Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act

Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act below.
Solutions of Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 1

What must be established for an alibi defense to be effective in a legal case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 1
For an alibi defense to be effective, the accused must establish their absence from the crime scene during the time the crime was committed. This involves providing evidence that places them at a different location, making it impossible for them to have been present at the scene of the crime. This is a crucial aspect of the alibi defense in legal proceedings.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 2

When should the defense of an alibi typically be raised in legal proceedings?

Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 2
In legal proceedings, it is essential for the defense of an alibi to be raised early, typically at the beginning of the trial. By doing so, the accused can present their evidence and arguments regarding their whereabouts during the time of the crime, aiming to establish their alibi effectively. Raising the alibi defense early allows for a thorough examination of the evidence and provides the accused with the opportunity to prove their innocence.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 3

In a criminal case, what does the inability of the accused to prove an alibi signify, according to legal principles?

Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 3
The inability of the accused to prove an alibi does not automatically indicate their presence at the crime scene. Instead, this situation necessitates that the prosecution presents concrete evidence demonstrating the accused's location at the crime scene. It is crucial to understand that the mere failure to establish an alibi does not serve as proof of guilt in a legal context.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 4
How does Section 11 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, define the relevance of certain facts that are not otherwise significant?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 4
Section 11 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, addresses the relevance of facts that may not seem significant at first glance. According to this section, these facts become relevant when they contradict any fact, relevant fact, or when they make the existence or non-existence of a particular fact highly probable or improbable. This legal provision highlights the nuanced approach taken in considering evidence within the legal framework.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 5
According to Section 103 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, where does the burden of proof lie regarding a specific fact?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 5
As per Section 103 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the burden of proof concerning a specific fact lies with the individual who wants the court to believe in the existence of that fact unless stated otherwise by law. This means that the responsibility of proving a particular fact rests on the person making the assertion, highlighting the significance of providing evidence to support claims in legal proceedings.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 6
In a legal scenario where the question pertains to a crime committed in Calcutta on a specific day, who is responsible for proving that the suspect was in New Delhi on that day?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 6
When the issue at hand involves establishing an alibi in a criminal case, the burden of proving that the accused individual was in a different location at the time of the alleged crime typically falls on the defense attorney. This requirement underscores the importance of substantiating claims with evidence to challenge the prosecution's case effectively.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 7
How does Section 103 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 impact legal proceedings when it comes to proving specific facts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 7
Section 103 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 plays a crucial role in legal proceedings by stipulating that the burden of proof concerning a particular fact rests on the individual who is seeking to convince the court of its existence, unless specified otherwise by law. This provision emphasizes the fundamental principle that the party making a claim or assertion must provide evidence to substantiate their position, ensuring a fair and evidence-based adjudication process.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 8
In which case did the court emphasize the accused's presence reasonably close to the scene of the crime to substantiate a plea of alibi, setting a minimum distance of 500 meters?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 8
In the case of Munshi Prasad v State of Bihar 2001 (SC), the Supreme Court stressed the importance of the accused being present reasonably close to the scene of the crime to support a plea of alibi, establishing a minimum distance of 500 meters. This requirement indicates the significance of proximity in validating an alibi defense, ensuring that the accused's claim of being elsewhere during the crime is substantiated by credible evidence.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 9
Which case highlighted the dismissal of an alibi defense due to conflicting evidence such as the victim's dying declaration, DNA, fingerprints, and confirmation from park authorities?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 9
In the case of Mukesh v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi, AIR 2017 SC 2161, the accused's alibi defense was rejected due to conflicting evidence such as the victim's dying declaration, DNA, fingerprints, and confirmation from park authorities that no music event took place. This demonstrates the importance of coherent and consistent evidence to support an alibi claim and the impact of contradictory information on the defense's validity.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 10
Which case underscored the necessity of promptly raising an alibi defense rather than delaying it until the defense phase, leading to the defense being disregarded?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 10
In the case of Lakhan Singh @ Pappu v. The State of NCT of Delhi, the court emphasized the importance of raising an alibi defense promptly rather than delaying it until the defense phase. Failure to provide an early explanation regarding an alibi can result in the defense being disregarded, highlighting the significance of timely and well-supported alibi claims in legal proceedings.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 11
In the legal context, what crucial aspect did the court emphasize in the case of Lakhan Singh @ Pappu v. The State of NCT of Delhi?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 11
The court stressed the significance of raising an alibi defense promptly in the case of Lakhan Singh @ Pappu v. The State of NCT of Delhi. This highlights the importance of presenting a defense explanation early in the legal process rather than delaying it until later stages. Providing an early alibi defense allows for a more effective and coherent presentation of the defendant's position, aiding in the overall legal strategy.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 12
What did the case of Binay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar establish regarding the concept of alibi in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 12
The case of Binay Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar clarified that alibi is not considered an exception in the Indian Penal Code but rather a recognized evidentiary rule under Section 11 of the Evidence Act. This legal precedent underscores the importance of presenting evidence that contradicts the allegations at hand, emphasizing the strategic value of alibi as a defense tactic in criminal trials.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 13
What led to the dismissal of the accused's alibi defense in the case of Mukesh v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi, AIR 2017 SC 2161?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 13
The accused's alibi defense in the case of Mukesh v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi, AIR 2017 SC 2161, was dismissed due to conflicting evidence that contradicted the alibi. Factors such as the victim's dying declaration, DNA evidence, and fingerprints that did not align with the alibi provided by the accused played a crucial role in discrediting the defense. This case illustrates the importance of consistency and reliability in presenting an alibi in legal proceedings.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 14
What crucial role does the plea of alibi play in criminal cases according to the provided content?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 14
The plea of alibi plays a crucial role in criminal cases by assisting the accused in proving their innocence. It allows the accused to establish their presence elsewhere at the time of the alleged offense, thereby creating reasonable doubt regarding their involvement in the crime.
Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 15
What is the primary responsibility of the accused when asserting the plea of alibi in a criminal case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act - Question 15
When asserting the plea of alibi in a criminal case, the primary responsibility of the accused is to demonstrate their presence elsewhere at the time of the offense. By providing evidence supporting their absence from the crime scene, the accused aims to cast doubt on the prosecution's allegations and establish their innocence.
Information about Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Plea of Alibi in Evidence Act, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams