UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Tests  >  Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly  >  Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - UPSC MCQ

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - UPSC MCQ


Test Description

15 Questions MCQ Test Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly - Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024)

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) for UPSC 2025 is part of Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly preparation. The Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) questions and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus.The Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) MCQs are made for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) below.
Solutions of Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) questions in English are available as part of our Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly for UPSC & Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) solutions in Hindi for Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) | 15 questions in 18 minutes | Mock test for UPSC preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly for UPSC Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 1

Consider the following pairs regarding the Indian Constitution and its role in promoting social justice:

1. Article 17: Abolishes untouchability and prohibits discrimination based on religion

2. Article 15(2): Prohibits discrimination in public spaces based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth

3. Article 23: Prohibits bonded labor and human trafficking

4. Universal Adult Franchise: Ensures each adult citizen, regardless of caste, religion, or ethnicity, has the right to vote

How many pairs given above are correctly matched?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 1

1. Article 17: Abolishes untouchability and prohibits discrimination based on religion - This is incorrectly matched. Article 17 specifically abolishes untouchability and forbids its practice in any form. It does not directly address discrimination based on religion.

2. Article 15(2): Prohibits discrimination in public spaces based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth - This is correctly matched. Article 15(2) ensures that no citizen shall be subjected to any disability, liability, restriction, or condition with regard to access to public spaces on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.

3. Article 23: Prohibits bonded labor and human trafficking - This is correctly matched. Article 23 explicitly prohibits traffic in human beings, begar (forced labor), and other similar forms of forced labor. Any contravention of this provision is an offense punishable by law.

4. Universal Adult Franchise: Ensures each adult citizen, regardless of caste, religion, or ethnicity, has the right to vote - This is correctly matched. The Universal Adult Franchise is a principle enshrined in the Constitution that provides every adult citizen the right to vote without discrimination based on caste, religion, or ethnicity.

Thus, pairs 2, 3, and 4 are correctly matched.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 2

Consider the following statements:

Statement-I:
The Indian Constitution emphasizes the importance of transformative constitutionalism for promoting social justice.

Statement-II:
The American Constitutionalism model of the 18th century primarily focused on restricting political power and fostering mistrust.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 2

Statement-I is correct as it highlights the Indian Constitution's emphasis on transformative constitutionalism for promoting social justice, as discussed in the provided text. Statement-II is also correct as it contrasts Indian Constitutionalism with American Constitutionalism, explaining that the latter was rooted in restricting political power and mistrust, unlike the transformative approach of the former. Therefore, both statements are accurate, and Statement-II provides an explanation for Statement-I, making option A the correct answer.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 3

Consider the following statements:

1. The Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) established the Basic Structure Doctrine, which asserts that certain core features of the Constitution cannot be amended.

2. The 42nd Amendment (1976) expanded the judiciary's power while limiting Parliament's amendment authority.

3. The Minerva Mills Case (1980) reinforced the idea that amendments disrupting the balance between fundamental rights and directive principles are unconstitutional.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 3

1. Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): This landmark case indeed established the Basic Structure Doctrine, which held that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its fundamental structure. The core elements protected under this doctrine include democracy, federalism, judicial independence, and more. Thus, Statement 1 is correct.

2. 42nd Amendment (1976): Known as the "Mini-Constitution," this amendment actually sought to limit the powers of the judiciary and expanded the amendment powers of Parliament. It attempted to curb judicial review and enhance the authority of the executive and Parliament. Therefore, Statement 2 is incorrect.

3. Minerva Mills Case (1980): This case reaffirmed the Basic Structure Doctrine and emphasized that any amendment that disturbs the essential balance between fundamental rights and the directive principles would be unconstitutional. It underscored the importance of maintaining harmony between these two key aspects of the Constitution. Therefore, Statement 3 is correct.

Hence, the correct statements are 1 and 3, making Option C the correct answer.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 4

What is the core philosophical shift brought about by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) in the Indian legal system?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 4

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) signifies a significant philosophical shift in the Indian legal system from a punitive approach based on 'Dand' (punishment) to a more holistic concept of justice termed 'Nyaya'. This change emphasizes that justice is not merely about punishment but also about restoration, rehabilitation, and protection of vulnerable groups. The BNS aims to create a legal framework that is more just, balanced, and inclusive, focusing on the well-being of society as a whole.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 5

Consider the following pairs:

1. Government of India Act, 1935 - Laid the foundation for India's federal structure

2. Kesavananda Bharati Case, 1973 - Introduced the concept of Judicial Review

3. Minerva Mills Case, 1980 - Reinforced the balance between fundamental rights and directive principles

4. 73rd Amendment, 1992 - Introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST)

How many pairs given above are correctly matched?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 5

1. Government of India Act, 1935 - Laid the foundation for India's federal structure: This pair is correctly matched. The Government of India Act, 1935, indeed laid the groundwork for the federal structure of India by introducing provincial autonomy and a federal scheme of governance.

2. Kesavananda Bharati Case, 1973 - Introduced the concept of Judicial Review: This pair is incorrectly matched. The Kesavananda Bharati Case is famous for establishing the Basic Structure Doctrine, which limits the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution in a way that would alter its fundamental framework. Judicial review as a concept existed prior to this case.

3. Minerva Mills Case, 1980 - Reinforced the balance between fundamental rights and directive principles: This pair is correctly matched. The Minerva Mills Case reinforced the importance of maintaining a balance between fundamental rights and directive principles, asserting that amendments disrupting this balance would be unconstitutional.

4. 73rd Amendment, 1992 - Introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST): This pair is incorrectly matched. The 73rd Amendment actually pertains to the constitutional recognition of Panchayati Raj Institutions, not GST. GST was introduced by the 101st Amendment in 2016.

Thus, only two pairs (1 and 3) are correctly matched.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 6

What is one of the key provisions in the Indian Constitution aimed at promoting social justice by targeting the eradication of caste-based discrimination?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 6

Article 17 of the Indian Constitution abolishes untouchability, targeting the eradication of caste-based discrimination. This provision is crucial in promoting social justice and striving towards a more equitable society by addressing historical injustices related to caste discrimination.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 7

Consider the following pairs related to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and related reforms:

1. Matsya Nyaya - Protection of weaker sections

2. Section 69 - Punishment for mob lynching

3. Section 95 - Hiring children for crimes

4. Rashtradroh - Abolishment of sedition law

How many pairs given above are correctly matched?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 7

1. Matsya Nyaya - Protection of weaker sections: Correctly matched. The Matsya Nyaya principle, as reflected in the BNS, emphasizes the protection of vulnerable sections of society, aligning with the state's responsibility to safeguard the weak from the powerful.

2. Section 69 - Punishment for mob lynching: Incorrectly matched. Section 69 of the BNS is related to sexual intercourse by deceitful means, not mob lynching. Mob lynching is addressed under Section 103(2).

3. Section 95 - Hiring children for crimes: Correctly matched. Section 95 indeed pertains to hiring children for crimes, imposing penalties for using minors in criminal activities.

4. Rashtradroh - Abolishment of sedition law: Correctly matched. The term Rashtradroh replaces the colonial-era sedition law under Section 124A of the IPC, aligning with the effort to decolonize India's legal framework.

Thus, three pairs are correctly matched: 1, 3, and 4.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 8

Consider the following statements:

1. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) abolishes the colonial-era sedition law and replaces it with 'Rashtradroh', focusing on acts that undermine national unity or advocate armed rebellion.
2. The BNS includes a provision for community service as a form of punishment for first-time offenders committing petty offenses.
3. The BNS specifically addresses the protection of digital privacy by limiting the use of AI in criminal investigations.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 8

To determine the correct statements, let's analyze each one based on the provided content:
1. Statement 1 is correct. The BNS does indeed abolish the colonial-era sedition law, Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, and replaces it with 'Rashtradroh', focusing on acts against the nation that undermine national unity or call for armed rebellion. This represents a shift towards addressing issues of national security while balancing freedom of speech.
2. Statement 2 is correct. The BNS introduces community service as a punishment for first-time offenders committing petty offenses. This aligns with the Bharatiya philosophy of 'Prayaschit' (atonement) and provides an alternative to imprisonment, hence promoting rehabilitation over punishment.
3. Statement 3 is incorrect. While the BNS does facilitate the use of electronic evidence in criminal investigations, it does not specifically address the limitation of AI use for protecting digital privacy within the context of its provisions. Instead, the potential risks and ethical concerns regarding AI in investigations, such as privacy violations, are highlighted as areas needing oversight, but no specific provision for limiting AI use is mentioned in the BNS.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option B: 1 and 2 Only as both statements 1 and 2 are accurate reflections of the BNS reforms, while statement 3 is not supported by the information provided.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 9

What was the significance of the Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973)?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 9

The Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) was a landmark judgment that introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, which safeguards essential features of the Constitution from being amended. This doctrine ensures that core elements such as the supremacy of the Constitution, democratic values, secularism, federalism, and judicial independence remain intact and cannot be altered through amendments. The case significantly impacted the constitutional landscape of India by establishing limits on the amending power of the Parliament and reinforcing the foundational principles of the Constitution.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 10

Consider the following statements:

Statement-I:
The Indian Constitution was formally implemented on January 26, 1950, Republic Day.

Statement-II:
The Government of India Act, 1935, laid the foundation for the Indian Constitution, with approximately 65% of its provisions directly incorporated.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 10

Statement-I correctly states that the Indian Constitution was formally implemented on January 26, 1950, Republic Day, which is accurate as per historical records. However, Statement-II incorrectly attributes the foundation of the Indian Constitution to the Government of India Act, 1935, stating that approximately 65% of its provisions were directly incorporated. While the Government of India Act, 1935, did influence certain aspects of the Indian Constitution, it did not directly form the foundation of the Constitution or contribute 65% of its provisions. The Indian Constitution was primarily shaped by the deliberations and decisions of the Constituent Assembly, which worked independently to draft and finalize the Constitution.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 11

What is the primary purpose of laws like Bharatiya Naya Sahita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) in India's fight against cybercrime?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 11

The laws such as Bharatiya Naya Sahita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) play a crucial role in addressing cybercrimes that operate beyond physical borders in the digital space. These laws recognize the challenges posed by cybercriminals who exploit the borderless nature of the internet for financial and data theft. By providing frameworks for jurisdictional flexibility and handling digital evidence, these laws aim to enhance India's ability to combat cybercrimes effectively.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 12

Consider the following statements regarding the role of the Indian Constitution in promoting social justice:

1. The Indian Constitution empowers the state to intervene in civil society to address cruelty and injustice.

2. Article 15(2) of the Indian Constitution eliminates discrimination in public spaces based solely on caste.

3. The Directive Principles of State Policy are legally enforceable and mandate the state to implement a social revolution.

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 12

1. Statement 1 is correct. The Indian Constitution indeed empowers the state to intervene against cruelty and injustice within civil society. This is part of its broader goal to facilitate social justice and protection of individuals against various forms of discrimination and exploitation.

2. Statement 2 is incorrect. While Article 15(2) of the Indian Constitution addresses discrimination in public spaces, it is not limited solely to caste. It ensures non-discrimination on multiple grounds, including religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.

3. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Directive Principles of State Policy, as articulated in the Indian Constitution, are not legally enforceable. They are guidelines for the state to follow in order to achieve social justice and other goals, but they do not have the force of law and cannot be enforced in a court of law.

Therefore, only Statement 1 is correct, making Option A the right answer.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 13

Consider the following statements:

Statement I:
Traditional crime-fighting models, such as those used to address physical crimes like dacoity, are well-equipped to effectively deal with cybercrimes.
Statement II:
The Bharatiya Naya Sahita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) offer comprehensive solutions to combat cybercrimes in India.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 13

Statement I is incorrect because traditional crime-fighting models are not well-equipped to effectively deal with cybercrimes. Cybercrimes differ significantly from physical crimes and require specialized approaches due to their unique characteristics, such as the lack of physical evidence and jurisdictional boundaries. Statement II is correct as it highlights the role of specific laws like the Bharatiya Naya Sahita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) in providing legislative responses to combat cybercrimes in India. These laws are designed to address the challenges posed by modern crimes in the digital age, emphasizing jurisdictional flexibility, digital evidence handling, and security measures.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 14

Consider the following statements:

1. Bharatiya Naya Sahita (BNS) provides a framework for handling cybercrimes with jurisdictional flexibility and the digital nature of evidence.

2. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahita (BNSS) mandates forensic audits in cases involving cybercrime and financial fraud under Section 176(3).

3. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) focuses on international collaboration for cybersecurity frameworks.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 14

To determine the correct statements, let's analyze each one:

1. Bharatiya Naya Sahita (BNS): The statement accurately reflects that the BNS provides a framework for handling cybercrimes, emphasizing jurisdictional flexibility and the digital nature of evidence. This is in line with the need for modern laws that can address crimes without clear physical boundaries, as cybercrimes often span multiple jurisdictions.

2. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahita (BNSS): This statement is correct. The BNSS indeed mandates forensic audits in cases involving cybercrime and financial fraud, specifically under Section 176(3). This aligns with the law's focus on empowering law enforcement to use digital forensic technology in investigations.

3. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA): This statement is incorrect. The BSA is primarily concerned with the collection, preservation, and presentation of digital evidence in court, not directly with international collaboration for cybersecurity frameworks. The BSA establishes guidelines for handling digital evidence to strengthen prosecutions, but it does not explicitly focus on international collaboration.

Therefore, statements 1 and 2 are correct, while statement 3 is not. Thus, the correct answer is Option B: 1 and 2 Only.

Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 15

Consider the following statements:

Statement-I:
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) signifies a transformative shift away from colonial-era laws to create a legal system that is just, balanced, and inclusive.
Statement-II:
The BNS emphasizes justice as not just about punishment but also about restoration, rehabilitation, and protecting vulnerable groups.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Detailed Solution for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) - Question 15


Statement-I correctly highlights the significance of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) as a departure from colonial-era laws towards establishing a legal system focused on justice, balance, and inclusivity. Statement-II complements this by emphasizing that the BNS goes beyond mere punishment to encompass restoration, rehabilitation, and the protection of vulnerable groups. Therefore, both statements are accurate, with Statement-II providing additional insight that reinforces and elaborates on the core theme presented in Statement-I.

39 videos|4566 docs|979 tests
Information about Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024) solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Yojana Magazine (November 2024), EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice
Download as PDF