What was the primary purpose of implementing sovereign immunity under British rule in pre-independence India?

To avoid legal responsibilities for any actions committed by the East India Company

To protect the people from potential harm caused by the East India Company

To establish a system of government immunity in India

To assert dominance and control over Indian territories

In the 1893 case of O. and P. Navigation Company vs. Secretary of State of India, what terms were introduced to determine the liability of the East India Company for torts committed by its servants?

'Corporate' and 'Personal' liability

'Sovereign' and 'Non-sovereignty'

'Legal' and 'Illegal' liability

'Civil' and 'Criminal' immunity

In Kasturi Lal vs. State of U.P., what distinction did the Supreme Court make regarding state functions?

Sovereign and non-sovereign state functions

Legislative and executive state functions

Administrative and judicial state functions

Central and state government functions

How did the court rule in the case of a government servant injuring a pedestrian in State of Rajasthan vs. Vidyawati?

The government servant was acquitted

The pedestrian was found at fault

The case was dismissed for lack of evidence

What was the key emphasis made in the Vidyawati case regarding the state's power?

The state's unrestricted use of power

The misuse of power under sovereign immunity

The state's absolute authority over laws

The extension of sovereign immunity to all state functions

What did the court express dissatisfaction with in relation to laws concerning sovereign immunity?

Lack of legislative responsibility

Judicial overreach in sovereign matters

Executive interference in legal proceedings

Inadequate protection of state interests

According to the State of Andhra Pradesh v. Challa Ramakrishnan Reddy Case, what ruling did the court make regarding the maxim 'the king can do no wrong' or 'the crown is not accountable to the people for any violations'?

The court upheld the validity of the maxim.

The court ruled that the maxim is applicable in certain cases.

The court declared that the maxim does not hold true.

The court suggested a rephrasing of the maxim.

What is the procedural aspect highlighted in the State of Andhra Pradesh v. Challa Ramakrishnan Reddy Case regarding filing petitions for tortious acts committed by the state?

Only the Supreme Court can hear such petitions.

High Court approval is mandatory for filing such petitions.

A trial court is the appropriate venue for filing such petitions.

Approaching the President is necessary before filing such petitions.

Why is it significant that states are unable to defend themselves using statutory authority when fundamental rights are involved, as per the court's ruling in the case?

It reinforces the supremacy of statutory laws.

It highlights the importance of fundamental rights protection.

It restricts the power of the state in legal matters.

It establishes a new legal precedent for future cases.

Why are constitutional benches often necessary for decisions on critical legal matters?

To expedite the decision-making process

To ensure a diverse range of perspectives

To maintain secrecy around the decision

To bypass the need for further appeals

In what scenario would a constitutional bench comprising seven or more judges need to overrule the Kasturi Lal case?

If a lower court challenges its authority

If a new constitutional amendment is passed

If a situation arises necessitating its overruling

If a unanimous decision cannot be reached among judges

What key aspect did the court fail to address regarding violations in the Kasturi Lal case?

Potential conflicts with international law

Situations involving criminal offenses

Violations of legal rights beyond fundamental rights

Challenges related to administrative law

Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts Free MCQ Practice Test with Solutions

Important Questions for Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts

Find all the important questions for Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts at EduRev.Get fully prepared for Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts with EduRev's comprehensive question bank and test resources. Our platform offers a diverse range of question papers covering various topics within the Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts syllabus. Whether you need to review specific subjects or assess your overall readiness, EduRev has you covered. The questions are designed to challenge you and help you gain confidence in tackling the actual exam. Maximize your chances of success by utilizing EduRev's extensive collection of Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts resources.

Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts MCQs with Answers

Prepare for the Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts within the Judiciary Exams exam with comprehensive MCQs and answers at EduRev. Our platform offers a wide range of practice papers, question papers, and mock tests to familiarize you with the exam pattern and syllabus. Access the best books, study materials, and notes curated by toppers to enhance your preparation. Stay updated with the exam date and receive expert preparation tips and paper analysis. Visit EduRev's official website today and access a wealth of videos and coaching resources to excel in your exam.

Online Tests for Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts

Practice with a wide array of question papers that follow the exam pattern and syllabus. Our platform offers a user-friendly interface, allowing you to track your progress and identify areas for improvement. Access detailed solutions and explanations for each test to enhance your understanding of concepts. With EduRev's Online Tests, you can build confidence, boost your performance, and ace Statutory Authority as a Defence to Torts with ease. Join thousands of successful students who have benefited from our trusted online resources.

Education Revolution