Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act

Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act below.
Solutions of Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 1

According to Section 24-30 of the Indian Evidence Act, what is the key difference between a confession and an admission?

Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 1
In legal terms, a confession under the Indian Evidence Act must relate to an offense or significant facts initiating criminal proceedings. On the other hand, an admission, although it may incriminate, does not have to involve serious wrongdoing. This distinction is crucial in understanding the legal implications of statements made by individuals in the context of criminal proceedings.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 2

Why is it significant to differentiate between confessions and admissions according to the Indian Evidence Act?

Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 2
It is crucial to differentiate between confessions and admissions under the Indian Evidence Act to safeguard the legal process against false or misleading statements. By making this distinction, the Act aims to uphold the integrity of evidence presented in court, thereby promoting fairness and accuracy in adjudicating criminal cases. This differentiation helps in maintaining the credibility and reliability of statements provided during legal proceedings.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 3

What is a key principle highlighted for Extra Judicial Confessions?

Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 3

The emphasizes that for Extra Judicial Confessions, a key principle is that confessions must be voluntary and truthful. Additionally, the confessor's statements should establish guilt akin to any other proven fact in a judicial proceeding. This principle underscores the importance of credibility and reliability in extrajudicial confessions, especially when corroborated by other evidence.

Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 4

Assessing extrajudicial confessions, what should the court do?

Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 4

The guidelines suggest that the court must scrutinize all statements to determine the trustworthiness of the confessor when assessing extrajudicial confessions. This scrutiny is crucial to evaluate the credibility and reliability of the confession, ensuring that justice is served based on authentic and truthful information.

Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 5
What should be considered when evaluating retracted confessions in legal contexts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 5
When assessing retracted confessions in legal cases, it is crucial to remember that convictions should not rely solely on such retractions without additional corroboration. This is because retractions can be complex and influenced by various factors, making it necessary to have supporting evidence to ensure a fair and just legal process.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 6
In what circumstances can confessions occur, as highlighted in the provided material?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 6
The material suggests that confessions can arise not only in formal settings but also through self-dialogue, indicating that they are not restricted to specific formal environments. This broader understanding of confessions underscores the complexity of human behavior and communication, which can lead to disclosures in various contexts beyond formal legal procedures.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 7
Why do confessions made by co-accused individuals have limited evidentiary value in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 7
Confessions made by co-accused individuals are generally viewed with caution in legal proceedings due to their limited evidentiary value. This is because such confessions may be influenced by various factors, including coercion or collusion, and are often seen as less reliable compared to other forms of evidence. As a result, they cannot typically serve as standalone pieces of evidence in legal cases.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 8
What conditions render confessions irrelevant under the law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 8
Confessions are considered irrelevant under the law when they are made under inducement, threat, or promise from a person in authority, when they pertain to the charge in question, or when they offer some temporal benefit or disadvantage. These conditions undermine the voluntary nature of confessions and can lead to their inadmissibility in court.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 9
According to Section 29 of the law, confessions are not considered relevant if obtained through which of the following methods?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 9
Section 29 of the law specifies that confessions are not considered relevant if obtained through assurances of secrecy or deception tactics. This means that if an accused person is misled or provided false assurances of confidentiality to extract a confession, such a confession would be deemed irrelevant under the law.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 10
How does Section 28 of the law address the issue of voluntariness in confessions?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 10
Section 28 of the law addresses the issue of voluntariness in confessions by stipulating that if the elements of inducement, threat, or promise are eliminated from a confession, it can be deemed voluntary and relevant. This section emphasizes the importance of ensuring that confessions are not obtained through coercive means but rather given voluntarily by the individual.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 11
Why are confessions made to the police or during custody not automatically considered valid in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 11
Confessions made to the police or during custody are not automatically considered valid in legal proceedings because their admissibility hinges on whether they lead to the discovery of new information related to the crime. This requirement is essential to ensure that confessions are not admitted arbitrarily but only if they contribute to uncovering additional facts pertinent to the investigation.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 12
In a joint trial of persons for the same offense, a confession made by one individual is considered as evidence against whom?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 12
In a joint trial where multiple individuals are being tried together for the same offense, a confession made by one person is considered as evidence against all the accused individuals, not just the one making the confession. This legal principle allows for the confession to impact the trial of all individuals involved, emphasizing the interconnectedness of their legal proceedings.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 13
What is the key exception to the general rule regarding the admissibility of confessions in a joint trial of individuals?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 13
The exception to the general rule about the admissibility of confessions in a joint trial lies in the fact that a confession made by one person is considered as evidence against all the accused individuals in the trial. This exception allows for the confession to have broader implications and impact the legal proceedings of all individuals involved in the case.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 14
What are the necessary conditions that must be met for a confession to be considered in a joint trial of individuals for the same offense?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 14
For a confession to be considered in a joint trial where multiple individuals are tried together for the same offense, it must meet specific conditions. These conditions include the confession being related to the crime committed and having an impact on both the confessor and all other individuals involved in the trial. This ensures that the confession is relevant and applicable to the legal proceedings of all accused individuals.
Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 15
In a scenario where multiple individuals are jointly tried for the same offense and one confesses, whose confession can be used as evidence against all individuals involved?
Detailed Solution for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act - Question 15
In cases where multiple individuals are tried together for the same offense and one confesses, that confession can be used as evidence against all individuals involved. This legal principle allows for the confession of one to implicate not only the confessor but also all other individuals connected to the crime. It underscores the shared responsibility and potential consequences that stem from joint criminal activities.
Information about Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Confession Under Indian Evidence Act, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams