All questions of Situation Reaction Test, Facts and Opinions for Class 6 Exam

Ykksng

C)

buy a gift for her daughter and help in wedding

Sentence Analysis

The sentence "Venus is the second planet from the sun" is an opinion.

Explanation

An opinion is a statement that expresses a person's feelings, thoughts, or beliefs. It is not based on factual evidence or objective information. In this case, the sentence "Venus is the second planet from the sun" is an opinion because it expresses a belief or thought about the position of Venus in relation to the sun.

Other Options

- The sentence "All students should see a meteor" is not an opinion. It is a statement that suggests a recommendation or a desirable experience for all students. It does not express a personal belief or thought.
- The sentence "Galaxy is a group of stars" is not an opinion. It is a factual statement that describes the nature of a galaxy as a collection of stars. It is based on scientific knowledge and can be objectively verified.
- The sentence "Saturn has rings around it" is not an opinion. It is a factual statement that describes the physical appearance of Saturn, which is known to have rings. This information is based on scientific observations and can be objectively verified.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A, as it is the only sentence that expresses a personal belief or thought rather than stating a fact or recommendation.

Opinion Sentence: The study of fruits is called Pomology.

Explanation:

Definition of Opinion: An opinion is a statement that expresses a person's belief, feeling, or judgment about something, rather than stating a fact.

Identifying the Opinion Sentence:

To identify the opinion sentence among the given options, we need to determine which sentence expresses a personal belief or judgment rather than stating a fact.

Sentence Analysis:

a) "Strawberries are the only fruit with seeds on the outside."
This sentence is stating a fact about strawberries. It is a general statement about the characteristic of strawberries, which can be verified.

b) "The study of fruits is called Pomology."
This sentence expresses a personal belief or judgment about the study of fruits. It is not a verifiable fact but rather a statement based on the opinion of the person making the statement.

c) "Apples stay afloat in water as they are 25 percent air."
This sentence is stating a fact about apples. It explains why apples float in water and provides a scientific explanation based on their air content.

d) "Dried fruits are better than fresh fruits."
This sentence expresses a personal belief or judgment about the superiority of dried fruits over fresh fruits. It is subjective and can vary from person to person.

Conclusion:

Among the given options, the sentence "The study of fruits is called Pomology" is an opinion because it expresses a personal belief or judgment rather than stating a verifiable fact.

A) Fact

Opinion Sentence: Some species of bamboo develop flowers after 65 or 120 years.

Explanation:
The sentence "Some species of bamboo develop flowers after 65 or 120 years" is an opinion because it expresses a personal belief or point of view. Opinions are subjective and can vary from person to person.

Objective vs. Subjective:
In order to understand why this sentence is an opinion, it's important to distinguish between objective and subjective statements:

- Objective sentences are based on facts that can be proven or verified. They are unbiased and not influenced by personal feelings or opinions. For example, the sentence "The sunflower head is actually made of many tiny flowers called florets" is an objective statement because it presents a verifiable fact.

- Subjective sentences are based on personal opinions, beliefs, or feelings. They reflect the speaker's or writer's point of view and cannot be proven or disproven. The sentence "Some species of bamboo develop flowers after 65 or 120 years" falls into this category because it expresses a personal belief about the flowering habits of bamboo.

Subjectivity in Opinion:
Opinions are subjective because they can be influenced by personal experiences, preferences, cultural backgrounds, and other factors. Different people may have different opinions about the same topic based on their unique perspectives.

In the given sentence, the opinion is related to the flowering habits of bamboo. While it is a known fact that some species of bamboo do indeed flower, the specific time frame mentioned (65 or 120 years) is not universally applicable to all bamboo species. This is where the personal belief or opinion comes into play.

It's important to note that opinions are not necessarily right or wrong. They are simply expressions of personal viewpoints. In this case, the opinion about the flowering habits of bamboo may be influenced by the speaker's knowledge, observations, or cultural beliefs.

Understanding the Situation
In a crowded bus, it can be challenging to navigate through passengers to purchase a ticket. However, it's essential to maintain decorum and follow the proper procedures when it comes to public transport.
Why Option 'B' is Correct
- Direct Interaction: Calling the conductor directly ensures that the money reaches the right person without any misunderstandings. This is the most responsible action.
- Accountability: By paying the conductor, you take responsibility for your fare. This shows respect for the rules of public transport.
- Prevention of Embarrassment: Approaching the conductor calmly can prevent any potential embarrassment that might occur from jumping out and avoiding payment.
Why Other Options Are Less Suitable
- Option 'A' - Jumping Out: This could lead to legal consequences and is inappropriate behavior. It’s important to respect the rules and not evade responsibility.
- Option 'C' - Handing Money to a Nearby Passenger: This is risky and unreliable. You can't ensure the passenger will pass on the money to the conductor.
- Option 'D' - Giving Money to the Driver: The driver’s primary responsibility is to operate the bus safely, not collect fares. This may disrupt the driving process and lead to confusion.
Conclusion
In conclusion, option 'B' is the best choice as it promotes accountability and ensures you follow the proper protocol. Public transport functions smoothly when all passengers adhere to the rules, and paying your fare is a part of that responsibility.

