All Courses
Get the App Signup / Login
Sign in Open App
Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat

Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat below.
Solutions of Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 1
Save

In the case of Chiranji vs. State, why was Chiranji not held guilty of any offense despite mistakenly killing his son?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 1
In the case of Chiranji vs. State, Chiranji mistakenly killed his son while suffering from an abscess and temporary insanity, believing in good faith that his son was a tiger. This mistaken belief, made in good faith and based on a mistake of fact, aligns with the provisions of Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, which offers immunity from liability in such circumstances. It emphasizes the significance of intent and knowledge in determining legal culpability.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 2
Save

In the scenario of Chiranji vs. State, under what circumstances does Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code provide immunity from liability for an individual's actions?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 2
Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code grants immunity from liability to individuals who, in good faith, believe themselves to be justified by law due to a mistake of fact, not a mistake of law. This provision aims to protect individuals who act under a genuine misconception about the circumstances, as was the case with Chiranji, who mistakenly believed he was attacking a tiger, not his son.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 3
Save

According to the principle of mistake of fact in the Indian Contract Act of 1872, when is a contract considered void?

Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 3
In the Indian Contract Act of 1872, a contract is deemed void when both parties to the agreement are mistaken about a matter of fact. This means that for a contract to be void, there must be a mutual misunderstanding regarding a key aspect of the agreement, highlighting the importance of a shared understanding for a valid contract.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 4
Save
In the case of State of Orissa v. Khora Ghasi, why was the accused granted immunity from liability for the death resulting from their actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 4
The accused in the case of State of Orissa v. Khora Ghasi was granted immunity from liability for the death resulting from their actions because they acted under a mistaken belief about a factual circumstance in good faith. This principle of mistake of fact, when applied, provides protection to individuals who genuinely believe in a certain set of circumstances, even if those beliefs turn out to be incorrect.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 5
Save
What legal principle provides immunity from liability when an individual acts under a mistaken belief about a factual circumstance?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 5
The legal principle that provides immunity from liability when an individual acts under a mistaken belief about a factual circumstance is known as the Principle of Mistake of Fact. This principle acknowledges that individuals may not be held accountable for actions taken under a genuine and mistaken belief in a particular situation. It serves as a safeguard in cases where a person's actions were based on an honest and reasonable misunderstanding of the facts.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 6
Save
What is the primary purpose of the concept of consensus ad idem in contract law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 6
The concept of consensus ad idem in contract law serves the primary purpose of ensuring that there is a meeting of the minds between the parties involved in an agreement. This principle emphasizes the importance of both parties understanding and agreeing on the essential terms and intentions of the contract. By requiring a mutual consensus and understanding, consensus ad idem helps to prevent misunderstandings and disputes that may arise from differing interpretations or perceptions of the contract's terms.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 7
Save
What does the Latin phrase "Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat" signify?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 7
The Latin phrase "Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat" translates to "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." This means that individuals are expected to be aware of and comply with the law, regardless of their awareness of it. It signifies that not knowing the law is not a valid defense in legal matters.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 8
Save
What is the primary focus of tort law in the legal system?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 8
Tort law primarily deals with civil wrongs or harm caused by one individual to another or their property. It focuses on providing remedies to individuals who have suffered harm due to the actions of others. Tort law aims to compensate victims for the harm inflicted upon them and seeks to establish liability for the damages caused.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 9
Save
What protection does the Indian Penal Code, 1860 offer for individuals who make errors of fact in good faith?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 9
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 provides safeguards under Sections 76 and 79 specifically for individuals who make errors of fact in good faith. However, it's important to note that this protection does not extend to mistakes of law.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 10
Save
What does the Latin phrase "Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat" signify in the legal context?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 10
"Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat" signifies that not knowing the law is not a valid defense. This principle implies that individuals are expected to be aware of and comply with the law, regardless of their awareness of it.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 11
Save
In the context of contracts under The Indian Contract Act, 1872, what happens if a contract is based on a mistake of law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 11
Under The Indian Contract Act, 1872, if a contract is based on a mistake of law, it is considered void. This means that parties to a contract cannot seek relief based on their ignorance of Indian law, and the contract is not enforceable due to the mistake of law.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 12
Save
How does the Indian Penal Code, 1860 provide safeguards for individuals who make errors of fact in good faith?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 12
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 offers safeguards under Sections 76 and 79 for individuals who make errors of fact in good faith. These sections provide protection for mistakes of fact but not mistakes of law.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 13
Save
What legal doctrine serves as a defense for individuals who commit actions in good faith, believing they are following the law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 13
Ignorantia Facti Excusat is the legal doctrine that serves as a defense for individuals who commit actions in good faith, believing they are following the law. This principle essentially excuses individuals who act without knowledge of the facts, such as unknowingly purchasing stolen goods. It highlights the concept that genuine ignorance of specific factual circumstances can serve as a valid defense in certain legal situations.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 14
Save
According to which legal doctrine, ignorance of the law is not a valid defense?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 14
Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat is the legal doctrine that states ignorance of the law is not a valid defense. This doctrine emphasizes that individuals are generally expected to be aware of the laws that govern their actions, and ignorance of the law itself is not an excuse for engaging in unlawful activities. It underscores the importance of legal awareness and compliance within society.
Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 15
Save
Which legal principle asserts that individuals are expected to know the law, and ignorance of it is not a justification for unlawful actions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat - Question 15
Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat is the legal principle that individuals are expected to know the law, and ignorance of it is not a justification for unlawful actions. This doctrine highlights the fundamental expectation that individuals should educate themselves about the laws that regulate their conduct to avoid legal consequences. It underscores the notion that legal ignorance does not absolve individuals of their responsibilities to abide by the law.
Information about Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Important Questions for Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat

Find all the important questions for Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat resources.

Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Ignorantia Facti Excusat and Ignorantia Juris Non Excusat with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup