Russia; the Kievan Rus; and the Mongols: Crash Course World History #20 Video Lecture | A Complete Guide to World History : 1 - World Knowledge

Hi, I’m John Green, this is Crash Course
World History, and today we're gonna talk
about Russia, which means we get to talk about
this guy again! We haven’t talked about
Russia much so far because one, it’s complicated,
and two, ya actually gavaryu pa ruski a little bit,
because I had some Russian in college, and that makes
it difficult to mispronounce things, which is my thing!
Mr. Green, Mr. Green! Why’d you take Russian?
Well, because I had this big crush on a Russian major.
But, anyway, I’m sure I’ll still mispronounce everything.
[theme music]
So, today we’re going to talk about persistent
stereotypes about Russia, and how Russia came
to take its current shape, a turn of events
we owe largely to the Mongols.
But before we discuss the Mongol conquest
of Russia, let’s discuss exactly what got
conquered. So before there was a Russian empire,
or even a Russian kingdom, there was the Kievan
Rus. We know Kiev was a powerful city-state,
but who exactly founded it is a subject of
debate. Most historians now believe that the
settlers of Kiev were Slavic people who migrated
from around the Black Sea. But there’s an
older theory that the settlers of Kiev were
actually, like, Vikings. That theory goes
that Vikings came down to Kiev from rivers
like the Dnieper and founded a trading outpost
similar to ones they’d founded in Iceland
and Greenland. Which is an awesome idea and
everything, but Russian, the language that
developed from what the Rus spoke, sounds
a lot more Slavic than it sounds, you know,
Swedish. To illustrate, here is a Swede fighting
with a Russian over who founded Kiev.
Right, okay, so trade was hugely important
to Kiev. Almost all of their wars ended with
trade concession treaties, and their law codes
were unusually devoted to the subject of commerce.
The Rus traded raw materials like fur, wax,
and also slaves — We’re not gonna venture
into the astonishingly intense etymological
debate over whether the word ''Slav'' derives
from the Latin word for slave because there's
nothing more terrifying and verbose than an
etymologist flame war. But, yeah, the Rus
traded slaves. They also relied on agriculture
— and your relationships to the land determined
both your social status and your tax burden.
And if you fell into tax debt, which a lot
of peasants did, then you became bonded to
the land you farmed for the rest of your life.
I guess that slave-like dynamic is okay as
a model for social organization, but if you
step on the proletariat for too long, you
might end up with a Communist revolution.
But I’m getting way ahead of myself. Couple
more things about Kiev: First, the ruler of
Kiev was called the Grand Prince, and he became
the model for future Russian Kings. Also,
the early grand princes made a fateful decision:
They became Byzantine Christians. According
to legend, prince Vladimir chose to convert
the Rus to Byzantine Christianity in the 11th
century. He purportedly chose Christianity
over Islam because of Islam’s prohibition
on alcohol saying: “Drink is the joy of
the Russian.”
Anyway, the Kievan Rus eventually fell in
1240 when these guys showed up and replaced
them. By that time the Rus had been at war
with pastoral nomads for centuries; from the
Khazars to the Pechenegs to the Cumans, and
they were tired. Which made them easy targets.
The period of Mongol “rule” over Russia
is also known as Appanage Russia. An Appanage
is princedom, and this period basically featured
a bunch of Russian princes vying for control
over territory, which is not a recipe for
political stability or economic growth, another
theme that will re-emerge in Russian history.
By the way, I’m describing all of this as
Russia even though if you did that in the
13th century, people would look at you funny.
They’d be like, “What do you mean, Russia?
Also, where’d you get those pants? And all
those teeth?” “MMMM…YOU SMELL PRETTY.”
Right. So, to discuss how important the Mongols
were to Russia, let’s go to the Thought Bubble.
The Mongols did set up the Khanate of the
Golden Horde in Russia, but it didn’t leave
much lasting impact on the institutions of
the region, which had already been set up
by the Kievans. But they did bring about a
population shift — away from the South,
where Kiev was, toward the Northeast. This
was partly to get away from the Mongols and
their massacring, but that noted, the Mongols
were comparatively light rulers: They were
happy to live in their yurts and collect tribute
from the ever-bickering Russian princes. And
all the princes had to do in exchange for
their relative freedom was recognize the Mongol
khans as their rulers and allow the Mongols
to pick the Grand Prince from among the Russians.
Perhaps most importantly, Mongol rule cut
the Russians off from the Byzantines and further
isolated them from Europe, leaving Russia
not Byzantine, not European, and not really
Mongol either, since they hated the Mongols
and generally believed the Mongols were a
scourge sent from God to punish them for their
sinfulness and everything.
But the Mongols did help propel Moscow to
prominence and in doing so, created the idea
that this was Russia. And as an aside, they
also did what Napoleon, Hitler, and many others
couldn’t: The Mongols successfully conquered
Russia in the winter. Thanks, Thought Bubble.
So how did the Mongols help catapult Moscow
and its princes to prominence? Well, first,
they named Muscovite princes The Grand Prince
on more than one occasion. More importantly,
the Muscovite princes won — that is to say
purchased — the right to collect tribute
on behalf of the Khan from other princes.
That’s a good gig because it’s easy to
skim a little bit off the top before you send
it down the line to the Mongols. Which is
precisely what the Muscovites did to enrich
themselves. One prince who was particularly
good at this was known as Ivan Kalita. Using
my Russian, I can tell you that that translates
to “Johnny Moneybags.” As my Russian professor
would tell you, I’m a “creative” translator.
All this loot helped Moscow expand their influence
and buy principalities. The Mongols also helped
them more directly by attacking their enemies.
Plus Moscow was at the headwaters of four
rivers which made it well-positioned for trade.
And because they were kind of the allies of
the Mongols, the Mongols rarely attacked them
– which meant that lots of people went to
Moscow because it was relatively safe. Including
churchy people. In fact, Moscow also became
the seat of the Eastern Orthodox church in
1325, when the Metropolitan Peter moved there.
So you might think that the Muscovites would
be grateful for all this help from the Mongols,
but you would be wrong. As the Mongols’
position weakened in Russia in the latter
half of the 14th century, one of Moscow’s
princes Dmitry Donskoy made war on them and
inflicted the first major defeat of Mongols
in Russia at battle of Kulikovo Field. This
showed that the Mongols weren’t invincible,
which is always really bad for an imperial
force. Plus it made Moscow look like the hero
of the Russians. And that helped strengthen
the idea of a unified Russia, just as you’ll
remember the Persians helped unify the Greeks
a long time ago. Aiding this growth was stability,
which Moscow owed largely to luck: Muscovite
princes usually had sons which allowed them
to have successors. In fact, there was only
one major succession struggle and it was between
two blind guys named Basil. That’s not a
joke by the way. Oh, it’s time for the Open
Letter?
An Open Letter to Basil and Basil.
But first, let’s see in the Secret Compartment.
Oh, it’s Grizzlor! Yeah, I guess that is
kind of how the Russians saw the Mongols.
Dear Basils,
The 15th century Muscovite civil war was insanely
complicated, but it culminated with you guys
essentially blinding each other. First, Basil
II, the eventual winner of the civil war,
had Basil the cross-eyed blinded. Because
being cross-eyed wan’t bad enough. And that
was seen as the end of the political career
of Basil the Cross-Eyed. But then Basil the
Cross-Eyed’s brother tracked down Basil
II and he was like “Imma blind you back!”
And of course, everybody thought that would
end Basil II’s political career, but they
were wrong. It turns out you can rule Russia
like a Boss even if you’re blind.
