 7.26 ammo is kept at any place below SV98.

The position of 6.87 ammo is not definite. 
On Combining Statement I and Statement II:

The position of 6.87 ammo is not fixed. 
Hence, The data in both statements I and II together is not sufficient to answer the question.

Five persons - Nimisha, RIshita, Jahanavi, RItik and Raj
Statement I: Neither Janahavi nor Raj goes to GCET. Jahanavi does not have Adidas, The one who has Puma goes to GCET. Rishita does not have Puma.

Hence statement I alone is not sufficient to answer.
Statement II: Rishita does not go to BCET. Nimisha has Reebok but does not go YCET. The one, who goes BCET and has Adidas.

Hence statement II alone is not sufficient to answer
When we merge both the statements together,

Raj goes to BCET, Hence I and II together are sufficient to answer.

From I:
1. T is kept at bottom having pink cover. P is at second position from top.
2. Book having Red cover is kept at the top. Q book is just placed below P book.

3. There is a gap of one place between R and S, which has cover of Green color.
4. R having Blue cover is above S, which means R book is kept just below Q book.

Clearly, no exact position for V book is known.
Hence, statement I is not sufficient alone.

From II:
We have: ·
1. V is kept third from the bottom just below R having Blue cover.
2. U book is kept on top at a gap of one place from Q book.

3. V book having Black cover is kept at any place below P book.
4. T book having Pink cover is kept at any place below S book, which means T book is kept at bottom.

Clearly, exact position Yellow covered book is not known.
Hence, statement II is not sufficient alone.

From I and II:
After combining statement I and II we have:

Clearly, exact position of Yellow covered book is not known. 
Hence, statement I and II together not sufficient.
Hence, option IV is correct answer.

Given Information:
Tina stays on floor no. 2 and works in Company D.
Charu stays on floor no. 5.
The one who stays on floor no. 1 works in company A.

Statement I: Neither Lina nor Anita works in company A.

Since the person on floor no. 1 works in Company A, this statement implies that Rama lives on floor no. 1.
Statement II: One who lives on floor no. 3 works in Company C.

This statement gives us the company the person on floor no. 3 works for but doesn't tell us who that person is.
Statement III: Anita does not work in company C.
Since we know from Statement II that the person on floor no. 3 works in company C, this statement implies that Anita does not live on floor no. 3.
Using statements I, II, and III together, we can update the table as follows:

Since Anita does not work in company C and Lina does not work in company A (Statement I), the only remaining person who could live on floor no. 3 is Lina. Therefore, Lina lives on floor no. 3 and works in Company C (from Statement II).So, the answer to the question is: Lina lives on floor no. 3 and works in Company C. All three statements were required to answer the question.

Hence the correct answer is "Option (d)".

From the given information, we can deduce the following:

P > R, P > Q, P > S
T > S, T < U
R wears a Yellow shirt and is opposite the person wearing a Blue shirt.
Since P is taller than Q, and R wears a Yellow shirt, it is certain that R is taller than Q. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

From the given information, we can deduce the following:

• Red - Second Street
• Green - Fifth Street
• C - First Street, not Yellow
• Pink - Fourth Street
• E - Sixth Street

Since there is only one house left for D, it must be Green, and the only street left is the Third street. Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

From the given information, we can deduce the following:

1. T works in the IT department with one more person.
2. R and U work in different departments.
3. P works in HR and is not with U.

Since there are only two employees in each department, and P works in the HR department and is not with U, it is certain that T works in the IT department with one more person, which is S. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

From the given information, we can deduce the following:

1. C is from Mumbai and studying Chemistry.
2. E is from Chennai and studying Geography.
3. B is studying Mathematics.

Since there is only one student left for Chennai, B must be from Chennai and studying Mathematics. Therefore, option E is the correct answer.