The French Revolution: Crash Course World History #29 Video Lecture | A Complete Guide to World History : 1 - World Knowledge

Hi, my name is John Green, this is Crash Course
World History, and today we’re going to
talk about The French Revolution. Admittedly,
this wasn’t the French flag until 1794,
but we just felt like he looked good in stripes.
As does this guy. Huh?
So, while the American Revolution is considered
a pretty good thing, the French Revolution
is often seen as a bloody, anarchic mess,
which...
Mr. Green, Mr. Green! I bet, like always,
it’s way more complicated than that.
Actually no. It was pretty terrible. Also,
like a lot of revolutions, in the end it exchanged
an authoritarian regime for an authoritarian
regime. But even if the revolution was a mess,
its ideas changed human history - far more,
I will argue, than the American Revolution.
[theme music]
Right, so France in the 18th century was a
rich and populous country, but it had a systemic
problem collecting taxes because of the way
its society was structured. They had a system
with kings and nobles we now call the Ancien
Régime. Thank you, three years of high school French.
And for most French people, it sucked, because
the people with the money - the nobles and
the clergy - never paid taxes. So by 1789,
France was deeply in debt thanks to their
funding the American Revolution - thank you,
France; we will get you back in World Wars
I and II. And King Louis XVI was spending
half of his national budget to service the federal debt.
Louis tried to reform this system under various
finance ministers. He even called for democracy
on a local level, but all attempts to fix
it failed and soon France basically declared
bankruptcy. This nicely coincided with hailstorms
that ruined a year’s harvest, thereby raising food prices
and causing widespread hunger, which really made
the people of France angry, because they love to eat.
Meanwhile, the King certainly did not look
broke, as evidenced by his well-fed physique
and fancy footwear. He and his wife Marie
Antoinette also got to live in the very nice
Palace at Versailles thanks to God’s mandate,
but Enlightenment thinkers like Kant were
challenging the whole idea of religion, writing
things like: “The main point of enlightenment
is of man’s release from his self-caused
immaturity, primarily in matters of religion.”
So basically the peasants were hungry, the
intellectuals were beginning to wonder whether
God could or should save the King, and the
nobility were dithering about, eating foie
gras and songbirds, failing to make meaningful
financial reform.
In response to the crisis, Louis XVI called
a meeting of the Estates General, the closest
thing that France had to a national parliament,
which hadn’t met since 1614. The Estates
General was like a super parliament made up
of representatives from the First Estate,
the nobles, the Second Estate, the clergy,
and the Third Estate, everyone else.
The Third Estate showed up with about 600
representatives, the First and Second Estates
both had about 300, and after several votes,
everything was deadlocked, and then the Third
Estate was like, “You know what? Forget
you guys. We’re gonna leave and we’re
gonna become our own National Assembly.”
This did not please King Louis XVI. So when
the new National Assembly left the room for
a break, he locked the doors, and he was like,
"Sorry, guys, you can't go in there. And if
you can't assemble, how you gonna be a National
Assembly?"
Shockingly, the Third Estate representatives
were able to find a different room in France,
this time an indoor tennis court where they
swore the famous Tennis Court Oath. And they
agreed not to give up until a French constitution
was established.
So then Louis XVI responded by sending troops
to Paris primarily to quell uprisings over
food shortages, but the revolutionaries saw
this as a provocation, so they responded by
seizing the Bastille Prison on July 14th,
which, coincidentally, is also Bastille Day.
The Bastille was stormed ostensibly to free
prisoners - although there were only seven
in jail at the time - but mostly to get guns.
But the really radical move in the National
Assembly came on August 4, when they abolished
most of the Ancien Régime - feudal rights,
tithes, privileges for nobles, unequal taxation,
they were all abolished - in the name of writing
a new constitution.
And then, on August 26th, the National Assembly
proclaimed the Declaration of Rights of Man
and Citizen, which laid out a system of rights
that applied to every person, and made those
rights integral to the new constitution. That’s
quite different from the American bill of
rights, which was, like, begrudgingly tacked
on at the end and only applied to non-slaves.
The DoRoMaC, as I called it in high school,
declared that everyone had the right to liberty,
property, and security - rights that the French
Revolution would do an exceptionally poor
job of protecting, but as noted last week,
the same can be argued for many other supposedly
more successful revolutions. Okay, let’s
go to the Thought Bubble.
Meanwhile, back at Versailles, Louis XVI was
still King of France, and it was looking like
France might be a constitutional monarchy.
Which might've meant that the royal family
could hang on to their awesome house, but
then, in October of 1789, a rumor started
that Marie Antoinette was hoarding grain somewhere
inside the palace.
And in what became known as the Women's March,
a bunch of armed peasant women stormed the
palace and demanded that Louis and Marie Antoinette
move from Versailles to Paris. Which they
did, because everyone is afraid of armed peasant
women. And this is a nice reminder that to
many people at the time, the French Revolution
was not primarily about fancy Enlightenment
ideas; it was mostly about lack of food and
a political system that made economic contractions
hardest on the poor.
Now, a good argument can be made that this
first phase of the revolution wasn’t all
that revolutionary. The National Assembly
wanted to create a constitutional monarchy;
they believed that the king was necessary
for a functioning state and they were mainly
concerned that the voters and office holders
be men of property. Only the most radical
wing, the Jacobins, called for the creation
of a republic. But things were about to get
much more revolutionary - and also worse for
France.
First, the Jacobins had a huge petition drive
that got a bit unruly, which led troops controlled
not by the King but by the National Assembly
to fire on the crowd, killing 50 people. And
that meant that the National Assembly, which
had been the revolutionary voice of the people,
had killed people in an attempt to reign in
revolutionary fervor. You see this a lot throughout
history during revolutions. What looked like
radical hope and change suddenly becomes "The
Man" as increasingly radical ideas are embraced.
Thanks, Thought Bubble.
Meanwhile, France’s monarchical neighbors
were getting a little nervous about all this
republic business, especially Leopold II,
who in addition to being the not holy, not
Roman, and not imperial Holy Roman Emperor,
was Marie Antoinette’s brother. I should
note, by the way, that at this point, the
Holy Roman Empire was basically just Austria.
Also, like a lot of monarchs, Leopold II liked
the idea of monarchies, and he wanted to keep
his job as a person who gets to stand around
wearing a dress, pointing at nothing, owning
winged lion-monkeys made out of gold. And who
can blame him? So he and King William Frederick II
of Prussia together issued the Declaration of Pillnitz,
which promised to restore the French monarchy.
At this point, Louis and the National Assembly
developed a plan: Let’s invade Austria.
The idea was to plunder Austria’s wealth
and maybe steal some Austrian grain to shore
up French food supplies, and also, you know,
spread revolutionary zeal. But what actually
happened is that Prussia joined Austria in
fighting the French. And then Louis encouraged
the Prussians, which made him look like an
enemy of the revolution, which, of course,
he was. And as a result, the Assembly voted
to suspend the monarchy, have new elections
in which everyone could vote (as long as they
were men), and create a new republican constitution.
Soon, this Convention decided to have a trial
for Louis XVI, who was found guilty and, by
one vote, sentenced to die via guillotine.
Which made it difficult for Austria and Prussia
to restore him to the throne. Oh, it’s time
for the open letter?
An Open Letter to the Guillotine. But first,
let’s see what’s in the secret compartment today.
Oh, there’s nothing. Oh my gosh, Stan! Jeez.
That’s not funny!
Dear Guillotine, I can think of no better example of
Enlightenment thinking run amok. Dr. Joseph Guillotine,
the inventor of the guillotine, envisioned
it as an egalitarian way of dying. They said
the guillotine was humane and it also made
no distinction between rich or poor, noble
or peasant. It killed equally.
You were also celebrated for taking the torture
out of execution. But I will remind you, you
did not take the dying out of execution. Unfortunately
for you, France hasn’t executed anyone since
1977. But you’ll be happy to know that the
last legal execution in France was via guillotine.
Plus, you’ve always got a future in horror
movies.
Best wishes, John Green
The death of Louis XVI marks the beginning
of The Terror, the best known or at least
the most sensational phase of the revolution.
I mean, if you can kill the king, you can
kill pretty much anyone, which is what the
government did under the leadership of the
Committee of Public Safety (Motto: We suck at
protecting public safety), led by Maximilien Robespierre.
The terror saw the guillotining of 16,000
enemies of the revolution including Marie
“I never actually said Let them eat cake”
Antoinette and Maximilien Robespierre himself,
who was guillotined in the month of Thermidor
in the year Two.
Alright, so while France was broke and fighting
in like nine wars, the Committee of Public
Safety changed the measurements of time because,
you know, the traditional measurements are
so irrational and religion-y. So they renamed
all the months and decided that every day
would have 10 hours and each hour 100 minutes.
And then, after the Terror, the revolution
pulled back a bit and another new constitution
was put into place, this one giving a lot
more power to wealthy people. At this point,
France was still at war with Austria and Britain,
wars that France ended up winning, largely
thanks to a little corporal named Napoleon
Bonaparte.
The war was backdrop to a bunch of coups and
counter coups that I won’t get into right
now because they were very complicated, but
the last coup that we’ll talk about, in
1799, established Napoleon Bonaparte as the
First Consul of France. And it granted him
almost unlimited executive power under yet
another constitution. And when he was declared
First Consul of France, Napoleon proclaimed
"Citizens! The revolution is established on
the principals with which it began. It is
over." By which he presumably meant that France’s
government had gone all the way from here
to here to here.
As with the American revolution, it’s easy
to conclude that France’s revolution wasn’t
all that revolutionary. I mean, Napoleon was
basically an emperor and, in some ways, he
was even more of an absolute monarch than
Louis XVI had been. Gradually the nobles came
back to France, although they had mostly lost
their special privileges. The Catholic Church
returned, too, although much weaker because
it had lost land and the ability to collect tithes.
And when Napoleon himself fell, France restored
the monarchy, and except for a four-year period,
between 1815 and 1870, France had a king who
was either a Bourbon or a Bonaparte.
Now, these were no longer absolute monarchs who
claimed that their right to rule came from
God; they were constitutional monarchs of
the kind that the revolutionaries of 1789
had originally envisioned. But the fact remains
that France had a king again, and a nobility,
and an established religion and it was definitely
not a democracy or a republic.
And perhaps this is why the French Revolution
is so controversial and open to interpretation.
Some argue the revolution succeeded in spreading
enlightenment ideals even if it didn’t bring
democracy to France. Others argue that the
real legacy of the Revolution wasn’t the
enhancement of liberty, but of state power.
Regardless, I’d argue that the French Revolution
was ultimately far more revolutionary than
its American counterpart. I mean, in some
ways, America never had an aristocracy, but
in other ways it continued to have one - the
French enlightenment thinker, Diderot, felt
that Americans should “fear a too unequal
division of wealth resulting in a small number
of opulent citizens and a multitude of citizens
living in misery.” And the American Revolution
did nothing to change that polarization of
wealth.
What made the French Revolution so radical
was its insistence on the universality of
its ideals. I mean, look at Article 6 of the
Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen:
“Law is the expression of the general will.
Every citizen has a right to participate personally,
or through his representative, in its foundation. It must
be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes.”
Those are radical ideas, that the laws come
from citizens, not from kings or gods, and
that those laws should apply to everyone equally.
That’s a long way from Hammurabi - and in
truth, it’s a long way from the slaveholding
Thomas Jefferson.
In the 1970s, Chinese President Zhou Enlai
was asked what the affects of the French Revolution
had been. And he said, “It’s too soon
to say.” And in a way, it still is. The
French Revolution asked new questions about
the nature of people’s rights and the derivation
of those rights. And we’re still answering
those questions and sorting through how our
answers should shape society today - must
government be of the people to be for the
people? Do our rights derive from nature or
from God or from neither? And what are those rights?
As William Faulkner said, “The past is never
dead. It’s not even past.” Thanks for
watching. I’ll see you next week.
Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan
Muller, our script supervisor is Danica Johnson,
the show is written by my high school history
teacher Raoul Meyer and myself, our graphics
team is Thought Bubble, and we are ably interned
by Meredith Danko.
Last week’s phrase of the week was "Giant
Tea Bag"; if you want to suggest future phrases
of the week, or guess at this week's you can
do so in comments, where you can also ask
questions about today’s video that will
be answered by our team of historians.
Thanks for watching Crash Course, and as we
say in my hometown, Don’t Forget To Be Awesome.