Best wishes, John Green
After Basil the Blind came the real man who
expanded Moscow’s power, Ivan III, later
known as Ivan the Great. First, he asserted
Russian independence from the Mongols and
stopped paying tribute to the khan-- after
the khan had named him Grand Prince, of course.
Then, Ivan purchased, negotiated for or conquered
multiple appanages, thus expanding Muscovite
power even more. Ivan later declared himself
sovereign of all Russians and then married
the niece of the last Byzantine emperor, thus
giving him even more legitimacy. And he took
titles autocrat and tsar, which means Caesar.
Basically, Ivan created the first centralized
Russian state and for doing that he probably
deserves title “the Great.”
And that would be a good place to stop, except
then we won’t see the type of absolute rule
that characterized Russia for most of the
rest of its history, even unto Putin. OH GOD.
JUST KIDDING PUTIN! YOU’D NEVER RIG AN ELECTION..
N-NO…PLEASE DON’T PUT ME IN JAIL!
While Ivan III consolidated Muscovite power,
the undeniable brutal streak in Russian governance
comes not from the Mongols, but from Ivan
IV, better known as Ivan the Terrible. Ivan
IV ruled from 1533 to 1584, taking the throne
at age 16, yet more evidence that adolescents
should not be trusted with emerging empires.
Ivan the Terrible’s reign represents the
end of princely power and the beginning of
the autocracy that Russia is famous for. But
in the beginning, he was really an innovative
leader. As a young king, he worked with a
group of advisers called the Chosen Council,
which certainly sounds like a good thing.
He also called the very first meeting of the
zemsky sobor, a grand council of representatives
similar to the estates general that would
become so important in France two hundred
years later. And also reformed the army, emphasizing
the new technology of muskets.
But in the second part of his reign, Ivan
earned his nickname, the Terrible — which
can mean either bad or just awe-inspiring,
depending on your perspective. Psychological
historians will point out that things started
go terribly wrong with Ivan after the death
of his beloved wife, Anastasia Romanov. Or
they might point to the fact that he enjoyed
torturing animals when he was a kid.
Regardless, Ivan set out to break the power
of the nobility-- the former princes and landowners
called the boyars. They were the last link
to princely rule. And after an odd episode
that saw him briefly “abdicate,” Ivan
returned to Moscow and declared he had the
right to punish all traitors and evildoers.
To help him in this effort, Ivan created the
oprichniki, a corps of secret police who rode
around on black horses, wearing all black,
whose job it was to hunt down and destroy
any enemies of the tsar. See also: Nazgûl
and Dementors. So this was the first of Russia’s
purges. And over the latter half of Ivan’s
reign, whole towns were destroyed. It was,
in effect, a civil war, except with no resistance.
One historian called it a civil massacre.
In the end, Ivan IV established absolute control
of the tsar over all the Russian people, but
he also set the precedent of accomplishing
this through terror, secret police, and the
suspension of law. And that would echo through
the ages of Russian history… I mean, until
Vladimir Putin heroically put an end to it.
His little eyes. They’re scary…
So, hence the stereotype of Russian brutality
and barbarism, but here’s the truth; the
rest of Europe also knew a lot about brutality
and secret police forces. But for centuries,
Russia was seen by western Europe as both
European and not, an “Other” that was
to be doubly feared because it was not fully
Other. And when we think of all these historical
stereotypes about Russia, it’s worth remembering
that what you see as barbaric about others
is often what they see as barbaric about you.
Thanks for watching, and I’ll see you next week.
Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan
Muller, our script supervisor is Danica Johnson.
The show is written by my high school history
teacher Raoul Meyer and myself. Our graphics
team is Thought Bubble, Last week's Phrase
of the Week was: "Nobody's business but the
Turks" If you want to suggest future phrases
of the week or guess at this week’s you
can do so in comments where you can also ask
questions related to today's video that will
be answered by our team of historians. Thanks
for watching, and as we say in my hometown,
Don't Forget To Be Awesome.