Who were samantas?How they weaken the athaurity of the king?
Samantas were feudal lords who had authority over some portion of a kingdom. The king would transfer the authority to collect revenue and maintain law and order in a particular area of his kingdom to a samanta. Samantas weakened the authority of a king because the king lost central control over his kingdom. Instead, these samantas became the face of the kingdom to common people. The king became dependent on these samantas for revenue and even soldiers. One example of a kingdom that lost its central authority due to samantas was Harshavardhana's kingdom.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Class 7 courses
Who were samantas?How they weaken the athaurity of the king?
The Samantas: Weakening the Authority of the King
The Samantas were a powerful group of local feudal lords in ancient and medieval India. They emerged during the post-Gupta period and played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of the subcontinent. The Samantas were granted land grants by the king, which gave them control over a specific area or region. Over time, they became increasingly influential and were able to weaken the authority of the king in several ways.
1. Independent Power Base:
The Samantas established their own power base within their respective regions. They had control over the local administration, including the collection of taxes and maintenance of law and order. This autonomy allowed them to assert their authority and challenge the king's control.
2. Military Strength:
The Samantas maintained their own armies, which gave them significant military power. They could use this force to resist the king's commands or even launch rebellions against the central authority. The strength of their military made them a formidable force that the king had to reckon with.
3. Economic Influence:
Controlling vast territories and resources, the Samantas became wealthy and economically influential. They amassed large fortunes through the collection of taxes and tributes from the local population. This economic power enabled them to assert their independence and weaken the financial grip of the king over their territories.
4. Patronage and Alliances:
The Samantas built alliances and patronage networks with other local rulers, Brahmins, and influential individuals. These alliances helped strengthen their position and provided them with a support base to challenge the king's authority. By having influential allies, the Samantas could resist royal interference and protect their interests.
5. Neglecting Royal Orders:
The Samantas often neglected or ignored royal orders if they believed they were not in their best interests. They could delay implementing royal decrees or simply refuse to comply altogether. This defiance weakened the king's authority and undermined his ability to enforce his commands effectively.
6. Dynastic Ambitions:
Some Samantas had dynastic ambitions and sought to establish their own lineages and kingdoms. They aimed to become independent rulers instead of mere vassals of the king. This aspiration further weakened the authority of the king as it challenged the notion of a centralized monarchy.
In conclusion, the Samantas weakened the authority of the king through their independent power bases, military strength, economic influence, alliances, disregard for royal orders, and dynastic ambitions. Their actions and autonomy eroded the central authority of the king, leading to a fragmented political landscape in ancient and medieval India.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 7 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 7.