Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the 17th century, the Dutch Republic was experiencing its Golden Age, marked by advancements in trade, science, military prowess, and art. It was during this period that a peculiar economic phenomenon, known as "Tulip Mania," took hold of the nation.
Tulips, which had been introduced to the Dutch from the Ottoman Empire, were not merely flowers but had become symbols of wealth and sophistication among the affluent. The rarity of some tulip bulbs, particularly those with striking color patterns caused by a virus, led to a speculative frenzy unlike any seen before.
At the peak of Tulip Mania, the prices for these bulbs reached astronomical levels. A single bulb of the coveted 'Semper Augustus' variety was worth roughly ten times the annual income of a skilled craftsman, and at one point, it could be exchanged for an entire estate. Transactions were no longer just in the realm of the tangible; futures contracts were drawn up for bulbs yet to be harvested, and a bustling market emerged, driven purely by speculation and the promise of quick riches.
However, this economic bubble was not to last. As the market expanded, more people grew aware of the immense profits to be made and began to sell their tulip bulbs, leading to a sudden and catastrophic drop in prices. The fallout was severe, with many investors left in financial ruin.
This event is often cited as one of the first recorded instances of an economic bubble and serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of speculation and the volatility of markets. It also raises questions about the value we assign to objects and the psychological forces that drive markets.
Q. Which of the following best describes the main theme of the passage?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the 17th century, the Dutch Republic was experiencing its Golden Age, marked by advancements in trade, science, military prowess, and art. It was during this period that a peculiar economic phenomenon, known as "Tulip Mania," took hold of the nation.
Tulips, which had been introduced to the Dutch from the Ottoman Empire, were not merely flowers but had become symbols of wealth and sophistication among the affluent. The rarity of some tulip bulbs, particularly those with striking color patterns caused by a virus, led to a speculative frenzy unlike any seen before.
At the peak of Tulip Mania, the prices for these bulbs reached astronomical levels. A single bulb of the coveted 'Semper Augustus' variety was worth roughly ten times the annual income of a skilled craftsman, and at one point, it could be exchanged for an entire estate. Transactions were no longer just in the realm of the tangible; futures contracts were drawn up for bulbs yet to be harvested, and a bustling market emerged, driven purely by speculation and the promise of quick riches.
However, this economic bubble was not to last. As the market expanded, more people grew aware of the immense profits to be made and began to sell their tulip bulbs, leading to a sudden and catastrophic drop in prices. The fallout was severe, with many investors left in financial ruin.
This event is often cited as one of the first recorded instances of an economic bubble and serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of speculation and the volatility of markets. It also raises questions about the value we assign to objects and the psychological forces that drive markets.
Q. The author mentions "futures contracts" in the context of Tulip Mania. What does this imply about the nature of the market during that period?
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App |
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the 17th century, the Dutch Republic was experiencing its Golden Age, marked by advancements in trade, science, military prowess, and art. It was during this period that a peculiar economic phenomenon, known as "Tulip Mania," took hold of the nation.
Tulips, which had been introduced to the Dutch from the Ottoman Empire, were not merely flowers but had become symbols of wealth and sophistication among the affluent. The rarity of some tulip bulbs, particularly those with striking color patterns caused by a virus, led to a speculative frenzy unlike any seen before.
At the peak of Tulip Mania, the prices for these bulbs reached astronomical levels. A single bulb of the coveted 'Semper Augustus' variety was worth roughly ten times the annual income of a skilled craftsman, and at one point, it could be exchanged for an entire estate. Transactions were no longer just in the realm of the tangible; futures contracts were drawn up for bulbs yet to be harvested, and a bustling market emerged, driven purely by speculation and the promise of quick riches.
However, this economic bubble was not to last. As the market expanded, more people grew aware of the immense profits to be made and began to sell their tulip bulbs, leading to a sudden and catastrophic drop in prices. The fallout was severe, with many investors left in financial ruin.
This event is often cited as one of the first recorded instances of an economic bubble and serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of speculation and the volatility of markets. It also raises questions about the value we assign to objects and the psychological forces that drive markets.
Q. According to the passage, what was the result of more people selling their tulip bulbs?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the 17th century, the Dutch Republic was experiencing its Golden Age, marked by advancements in trade, science, military prowess, and art. It was during this period that a peculiar economic phenomenon, known as "Tulip Mania," took hold of the nation.
Tulips, which had been introduced to the Dutch from the Ottoman Empire, were not merely flowers but had become symbols of wealth and sophistication among the affluent. The rarity of some tulip bulbs, particularly those with striking color patterns caused by a virus, led to a speculative frenzy unlike any seen before.
At the peak of Tulip Mania, the prices for these bulbs reached astronomical levels. A single bulb of the coveted 'Semper Augustus' variety was worth roughly ten times the annual income of a skilled craftsman, and at one point, it could be exchanged for an entire estate. Transactions were no longer just in the realm of the tangible; futures contracts were drawn up for bulbs yet to be harvested, and a bustling market emerged, driven purely by speculation and the promise of quick riches.
However, this economic bubble was not to last. As the market expanded, more people grew aware of the immense profits to be made and began to sell their tulip bulbs, leading to a sudden and catastrophic drop in prices. The fallout was severe, with many investors left in financial ruin.
This event is often cited as one of the first recorded instances of an economic bubble and serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of speculation and the volatility of markets. It also raises questions about the value we assign to objects and the psychological forces that drive markets.
Q. What can be inferred about the psychological forces that drive markets, based on the passage?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the early 20th century, the city of Vienna was a melting pot of intellectual thought, with luminaries such as Sigmund Freud, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gustav Klimt contributing to a vibrant cultural scene. This period, often referred to as the Viennese Modern Age, was marked by a radical departure from traditional forms and an embrace of the avant-garde in art, literature, and philosophy.
One of the most significant movements of this era was the Vienna Secession, founded in 1897 by a group of artists who sought to break away from the conservative constraints of the Vienna Künstlerhaus. The Secessionists, as they were known, championed the idea of Gesamtkunstwerk, or "total work of art," which aimed to synthesize the visual, architectural, and decorative arts into a single, unified artistic expression.
At the heart of the Secessionist movement was the belief that art should be accessible to all and should serve a social purpose. This was in stark contrast to the prevailing view that art was a luxury meant only for the elite. The Secessionists' commitment to accessibility was evident in their exhibitions, which were open to the public and featured works that were both innovative and provocative.
The movement's most iconic symbol was the Secession Building, designed by Joseph Maria Olbrich. Its striking white facade and golden dome, adorned with the motto "To every age its art, to art its freedom," embodied the Secessionists' vision of art as a force for change and liberation. However, the outbreak of World War I and the subsequent political and economic turmoil brought an end to the Viennese Modern Age.
The ideals of the Secessionists, though influential, were overshadowed by the harsh realities of the time. Yet, their legacy endures, reminding us of a moment when art sought to redefine society and the role of the artist within it.
Q. What was the primary objective of the Vienna Secession movement?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the early 20th century, the city of Vienna was a melting pot of intellectual thought, with luminaries such as Sigmund Freud, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gustav Klimt contributing to a vibrant cultural scene. This period, often referred to as the Viennese Modern Age, was marked by a radical departure from traditional forms and an embrace of the avant-garde in art, literature, and philosophy.
One of the most significant movements of this era was the Vienna Secession, founded in 1897 by a group of artists who sought to break away from the conservative constraints of the Vienna Künstlerhaus. The Secessionists, as they were known, championed the idea of Gesamtkunstwerk, or "total work of art," which aimed to synthesize the visual, architectural, and decorative arts into a single, unified artistic expression.
At the heart of the Secessionist movement was the belief that art should be accessible to all and should serve a social purpose. This was in stark contrast to the prevailing view that art was a luxury meant only for the elite. The Secessionists' commitment to accessibility was evident in their exhibitions, which were open to the public and featured works that were both innovative and provocative.
The movement's most iconic symbol was the Secession Building, designed by Joseph Maria Olbrich. Its striking white facade and golden dome, adorned with the motto "To every age its art, to art its freedom," embodied the Secessionists' vision of art as a force for change and liberation. However, the outbreak of World War I and the subsequent political and economic turmoil brought an end to the Viennese Modern Age.
The ideals of the Secessionists, though influential, were overshadowed by the harsh realities of the time. Yet, their legacy endures, reminding us of a moment when art sought to redefine society and the role of the artist within it.
Q. The concept of Gesamtkunstwerk is central to the Vienna Secession movement. What does it entail?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the early 20th century, the city of Vienna was a melting pot of intellectual thought, with luminaries such as Sigmund Freud, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gustav Klimt contributing to a vibrant cultural scene. This period, often referred to as the Viennese Modern Age, was marked by a radical departure from traditional forms and an embrace of the avant-garde in art, literature, and philosophy.
