Open App

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Videos > Political Science Class 11 > Judicial Activism

Judicial Activism Video Lecture | Political Science Class 11 - Humanities/Arts

FAQs on Judicial Activism Video Lecture - Political Science Class 11 - Humanities/Arts

1. What is judicial activism?

Ans. Judicial activism refers to an approach taken by judges to interpret and apply the law in a way that goes beyond the traditional legal boundaries. It involves actively shaping or influencing public policy through their decisions, rather than solely relying on the strict interpretation of the law.

2. What are the key characteristics of judicial activism?

Ans. The key characteristics of judicial activism include judges taking an active role in interpreting the law, being more willing to make bold and innovative decisions, and considering the societal impact of their rulings. It often involves judges using their power to address social, political, or economic issues and to advocate for change.

3. How does judicial activism differ from judicial restraint?

Ans. Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two contrasting approaches to interpreting the law. While judicial activism involves judges taking an active and expansive role in shaping public policy, judicial restraint refers to a more conservative approach where judges are cautious about overstepping their boundaries and defer to the decisions made by other branches of government.

4. What are the advantages of judicial activism?

Ans. Proponents of judicial activism argue that it can help address societal injustices, protect individual rights, and promote progressive social change. It allows judges to fill gaps in legislation, challenge unconstitutional laws, and ensure that the law remains relevant in a changing society. It also provides a check on potential abuses of power by other branches of government.

5. What are the criticisms of judicial activism?

Ans. Critics of judicial activism argue that it undermines the democratic process by allowing unelected judges to make policy decisions. They believe that it encroaches on the powers of the legislative and executive branches, infringes on the principle of separation of powers, and can lead to judicial overreach. Critics also contend that it can create legal uncertainty and inconsistency.

About this Video

4.69/5 Rating

Sep 21, 2025 Last updated

Related Exams

Humanities/Arts

Video Description: Judicial Activism for Humanities/Arts 2025 is part of Political Science Class 11 preparation. The notes and questions for Judicial Activism have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Judicial Activism covers all important topics for Humanities/Arts 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Judicial Activism.

Introduction of Judicial Activism in English is available as part of our Political Science Class 11 for Humanities/Arts & Judicial Activism in Hindi for Political Science Class 11 course. Download more important topics related with notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Description

Video Lecture & Questions for Judicial Activism Video Lecture | Political Science Class 11 - Humanities/Arts - Humanities/Arts full syllabus preparation | Free video for Humanities/Arts exam to prepare for Political Science Class 11.

Information about Judicial Activism

Here you can find the meaning of Judicial Activism defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides explaining types of Judicial Activism theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Judicial Activism tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

	Political Science Class 11 44 videos\|387 docs\|50 tests

Political Science Class 11

44 videos|387 docs|50 tests

Join Course for Free

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

study material

video lectures

Important questions

practice quizzes

Extra Questions