All questions of The Unlikely Best Friends for Class 6 Exam

Understanding the Farmer's Reaction
The farmer's reaction upon finding the dog with the elephant was one of joy and affection. Here’s why option 'B' is the correct answer:
1. Bond Between the Farmer and Dog
- The farmer likely has a strong bond with his dog.
- Dogs are often considered loyal companions, and this relationship fosters a sense of happiness.
2. Unusual Sight
- Seeing a dog with an elephant is an unusual and heartwarming sight.
- The farmer may have been surprised and delighted by the unexpected friendship between the two animals.
3. Positive Emotions
- The presence of the elephant may symbolize something extraordinary.
- The farmer's immediate reaction would probably be to embrace this moment with joy rather than scolding or ignoring it.
4. Encouragement of Friendship
- By hugging the dog, the farmer would be encouraging the bond between the dog and the elephant.
- This promotes a sense of community and togetherness among the animals.
5. Contrast with Other Options
- Scolding the dog or chasing it away would suggest anger or disapproval, which doesn't align with the joyous context.
- Ignoring the dog would be contrary to a loving relationship that is typically seen between farmers and their pets.
In summary, the farmer's joyful reaction to finding the dog with the elephant reflects the themes of friendship, loyalty, and positive emotions in relationships with animals. This reinforces the idea that special moments in life should be celebrated.

Reason for Removing the Rope from the Dog:

The farmer saw the dog looking happy:
The farmer noticed that the dog appeared to be happy after removing the rope. This indicated to the farmer that the dog was not feeling restricted or uncomfortable anymore.

Implication of the Dog's Happiness:
The dog's happiness suggested that it was feeling more comfortable and free without the rope. This observation reassured the farmer that the dog did not need to be tied up.

Positive Indicator of the Dog's Well-being:
The fact that the dog was looking happy after the rope was removed indicated that it was in a good state of mind. This positive change in the dog's behavior influenced the farmer's decision to keep the dog untied.

Decision to Remove the Rope:
Based on the dog's happiness and improved demeanor, the farmer decided to remove the rope completely. This decision was made in the best interest of the dog's well-being and happiness.
Overall, the farmer's decision to remove the rope from the dog was prompted by the dog's visible happiness and contentment, indicating that it was more comfortable and free without being tied up.

The mahout noticed that Gajaraj liked the company of the dog and threw some crumbs to the dog, allowing it to stay.

The mahout was relieved to see Gajaraj happy again and quickly brought food for both the elephant and the dog, ensuring they were well-fed and content.

Understanding Gajaraj's Sadness
Gajaraj, despite enjoying a life of luxury in the royal stables, felt a deep sense of sadness. This emotional state can be understood through the following points:

Longing for Companionship
- Gajaraj's primary issue was his longing for a friend to play with.
- As a social creature, elephants thrive on interaction and companionship.
- The absence of a companion left Gajaraj feeling isolated, despite his comfortable surroundings.

Royal Comforts Do Not Replace Friendship
- Living in the best booth and having access to royal comforts did not fulfill Gajaraj's emotional needs.
- Material wealth and physical comforts cannot substitute for meaningful social interactions.
- Gajaraj’s sadness reflects the importance of friendships and connections over mere physical luxuries.

Impacts of Isolation
- Gajaraj’s emotional distress illustrates how creatures, including elephants, suffer when deprived of camaraderie.
- Isolation can lead to feelings of loneliness, which can overshadow even the most comfortable living conditions.
- This highlights the essential role of social bonds in maintaining emotional well-being.

Conclusion
In summary, Gajaraj's sadness stemmed from his desire for a friend to share his life with, which indicates that genuine happiness often hinges on meaningful relationships rather than just physical comforts.

Understanding the Farmer's Decision
The story revolves around the relationship between the farmer and the dog, emphasizing the bond of ownership and companionship. The correct answer, option 'C', states that the dog belonged to the farmer. Here’s a detailed explanation:
1. Ownership and Responsibility
- The farmer likely had a sense of responsibility towards the dog, indicating that it was his pet.
- Taking the dog home suggests a commitment to care for and protect it, reflecting the farmer's nurturing nature.
2. Bond Between the Farmer and the Dog
- The dog and the farmer share a connection that goes beyond mere companionship.
- This bond is crucial in the story, highlighting loyalty and affection, which often exist in farmer-pet relationships.
3. Contextual Clues
- Throughout the story, hints may point to the dog's previous life with the farmer, indicating it was not just a random encounter.
- The dog returning home with the farmer signifies a reunion rather than a new acquisition, reinforcing the idea of ownership.
4. Emotional Undertones
- The act of taking the dog home carries emotional weight, suggesting love and attachment.
- The farmer's actions reflect a deeper understanding of the dog's needs and his role as a caregiver.
In conclusion, the farmer took the dog home because it belonged to him, showcasing themes of responsibility, affection, and the special bond shared between animals and their owners. This choice reflects the farmer's character and the significance of companionship in rural life.

Understanding the Dog's Reaction
When an elephant playfully splashes water, the expectation might be that the dog would enjoy the playful interaction. However, the correct answer indicates that the dog yelped in dislike. Here’s a deeper look into this reaction:

Possible Reasons for the Dog's Dislike
- Surprise and Shock: Elephants are massive, and a sudden splash of water from such a large animal can be startling for a dog. The unexpectedness of the situation might cause the dog to react negatively.
- Personal Space: Dogs often have a defined personal space, and being splashed with water can invade that comfort zone. This intrusion can lead to a defensive or negative reaction.
- Instinctual Response: Dogs have instinctual reactions that can be triggered by sudden movements or actions. A yelp can be a natural reflex to express discomfort or displeasure.

The Context of Playfulness
- Different Interpretations: While the elephant may have intended the splash to be playful, the dog might not interpret it the same way. Canine communication is different from that of elephants, leading to misunderstandings in intentions.
- Emotional State: The dog might be feeling anxious or threatened by the elephant's size and the sudden movement. This emotional state can lead to a yelp rather than a joyful response.
In conclusion, while the elephant's playfulness is evident, the dog's reaction highlights the complexities of interspecies communication and the importance of understanding animal behavior. The yelp indicates a sense of discomfort rather than enjoyment in this playful scenario.

Gajaraj's Reaction to Buntee's Return
When Buntee returned to the stable, Gajaraj's reaction was quite significant. Here's a detailed explanation of why option 'B' is the correct answer.
Background of the Characters
- Gajaraj is a majestic elephant known for his strength and gentle nature.
- Buntee, a smaller animal, likely had a close bond with Gajaraj, which adds to the emotional depth of the situation.
Gajaraj's Welcoming Gesture
- When Buntee returned, Gajaraj did not ignore him; instead, he acknowledged his presence enthusiastically.
- The act of giving a swing with his trunk symbolizes affection and joy. It indicates that Gajaraj was happy to see Buntee back in the stable.
Emotional Connection
- The trunk swing is more than just a physical gesture; it reflects Gajaraj's emotional attachment to Buntee.
- Such behavior is common in animal social interactions, showing that Gajaraj was relieved and pleased to have his friend back.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
- Ignored Him: This option would suggest a lack of interest, which contradicts Gajaraj's nurturing character.
- Chased Him Away: This indicates aggression, which is unlikely given Gajaraj's gentle nature.
- Ate All the Food: While it could show greed, it does not align with the theme of friendship and welcoming.
Conclusion
Gajaraj's reaction of giving Buntee a swing with his trunk illustrates the warmth of their friendship. It emphasizes the joy of reunion, making option 'B' the most fitting answer. The bond between the two characters highlights the importance of companionship and emotional connections in animal behavior.

Observation of Gajaraj's Food
The mahout's observation regarding Gajaraj's food during lunchtime was significant in understanding the elephant's state and behavior.
Untouched Food
- The mahout noticed that Gajaraj’s food was untouched.
- This indicated that Gajaraj was likely feeling unwell or distressed.
- Elephants typically enjoy their meals and are known for their large appetites, so not eating is unusual for them.
Implications of Untouched Food
- An untouched meal can be a sign of various issues such as health problems, stress, or a change in environment.
- The mahout might have considered factors like Gajaraj’s emotional state, recent experiences, or physical health.

Conclusion
- The observation of untouched food suggested a need for immediate attention.
- The mahout would likely take steps to assess Gajaraj’s well-being, ensuring he receives the care required to address any underlying issues.
- This incident emphasizes the bond between the mahout and Gajaraj, showcasing the mahout's responsibility in monitoring the elephant's health and happiness.