Understanding the Statement
The statement "Ayaan has two brothers" presents a specific claim about Ayaan's family. To categorize this statement correctly, we need to analyze its nature.
Evaluating the Options
- Fact: A fact is a statement that can be proven true or false based on evidence. For example, if we had information confirming Ayaan's siblings, this would be classified as a fact.
- Opinion: An opinion is a personal belief or judgment that is subjective and cannot be proven true or false. For instance, saying "Ayaan is the best brother" is an opinion.
- Can’t say: This option reflects uncertainty. If we lack sufficient information about Ayaan's family, this statement could be categorized as "can't say."
- None: This option suggests that the statement does not fit into any of the provided categories.
Determining the Correct Answer
In the context of the statement "Ayaan has two brothers":
- If we do not have information about Ayaan's family, we cannot confirm whether this statement is true or false. Thus, we cannot classify it as a fact.
- We also cannot classify it as an opinion because it is a statement about Ayaan's family and not a subjective belief.
Therefore, without concrete evidence confirming or denying the statement, it falls into the realm of uncertainty.
Conclusion
The correct answer is option 'D' (None), as the statement cannot be classified definitively as a fact, opinion, or an uncertain claim based on the information provided.

Cigarettes cause lung cancer.

This statement is a fact rather than an opinion or a statement with insufficient data. There is a significant amount of evidence and research that supports the link between smoking cigarettes and the development of lung cancer. Here are the reasons why this statement is considered a fact:

Evidence from research:
- Numerous scientific studies have been conducted over the years, and the majority of them have consistently found a strong association between smoking cigarettes and lung cancer. These studies involve large sample sizes and have been conducted by reputable institutions and researchers.
- The World Health Organization (WHO), the American Cancer Society, and other reputable health organizations have published reports that clearly state the link between smoking and lung cancer.
- Long-term epidemiological studies have shown that individuals who smoke cigarettes are at a significantly higher risk of developing lung cancer compared to non-smokers.
- The harmful chemicals present in tobacco smoke, such as tar, nicotine, benzene, and formaldehyde, have been proven to be carcinogenic (cancer-causing) and have a direct impact on the development of lung cancer.

Statistics:
- According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), smoking is the leading cause of preventable deaths worldwide, with lung cancer being the most common cause of cancer-related deaths.
- In the United States, more than 80% of lung cancer deaths are directly attributed to smoking.
- The risk of lung cancer increases with the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the duration of smoking.

Consensus among experts:
- The medical and scientific communities widely accept the fact that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer. This consensus is based on years of research, evidence, and peer-reviewed studies.
- The Surgeon General of the United States has issued multiple reports emphasizing the link between smoking and lung cancer, further solidifying the consensus among experts.

In conclusion, the statement "Cigarettes cause lung cancer" is considered a fact due to the overwhelming evidence from research, statistics, and the consensus among experts. It is crucial to spread awareness about the dangers of smoking and encourage individuals to quit smoking or never start in order to reduce the incidence of lung cancer and improve public health.

Why option 'D' is the correct answer:

In a situation where the other members of the sports team stop talking to you due to a misunderstanding, it is important to take proactive steps to resolve the issue and rebuild communication. Option 'D' suggests going forward and starting the conversation, which is the most effective approach for resolving the misunderstanding and restoring relationships within the team.

Benefits of choosing option 'D':

1. Initiating communication: By taking the first step and starting the conversation, you demonstrate your willingness to resolve the issue and move forward. This can help break the ice and encourage others to open up as well.

2. Addressing misunderstandings: By initiating the conversation, you create an opportunity to clarify any misunderstandings that may have led to the breakdown in communication. This allows you to share your perspective and listen to others, fostering a better understanding of the situation.

3. Promoting teamwork: By actively engaging in conversation, you contribute to building a positive team dynamic. Effective communication is crucial for teamwork and achieving common goals. By initiating dialogue, you encourage others to do the same, fostering a supportive and collaborative environment.

4. Rebuilding trust: Openly addressing the misunderstanding and initiating communication can help rebuild trust among team members. By showing your willingness to resolve the issue, you demonstrate your commitment to the team and its goals, thus strengthening the bonds within the group.

5. Preventing further misunderstandings: By proactively addressing the situation, you can prevent the misunderstanding from escalating or causing further issues within the team. Open communication allows for clarification, resolution, and the development of effective strategies to prevent similar issues in the future.

