Judiciary Exams Exam  >  Judiciary Exams Tests  >  Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Judiciary Exams MCQ

Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Judiciary Exams MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test - Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal

Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal for Judiciary Exams 2024 is part of Judiciary Exams preparation. The Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal questions and answers have been prepared according to the Judiciary Exams exam syllabus.The Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal MCQs are made for Judiciary Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal below.
Solutions of Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal questions in English are available as part of our course for Judiciary Exams & Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal solutions in Hindi for Judiciary Exams course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Judiciary Exams Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal | 15 questions in 15 minutes | Mock test for Judiciary Exams preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study for Judiciary Exams Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 1

In Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, which judicial body delivered the final verdict?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 1
The Supreme Court of India was the judicial body responsible for delivering the final verdict in the Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case. This apex court's decision held significant legal implications and set precedents regarding the interpretation of laws related to obscenity.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 2

How did the Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case contribute to the understanding of legal principles in India?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 2
The Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case played a crucial role in interpreting the concept of obscenity within legal contexts in India. By providing clarity on what constitutes obscenity and the role of intention in such cases, this case contributed significantly to the understanding and application of legal principles in the country.
1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 3

What significance does the Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case hold in the realm of Indian jurisprudence?

Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 3
The Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case holds significance in Indian jurisprudence for its role in interpreting and defining the legal aspects of obscenity. This case shed light on the nuances of obscenity laws and the importance of intention in determining legal outcomes related to such matters in the Indian legal system.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 4
According to the legal case discussed, what action led to a complaint being filed under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellants?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 4
In this case, the complaint was filed under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellants for publishing the same photograph and article in a Kolkata newspaper. This act was considered to potentially fall under the purview of obscenity laws, leading to legal action. It is crucial to understand the implications of publishing such content and the legal consequences that can arise from it.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 5
What specific legal concern was raised regarding the photograph in the case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 5
The primary legal concern raised in the case regarding the photograph was whether it should be considered obscene under the Indian Penal Code. This raised questions about the potential effects of the photograph on readers, particularly regarding whether it had the tendency to deprave and corrupt individuals. Understanding the legal definitions of obscenity and its implications is crucial in analyzing such cases.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 6
What was the role of "STERN" magazine in the legal case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 6
"STERN" magazine played a significant role in the legal case by publishing an article featuring Boris Becker. This publication eventually led to the reproduction of the article in an Indian magazine and a Kolkata newspaper, which triggered the legal issues discussed in the case. Understanding the chain of events and the roles of each entity involved is crucial in comprehending the context of the legal dispute.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 7
Which legal provision was invoked in the case against the appellants?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 7
The complaint against the appellants in this case was filed under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code. This section deals with the publication of obscene material and aims to prevent the dissemination of content that could be considered morally objectionable or harmful to society. Understanding the specific legal provisions invoked in such cases is essential for grasping the legal framework within which these disputes are addressed.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 8
What is one of the key arguments presented by the respondents regarding the nude photograph published in Anandbazar Patrika and The Sports World?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 8
The respondents argue that the nude photograph published in Anandbazar Patrika and The Sports World has a corrupting influence on the youth, going against the cultural and moral values of society. They believe that such publication can lead to moral degradation and encourage individuals to commit sexual offenses, impacting the societal fabric negatively.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 9
What is one of the accusations made against Ananda Bazar Patrika and Sports World in relation to the publication of the nude photograph?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 9
Ananda Bazar Patrika and Sports World are accused of intentionally using the nude photograph for the sale of their publications, leading to public exhibition and circulation. This accusation suggests that their motive was profit-driven, using controversial content to attract readership and boost sales.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 10
What legal justification do the appellants provide regarding the magazine in question that published the controversial article?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 10
The appellants argue that the magazine in question was never banned in India and was not deemed 'obscene' according to the law. They reference Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code to justify their stance, suggesting that the actions taken were lawful and did not breach any legal boundaries in terms of obscenity or publication regulations.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 11
What criteria must material meet in order to be deemed obscene under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 11
According to Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code, material is deemed obscene if it incites explicit sexual responses. Mere nudity is not sufficient to classify material as obscene; it must go further and stimulate lustful thoughts or explicit sexual reactions in viewers.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 12
How did the Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case impact legal interpretations of obscenity?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 12
The Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case highlighted the evolving nature of obscenity definitions, acknowledging that societal standards and perceptions of obscenity change over time. This recognition underscores the need for legal interpretations to adapt and evolve alongside societal values and norms.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 13
What was the ultimate legal outcome of the Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 13
The final legal verdict in the Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal case resulted in no offence being found under Article 292. This outcome signifies that the actions or materials in question did not violate the specific provisions outlined in Article 292, as determined by the court.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 14
Why is it crucial to consider individual beliefs and backgrounds in assessing controversial content, as demonstrated in the Boris Becker case?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 14
Considering individual beliefs and backgrounds in evaluating controversial content, as seen in the Boris Becker case, is vital due to the subjective nature of judgment. Different perspectives can lead to varying interpretations of the same actions, highlighting the importance of recognizing this subjectivity.
Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 15
In what way does the Boris Becker case exemplify the complexity of evaluating actions involving provocative or controversial material?
Detailed Solution for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal - Question 15
The Boris Becker case exemplifies the complexity of evaluating actions with provocative content by emphasizing how societal norms significantly influence perceptions. It shows that what may be acceptable or controversial is often shaped by the prevailing norms and values within a given society.
Information about Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Case Brief: Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams

Download as PDF

Top Courses for Judiciary Exams