Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act

Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act below.
Solutions of Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 1

What is the primary characteristic of Estoppel by Deed?

Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 1
Estoppel by Deed binds a person to another based on a recorded document concerning certain facts. This means that neither the person nor anyone claiming through them can deny the contents of that document. It is a legal principle that prevents a person from going back on the truth contained in a recorded document, ensuring accountability and reliability in legal dealings.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 2

In which type of estoppel does a person promise another a benefit or relief, leading the other individual to alter their position based on that promise?

Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 2
Promissory Estoppel comes into play when one person promises another a benefit or relief, causing the other individual to change their position based on that promise. This legal principle is an exception to the consideration requirement in contract law. It serves to uphold promises made by ensuring that the promisor cannot claim that the promise lacked consideration, thus promoting fairness and trust in contractual agreements.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 3

What type of estoppel is established by the final decision of a competent court, binding the parties involved to that decision and preventing them from initiating another lawsuit on the same subject?

Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 3
Estoppel by Record is established by the final decision of a competent court, legally binding the parties involved to that decision. This type of estoppel prevents the parties from initiating another lawsuit on the same subject or disputing the matter again. It functions similarly to res judicata, emphasizing the legal significance and finality of court decisions.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 4
In which type of estoppel does a person promise another a benefit or relief, leading the other individual to alter their position based on that promise, thereby preventing the promisor from claiming lack of consideration?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 4
Promissory Estoppel arises as an exception to the consideration requirement in contract law. When one person promises another a benefit or relief, causing the other individual to change their position based on that promise, the promisor is prevented from claiming that the promise lacked consideration. This principle emphasizes the importance of honoring promises made, even in the absence of formal consideration, to prevent injustice and unfairness in contractual relationships.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 5
According to the provided content on estoppel exceptions, which of the following situations would estoppel be applicable to?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 5
Estoppel would be applicable in a scenario involving an ultra-vires decision made by a government body. Ultra-vires decisions refer to actions taken beyond the legal authority of the entity making the decision. In such cases, estoppel can still be invoked, unlike situations involving statutory provisions or sovereign acts of the government.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 6
In the case example of Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders v. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Meerut, what was the court's decision regarding the estoppel claim?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 6
In the case of Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders v. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Meerut, the court ruled against the estoppel claim. The court's decision was based on the fact that no misrepresentation took place as the plaintiff was aware and knowledgeable about purchasing the N.S.C. without fulfilling the total payment requirement. This outcome underscores the importance of clear understanding and awareness in legal transactions to avoid misconceptions that could lead to claims such as estoppel.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 7
In which legal case was the university estopped from withholding a student's final year results despite objections raised after completing two years at a law college?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 7
In the case of Sanatan Gauda v. Bharampur University, the university was estopped from withholding a student's final year results. Despite the student completing two years at a law college, objections were raised by the university regarding the release of his results. However, the court intervened and held that the university was estopped from withholding the student's results. This decision was based on the principle of estoppel, which prevents a party from going back on a representation or promise that has been relied upon by another party to their detriment.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 8
According to Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, what is the key restriction imposed on tenants or those deriving rights through tenancy agreements regarding the landlord's title during the tenancy period?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 8
Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, establishes that tenants or individuals deriving their rights through tenancy agreements are prohibited from denying the landlord's title during the tenancy period. This legal provision ensures stability in the landlord-tenant relationship by preventing tenants from disputing the landlord's title while occupying the property. It upholds the principle that tenants must acknowledge the landlord's rightful ownership of the property throughout the tenancy.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 9
How does Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, influence the relationship between a licensor and a licensee?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 9
Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, impacts the relationship between a licensor and a licensee by restricting the licensee from denying the licensor's title to the land. This legal provision ensures that once a license is granted, the licensee cannot later dispute or challenge the rightful ownership of the licensor over the land. By doing so, Section 116 maintains the integrity of the licensing agreement and upholds the principle of estoppel, which prevents the licensee from asserting contradictory claims regarding the land's title.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 10
What is a key legal restriction imposed by Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act on tenants in relation to their landlords?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 10
Section 116 of the Indian Evidence Act legally prohibits tenants from disputing their landlord's rightful title to the property being rented. This means that tenants cannot claim that their landlord does not have ownership rights over the property they are renting. This provision ensures a clear legal relationship between landlords and tenants, preventing tenants from denying their landlord's property rights.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 11
In the legal case of Udai Pratap v. Krishna Pradhan, what concept was established regarding tenancy?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 11
In the case of Udai Pratap v. Krishna Pradhan, it was established that tenancy continues as long as the tenant possesses the property and benefits from it. This ruling highlighted that mere possession and enjoyment of benefits constitute the basis of tenancy. This concept underscores the essence of the landlord-tenant relationship, emphasizing the rights and responsibilities associated with the possession of the property.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 12
What was the key takeaway from the legal case of Sri S.K. Sharma v. Mahesh Kumar Verma regarding the officer's obligation towards premises received upon promotion?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 12
In the case of Sri S.K. Sharma v. Mahesh Kumar Verma, it was emphasized that the officer must vacate the premises post-retirement, regardless of the ownership status of the land. This ruling highlights the obligation of the officer to relinquish the premises upon retirement, illustrating the legal considerations surrounding the possession of property acquired during the course of employment.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 13
According to Section 117 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, what is the obligation of the individual who accepts bills of exchange?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 13
According to Section 117 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the individual accepting bills of exchange is obligated to allow the drawer to draw or endorse them. This means that once a person accepts a bill of exchange, they cannot later deny the drawer the right to draw or endorse the bill. This rule ensures the smooth functioning of bill transactions and establishes a clear obligation on the acceptor to honor the terms of the bill.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 14
When a bailor mistakenly delivers goods to a third party instead of the designated bailee, what action can the third party take against the bailor?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 14
If a bailor erroneously hands over goods meant for a designated bailee to a third party, the third party can establish their rights over the goods against the bailor. This scenario highlights the importance of accurate delivery in bailment agreements and the legal recourse available to a third party who receives goods mistakenly.
Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 15
In what scenario can a bailee challenge the authority of a bailor in a bailment agreement?
Detailed Solution for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act - Question 15
In a bailment agreement, a bailee can challenge the authority of the bailor by demonstrating that a third party, not the bailor, had the right against the bailee. This provision allows for situations where the bailee can prove that the bailor's authority might not have been absolute, thereby protecting the interests of all parties involved in the agreement.
Information about Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act: Estoppel under Indian Evidence Act, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams