All questions of A Visit to Cambridge for Class 8 Exam

The advice given by Hawking to other disabled people was to concentrate on what they were good at.

Understanding Hawking's Perspective on Disability
Stephen Hawking, a renowned physicist and cosmologist, had a unique outlook on life, particularly regarding disability. His insights can be quite empowering for disabled individuals and those around them.
Humor and Patronization
- Hawking’s statement, "I find it amusing when people patronise me," reflects his ability to maintain a sense of humor in the face of challenges.
- He often encountered patronizing attitudes due to his disability, which stemmed from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
- Rather than being offended, he chose to view these interactions with amusement, showcasing his resilience and strength.
Empowerment Through Humor
- By finding humor in patronization, Hawking highlighted the importance of not allowing others’ perceptions to dictate one’s self-worth or capabilities.
- His attitude encourages individuals with disabilities to embrace their uniqueness and approach life with confidence and humor.
Inspiration for Others
- Hawking's perspective serves as an inspiration, proving that a positive outlook can transcend physical limitations.
- His achievements in theoretical physics demonstrate that disabilities do not define one's potential to contribute significantly to society.
Conclusion
- Stephen Hawking’s views remind us that humor can be a powerful tool in overcoming societal challenges.
- His life and philosophy encourage a more inclusive and understanding perspective towards disabled individuals, emphasizing their capabilities rather than their limitations.

Understanding Hawking's View on Bravery
Stephen Hawking, the renowned physicist, had a unique perspective on bravery shaped by his personal experiences. His quote, "I haven’t been brave, I’ve had no choice," reflects a profound understanding of courage in the face of adversity.
Life's Challenges
- Hawking was diagnosed with ALS, a motor neuron disease, at a young age.
- This condition significantly limited his physical abilities but did not diminish his intellectual prowess or spirit.
Bravery vs. Choice
- Hawking suggests that what many perceive as bravery might simply be a response to unavoidable circumstances.
- His statement implies that true bravery often arises not from a conscious decision to be courageous, but rather from facing the realities of life that one cannot escape.
Redefining Courage
- This perspective encourages individuals to recognize that bravery can manifest in various forms.
- It highlights that enduring hardships and continuing to pursue one's passions despite difficulties can be seen as a form of bravery.
Inspiration for Others
- Hawking’s insight serves as motivation for many, illustrating that one’s circumstances do not define their strength or capabilities.
- It invites people to confront their challenges head-on, understanding that courage may not always be a choice but can still lead to remarkable achievements.
In summary, Hawking's reflection on bravery emphasizes resilience and the ability to persevere even when faced with life’s toughest challenges.

Firdaus Kanga is a journalist. He is known for his work as a writer and journalist in various media outlets. Let's explore this in more detail:

1. Introduction:
Firdaus Kanga is a well-known figure in the field of journalism. He has made significant contributions to the media industry through his writing and reporting.

2. Firdaus Kanga as a Journalist:
- Firdaus Kanga has worked as a journalist for several reputed publications. He has written numerous articles and features on a wide range of topics, including current affairs, politics, culture, and social issues.
- As a journalist, Kanga has the responsibility of gathering information, conducting interviews, and reporting news to the public. His work involves researching, fact-checking, and presenting information in a clear and unbiased manner.
- Kanga's writing style is often characterized by his ability to engage readers through his storytelling techniques. He has a unique perspective and often brings a fresh and insightful approach to his articles.

3. Not a Scientist:
Firdaus Kanga is not primarily known for his work as a scientist. While he may have written about scientific topics as a journalist, his main focus is on reporting and analyzing news rather than conducting scientific research.

4. Not a Friend of Hawking:
Firdaus Kanga is not specifically known as a friend of Hawking. While he may have interacted with or interviewed Stephen Hawking during his career as a journalist, it is not a defining characteristic of his work or identity.

5. Not a Politician:
Firdaus Kanga is not involved in politics. His career and contributions have been primarily in the field of journalism, where he has made significant contributions as a writer and reporter.

In conclusion, Firdaus Kanga is a journalist known for his work in various media outlets. He has written numerous articles and features on a wide range of topics, showcasing his ability to engage readers through his storytelling techniques. While he may have covered scientific topics and interviewed notable figures like Stephen Hawking, his primary focus is on reporting news and analyzing current affairs.

Hawking felt amused when people patronished him.

Disabled Person's Frustration with Being Asked to Be Brave

One reason why a disabled person may be fed up when people ask him to be brave is because it can come across as dismissive of the challenges and struggles they face on a daily basis. Here's why:

Invalidating Their Feelings
- When someone tells a disabled person to be brave, it can imply that they are not allowed to feel scared, frustrated, or vulnerable about their situation.
- This can be invalidating and dismissive of their emotions, making them feel like their feelings are not being acknowledged or understood.

Pressure to Conceal Their True Emotions
- Asking a disabled person to be brave can put pressure on them to hide their true emotions and always put on a brave face, even when they are struggling internally.
- This can create a sense of internal conflict and make them feel like they have to constantly pretend to be strong, even when they are not feeling that way.

Minimizing the Complexity of Their Experience
- By telling a disabled person to be brave, others may unintentionally minimize the complexity of their experience and the impact that their disability has on their lives.
- This can be frustrating for the disabled person, as it overlooks the multifaceted nature of their challenges and reduces their experience to a simple directive to be brave.

In conclusion, while the intention behind asking a disabled person to be brave may be well-meaning, it is important to consider the implications of such a statement and to validate their feelings and experiences instead of dismissing them.

The correct answer is option 'A' - The Disabled Olympics.

Explanation:
-------------------

The scientist in question was deadly against the Disabled Olympics. Here's a detailed explanation:

1. The Scientist:
The question mentions a scientist who held a strong opposition or disagreement towards a particular topic or event. While the name of the scientist is not provided, the focus is on understanding the topic against which the scientist was opposed.

2. The Disabled Olympics:
The Disabled Olympics, also known as the Paralympic Games, is an international multi-sport event for athletes with disabilities. It is held parallel to the Olympic Games and showcases the athletic abilities of individuals with physical, intellectual, or visual impairments.

3. Opposition of the Scientist:
The scientist mentioned in the question was against the Disabled Olympics. However, the reasons behind this opposition are not provided. It could be speculated that the scientist held a negative view towards the event due to various reasons such as:

a) Ethical Concerns: The scientist might have ethical concerns regarding the competitiveness and fairness of the Disabled Olympics. They could argue that athletes with disabilities may have an unfair advantage or disadvantage compared to their non-disabled counterparts.

b) Resource Allocation: The scientist might have believed that resources allocated to organizing the Disabled Olympics could be better utilized in other areas such as medical research, rehabilitation programs, or improving accessibility and inclusivity for individuals with disabilities.

c) Social Stigma: The scientist might have been against the idea of segregating athletes with disabilities in a separate event. They might argue that including athletes with disabilities in the mainstream Olympics would help break down social stigmas and promote inclusivity.

d) Scientific Perspectives: The scientist might have had scientific evidence or research that questioned the effectiveness or impact of the Disabled Olympics. They might have argued that the event did not contribute significantly to the overall well-being or development of individuals with disabilities.

4. Conclusion:
While the exact reasons behind the scientist's opposition to the Disabled Olympics are not provided, it is clear that the scientist strongly disagreed with the event. Understanding the specific arguments or concerns of the scientist would require further information.

Reasons for wishing to meet Hawking:

Stephen Hawking was a renowned physicist and cosmologist who made significant contributions to the field of science. He was widely regarded as a living genius, and his work on black holes and the theory of relativity revolutionized our understanding of the universe. This is why the correct answer is option 'A' - Hawking was a living genius.

Explanation:

- Hawking's intellectual brilliance: Stephen Hawking's intelligence and knowledge were exceptional. He possessed a profound understanding of complex scientific concepts and theories. His groundbreaking research and theories have had a lasting impact on the scientific community.

- Influence on the field of science: Hawking's work on black holes, particularly his discovery that they emit radiation, known as Hawking radiation, was a groundbreaking achievement. This discovery challenged existing scientific theories and opened up new avenues for research in the field of physics.

- Inspirational figure: Hawking's perseverance and determination in the face of physical challenges made him an inspirational figure for many. Despite being diagnosed with a rare form of motor neuron disease at a young age, he continued to pursue his passion for science and made significant contributions to the field.

- Opportunity to learn: Meeting Hawking would provide an opportunity to gain insights into his thought process, scientific approach, and unique perspectives on various scientific phenomena. His deep understanding of the universe and his ability to simplify complex concepts would be invaluable for anyone interested in science.

- Seeking guidance and mentorship: Meeting Hawking would allow individuals to seek guidance and mentorship from a renowned scientist. Hawking's expertise and experience would be invaluable in shaping and guiding the scientific careers of aspiring scientists.

In conclusion, the desire to meet Hawking stemmed from his status as a living genius, his groundbreaking contributions to science, and his inspirational journey. Meeting him would offer a unique opportunity to learn from his vast knowledge and seek guidance in the field of science.

Kanga felt guilty everytime he spoke to Hawking because hawking had to work hard to respond.

Hawking was a scientist.