CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Tests  >  Additional Study Material for CLAT  >  Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - CLAT MCQ

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - CLAT MCQ


Test Description

30 Questions MCQ Test Additional Study Material for CLAT - Test: Law Of Tort - 6

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 for CLAT 2024 is part of Additional Study Material for CLAT preparation. The Test: Law Of Tort - 6 questions and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus.The Test: Law Of Tort - 6 MCQs are made for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 below.
Solutions of Test: Law Of Tort - 6 questions in English are available as part of our Additional Study Material for CLAT for CLAT & Test: Law Of Tort - 6 solutions in Hindi for Additional Study Material for CLAT course. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free. Attempt Test: Law Of Tort - 6 | 50 questions in 30 minutes | Mock test for CLAT preparation | Free important questions MCQ to study Additional Study Material for CLAT for CLAT Exam | Download free PDF with solutions
Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 1

‘X’ with a view to murdering ‘Y’ enters ‘Y’ bedroom at night when ‘Y’ is out of station. What is ‘X’ guilty of?

Detailed Solution for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 1

So X is guilty of trespassing.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 2

Legal principle: whoever uses force without any lawful justification is deemed to commit battery

Facts: Mary and Maya have an argument over an issue in the classroom. In order to take revenge over this Mary tries to humiliate maya in front of the other classmates by pulling the chair the moment she is about to sit on the chair. Though maya falls, she is not hurt. However she files a case against mary for battery.

Q. Is mary liable?

Detailed Solution for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 2

The correct option is D.
Battery is referred to as an intentional tort involving unwanted physical contact, that may or may not cause physical harm.  The four essential requirements: 
(1) Intent: the person accused of committing the act must have intended to cause some unwanted contact and not necessarily the harm that has been caused. 
(2) Contact: It refers to a non-consensual contact that is made with the victim or to the victim's extended personality i.e. on any property on the body of the victim. 
(3) Harm: It is not necessary to prove any actual physical injury. Rather the plaintiff must prove an unpermitted contact in a harmful or offensive manner. 
(4) Damages: it includes physical, emotional or monetary harm. 
In the present instance, all these instances have been proved against Mary.

1 Crore+ students have signed up on EduRev. Have you? Download the App
Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 3

Legal Principle: A person is entitled to use reasonable force for self defence.

Facts: Gokul was living in a farm house with a few family members. One night, a group of robbers broke open a door of the house and there was scuffle b/w the intruders and the residents. Gokul took out his pistol and fired a shot at one of the intruders. The shot did not hit the target and the robbers ran out of the house and by that time, the neighbors gathered in front of the house. Gokul in a fit of anger came out of the house and fired at fleeing robbers who by that time mingled with the neighbors. The shot injured a neighbor and he filed a suit against Gokul.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 4

Legal principle: A master will be liable for the wrongful acts of his servants in the course of employment

Facts: Mahesh was working as a driver in a company Lipton & Co. one day the manager asked him to drop a customer at the airport and get back at the earliest. On his way back from the airport, he happened to see his fiancé Roopa waiting for a bus to go home. He offered to drop her at home, which happened to be close to his office. She got into the car somersaulted due to the negligence of Mahesh. Roopa was thrown out of the car and suffered multiple injuries. She seeks compensation from Lipton & Co.

Detailed Solution for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 4

The correct option is B

Vicarious liability can be defined as a legal doctrine that assigns liability for an injury to a person who did not cause the injury who has a particular relationship to the person who did act negligently. It can also be called imputed negligence. This doctrine arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability or duty to control" the activities of a violator.  Hence, in the above situation, since the act was not committed in the course of employment, Roopa will not succeed.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 5

Legal principle: An unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land or some right over or in connection with it is a nuisance in tort.

Facts: Mr. Prasad filed suit against Mr. Shyam for a permanent injunction to restrain him from installing and running flour mill in their premises. According to Mr. Prasad, it created nuisance to them as they were put on the first floor of the same premises.

Q. Will his action succeed?

Detailed Solution for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 5

The correct option is A.
It is clear from the case below.
Case Law: Radhey Shyam v. Gur Prasad AIR 1978 All 86
Mr Gur Prasad Saxena and another filed a suit against Mr Radhey Shyam and five other individuals for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from installing and running a flour mill in the premises occupied by the defendant. Gur Prasad Saxena filed another suit against Radhey Shyam and five other individuals for a permanent injunction from running and continuing to run an oil expeller plant. The plaintiff has alleged that the mill was causing a lot of noise which in turn was affecting the health of the plaintiff. It was held that by running a flour mill in a residential area, the defendant was causing a nuisance to the plaintiff and affecting his health severely.
 

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 6

Complete the sentence:To constitute trespass actual damage is………………………..

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 7

In an action for trespass, burden to prove justification is on the…………………….

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 8

X actually beats B with a stick. He has committed the offence of………………….

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 9

A throws water on B and the drop of the water falls on B. A committed

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 10

Vicarious liability is based on which of the following principle?

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 11

Respondent superior means

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 12

In which of the following cases, ‘P’ did not owe duty of care to ‘Q’.

Detailed Solution for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 12

Q took the risk to travel on the roof of the bus and owner's liability limits to seats available in the bus.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 13

A is running a polyclinic well-equipped with operation theaters and supporting staff. S is a surgeon who makes use of this polyclinic to operate his patients. While operating a patient P, due to the negligence of nurse N (Who was a support staff of polyclinic), the surgical knife was left inside the abdomen of P. As a result, P developed several complications. Advise P as to against whom, i.e., A or S, he should file the suit for damages.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 14

Legal Principle:

1. Whoever is under a duty of care to another shall be liable for any injury to the latter directly resulting from the breach of that duty.

2. Harm suffered voluntarily does not constitute legal injury.

Factual Situation: Gupta Confectioners sent certain items in a horse carriage to a customer's house, which happened to be by the side of a main road and near a school zone. The driver of the carriage delivered the items to the customers and went inside the house to collect the receipt, leaving the carriage unattended on tile road. Some naughty children nearby threw stones at the horses. The horses ran over confusion and were about to run over an old woman. A traffic police, at great risk to his life, somehow seized the horses and stopped the carriage. He suffered serious personal injuries in the process. The policemen seeks compensation from Gupta Confectioners.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 15

Legal Principles:

1. Negligence is the omission to do some-thing, which a reasonable man would do, breach of which, if it causes damage, makes one liable to the person who suffered loss.

2. One owes a duty of care to another, if a responsible man can foresee that he will be affected by the breach of duty.

3. One is not liable if the injured party volunteers to take the risk.

Factual Situation: A cricket match is being held in a stadium. Akshit, being unable to afford the ticket price, is viewing the cricket match sitting atop a branch of a nearby tree. When a batsman hits a ball over the boundary, the ball in turn hits Akshit and sustains injury on his spinal cord due to fall from the tree.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 16

Principle Trespass to land means direct interference with the possession of land without lawful justification. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another person or doing the same through some tangible object (s).

Facts ‘A’ throws some stones upon his neighbor’s (B’s) premises

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 17

Principle: Nuisance is an unlawful interference with a person’s use or enjoyment with it, if the interference is connection wrong is trespass; whereas, if the interference is ‘consequential’, it amounts to nuisance.

Facts ‘A’ plants a tree on his land. However, he allows its branches to project over the land of ‘B’.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 18

Principle : Interference with another’s goods in such a way as to deny the latter’s title to the goods amounts to conversion, and thus it is a civil wrong. It is an act intentionally done inconsistent with the owner’s right, though the doer may not know of, or intend to challenge, the property or possession of the true owner.

Facts : ‘R’ went to a cycle-stand to park his bicycle. Seeing the stand fully occupied, he removed a few bicycles in order to rearrange a portion of the stand and make some space for his bicycle. He parked his bicycle properly, and put back all the bicycles except the one belonging to ‘S’, In fact, ‘R’ was in a hurry and therefore, he could not put back S’s bicycle somebody come on the way and took away S’s bicycle. The watchmen of the stand did not take care of it assuming that the bicycle was to parked inside the stand. ‘S’ filed a suit against ‘R’ for conversion.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 19

Assertion (A): In the event of violation of any legal right (tort) the aggrieved party is entitled to recover unliquidated damages.

Reason (R): The object of awarding damages to the aggrieved party is to put him in the same position in which he would have been if the wrong would not have been committed. Damages are, therefore, assessed on that basis.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 20

Assertion (A): The Constitution of India provides for the appointment of a Governor for a period of five years.

Reason (R): The Governor holds office during the pleasure of the President.

Detailed Solution for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 20

The correct option is A.

 Subject to the foregoing provisions of this article, a Governor shall hold office for a term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office: Provided that a Governor shall, notwithstanding the expiration of his term, continue to hold office until his successor enters upon his office.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 21

Which of the following acts invite tortuous liability and is not saved by the doctrine "volenti non fit injuria"?

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 22

In tort, the remedy is:

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 23

A person is said to be vicariously liable when:

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 24

Principle: A master shall be responsible for the wrongful acts of his servants in the course of his employment.

Facts: The Syndicate Bank was running a small savings scheme under which its authorized agents would go round and collect small savings from several people on a daily basis. These agents would get commission, on the deposits so collected. Ananth was one such agent, collecting deposits from factory workers engaged on daily wages. Though he regularly carried on his business for some time, slowly he started appropriating deposits for his personal use and one day he just disappeared. One Fatima, who had been handing over her savings to him found that nearly for a month before his disappearance, he was not depositing her savings at all. The bank, when approached, took the stand that Ananth was not its regular and paid employee and, therefore, it was not responsible for his misconduct. She filed a suit against the bank.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 25

Principle: A person is liable for all the injuries caused on account of consequences of his careless act.

Facts: Ram, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalized for two days for treatment.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 26

The maxim damnum sine injuria means

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 27

To succeed in an action for the tort of negligence, what is required to be proved is

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 28

Libel is addressed to the eye, slander to the ear. State which of the following statements amount to libel

Detailed Solution for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 28

Libel and slander are two types of defamation i.e. false communication regarding someone's reputation. Libel is publication against someone's reputation and can be in the form of photos, videos, cartoons, films, CDs etc and hence is said to be addressed to the eye. On the other hand slander is a statement in a temporary form and can take the form of spoken words or even gestures and therefore is said to be addressed to the ears. Hence, the answer is abuses recorded in the gramophone disc.

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 29

In a claim for malicious prosecution damages can be claimed on the account of

Test: Law Of Tort - 6 - Question 30

A patient is brought to a hospital maintained by B. The patient is to be operated upon. If as a result of faulty oxygen supply machine, the patient dies on the operation table, then:

View more questions
1 videos|19 docs|124 tests
Information about Test: Law Of Tort - 6 Page
In this test you can find the Exam questions for Test: Law Of Tort - 6 solved & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving Questions and answers for Test: Law Of Tort - 6, EduRev gives you an ample number of Online tests for practice

Top Courses for CLAT

Download as PDF

Top Courses for CLAT