One of the most significant movements of this era was the Vienna Secession, founded in 1897 by a group of artists who sought to break away from the conservative constraints of the Vienna Künstlerhaus. The Secessionists, as they were known, championed the idea of Gesamtkunstwerk, or "total work of art," which aimed to synthesize the visual, architectural, and decorative arts into a single, unified artistic expression.
At the heart of the Secessionist movement was the belief that art should be accessible to all and should serve a social purpose. This was in stark contrast to the prevailing view that art was a luxury meant only for the elite. The Secessionists' commitment to accessibility was evident in their exhibitions, which were open to the public and featured works that were both innovative and provocative.
The movement's most iconic symbol was the Secession Building, designed by Joseph Maria Olbrich. Its striking white facade and golden dome, adorned with the motto "To every age its art, to art its freedom," embodied the Secessionists' vision of art as a force for change and liberation. However, the outbreak of World War I and the subsequent political and economic turmoil brought an end to the Viennese Modern Age.
The ideals of the Secessionists, though influential, were overshadowed by the harsh realities of the time. Yet, their legacy endures, reminding us of a moment when art sought to redefine society and the role of the artist within it.
Q. According to the passage, how did the Vienna Secessionists differ from the prevailing view of art during their time?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
In the early 20th century, the city of Vienna was a melting pot of intellectual thought, with luminaries such as Sigmund Freud, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Gustav Klimt contributing to a vibrant cultural scene. This period, often referred to as the Viennese Modern Age, was marked by a radical departure from traditional forms and an embrace of the avant-garde in art, literature, and philosophy.
One of the most significant movements of this era was the Vienna Secession, founded in 1897 by a group of artists who sought to break away from the conservative constraints of the Vienna Künstlerhaus. The Secessionists, as they were known, championed the idea of Gesamtkunstwerk, or "total work of art," which aimed to synthesize the visual, architectural, and decorative arts into a single, unified artistic expression.
At the heart of the Secessionist movement was the belief that art should be accessible to all and should serve a social purpose. This was in stark contrast to the prevailing view that art was a luxury meant only for the elite. The Secessionists' commitment to accessibility was evident in their exhibitions, which were open to the public and featured works that were both innovative and provocative.
The movement's most iconic symbol was the Secession Building, designed by Joseph Maria Olbrich. Its striking white facade and golden dome, adorned with the motto "To every age its art, to art its freedom," embodied the Secessionists' vision of art as a force for change and liberation. However, the outbreak of World War I and the subsequent political and economic turmoil brought an end to the Viennese Modern Age.
The ideals of the Secessionists, though influential, were overshadowed by the harsh realities of the time. Yet, their legacy endures, reminding us of a moment when art sought to redefine society and the role of the artist within it.
Q. What does the motto "To every age its art, to art its freedom" signify in the context of the Vienna Secession movement?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The philosophy of Existentialism, which blossomed in the 19th and 20th centuries, places a strong emphasis on individual freedom and the importance of personal choices. Prominent existentialists like Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus argued that life inherently lacks meaning, and it is up to each individual to create their own sense of purpose and value.
Existentialists believe that individuals are free to make their own choices, but with this freedom comes immense responsibility. This responsibility can often lead to feelings of angst and despair, as individuals realize the weight of their freedom and the consequences of their choices. Kierkegaard, often regarded as the father of Existentialism, introduced the concept of the "leap of faith," suggesting that one must make a personal and subjective commitment to a belief or course of action without relying on objective certainty.
Jean-Paul Sartre famously declared, "Existence precedes essence," implying that individuals first exist and then define themselves through their actions and decisions. For Sartre, freedom is the very essence of human existence, and we are condemned to be free, even in situations that appear to limit our freedom.
Albert Camus, on the other hand, introduced the notion of the Absurd, the conflict between the human tendency to seek inherent value and meaning in life and the inability to find any in a purposeless, meaningless or chaotic and irrational universe. His response to the Absurd was to embrace it and live life to the fullest, a concept known as "absurd heroism."
Existentialism, while not a uniform doctrine, offers a view of human existence that emphasizes individual freedom, choice, and responsibility. It encourages individuals to create their own meaning in an indifferent or even hostile universe.
Q. According to the passage, which one of the following statements is true?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The philosophy of Existentialism, which blossomed in the 19th and 20th centuries, places a strong emphasis on individual freedom and the importance of personal choices. Prominent existentialists like Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus argued that life inherently lacks meaning, and it is up to each individual to create their own sense of purpose and value.
Existentialists believe that individuals are free to make their own choices, but with this freedom comes immense responsibility. This responsibility can often lead to feelings of angst and despair, as individuals realize the weight of their freedom and the consequences of their choices. Kierkegaard, often regarded as the father of Existentialism, introduced the concept of the "leap of faith," suggesting that one must make a personal and subjective commitment to a belief or course of action without relying on objective certainty.
Jean-Paul Sartre famously declared, "Existence precedes essence," implying that individuals first exist and then define themselves through their actions and decisions. For Sartre, freedom is the very essence of human existence, and we are condemned to be free, even in situations that appear to limit our freedom.
Albert Camus, on the other hand, introduced the notion of the Absurd, the conflict between the human tendency to seek inherent value and meaning in life and the inability to find any in a purposeless, meaningless or chaotic and irrational universe. His response to the Absurd was to embrace it and live life to the fullest, a concept known as "absurd heroism."
Existentialism, while not a uniform doctrine, offers a view of human existence that emphasizes individual freedom, choice, and responsibility. It encourages individuals to create their own meaning in an indifferent or even hostile universe.
Q. Which one of the following statements, if true, would contradict the arguments presented in the passage?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The philosophy of Existentialism, which blossomed in the 19th and 20th centuries, places a strong emphasis on individual freedom and the importance of personal choices. Prominent existentialists like Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus argued that life inherently lacks meaning, and it is up to each individual to create their own sense of purpose and value.
Existentialists believe that individuals are free to make their own choices, but with this freedom comes immense responsibility. This responsibility can often lead to feelings of angst and despair, as individuals realize the weight of their freedom and the consequences of their choices. Kierkegaard, often regarded as the father of Existentialism, introduced the concept of the "leap of faith," suggesting that one must make a personal and subjective commitment to a belief or course of action without relying on objective certainty.
Jean-Paul Sartre famously declared, "Existence precedes essence," implying that individuals first exist and then define themselves through their actions and decisions. For Sartre, freedom is the very essence of human existence, and we are condemned to be free, even in situations that appear to limit our freedom.
Albert Camus, on the other hand, introduced the notion of the Absurd, the conflict between the human tendency to seek inherent value and meaning in life and the inability to find any in a purposeless, meaningless or chaotic and irrational universe. His response to the Absurd was to embrace it and live life to the fullest, a concept known as "absurd heroism."
Existentialism, while not a uniform doctrine, offers a view of human existence that emphasizes individual freedom, choice, and responsibility. It encourages individuals to create their own meaning in an indifferent or even hostile universe.
Q. In the context of the passage, what can be inferred about Jean-Paul Sartre's view on human existence?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The philosophy of Existentialism, which blossomed in the 19th and 20th centuries, places a strong emphasis on individual freedom and the importance of personal choices. Prominent existentialists like Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus argued that life inherently lacks meaning, and it is up to each individual to create their own sense of purpose and value.
Existentialists believe that individuals are free to make their own choices, but with this freedom comes immense responsibility. This responsibility can often lead to feelings of angst and despair, as individuals realize the weight of their freedom and the consequences of their choices. Kierkegaard, often regarded as the father of Existentialism, introduced the concept of the "leap of faith," suggesting that one must make a personal and subjective commitment to a belief or course of action without relying on objective certainty.
Jean-Paul Sartre famously declared, "Existence precedes essence," implying that individuals first exist and then define themselves through their actions and decisions. For Sartre, freedom is the very essence of human existence, and we are condemned to be free, even in situations that appear to limit our freedom.
Albert Camus, on the other hand, introduced the notion of the Absurd, the conflict between the human tendency to seek inherent value and meaning in life and the inability to find any in a purposeless, meaningless or chaotic and irrational universe. His response to the Absurd was to embrace it and live life to the fullest, a concept known as "absurd heroism."
Existentialism, while not a uniform doctrine, offers a view of human existence that emphasizes individual freedom, choice, and responsibility. It encourages individuals to create their own meaning in an indifferent or even hostile universe.
Q. Which of the following is not a central theme of Existentialism as depicted in the passage?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The Digital Transformation (DT) has redefined the way we live and interact with the world. This phenomenon refers to the integration of digital technology into all areas of human life, fundamentally altering how we operate and deliver value. DT is not just about technology; it is also about how we evolve and adapt to the changing cultural landscape brought about by these technological advancements.
At the core of DT is the concept of 'disruption.' Industries that once seemed impervious to change are now being reshaped by innovative digital solutions. For instance, the advent of ride-sharing apps has disrupted the traditional taxi industry, while streaming services have upended the entertainment and media sectors. These disruptions are not merely technological; they fundamentally alter market dynamics, customer expectations, and the very nature of products and services.
Another critical aspect of DT is the emphasis on data. In today's digital ecosystem, data is the new oil. It is the raw material that drives decision-making, product development, and customer experience. Businesses that harness the power of big data and analytics have a competitive edge, as they can gain deeper insights into customer behavior and market trends.
However, DT also poses significant challenges. The digital divide, for instance, is a pressing concern. As technology becomes more ingrained in our lives, those without access to digital tools and literacy are increasingly left behind. Additionally, privacy and cybersecurity are becoming paramount as more personal and sensitive information is stored and processed online.
Q. According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true about Digital Transformation (DT)?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The Digital Transformation (DT) has redefined the way we live and interact with the world. This phenomenon refers to the integration of digital technology into all areas of human life, fundamentally altering how we operate and deliver value. DT is not just about technology; it is also about how we evolve and adapt to the changing cultural landscape brought about by these technological advancements.
At the core of DT is the concept of 'disruption.' Industries that once seemed impervious to change are now being reshaped by innovative digital solutions. For instance, the advent of ride-sharing apps has disrupted the traditional taxi industry, while streaming services have upended the entertainment and media sectors. These disruptions are not merely technological; they fundamentally alter market dynamics, customer expectations, and the very nature of products and services.
Another critical aspect of DT is the emphasis on data. In today's digital ecosystem, data is the new oil. It is the raw material that drives decision-making, product development, and customer experience. Businesses that harness the power of big data and analytics have a competitive edge, as they can gain deeper insights into customer behavior and market trends.
However, DT also poses significant challenges. The digital divide, for instance, is a pressing concern. As technology becomes more ingrained in our lives, those without access to digital tools and literacy are increasingly left behind. Additionally, privacy and cybersecurity are becoming paramount as more personal and sensitive information is stored and processed online.
Q. Which of the following can be inferred as a consequence of the 'disruption' caused by DT?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The Digital Transformation (DT) has redefined the way we live and interact with the world. This phenomenon refers to the integration of digital technology into all areas of human life, fundamentally altering how we operate and deliver value. DT is not just about technology; it is also about how we evolve and adapt to the changing cultural landscape brought about by these technological advancements.
At the core of DT is the concept of 'disruption.' Industries that once seemed impervious to change are now being reshaped by innovative digital solutions. For instance, the advent of ride-sharing apps has disrupted the traditional taxi industry, while streaming services have upended the entertainment and media sectors. These disruptions are not merely technological; they fundamentally alter market dynamics, customer expectations, and the very nature of products and services.
Another critical aspect of DT is the emphasis on data. In today's digital ecosystem, data is the new oil. It is the raw material that drives decision-making, product development, and customer experience. Businesses that harness the power of big data and analytics have a competitive edge, as they can gain deeper insights into customer behavior and market trends.
However, DT also poses significant challenges. The digital divide, for instance, is a pressing concern. As technology becomes more ingrained in our lives, those without access to digital tools and literacy are increasingly left behind. Additionally, privacy and cybersecurity are becoming paramount as more personal and sensitive information is stored and processed online.
Q. The passage mentions 'data' as the new oil. What does this metaphor primarily emphasize?
Directions: Read the passage and answer the following question.
The Digital Transformation (DT) has redefined the way we live and interact with the world. This phenomenon refers to the integration of digital technology into all areas of human life, fundamentally altering how we operate and deliver value. DT is not just about technology; it is also about how we evolve and adapt to the changing cultural landscape brought about by these technological advancements.
At the core of DT is the concept of 'disruption.' Industries that once seemed impervious to change are now being reshaped by innovative digital solutions. For instance, the advent of ride-sharing apps has disrupted the traditional taxi industry, while streaming services have upended the entertainment and media sectors. These disruptions are not merely technological; they fundamentally alter market dynamics, customer expectations, and the very nature of products and services.
Another critical aspect of DT is the emphasis on data. In today's digital ecosystem, data is the new oil. It is the raw material that drives decision-making, product development, and customer experience. Businesses that harness the power of big data and analytics have a competitive edge, as they can gain deeper insights into customer behavior and market trends.
However, DT also poses significant challenges. The digital divide, for instance, is a pressing concern. As technology becomes more ingrained in our lives, those without access to digital tools and literacy are increasingly left behind. Additionally, privacy and cybersecurity are becoming paramount as more personal and sensitive information is stored and processed online.
Q. What challenge of Digital Transformation is highlighted in the passage?