Conclusion:

Option 'D', which involves going forward and starting the conversation, is the correct answer in this situation. By taking the initiative to communicate, you can address the misunderstanding, rebuild relationships, promote teamwork, rebuild trust, and prevent further issues within the team. Effective communication is essential for a successful sports team, and taking the first step is crucial in resolving conflicts and maintaining a positive team environment.

Explanation:

When passing through a railway line and noticing that two trains from opposite directions are running on the same line, it is important to take immediate action to prevent any potential accidents or collisions. The correct answer in this scenario is option 'B', which is to rush to either of the engine staff and inform them about the situation. Let's understand why this is the best course of action:

1. Ensuring Safety:
The primary concern in this situation is the safety of the passengers on both trains as well as other individuals who may be present in the vicinity. By immediately informing the engine staff, they can take necessary steps to avert any accidents or collisions and ensure the safety of everyone involved.

2. Professional Expertise:
The engine staff consists of trained professionals who are responsible for operating and controlling the trains. They are well-equipped to handle such situations and have the knowledge and experience to make quick decisions to avoid any mishaps. By informing them, you are alerting individuals who can take appropriate action based on their expertise.

3. Communication Channel:
The engine staff is the closest point of contact for immediate communication with the trains. They can immediately relay the information to the respective train drivers and take necessary steps to ensure the safe passage of both trains. By rushing to them, you are utilizing the most direct and effective communication channel available in this situation.

4. Time-sensitive Issue:
In a scenario where two trains are running on the same line, time becomes a critical factor. Waiting and seeing until the trains pass on (option 'D') may not be the best choice as it can lead to a delay in taking action and potentially increase the risk of accidents. By rushing to the engine staff (option 'B'), you are taking immediate action and minimizing the time gap between noticing the situation and informing the relevant authorities.

In conclusion, when passing through a railway line and encountering two trains from opposite directions running on the same line, it is crucial to choose the correct course of action. Rushing to either of the engine staff and informing them (option 'B') is the best choice as it ensures safety, utilizes professional expertise, utilizes the most direct communication channel, and minimizes the time gap in taking necessary action.

Answer:

Introduction:
When a friend asks for money, it is important to consider the situation carefully before making a decision. It is essential to maintain a balance between being helpful and ensuring that our own financial stability is not compromised. Option B, which suggests asking for the purpose of the money before deciding, is the most appropriate response in this situation.

Reasoning behind Option B:
1. Assessing the Purpose:
- Asking for the purpose of the money helps us understand the urgency and necessity of the request.
- It allows us to evaluate whether the money is being borrowed for a legitimate reason or if it is for non-essential expenses.
- Assessing the purpose helps to determine if the friend genuinely needs the money or if they are taking advantage of the friendship.

2. Evaluating Financial Situation:
- By asking for the purpose, we can evaluate our own financial situation and determine if we are capable of providing assistance without causing financial strain.
- It is crucial to prioritize our own financial stability and ensure we do not put ourselves at risk of financial hardship.

3. Maintaining Boundaries:
- Asking for the purpose of the money sets a boundary and establishes that we are responsible lenders.
- It encourages open communication and transparency, ensuring that both parties understand the terms of the loan.

4. Making an Informed Decision:
- By gathering information about the purpose, we can make an informed decision about whether to lend the money or not.
- It allows us to consider alternative ways of helping, such as suggesting other sources of financial assistance or offering non-monetary support.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, when a friend asks for money, it is important to approach the situation thoughtfully and responsibly. Option B, which suggests asking for the purpose of the money before deciding, allows us to gather necessary information, evaluate our financial situation, and make an informed decision. It helps maintain a balance between being a supportive friend and ensuring our own financial stability.

Understanding the Statement
The statement "Royal weddings always attract a lot of interest" is categorized as a fact. Here’s why:
Definition of Fact
- A fact is a statement that can be verified and is based on reality or evidence.
- It can be proven true or false through observation or research.
Evidence of Interest
- Royal weddings, such as those of Prince William and Kate Middleton or Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, have consistently drawn large audiences worldwide.
- Television broadcasts, social media engagement, and news coverage often highlight the immense public interest in these events.
Statistics and Viewership
- For example, the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle was watched by millions globally, showcasing how these events capture attention.
- Various reports and surveys consistently indicate that royal weddings are among the most-watched events in modern history.
Conclusion
- Since the statement can be supported with data and observation, it is classified as a fact.
- The widespread interest in royal weddings is not subjective; it is reflected in the viewership numbers and public engagement surrounding these events.
In summary, the correct answer is option 'A' because the statement can be confirmed through evidence and is not based on personal belief or interpretation.