Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Relevancy and Admissibility

Test: Relevancy and Admissibility for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Relevancy and Admissibility questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Relevancy and Admissibility MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility below.
Solutions of Test: Relevancy and Admissibility questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Relevancy and Admissibility solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Relevancy and Admissibility | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 1

What is the primary function of relevancy in legal evidence?

Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 1
Relevancy in legal evidence primarily serves to connect the presented evidence with the issues that require proof. This connection enhances the likelihood of proving the existence of specific facts. It acts as a vital bridge between the evidence provided and the facts that need to be established, ensuring that there is a logical correlation between the various facts involved in a legal case.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 2

According to the principles of relevancy, what is a key criterion for admitting evidence in a legal case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 2
As per the principles of relevancy, evidence should only be admitted if it is logically verified in relation to the matters requiring proof. This criterion ensures that only evidence that is relevant and contributes to proving or disproving the facts in question is considered admissible in a legal proceeding.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 3

Why might a court choose to exclude relevant evidence from a legal case?

Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 3
A court may choose to exclude relevant evidence from a legal case if its probative value is outweighed by risks such as unfair bias or potential confusion among the jurors. This exclusion is crucial to ensure that the legal process is fair and that the facts are determined justly, without the interference of evidence that could unduly influence the decision-making process.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 4
Which sections of the Indian Evidence Act provide a detailed framework for determining relevancy between facts?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 4
Sections 5 to 55 of the Indian Evidence Act offer a comprehensive framework for determining the relevancy between facts. These sections specify how facts can be associated and connected, and they deem a fact irrelevant if it does not align with the provisions of the Act.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 5
Who ultimately decides whether evidence is admissible in a court of law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 5
The judge is the one who ultimately decides whether evidence is admissible in a court of law. The judge plays a critical role in evaluating the relevance and admissibility of evidence based on legal criteria before allowing it to be presented to the jury or considered in the case. This responsibility ensures that only appropriate evidence is considered in legal proceedings.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 6
What is the key role of the judge in the determination of admissibility of evidence?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 6
The key role of the judge in the determination of admissibility of evidence is to assess the relevance and admissibility of the evidence presented in court. The judge carefully considers whether the evidence meets the legal standards for admissibility, ensuring that only pertinent and reliable evidence is considered during the legal proceedings. This process is essential for upholding the integrity and fairness of the legal system.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 7
How does the Indian Evidence Act influence the determination of admissibility of evidence in court proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 7
The Indian Evidence Act plays a crucial role in court proceedings by determining the admissibility of evidence based on legal rules rather than logical connections. This legislation sets the criteria for what evidence is considered legally significant and admissible in court, ensuring a structured and rule-based approach to the admission of facts during legal proceedings.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 8
What is the main emphasis of the concept of relevance in legal proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 8
The concept of relevance in legal proceedings primarily focuses on identifying essential facts that are crucial for court consideration. These facts play a key role in proving a case and are fundamental in establishing the logical link between the presented evidence and the issues being addressed in court.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 9
How does the concept of relevance differ from the concept of admissibility in legal frameworks?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 9
The distinction between relevance and admissibility lies in their core functions. Relevance is centered around identifying essential facts crucial for court consideration, emphasizing the logical link between facts and their significance in proving a case. On the other hand, admissibility is focused on distinguishing admissible from inadmissible facts based on legal criteria rather than intrinsic relevance, ensuring that only legally acceptable evidence is presented in court.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 10
How does judicial discretion differ between relevance and admissibility in a court of law?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 10
In judicial discretion, courts have more flexibility in determining the relevance of facts, allowing room for interpretation based on case specifics. However, when it comes to admissibility, courts have limited discretion as it is primarily governed by adherence to legal regulations, leaving less room for subjective judgment.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 11
What characterizes the relationship between admissibility and facts meeting legal requirements in court proceedings?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 11
Admissibility serves as an outcome in court proceedings, indicating whether evidence meets the legal standards for acceptance. It verifies the suitability of evidence for consideration based on the requirements outlined in the Evidence Act, ensuring that only relevant and permissible evidence is presented in legal proceedings.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 12
In the legal context, what role does relevance play in constructing a case and influencing legal outcomes?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 12
Relevance in the legal context is essential for constructing a case and influencing legal outcomes by bridging presented evidence with the required facts. It ensures that the facts presented are directly related to the case at hand, helping to establish the necessary elements for building a compelling argument in court.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 13
How does admissibility differ from relevance in a legal context?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 13
Admissibility in legal terms refers to the criteria that evidence must meet to be legally acceptable in court. On the other hand, relevance in a legal context indicates that while admissible facts can vary in relevance, legally relevant facts are admissible, representing a subset of evidence that is directly related and significant to the case being tried.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 14
Why is establishing the relevance of evidence crucial in a legal setting?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 14
Establishing the relevance of evidence in a legal setting is crucial as it connects the presented evidence with the required facts for the legal outcome. By ensuring that the evidence directly aligns with the elements needed to support a legal argument, relevance plays a fundamental role in building a strong and persuasive case in court.
Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 15
How do relevancy and admissibility interact to shape the legal approach to evidence?
Detailed Solution for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility - Question 15
Relevancy and admissibility work together to shape the legal approach to evidence by ensuring that only pertinent and permissible evidence is considered in court proceedings. This meticulous interplay between the two concepts is essential for maintaining the fairness and integrity of the legal system, guiding the court in its pursuit of justice and the determination of legal truths.
Information about Test: Relevancy and Admissibility Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Relevancy and Admissibility, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams