All questions of Syllogism for Mechanical Engineering Exam
Statement:
Some swords are sharp
All swords are rusty
Conclusion:
I.Some rusty things are sharp
II.Some rusty things are not sharp- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statement:
Some swords are sharp
All swords are rusty
Conclusion:
I.Some rusty things are sharp
II.Some rusty things are not sharp
Some swords are sharp
All swords are rusty
Conclusion:
I.Some rusty things are sharp
II.Some rusty things are not sharp
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
Ankit Ghosh answered |
Statements:
All Greeks are Romans.
Some Romans are Tandas.
Some Gangus are Tandas.
Conclusions:
I. Some Romans are Tandas.
II. All Greeks are Gangus.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusions II follows.
- c)If either conclusion I or II follows.
- d)If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusion I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All Greeks are Romans.
Some Romans are Tandas.
Some Gangus are Tandas.
Conclusions:
I. Some Romans are Tandas.
II. All Greeks are Gangus.
All Greeks are Romans.
Some Romans are Tandas.
Some Gangus are Tandas.
Conclusions:
I. Some Romans are Tandas.
II. All Greeks are Gangus.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusions II follows.
c)
If either conclusion I or II follows.
d)
If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusion I and II follow.
|
|
Mainak Saha answered |
Statements:
All rooms are houses
All houses are temples
Conclusion:
I.Some temples are rooms
II.Some temples are houses- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All rooms are houses
All houses are temples
Conclusion:
I.Some temples are rooms
II.Some temples are houses
All rooms are houses
All houses are temples
Conclusion:
I.Some temples are rooms
II.Some temples are houses
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow
|
Arya Saha answered |
Statements :
All tables are wood. No wood is a metal. Some metals are glasses.
Conclusions :
I.No Table is a metal
II.Some glasses are table- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
All tables are wood. No wood is a metal. Some metals are glasses.
Conclusions :
I.No Table is a metal
II.Some glasses are table
All tables are wood. No wood is a metal. Some metals are glasses.
Conclusions :
I.No Table is a metal
II.Some glasses are table
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Pankaj Nambiar answered |
Explanation:
- All tables are wood. This statement tells us that all tables are made of wood.
- No wood is a metal. This statement tells us that wood and metal are mutually exclusive categories.
- Some metals are glasses. This statement tells us that there is an overlap between metals and glasses.
Conclusion I: No Table is a metal
- Since all tables are wood and no wood is a metal, it can be concluded that no table is a metal. This conclusion directly follows from the given statements.
Conclusion II: Some glasses are table
- While some metals are glasses, there is no direct relationship established between glasses and tables in the given statements. Therefore, this conclusion cannot be inferred from the given premises.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - If only conclusion I follows.
Statements: All pens are eraser. Some erasers are pencil. Some pencils are ink.
Conclusions: 1) Some ink are eraser. 2) Some pencil are pen. 3) No pen is pencil.- a)Either 1 or 2 follow
- b)Either 2 or 3 follow
- c)Either 1 or 3 follow
- d)All follow
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: All pens are eraser. Some erasers are pencil. Some pencils are ink.
Conclusions: 1) Some ink are eraser. 2) Some pencil are pen. 3) No pen is pencil.
Conclusions: 1) Some ink are eraser. 2) Some pencil are pen. 3) No pen is pencil.
a)
Either 1 or 2 follow
b)
Either 2 or 3 follow
c)
Either 1 or 3 follow
d)
All follow
|
|
Harsh Choudhary answered |
Statements:
All crops are fields.
No yield is a field.
All fields are harvests
Conclusions:
I.No field is a crop
II.All crops are being harvest is a possibility- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All crops are fields.
No yield is a field.
All fields are harvests
Conclusions:
I.No field is a crop
II.All crops are being harvest is a possibility
All crops are fields.
No yield is a field.
All fields are harvests
Conclusions:
I.No field is a crop
II.All crops are being harvest is a possibility
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Rithika Chakraborty answered |
Statements:
Some mocks are exams.
Some exams are banks.
No bank is a local.
Conclusions:
I.Some mocks are local.
II.No local is a mock.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either conclusion I or II follows.
- d)If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some mocks are exams.
Some exams are banks.
No bank is a local.
Conclusions:
I.Some mocks are local.
II.No local is a mock.
Some mocks are exams.
Some exams are banks.
No bank is a local.
Conclusions:
I.Some mocks are local.
II.No local is a mock.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either conclusion I or II follows.
d)
If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Saanvi Rane answered |
Statements : All words are letters. All vowels are letters. Some vowels are alphabets.
Conclusions :
I.No word is a vowel
II.Some letters being alphabets is a possibility- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements : All words are letters. All vowels are letters. Some vowels are alphabets.
Conclusions :
I.No word is a vowel
II.Some letters being alphabets is a possibility
Conclusions :
I.No word is a vowel
II.Some letters being alphabets is a possibility
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Prashanth Jain answered |
Statements:
- All words are letters.
- All vowels are letters.
- Some vowels are alphabets.
Conclusions:
I. No word is a vowel.
II. Some letters being alphabets is a possibility.
Explanation:
- The given statements suggest that all words and vowels are a type of letter, and some vowels are also alphabets.
- Conclusion I, "No word is a vowel", is incorrect as some words can be vowels as well (e.g. "I", "a").
- Conclusion II, "Some letters being alphabets is a possibility", is correct as the given statements establish that some vowels are also alphabets.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option B, "If only conclusion II follows".
- All words are letters.
- All vowels are letters.
- Some vowels are alphabets.
Conclusions:
I. No word is a vowel.
II. Some letters being alphabets is a possibility.
Explanation:
- The given statements suggest that all words and vowels are a type of letter, and some vowels are also alphabets.
- Conclusion I, "No word is a vowel", is incorrect as some words can be vowels as well (e.g. "I", "a").
- Conclusion II, "Some letters being alphabets is a possibility", is correct as the given statements establish that some vowels are also alphabets.
- Therefore, the correct answer is option B, "If only conclusion II follows".
Statements :
No camera is bottle
All bottles are mobiles
Conclusion:
I.No mobile is camera
II.Some mobile are camera- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
No camera is bottle
All bottles are mobiles
Conclusion:
I.No mobile is camera
II.Some mobile are camera
No camera is bottle
All bottles are mobiles
Conclusion:
I.No mobile is camera
II.Some mobile are camera
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Aravind Pillai answered |
Statements :
All pens are pencils. Some erasers are pencils. All Scales are pens.
Conclusions :
I.All scales are pencils
II.All erasers being scale is a possibility.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
All pens are pencils. Some erasers are pencils. All Scales are pens.
Conclusions :
I.All scales are pencils
II.All erasers being scale is a possibility.
All pens are pencils. Some erasers are pencils. All Scales are pens.
Conclusions :
I.All scales are pencils
II.All erasers being scale is a possibility.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Kalyan Mukherjee answered |
Statements and Conclusions:
Statements:
- All pens are pencils.
- Some erasers are pencils.
- All scales are pens.
Conclusions:
I. All scales are pencils.
II. All erasers being scale is a possibility.
Explanation:
From the given statements, we can conclude that:
- All pens are pencils.
- Some erasers are pencils.
- All scales are pens, which means all scales are pencils as well.
Therefore, conclusion I follows logically from the given statements.
For conclusion II, we need to analyze the given statements carefully. It is given that "Some erasers are pencils" and "All pens are pencils". This means that there are some erasers which are also pencils, and since all pens are pencils, some pens must also be erasers. Hence, it is possible that some erasers are scales. Therefore, conclusion II also follows logically from the given statements.
Hence, both conclusions I and II follow from the given statements.
Answer: Option E (If both conclusions I and II follow).
Statements:
- All pens are pencils.
- Some erasers are pencils.
- All scales are pens.
Conclusions:
I. All scales are pencils.
II. All erasers being scale is a possibility.
Explanation:
From the given statements, we can conclude that:
- All pens are pencils.
- Some erasers are pencils.
- All scales are pens, which means all scales are pencils as well.
Therefore, conclusion I follows logically from the given statements.
For conclusion II, we need to analyze the given statements carefully. It is given that "Some erasers are pencils" and "All pens are pencils". This means that there are some erasers which are also pencils, and since all pens are pencils, some pens must also be erasers. Hence, it is possible that some erasers are scales. Therefore, conclusion II also follows logically from the given statements.
Hence, both conclusions I and II follow from the given statements.
Answer: Option E (If both conclusions I and II follow).
Statements: All tables are chair. Some plates are table. All glasses are plates.
Conclusions: 1) All glasses are chairs. 2) Some glasses are table 3) All plates are chairs.- a)Both 1 and 2 follow
- b)Both 1 and 3 follow
- c)None follow
- d)all follows
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: All tables are chair. Some plates are table. All glasses are plates.
Conclusions: 1) All glasses are chairs. 2) Some glasses are table 3) All plates are chairs.
Conclusions: 1) All glasses are chairs. 2) Some glasses are table 3) All plates are chairs.
a)
Both 1 and 2 follow
b)
Both 1 and 3 follow
c)
None follow
d)
all follows
|
|
Aditya Ghoshal answered |
Statements:
Some paints are brushes.
All brushes are varnishes.
All colours are varnishes.
No varnish is a canvas.
Conclusions:
I.No canvas is a brush
II.Some paints are varnishes- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some paints are brushes.
All brushes are varnishes.
All colours are varnishes.
No varnish is a canvas.
Conclusions:
I.No canvas is a brush
II.Some paints are varnishes
Some paints are brushes.
All brushes are varnishes.
All colours are varnishes.
No varnish is a canvas.
Conclusions:
I.No canvas is a brush
II.Some paints are varnishes
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Moumita Kaur answered |
Statements
All plants are flowers
Some flowers are roses
Conclusion:
I.Some roses are plants
II.No rose is plant- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements
All plants are flowers
Some flowers are roses
Conclusion:
I.Some roses are plants
II.No rose is plant
All plants are flowers
Some flowers are roses
Conclusion:
I.Some roses are plants
II.No rose is plant
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Varun Rane answered |
Explanation:
Given Statements:
- All plants are flowers
- Some flowers are roses
Conclusion I:
- Some roses are plants
- This conclusion can be derived from the given statements. Since all plants are flowers and some flowers are roses, it is reasonable to conclude that some roses are plants.
Conclusion II:
- No rose is plant
- This conclusion cannot be concluded from the given statements. The statements only mention that some flowers are roses, but it does not provide enough information to determine whether no rose is a plant.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
- If either I or II follows. This means that conclusion I can be derived from the given statements, while conclusion II cannot be definitively determined.
Given Statements:
- All plants are flowers
- Some flowers are roses
Conclusion I:
- Some roses are plants
- This conclusion can be derived from the given statements. Since all plants are flowers and some flowers are roses, it is reasonable to conclude that some roses are plants.
Conclusion II:
- No rose is plant
- This conclusion cannot be concluded from the given statements. The statements only mention that some flowers are roses, but it does not provide enough information to determine whether no rose is a plant.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
- If either I or II follows. This means that conclusion I can be derived from the given statements, while conclusion II cannot be definitively determined.
Statements : No score is a mark. All marks are percentages. Some grades are percentages.
Conclusions :
I.All grades being marks is a possibility
II.No mark is a score- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements : No score is a mark. All marks are percentages. Some grades are percentages.
Conclusions :
I.All grades being marks is a possibility
II.No mark is a score
Conclusions :
I.All grades being marks is a possibility
II.No mark is a score
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Kalyan Mukherjee answered |
Analysis:
Considering the given statements and conclusions, let's analyze them one by one to determine their validity.
Statement Analysis:
- No score is a mark: This statement implies that scores and marks are different entities.
- All marks are percentages: This statement indicates that all marks are represented in percentages.
- Some grades are percentages: This statement suggests that there are grades that are expressed in percentages.
Conclusion Analysis:
I. All grades being marks is a possibility
- This conclusion can be drawn from the fact that all marks are percentages, and some grades are percentages. It is possible for grades to also be considered as marks, given their interrelation with percentages.
II. No mark is a score
- This conclusion can be derived from the statement "No score is a mark," which implies that scores and marks are mutually exclusive.
Conclusion:
Both conclusions I and II are valid based on the given statements. Grades can be considered as marks since they are related to percentages, and scores are distinct from marks according to the statements provided. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'E,' where both conclusions follow logically.
Considering the given statements and conclusions, let's analyze them one by one to determine their validity.
Statement Analysis:
- No score is a mark: This statement implies that scores and marks are different entities.
- All marks are percentages: This statement indicates that all marks are represented in percentages.
- Some grades are percentages: This statement suggests that there are grades that are expressed in percentages.
Conclusion Analysis:
I. All grades being marks is a possibility
- This conclusion can be drawn from the fact that all marks are percentages, and some grades are percentages. It is possible for grades to also be considered as marks, given their interrelation with percentages.
II. No mark is a score
- This conclusion can be derived from the statement "No score is a mark," which implies that scores and marks are mutually exclusive.
Conclusion:
Both conclusions I and II are valid based on the given statements. Grades can be considered as marks since they are related to percentages, and scores are distinct from marks according to the statements provided. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'E,' where both conclusions follow logically.
Statements : Some papers are covers. No cover is a book. All books are pages
Conclusions :
At least some papers are not book
No book is a cover- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements : Some papers are covers. No cover is a book. All books are pages
Conclusions :
At least some papers are not book
No book is a cover
Conclusions :
At least some papers are not book
No book is a cover
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Krithika Bose answered |
Statements:
- Some papers are covers.
- No cover is a book.
- All books are pages.
Conclusions:
- At least some papers are not book.
- No book is a cover.
Explanation:
- From the first statement, we can infer that there is a possibility that some papers may not be covers.
- From the second statement, we can infer that covers and books are mutually exclusive categories.
- From the third statement, we can infer that all books are pages.
Conclusion I:
- As there is a possibility of papers that are not covers, it is possible that some papers are not books. Hence, conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II:
- As per the given statements, it is clear that no cover is a book. Hence, conclusion II also follows.
Therefore, both conclusions I and II follow.
Final Answer:
- Option E (If both conclusions I and II follow)
- Some papers are covers.
- No cover is a book.
- All books are pages.
Conclusions:
- At least some papers are not book.
- No book is a cover.
Explanation:
- From the first statement, we can infer that there is a possibility that some papers may not be covers.
- From the second statement, we can infer that covers and books are mutually exclusive categories.
- From the third statement, we can infer that all books are pages.
Conclusion I:
- As there is a possibility of papers that are not covers, it is possible that some papers are not books. Hence, conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II:
- As per the given statements, it is clear that no cover is a book. Hence, conclusion II also follows.
Therefore, both conclusions I and II follow.
Final Answer:
- Option E (If both conclusions I and II follow)
Statements:
All orchids are flowers.
Some orchids are beautiful.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are beautiful.
II. All beautiful are flowers.- a)if only conclusion I follows.
- b)if only conclusion II follows.
- c)if either I or II follows.
- d)if neither I nor II follows.
- e)if both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All orchids are flowers.
Some orchids are beautiful.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are beautiful.
II. All beautiful are flowers.
All orchids are flowers.
Some orchids are beautiful.
Conclusions:
I. Some flowers are beautiful.
II. All beautiful are flowers.
a)
if only conclusion I follows.
b)
if only conclusion II follows.
c)
if either I or II follows.
d)
if neither I nor II follows.
e)
if both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Mansi Mishra answered |
Statements:
Some paints are brushes.
All brushes are varnishes.
All colours are varnishes.
No varnish is a canvas.
Conclusions:
I.No paint is canvas
II.No colour is canvas- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some paints are brushes.
All brushes are varnishes.
All colours are varnishes.
No varnish is a canvas.
Conclusions:
I.No paint is canvas
II.No colour is canvas
Some paints are brushes.
All brushes are varnishes.
All colours are varnishes.
No varnish is a canvas.
Conclusions:
I.No paint is canvas
II.No colour is canvas
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Shivam Menon answered |
Statements:
Some buildings are sofas.
Some sofas are benches.
Some benches are tables.
Conclusions:
I.Some tables are sofas.
II.No table is sofa.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some buildings are sofas.
Some sofas are benches.
Some benches are tables.
Conclusions:
I.Some tables are sofas.
II.No table is sofa.
Some buildings are sofas.
Some sofas are benches.
Some benches are tables.
Conclusions:
I.Some tables are sofas.
II.No table is sofa.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Mansi Khanna answered |
Statements:
Some medicines are tablets.
Some medicines are not effective.
Conclusions:
I. Some tablets are effective.
II. No effective thing is a tablet.- a)if only conclusion I follows.
- b)if only conclusion II follows.
- c)if either I or II follows.
- d)if neither I nor II follows.
- e)if both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some medicines are tablets.
Some medicines are not effective.
Conclusions:
I. Some tablets are effective.
II. No effective thing is a tablet.
Some medicines are tablets.
Some medicines are not effective.
Conclusions:
I. Some tablets are effective.
II. No effective thing is a tablet.
a)
if only conclusion I follows.
b)
if only conclusion II follows.
c)
if either I or II follows.
d)
if neither I nor II follows.
e)
if both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Tushar Das answered |
tatements:
Some herbs are not plants.
All herbs are shrubs.
Conclusions:
I. All shrubs are plants is not a possibility.
II. All plants are shrubs is not a possibility.- a)if only conclusion I follows.
- b)if only conclusion II follows.
- c)if either I or II follows.
- d)if neither I nor II follows.
- e)if both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
tatements:
Some herbs are not plants.
All herbs are shrubs.
Conclusions:
I. All shrubs are plants is not a possibility.
II. All plants are shrubs is not a possibility.
Some herbs are not plants.
All herbs are shrubs.
Conclusions:
I. All shrubs are plants is not a possibility.
II. All plants are shrubs is not a possibility.
a)
if only conclusion I follows.
b)
if only conclusion II follows.
c)
if either I or II follows.
d)
if neither I nor II follows.
e)
if both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Lekshmi Sharma answered |
Statements :
Some pens are paper
Eraser is a pen
Conclusion:
I.Eraser is not a paper
II.Eraser is a paper- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
Some pens are paper
Eraser is a pen
Conclusion:
I.Eraser is not a paper
II.Eraser is a paper
Some pens are paper
Eraser is a pen
Conclusion:
I.Eraser is not a paper
II.Eraser is a paper
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Shruti Reddy answered |
Statements:
- Some pens are paper.
- Eraser is a pen.
Conclusion:
I. Eraser is not a paper.
II. Eraser is a paper.
Explanation:
To determine whether the conclusions follow from the given statements, let's analyze each conclusion separately.
Conclusion I: Eraser is not a paper.
- The first statement states that some pens are paper. This means that there is at least one pen that is made of paper.
- The second statement declares that an eraser is a pen.
- Combining these statements, we can conclude that since an eraser is a pen, it cannot be made of paper. Therefore, conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: Eraser is a paper.
- This conclusion contradicts the first statement which states that some pens are paper. If an eraser is a pen, it cannot be a paper.
- Therefore, conclusion II does not follow.
Final Answer:
Therefore, only conclusion I follows, and the correct answer is option 'C' - If either I or II follows.
- Some pens are paper.
- Eraser is a pen.
Conclusion:
I. Eraser is not a paper.
II. Eraser is a paper.
Explanation:
To determine whether the conclusions follow from the given statements, let's analyze each conclusion separately.
Conclusion I: Eraser is not a paper.
- The first statement states that some pens are paper. This means that there is at least one pen that is made of paper.
- The second statement declares that an eraser is a pen.
- Combining these statements, we can conclude that since an eraser is a pen, it cannot be made of paper. Therefore, conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: Eraser is a paper.
- This conclusion contradicts the first statement which states that some pens are paper. If an eraser is a pen, it cannot be a paper.
- Therefore, conclusion II does not follow.
Final Answer:
Therefore, only conclusion I follows, and the correct answer is option 'C' - If either I or II follows.
Statements: All A are B. Some B are C. All C are D.
Conclusions: – 1) All D are C. 2) All D are A. 3) Some D are B.- a)Only 1 follow
- b)Only 2 follow
- c)Only 3 follow
- d)all follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: All A are B. Some B are C. All C are D.
Conclusions: – 1) All D are C. 2) All D are A. 3) Some D are B.
Conclusions: – 1) All D are C. 2) All D are A. 3) Some D are B.
a)
Only 1 follow
b)
Only 2 follow
c)
Only 3 follow
d)
all follow.
|
|
Mainak Chakraborty answered |
Let's analyze each conclusion one by one in relation to the given statements:
All D are C: This conclusion cannot be derived from the given statements. The statements state that "All C are D," which means every element of C is also an element of D. However, this does not imply that every element of D is an element of C. Therefore, conclusion 1 does not follow.
All D are A: This conclusion cannot be derived from the given statements. The statements state that "All A are B" and "Some B are C," but they do not provide any direct relationship between A and D. Therefore, conclusion 2 does not follow.
Some D are B: This conclusion can be derived from the given statements. The statements state that "All C are D" and "Some B are C." If some B are C, and all C are D, then it is possible for some D to be B. Therefore, conclusion 3 follows.
Hence, the correct answer is option 'C' – Only conclusion 3 follows.
Statements :
All stars are moons. All moons are sun. All asteroids are sun.
Conclusions :
I.Some moons are asteroids.
II.All stars are sun- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
All stars are moons. All moons are sun. All asteroids are sun.
Conclusions :
I.Some moons are asteroids.
II.All stars are sun
All stars are moons. All moons are sun. All asteroids are sun.
Conclusions :
I.Some moons are asteroids.
II.All stars are sun
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Ishita Choudhury answered |
Explanation:
- All stars are moons and all moons are sun, so all stars and moons are also sun.
- All asteroids are sun, but it does not mean that all asteroids are moons or stars.
- Therefore, the conclusion II "All stars are sun" is correct, as all stars are also sun.
- However, the conclusion I "Some moons are asteroids" is not necessarily true, as there is no direct relation between moons and asteroids in the given statements. It is possible that there could be some moons that are asteroids, but it is not necessarily true.
- Hence, the correct answer is option B - If only conclusion II follows.
Statements: Some actors are singers. All the singers are dancers:
Conclusions:
a. Some actors are dancers.
b. No singer is actor.
- a)If only conclusion II follows.
- b)If only conclusion I follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: Some actors are singers. All the singers are dancers:
Conclusions:
a. Some actors are dancers.
b. No singer is actor.
Conclusions:
a. Some actors are dancers.
b. No singer is actor.
a)
If only conclusion II follows.
b)
If only conclusion I follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Rajat Saha answered |
Statement and Conclusion in LR
Statement: Some singers are actors. Some actors are dancers.
Conclusion I: Some dancers are definitely not actors.
Conclusion II: Some dancers being singers is a possibility.
Explanation:
To solve this question, we need to analyze the given statements and check whether the conclusions follow or not.
From the given statements, we can derive the following Venn diagram:
Singers (A) <--> Actors (B) <--> Dancers (C)
Now, let's analyze the conclusions one by one:
Conclusion I: Some dancers are definitely not actors.
From the given Venn diagram, we can see that there is a possibility that some dancers may not be actors. Hence, this conclusion follows.
Conclusion II: Some dancers being singers is a possibility.
From the given Venn diagram, we can see that there is a possibility that some dancers may also be singers. Hence, this conclusion also follows.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B - If only conclusion II follows.
Conclusion:
In this question, we have used logical reasoning to analyze the given statements and derive the correct conclusions. It is important to carefully read the statements and use logical thinking to arrive at the correct answer.
Statement: Some singers are actors. Some actors are dancers.
Conclusion I: Some dancers are definitely not actors.
Conclusion II: Some dancers being singers is a possibility.
Explanation:
To solve this question, we need to analyze the given statements and check whether the conclusions follow or not.
From the given statements, we can derive the following Venn diagram:
Singers (A) <--> Actors (B) <--> Dancers (C)
Now, let's analyze the conclusions one by one:
Conclusion I: Some dancers are definitely not actors.
From the given Venn diagram, we can see that there is a possibility that some dancers may not be actors. Hence, this conclusion follows.
Conclusion II: Some dancers being singers is a possibility.
From the given Venn diagram, we can see that there is a possibility that some dancers may also be singers. Hence, this conclusion also follows.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B - If only conclusion II follows.
Conclusion:
In this question, we have used logical reasoning to analyze the given statements and derive the correct conclusions. It is important to carefully read the statements and use logical thinking to arrive at the correct answer.
Statements:
All answer are questions.
All doubts are answers.
Some doubts are reasons.
Conclusions:
I.All doubts are questions.
II.All answers are doubts.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All answer are questions.
All doubts are answers.
Some doubts are reasons.
Conclusions:
I.All doubts are questions.
II.All answers are doubts.
All answer are questions.
All doubts are answers.
Some doubts are reasons.
Conclusions:
I.All doubts are questions.
II.All answers are doubts.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Prerna Choudhary answered |
Statements:
All tomatoes are potatoes
No potato is cabbage
Conclusion:
I.No cabbage is a tomato
II.No tomato is a cabbage
- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All tomatoes are potatoes
No potato is cabbage
Conclusion:
I.No cabbage is a tomato
II.No tomato is a cabbage
All tomatoes are potatoes
No potato is cabbage
Conclusion:
I.No cabbage is a tomato
II.No tomato is a cabbage
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Sharmila Yadav answered |
Statements: Some bananas are apple. Some guavas are apples. Some grapes are guava.
Conclusion: 1) Some bananas are definitely grapes. 2) Some grapes being apple is a possibility 3) All apples being banana is a possibility.- a)Both 1 and 2 follow
- b)Only 2 follow
- c)Both 2 and 3 follows
- d)None follows
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: Some bananas are apple. Some guavas are apples. Some grapes are guava.
Conclusion: 1) Some bananas are definitely grapes. 2) Some grapes being apple is a possibility 3) All apples being banana is a possibility.
Conclusion: 1) Some bananas are definitely grapes. 2) Some grapes being apple is a possibility 3) All apples being banana is a possibility.
a)
Both 1 and 2 follow
b)
Only 2 follow
c)
Both 2 and 3 follows
d)
None follows
|
|
Harsh Choudhary answered |
Statement: – No P is Q. All Q are S. Some R are S.
Conclusions: 1) All R being P is a possibility. 2) All S being R is a possibility.- a)Both follow
- b)Only 1 follow
- c)only 2 follow
- d)none of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statement: – No P is Q. All Q are S. Some R are S.
Conclusions: 1) All R being P is a possibility. 2) All S being R is a possibility.
Conclusions: 1) All R being P is a possibility. 2) All S being R is a possibility.
a)
Both follow
b)
Only 1 follow
c)
only 2 follow
d)
none of these
|
|
Baishali Choudhary answered |
The Earth is spherical.
Statements :
Some days are summer
Some summer are winter
Conclusion:
I.All winter are either summer or days
II.Some winter are summer- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
Some days are summer
Some summer are winter
Conclusion:
I.All winter are either summer or days
II.Some winter are summer
Some days are summer
Some summer are winter
Conclusion:
I.All winter are either summer or days
II.Some winter are summer
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Moumita Kaur answered |
Statements :
Some toys are cars
All cars are helicopters
Conclusion:
I.Some helicopters are toys
II.Some toys are helicopters- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
Some toys are cars
All cars are helicopters
Conclusion:
I.Some helicopters are toys
II.Some toys are helicopters
Some toys are cars
All cars are helicopters
Conclusion:
I.Some helicopters are toys
II.Some toys are helicopters
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Mansi Khanna answered |
Statements:
Some songs are not tunes.
All tunes are drums.
Some tunes are sticks.
Conclusions:
I.All sticks are drums.
II.No stick being drum is not a possibility.- a)if only I follows.
- b)if only II follows.
- c)if either I or II follows.
- d)if neither I nor II follows.
- e)if both I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some songs are not tunes.
All tunes are drums.
Some tunes are sticks.
Conclusions:
I.All sticks are drums.
II.No stick being drum is not a possibility.
Some songs are not tunes.
All tunes are drums.
Some tunes are sticks.
Conclusions:
I.All sticks are drums.
II.No stick being drum is not a possibility.
a)
if only I follows.
b)
if only II follows.
c)
if either I or II follows.
d)
if neither I nor II follows.
e)
if both I and II follow.
|
|
Krish Iyer answered |
Statements :
Many mangoes are sweets
All sweets are chocolates
Conclusion:
I.Some mangoes are chocolates
II.No sweet is a mango- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
Many mangoes are sweets
All sweets are chocolates
Conclusion:
I.Some mangoes are chocolates
II.No sweet is a mango
Many mangoes are sweets
All sweets are chocolates
Conclusion:
I.Some mangoes are chocolates
II.No sweet is a mango
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Debolina Pillai answered |
Statements:
Some tigers are goats.
No goat is rat.
All dogs are rats.
Conclusions:
I.No tiger is rat.
II.No dog is goat.
III.Some dogs are tigers
IV.Some rats are tigers.- a)Only either I or IV and II follow
- b)Only either I or IV and III follow
- c)Only II follow
- d)Only either I or IV follows
- e)None follows
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some tigers are goats.
No goat is rat.
All dogs are rats.
Conclusions:
I.No tiger is rat.
II.No dog is goat.
III.Some dogs are tigers
IV.Some rats are tigers.
Some tigers are goats.
No goat is rat.
All dogs are rats.
Conclusions:
I.No tiger is rat.
II.No dog is goat.
III.Some dogs are tigers
IV.Some rats are tigers.
a)
Only either I or IV and II follow
b)
Only either I or IV and III follow
c)
Only II follow
d)
Only either I or IV follows
e)
None follows
|
|
Arpita Pillai answered |
Statements :All jars are bowls. No bowl is a bottle.
Conclusions :
I.No jar is a bottle
II.All bowls being jars is a possibility- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :All jars are bowls. No bowl is a bottle.
Conclusions :
I.No jar is a bottle
II.All bowls being jars is a possibility
Conclusions :
I.No jar is a bottle
II.All bowls being jars is a possibility
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Nishtha Pandey answered |
Statements :
Some tables are desks. No desk is a chair. Some sofa are chairs.
Conclusions :
I.Some Sofa are not desks
II.At least some table are not chair.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
Some tables are desks. No desk is a chair. Some sofa are chairs.
Conclusions :
I.Some Sofa are not desks
II.At least some table are not chair.
Some tables are desks. No desk is a chair. Some sofa are chairs.
Conclusions :
I.Some Sofa are not desks
II.At least some table are not chair.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Aryan Goyal answered |
Some+no = some not => I follow
Some+no = some not => II follow
Some+no = some not => II follow
Statements:
All new are modern.
Some modern are old.
All old are gold.
Conclusions:
I.Some new are old is a possibility.
II.No modern is gold.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either conclusion I or II follows.
- d)If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All new are modern.
Some modern are old.
All old are gold.
Conclusions:
I.Some new are old is a possibility.
II.No modern is gold.
All new are modern.
Some modern are old.
All old are gold.
Conclusions:
I.Some new are old is a possibility.
II.No modern is gold.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either conclusion I or II follows.
d)
If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Lekshmi Sharma answered |
Statements: All trees are river. All mountains are trees. All branches are mountains.
Conclusions: 1) Some trees are branches 2) Some river are not mountain 3) All trees are mountain- a)Only 1 follow
- b)Both 1 and 2 follow
- c)only 3 follow
- d)Both 1 and 3 follow
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: All trees are river. All mountains are trees. All branches are mountains.
Conclusions: 1) Some trees are branches 2) Some river are not mountain 3) All trees are mountain
Conclusions: 1) Some trees are branches 2) Some river are not mountain 3) All trees are mountain
a)
Only 1 follow
b)
Both 1 and 2 follow
c)
only 3 follow
d)
Both 1 and 3 follow
|
|
Manoj Joshi answered |
Statements:
All songs are poems.
All poems are rhymes.
No rhyme is a paragraph.
Conclusions:
I.All rhymes are poems
II.All songs are rhymes- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All songs are poems.
All poems are rhymes.
No rhyme is a paragraph.
Conclusions:
I.All rhymes are poems
II.All songs are rhymes
All songs are poems.
All poems are rhymes.
No rhyme is a paragraph.
Conclusions:
I.All rhymes are poems
II.All songs are rhymes
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Anu Bose answered |
Statements:
Some blue are black.
Some black are brown.
Some brown are red.
Conclusions:
I.Some blue are brown.
II.Some black are red.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either conclusion I or II follows.
- d)If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some blue are black.
Some black are brown.
Some brown are red.
Conclusions:
I.Some blue are brown.
II.Some black are red.
Some blue are black.
Some black are brown.
Some brown are red.
Conclusions:
I.Some blue are brown.
II.Some black are red.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either conclusion I or II follows.
d)
If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Mansi Mishra answered |
Statements:
All banks are shops.
Some houses are shops.
Some houses are miracles.
Conclusions:
I.Some miracles are shops is a possibility.
II.Some banks are houses is a possibility.Statements:- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusions II follows.
- c)If either conclusion I or II follows.
- d)If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusion I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All banks are shops.
Some houses are shops.
Some houses are miracles.
Conclusions:
I.Some miracles are shops is a possibility.
II.Some banks are houses is a possibility.Statements:
All banks are shops.
Some houses are shops.
Some houses are miracles.
Conclusions:
I.Some miracles are shops is a possibility.
II.Some banks are houses is a possibility.Statements:
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusions II follows.
c)
If either conclusion I or II follows.
d)
If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusion I and II follow.
|
|
Gowri Dasgupta answered |
Statements:
All chocolates are sweets.
Some sweets are not harmful.
Conclusions:
I. Some chocolates are harmful is a possibility.
II. All harmful are chocolates is a possibility.- a)if only conclusion I follows.
- b)if only conclusion II follows.
- c)if either I or II follows.
- d)if neither I nor II follows.
- e)if both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All chocolates are sweets.
Some sweets are not harmful.
Conclusions:
I. Some chocolates are harmful is a possibility.
II. All harmful are chocolates is a possibility.
All chocolates are sweets.
Some sweets are not harmful.
Conclusions:
I. Some chocolates are harmful is a possibility.
II. All harmful are chocolates is a possibility.
a)
if only conclusion I follows.
b)
if only conclusion II follows.
c)
if either I or II follows.
d)
if neither I nor II follows.
e)
if both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Mainak Verma answered |
Statements:
All fashionable are addicts.
All addicts are noteworthy.
Conclusions:
I. No noteworthy is fashionable.
II. Some noteworthy are fashionable- a)if only conclusion I follows.
- b)if only conclusion II follows.
- c)if either I or II follows.
- d)if neither I nor II follows.
- e)if both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All fashionable are addicts.
All addicts are noteworthy.
Conclusions:
I. No noteworthy is fashionable.
II. Some noteworthy are fashionable
All fashionable are addicts.
All addicts are noteworthy.
Conclusions:
I. No noteworthy is fashionable.
II. Some noteworthy are fashionable
a)
if only conclusion I follows.
b)
if only conclusion II follows.
c)
if either I or II follows.
d)
if neither I nor II follows.
e)
if both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Priya Reddy answered |
Explanation:
All fashionable are addicts:
- This statement implies that every fashionable person is also an addict.
All addicts are noteworthy:
- This statement means that every addict is noteworthy.
Conclusions:
I. No noteworthy is fashionable:
- This conclusion is not valid because the statements do not provide any information about the relationship between noteworthy individuals and fashionable individuals. It cannot be definitively concluded that no noteworthy person is fashionable based on the given statements.
II. Some noteworthy are fashionable:
- This conclusion is valid. Since all addicts are noteworthy and all fashionable people are addicts, it is possible that some noteworthy individuals may also be fashionable. There is a possibility of overlap between the two groups.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B as only conclusion II follows logically from the given statements.
All fashionable are addicts:
- This statement implies that every fashionable person is also an addict.
All addicts are noteworthy:
- This statement means that every addict is noteworthy.
Conclusions:
I. No noteworthy is fashionable:
- This conclusion is not valid because the statements do not provide any information about the relationship between noteworthy individuals and fashionable individuals. It cannot be definitively concluded that no noteworthy person is fashionable based on the given statements.
II. Some noteworthy are fashionable:
- This conclusion is valid. Since all addicts are noteworthy and all fashionable people are addicts, it is possible that some noteworthy individuals may also be fashionable. There is a possibility of overlap between the two groups.
Therefore, the correct answer is option B as only conclusion II follows logically from the given statements.
Statements:
All sticks are plants.
All plants are insects.
All insects are frog.
Conclusions:
I.All frogs are sticks
II.All plants are frog- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All sticks are plants.
All plants are insects.
All insects are frog.
Conclusions:
I.All frogs are sticks
II.All plants are frog
All sticks are plants.
All plants are insects.
All insects are frog.
Conclusions:
I.All frogs are sticks
II.All plants are frog
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Rithika Chakraborty answered |
Statements: Some black are white. All blue are green. All white are blue.
Conclusions: 1) Some black are blue 2) All blue are white 3) All green are black 4) All blue are black.- a)Only 2 follow
- b)Only 3 follow
- c)Either 2 or 3 and 1 and 4 follow
- d)None of these
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: Some black are white. All blue are green. All white are blue.
Conclusions: 1) Some black are blue 2) All blue are white 3) All green are black 4) All blue are black.
Conclusions: 1) Some black are blue 2) All blue are white 3) All green are black 4) All blue are black.
a)
Only 2 follow
b)
Only 3 follow
c)
Either 2 or 3 and 1 and 4 follow
d)
None of these
|
|
Pranav Mehta answered |
Statements :
All letters are consonants. All alphabets are letters. All words are alphabets
Conclusions :
I.All words are consonants
II.Some letters are not words- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
All letters are consonants. All alphabets are letters. All words are alphabets
Conclusions :
I.All words are consonants
II.Some letters are not words
All letters are consonants. All alphabets are letters. All words are alphabets
Conclusions :
I.All words are consonants
II.Some letters are not words
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
|
Abhiram Patel answered |
To determine if the given conclusions follow from the statements, let's analyze each conclusion separately:
Conclusion I: All words are consonants.
- According to the given statements, all letters are consonants. Therefore, if all letters are consonants and all alphabets are letters, it can be concluded that all alphabets are consonants.
- However, there is no direct information given about words in the statements. So, we cannot definitively conclude that all words are consonants based on the given information.
Conclusion II: Some letters are not words.
- According to the given statements, all letters are consonants. This implies that all letters are part of the set of consonants.
- Since the set of letters includes all alphabets and all words are alphabets, it can be concluded that all letters are also part of the set of words.
- Therefore, it is not possible to have any letters that are not words based on the given information.
- Thus, conclusion II does not follow from the statements.
In summary, only conclusion I follows from the given statements. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - If only conclusion I follows.
Conclusion I: All words are consonants.
- According to the given statements, all letters are consonants. Therefore, if all letters are consonants and all alphabets are letters, it can be concluded that all alphabets are consonants.
- However, there is no direct information given about words in the statements. So, we cannot definitively conclude that all words are consonants based on the given information.
Conclusion II: Some letters are not words.
- According to the given statements, all letters are consonants. This implies that all letters are part of the set of consonants.
- Since the set of letters includes all alphabets and all words are alphabets, it can be concluded that all letters are also part of the set of words.
- Therefore, it is not possible to have any letters that are not words based on the given information.
- Thus, conclusion II does not follow from the statements.
In summary, only conclusion I follows from the given statements. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - If only conclusion I follows.
Statements :
All dogs are lions. No cat is lion. No cat is cow.
Conclusions :
I.No dog is cat
II.No lion is cow.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusion II follows.
- c)If either I or II follows.
- d)If neither I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements :
All dogs are lions. No cat is lion. No cat is cow.
Conclusions :
I.No dog is cat
II.No lion is cow.
All dogs are lions. No cat is lion. No cat is cow.
Conclusions :
I.No dog is cat
II.No lion is cow.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusion II follows.
c)
If either I or II follows.
d)
If neither I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusions I and II follow.
|
Jocelyn kunju john answered |
The right option is A, since it states that no dog is a cat. and no dog is a cat, either, but it hasnt stated about a cow being equal or not equal to a lion.
Statements: some flowers are lily. Some flowers are rose .some flowers are lotus.
Conclusions: 1) All lily being rose is a possibility 2) Some lily can be lotus.- a)Only 1 follow
- b)Only 2 follow
- c)Both follow
- d)none follow
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements: some flowers are lily. Some flowers are rose .some flowers are lotus.
Conclusions: 1) All lily being rose is a possibility 2) Some lily can be lotus.
Conclusions: 1) All lily being rose is a possibility 2) Some lily can be lotus.
a)
Only 1 follow
b)
Only 2 follow
c)
Both follow
d)
none follow
|
|
Mainak Chakraborty answered |
Statements:
All clocks are rocks.
No calendar is a mock.
Some clocks are calendars.
Conclusions:
I.No clock is a mock.
II.Some rocks are clocks- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusions II follows.
- c)If either conclusion I or II follows.
- d)If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusion I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
All clocks are rocks.
No calendar is a mock.
Some clocks are calendars.
Conclusions:
I.No clock is a mock.
II.Some rocks are clocks
All clocks are rocks.
No calendar is a mock.
Some clocks are calendars.
Conclusions:
I.No clock is a mock.
II.Some rocks are clocks
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusions II follows.
c)
If either conclusion I or II follows.
d)
If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusion I and II follow.
|
|
Sameer Yadav answered |
Statements:
No leopard is a cheetah.
Some cheetahs are tigers.
All tigers are lions.
Conclusions:
I.Some leopards are not tigers.
II.All leopards are tigers.- a)If only conclusion I follows.
- b)If only conclusions II follows.
- c)If either conclusion I or II follows.
- d)If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
- e)If both conclusion I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
No leopard is a cheetah.
Some cheetahs are tigers.
All tigers are lions.
Conclusions:
I.Some leopards are not tigers.
II.All leopards are tigers.
No leopard is a cheetah.
Some cheetahs are tigers.
All tigers are lions.
Conclusions:
I.Some leopards are not tigers.
II.All leopards are tigers.
a)
If only conclusion I follows.
b)
If only conclusions II follows.
c)
If either conclusion I or II follows.
d)
If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
e)
If both conclusion I and II follow.
|
|
Priya Reddy answered |
No leopard is a cheetah. Some cheetahs are tigers. All tigers are lions.
Let's evaluate the given statements and conclusions:
Statements:
1. No leopard is a cheetah: This statement implies that there is no overlap between the categories of leopards and cheetahs. In other words, there are no leopards that can be classified as cheetahs.
2. Some cheetahs are tigers: This statement suggests that there is a subset of cheetahs that can also be classified as tigers. It does not imply that all cheetahs are tigers, but it indicates that there is an overlap between these two categories.
3. All tigers are lions: This statement states that every tiger can be classified as a lion. It implies that there is no distinction between tigers and lions, and all tigers can be considered as lions.
Conclusions:
I. Some leopards are not tigers: This conclusion can be derived from the first statement, which states that there is no overlap between leopards and cheetahs. Since there are no leopards that are cheetahs and some cheetahs are tigers, it can be inferred that there are leopards that are not tigers.
II. All leopards are tigers: This conclusion cannot be logically derived from the given statements. The first statement clearly states that there is no overlap between leopards and cheetahs, and there is no information provided about the relationship between leopards and tigers. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude that all leopards are tigers.
Based on the above analysis:
- Conclusion I follows as it can be logically derived from the given statements.
- Conclusion II does not follow as there is no information provided to support this conclusion.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - if either conclusion I or II follows.
Let's evaluate the given statements and conclusions:
Statements:
1. No leopard is a cheetah: This statement implies that there is no overlap between the categories of leopards and cheetahs. In other words, there are no leopards that can be classified as cheetahs.
2. Some cheetahs are tigers: This statement suggests that there is a subset of cheetahs that can also be classified as tigers. It does not imply that all cheetahs are tigers, but it indicates that there is an overlap between these two categories.
3. All tigers are lions: This statement states that every tiger can be classified as a lion. It implies that there is no distinction between tigers and lions, and all tigers can be considered as lions.
Conclusions:
I. Some leopards are not tigers: This conclusion can be derived from the first statement, which states that there is no overlap between leopards and cheetahs. Since there are no leopards that are cheetahs and some cheetahs are tigers, it can be inferred that there are leopards that are not tigers.
II. All leopards are tigers: This conclusion cannot be logically derived from the given statements. The first statement clearly states that there is no overlap between leopards and cheetahs, and there is no information provided about the relationship between leopards and tigers. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude that all leopards are tigers.
Based on the above analysis:
- Conclusion I follows as it can be logically derived from the given statements.
- Conclusion II does not follow as there is no information provided to support this conclusion.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - if either conclusion I or II follows.
Statements:
Some people are buyers.
No buyer is market.
Some markets are not malls.
Conclusions:
I.All markets being people is a possibility.
II.No market is people.
- a)if only I follows.
- b)if only II follows.
- c)if either I or II follows.
- d)if neither I nor II follows.
- e)if both I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Statements:
Some people are buyers.
No buyer is market.
Some markets are not malls.
Conclusions:
I.All markets being people is a possibility.
II.No market is people.
Some people are buyers.
No buyer is market.
Some markets are not malls.
Conclusions:
I.All markets being people is a possibility.
II.No market is people.
a)
if only I follows.
b)
if only II follows.
c)
if either I or II follows.
d)
if neither I nor II follows.
e)
if both I and II follow.
|
|
Raghav Chawla answered |
Chapter doubts & questions for Syllogism - RRB JE Mock Test Series for Mechanical Engineering (ME) 2026 2025 is part of Mechanical Engineering exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Mechanical Engineering exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Mechanical Engineering 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Syllogism - RRB JE Mock Test Series for Mechanical Engineering (ME) 2026 in English & Hindi are available as part of Mechanical Engineering exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Mechanical Engineering Exam by signing up for free.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup